Assessing the impact of atrial fibrillation on symptoms and quality of life in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

INTRODUCTION: In hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), atrial fibrillation (AF) has historically been regarded to have a deleterious impact on clinical course, strongly associated with progressive heart failure (HF) symptoms. However, there is a paucity of information regarding the impact of AF on HCM employing validated quality of life (QoL) surveys. Therefore, we evaluated the impact of AF on QoL utilizing patient reported outcome measures (PROMs). METHODS: 218 consecutive HCM patients with or without AF at the Lahey HCM center in 2022 completed PROMs at their most recent visit evaluating HF (Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire [KCCQ]) and AF symptoms (AF Effect on QoL [AFEQT]). RESULTS: Among the 218 patients, 50 (23%) had a history of AF and comprise the primary study cohort. AF was diagnosed at 55 ± 10 years of age, median of 5.5 years before PROM, with 66% of patients treated with a rhythm control strategy with antiarrhythmic drug and/or AF ablation. AFEQT indicated that 52% of patients experienced no or minimal AF-related disability, mild to moderate in 22%, and severe in 26%. There was no substantial difference in HCM phenotype in patients with no or minimal AF disability compared to those with severe disability. HF symptoms for most HCM patients with prior AF history was consistent with no or minimal (59%) or only mild (27%) disability as measured by KCCQ overall summary scores. In addition, with multivariate analysis, AF history was associated with less HF symptoms and improved QoL (OR 0.4, p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: In contrast to prior perceptions, HCM patients with prior AF history were less likely to incur HF symptoms impairing QoL compared to HCM patients without AF. After treatment, prior history of AF did not substantially impact current QoL. These data provide a realistic appraisal for the impact that AF has on HCM patients and also offers a measure of reassurance for this patient subgroup.

Variations in Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Use and Charges in a Modern Cohort of Medicare Beneficiaries.

Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (CAF) is increasingly being used in the United States. This study aimed to identify variations in CAF use among Medicare beneficiaries (MBs) over a 6-year period (2013 to 2019). Using the Center of Medicare and Medicaid Services database, a 100% sample of MBs who underwent CAF from 2013 to 2019 was included. We stratified CAF use data geographically (Northeast, South, West, and Midwest) and identified the number of CAFs per 100,000 MBs, number of electrophysiologists performing CAFs per 100,000 MBs, number of CAFs per individual electrophysiologist, and average submitted charge for CAF. In addition, we stratified the data per urban versus rural areas and gender of the operator. We found that the mean atrial fibrillation (AF) prevalence, rates of CAFs, number of electrophysiologists performing CAFs, and number of CAFs per electrophysiologist have increased steadily in all regions. The mean AF prevalence was different among regions, with the highest prevalence in the Northeast (p <0.001); however, there was a pattern of higher CAFs rates in the West and the South (p ≥0.057). The number of electrophysiologists performing CAFs was not different among regions; however, the number of CAFs per electrophysiologist was higher in the West and the South (p <0.001). The average submitted charge for CAF has decreased over years and was the lowest in the West and the South (p <0.001). There was no major difference in these variables regarding operator gender. In conclusion, there are significant variations in CAF use among MBs in the United States according to geographic and urban versus rural regions. These variations have the potential to impact the outcomes in MBs diagnosed with AF.