ABSTRACT
Introduction: HIV preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP), a key strategy for preventing HIV transmission, requires awareness and access to PrEP services. Although all patients should be made aware of HIV PrEP; the diagnosis of bacterial sexually transmitted infections (STIs) is an important indicator of potential HIV PrEP need. In a previous evaluation of Get2PrEP (G2P), we found that an electronic medical record laboratory comments did not increase the frequency of PrEP discussions between patients and providers. In Get2PrEP2 (G2P2), we hypothesized that active, personalized messaging to providers about HIV PrEP would increase the documentation of PrEP discussions, referrals, and/or provision of HIV PrEP to individuals diagnosed with an STI. Methods: G2P2 was a parallel 3-arm, unblinded, randomized controlled design. Participants were allocated 2:1 to intervention or control. Participants in the intervention arm were further allocated to receive provider messaging through the electronic medical record chat message or e-mail. Results: The 191 randomized encounters resulted in a modest 7.8% (odds ratio, 1.078; confidence interval, 1.02-1.13) increase in documented PrEP discussions in intervention encounters versus none in the standard care group. There was no statistical difference by intervention modality. All documented discussions occurred in the outpatient or emergency department and were more frequent in women and those aged <25 years. Discussion: An e-mail or electronic medical record chat message sent to providers of patients testing positive for an STI had a small but significant effect on documented patient-provider PrEP discussions. Further investigation is required to determine whether provider messaging can increase PrEP uptake among eligible patients and longer-term outcomes.
ABSTRACT
Advances in breast cancer (BC) treatment have contributed to improved survival, but BC survivors experience significant short-term and long-term cardiovascular mortality and morbidity, including an elevated risk of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Most research has focused on HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) after BC; however, recent studies suggest HFpEF is the more prevalent subtype after BC and is associated with substantial health burden. The increased HFpEF risk observed in BC survivors may be explained by treatment-related toxicity and by shared risk factors that heighten risk for both BC and HFpEF. Beyond risk factors with physiological impacts that drive HFpEF risk, such as hypertension and obesity, social determinants of health (SDOH) likely contribute to HFpEF risk after BC, impacting diagnosis, management and prognosis.Increasing clinical awareness of HFpEF after BC and screening for cardiovascular (CV) risk factors, in particular hypertension, may be beneficial in this high-risk population. When BC survivors develop HFpEF, treatment focuses on initiating guideline-directed medical therapy and addressing underlying comorbidities with pharmacotherapy or behavioural intervention. HFpEF in BC survivors is understudied. Future directions should focus on improving HFpEF prevention and treatment by building a deeper understanding of HFpEF aetiology and elucidating contributing risk factors and their pathogenesis in HFpEF in BC survivors, in particular the association with different BC treatment modalities, including radiation therapy, chemotherapy, biological therapy and endocrine therapy, for example, aromatase inhibitors. In addition, characterising how SDOH intersect with these therapies is of paramount importance to develop future prevention and management strategies.
