Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 20
Filter
3.
J Fam Pract ; 50(2): 138-44, 2001 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11219562

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although office-based and telephone support services enhance the rate of smoking cessation in managed care systems, it is not clear whether such services are effective for very low-income smokers. We evaluated the comparative effectiveness of usual care (physician-delivered advice and follow-up) and usual care enhanced by 6 computer-assisted telephonic-counseling sessions by office nurses and telephone counselors for smoking cessation in very low-income smokers in Medicaid managed care. METHODS: A randomized clinical trial comparing the 2 approaches was conducted in 3 Michigan community health centers. All clinicians and center staff received standard training in usual care. Selected nurses and telephone counselors received special training in a computer-assisted counseling program focusing on relapse prevention. RESULTS: The majority of the study population (233 adult smokers with telephones) were white (64%) women (70%) with annual incomes of less than $10,000 (79%) and with prescriptions of nicotine replacement therapy (>90%). At 3 months, quit rates (smoke-free status verified by carbon monoxide monitors) were 8.1% in the usual-care group and 21% in the telephonic-counseling group (P=.009) by intention-to-treat analysis. Special tracking methods were successful in maintaining participants in treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Smoking cessation rates are enhanced in a population of very low-income smokers if individualized telephonic-counseling is provided. State and Medicaid managed care plans should consider investing in both office-based nurse and centralized telephonic-counseling services for low-income smokers.


Subject(s)
Computer-Assisted Instruction/methods , Counseling/methods , Managed Care Programs/standards , Office Nursing/standards , Patient Education as Topic/methods , Poverty , Smoking Cessation/methods , Smoking Prevention , Telephone , Adult , Aftercare/methods , Aftercare/standards , Community Health Centers , Female , Health Services Research , Humans , Male , Michigan , Nursing Evaluation Research , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Poverty/psychology , Program Evaluation , Recurrence , Smoking/psychology , Smoking Cessation/psychology
4.
Fam Med ; 31(10): 703-8, 1999.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10572766

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Clinicians need skills in critical appraisal of medical literature to improve quality of care. This report on evidence-based medicine (EBM) curricula describes 1) the role of family medicine educators, 2) timing, 3) value of a standard format across multiple communities, and 4) outcomes in attitudes and skills. METHODS: In 1992, a nine-session curriculum delivered across six community campuses was introduced during the third year of medical school in the College of Human Medicine at Michigan State University. Evaluation compared 1) responses on the Association of American Medical Colleges graduation questionnaires from classes who received the curriculum with the 1994 class who did not (424 students), 2) responses to questions on group process performance, and 3) focused surveys of two classes. RESULTS: Trained classes reported higher levels of confidence in critical appraisal and research skills than the 1994 class and other schools. Respondents reported the small-group process as effective, greater appreciation of the training after 1 year of residency than at graduation, and no change in research activity. CONCLUSIONS: Family medicine educators can lead a new curriculum in EBM and maintain consistent standards across multiple communities. Many questions remain concerning the ideal curricular design to help clinicians apply the best research to patient care.


Subject(s)
Curriculum , Education, Medical, Undergraduate/methods , Evidence-Based Medicine/education , Education, Medical, Undergraduate/organization & administration , Faculty, Medical , Family Practice , Humans , Michigan , Program Evaluation
5.
J Fam Pract ; 48(9): 711-8, 1999 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10498078

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (AHCPR) guidelines on smoking cessation recommend that primary care physicians provide both brief advice against smoking and follow-up care for all smokers. Surveys show that although physicians understand the importance of smoking cessation, the actual implementation of these guidelines is limited. The main objective of our study was to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of 2 different approaches to smoking cessation counseling: practice-based and community-based. METHODS: Both smoking cessation approaches consisted of 1 recruitment session and 6 computer-assisted counseling sessions. In the practice-based approach, counseling was provided by office nurses and telephone counselors; in the community-based approach, the counseling was given by telephone counselors only. Four practices in 3 mid-Michigan communities participated, including 120 physicians and 487 patients who were smokers. The physicians were trained to provide brief advice for smoking cessation consistent with the AHCPR guidelines; the nurses and telephone counselors were trained in relapse prevention, computer skills, and individual case management. Sixty-two percent of the participants obtained free nicotine replacement therapy. RESULTS: At 6 months, quit rates (7-day smoke-free status) were 35% in the practice-based group and 36% in the community-based group. Participants who completed at least 4 sessions showed higher quit rates than those who did not. CONCLUSIONS: Nurses in primary care practices and counselors can be trained to deliver effective relapse-prevention counseling during office visits and by telephone. Our study showed an increase in the reported rates of smoking cessation by using these counseling methods.


Subject(s)
Counseling , Family Practice , Smoking Cessation/methods , Tobacco Use Disorder/therapy , Behavior Therapy , Computers , Counseling/methods , Evaluation Studies as Topic , Family Practice/organization & administration , Family Practice/statistics & numerical data , Feasibility Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Michigan , Office Nursing/organization & administration , Patient Satisfaction , Recurrence , Smoking Cessation/statistics & numerical data , Software , Telephone , Treatment Outcome
6.
Nicotine Tob Res ; 1(2): 169-74, 1999 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11072398

ABSTRACT

This study determined whether higher dose nicotine patches are more efficacious than lower dose patches among heavy smokers. A randomized double-blind study compared 0, 21, 35, and 42 mg/day of a 24-h patch in 1039 smokers (> or = 30 cigarettes/day) at 12 clinical sites in the USA and one in Australia. Daily patches were used for 6 weeks followed by tapering over the next 10 weeks. Weekly group therapy occurred. Biochemically validated self-reported quit rates at 6, 12, 26, and 52 weeks post-cessation were measured. Quit rates were dose-related at all follow-ups (p < 0.01). Continuous, biochemically verified abstinence rates for the 0, 21, 35, and 42 mg doses at the end of treatment (12 weeks) were 16, 24, 30, and 39%. At 6 months, the rates were 13, 20, 20, and 26%. Among the 11 sites with 12 month follow-up (n = 879), the quit rates were 7, 13, 9, and 19%. In post-hoc tests, none of the active doses were significantly different from each other at any follow-up. The rates of dropouts due to adverse events for 0, 21, 35, and 42 mg were 3, 1, 3, and 6% (p = n.s.). Our results are similar to most prior smaller studies; i.e., in heavy smokers higher doses increase quit rates slightly. Longer durations of treatment may be necessary to show greater advantages from higher doses.


Subject(s)
Nicotine/administration & dosage , Smoking Cessation/methods , Administration, Cutaneous , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Nicotine/pharmacology , Regression Analysis
8.
Arch Fam Med ; 3(9): 793-800, 1994 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7987514

ABSTRACT

PURPOSES: To document the content and level of obstetrical hospital-based privileges for members of the American Academy of Family Physicians and to describe variations between regions, rural vs urban practices, and various physician characteristics. METHODS: About 12% of the active members of the American Academy of Family Physicians listed as offering obstetrical care by the Academy as of March 1991 were randomly sampled by mailed questionnaire. Samples were drawn from three national regions. Privileges were grouped by degree of restriction, based on whether consultation or transfer was required. RESULTS: Of 1464 surveys mailed, 1026 physicians (70%) responded. Only 740 (72%) stated that they still practiced obstetrics. Privileges ranged from least restricted (100% provided vaginal vertex delivery, with no consultation required) to most restricted (79% provided amniocentesis, with consultation or transfer required). A surprisingly large proportion of physicians reported having fewer routine and more advanced privileges without consultations being required, such as ultrasonography (53%), vaginal breech delivery (41%), and cesarean section (25%). Physicians having more advanced privileges tended to be located in the West or mountain-plains region; be trained in the Midwest, mountain-plains region, or the West; work in middle-sized, nonteaching hospitals in more rural countries; have completed advanced obstetrical training (> or = 6 months); and deliver more than 40 infants per year. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, a considerable number of hospital-based obstetrical privileges are granted to family physicians. No uniformity in privileges prevails, owing to significant regional and practice variations. Teaching hospitals reportedly restrict obstetrical care by family physicians more than other hospitals. The variations in restrictions could not be explained by degree of training.


Subject(s)
Medical Staff Privileges/statistics & numerical data , Obstetrics/statistics & numerical data , Physicians, Family/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Female , Hospital-Physician Relations , Humans , Institutional Practice/statistics & numerical data , Male , Medical Staff Privileges/classification , Obstetrics/standards , Professional Practice Location , Surveys and Questionnaires , United States
9.
J Fam Pract ; 39(1): 50-4, 1994 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8027733

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to survey family physicians regarding the barriers to providing primary care for persons with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infections and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) in a small, rural state with a low incidence of infection. The study focused on issues facing family physicians, such as lack of training and experience, skill in managing the complications of HIV and AIDS, fears about transmission, patients' fears about seeing a physician who treats patients with HIV or AIDS, and lack of community consultative and ancillary services. METHODS: All 132 members of the Vermont Academy of Family Physicians were mailed a 33-item survey questionnaire; 106 (80%) responded. RESULTS: Fifty-seven percent of family physicians currently provide medical care for HIV-positive asymptomatic patients, and 45% provide care for symptomatic patients. Seventy-three percent of family physicians either currently manage or are willing to be trained to manage HIV complications. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study indicate that a majority of physicians are willing to provide a wide spectrum of medical treatment and services to patients with HIV or AIDS.


Subject(s)
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome/therapy , Family Practice , HIV Infections/therapy , Adult , Attitude of Health Personnel , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Physicians, Family/psychology , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Rural Health , Vermont
11.
Prev Med ; 20(4): 486-96, 1991 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1908080

ABSTRACT

METHODS. One hundred six smokers seen in a family practice received brief physician advice and a prescription for nicotine gum. Smokers were randomly assigned to pay $20, $6, or $0/box of nicotine gum and followed for 6 months. RESULTS. Decreased cost increased the incidence of obtaining gum, the amount of gum used, and the incidence of long-term use (P less than 0.05). Decreased cost also increased cessation attempts and 1-week cessation (P less than 0.05) and appeared to increase abstinence at 6-month follow-up (19% vs 6% vs 8%, P less than 0.10). Cost-benefit estimates suggest that an insurance plan, HMO, etc., would recoup any costs in subsidizing nicotine gum and perhaps incur a net financial gain.


Subject(s)
Chewing Gum , Nicotine/therapeutic use , Smoking Prevention , Adult , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Costs and Cost Analysis , Female , Health Maintenance Organizations/economics , Humans , Income , Male , Nicotine/administration & dosage , Patient Compliance , Self Administration , Smoking/economics
14.
Fam Med ; 22(3): 201-4, 1990.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2189772

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study was to describe and compare the rates of recruitment during a randomized clinical trial on smoking cessation in two primary care practices. One site was a five-physician private family practice setting with about 15,000 patients. During 34 days, 576 patients were screened, of whom 22% were smokers. Among the smokers screened, 54% consented, 33% refused consent, and 13% were called in too early to consent. The other site was a six-physician academic medical practice with about 16,000 patients. During 53 days, 1,692 subjects were screened, of whom 16.2% were smokers. Among the smokers, 19% consented, 81% refused consent, and none were called in early. The enrollment of smokers was 3.3 times greater in the private practice than the academic practice. At the first site, study personnel screened 26.6 subjects per day, whereas the practice receptionist screened only 13.4 subjects per day (P less than .01). A randomized trial of having subjects read the informed consent versus having study personnel read it to them showed no differences in recruitment. The data suggest that private practices may have greater potential for subject recruitment than academic sites, that using study personnel improves recruitment, and that having study personnel actively involved in informed consent does not improve recruitment.


Subject(s)
Family Practice , Research Design , Smoking Prevention , Adult , Aged , Chewing Gum , Humans , Informed Consent , Mass Screening , Middle Aged , Nicotine/administration & dosage , Nicotine/therapeutic use , Pilot Projects , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Smoking/drug therapy , Vermont
15.
J Fam Pract ; 30(1): 81-5, 1990 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2294164

ABSTRACT

Maintaining a high-quality curriculum for family practice residency training in obstetrics has become increasingly difficult. In 1984 the faculty of the University of Vermont Department of Family Practice needed to upgrade its obstetric curriculum in a community where family practice obstetrics was nonexistent. The key steps to a new curriculum included the recruitment of family practice faculty with experience in obstetrics, expanded communication with the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the development of baseline attending privileges in family practice obstetrics, the formation of educational tracks for residents, and the promotion of chart audits. Also important were faculty role modeling, intradepartmental meetings, intensive elective rotations, and community education. This case report of program development in family practice obstetrics may serve as a model to help other residency programs.


Subject(s)
Family Practice/education , Internship and Residency/methods , Obstetrics/education , Curriculum , Faculty, Medical , Humans , Vermont
16.
J Fam Pract ; 29(4): 372-6, 1989 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2794885

ABSTRACT

Screening women for asymptomatic bacteriuria on the first prenatal visit is a standard of obstetric care. Treating women with positive results decreases the risk of pyelonephritis and possible prematurity. This study uses decision and cost analysis to compare the utility of screening for asymptomatic bacteriuria with not screening. Data are based on published reports and average charges for services. Costs are based on 1988 charges, projected for the expected results of outpatient screening, possible suppressive therapy, and risks of pyelonephritis. Screening is based on the combined sensitivities and specificities of the MacConkey and CLED (cysteine-lactose-electrolyte-deficient agar) panels of the dip-slide culture. Under the baseline assumptions, the risk of pyelonephritis is estimated to be 2 cases per 100 screened women vs 3.5 cases per 100 unscreened women. The anticipated cost of screening 100 women is $9,939, compared with $12,824 for not screening 100 women. Screening is cost saving unless the cost of screening is above $26, the length of hospitalization for pyelonephritis is fewer than 2.2 days, the risk of asymptomatic bacteriuria falls below 2%, the risk of pyelonephritis with asymptomatic bacteriuria falls below 13%, or the efficacy of treatment in preventing pyelonephritis falls below 38%.


Subject(s)
Bacteriuria/diagnosis , Decision Trees , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/economics , Bacteriuria/complications , Bacteriuria/economics , Costs and Cost Analysis , Female , Hospitalization/economics , Humans , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/diagnosis , Pyelonephritis/economics , Pyelonephritis/etiology
17.
J Fam Pract ; 29(3): 281-5, 1989 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2769193

ABSTRACT

A mailed survey of 141 Vermont family physicians (74% participating) was conducted to determine their breast cancer screening practices and beliefs and their interest in receiving training in breast cancer screening. Of these, only 12% reported that at least three fourths of their female patients older than 50 years received mammograms at least once a year, compared with 33% who reported providing breast self-examination instruction and 35% who administered clinical breast examination with at least three fourths of these patients at least once a year. Nevertheless, 55% of the physicians rated mammography as a very effective breast-screening procedure; 28% rated breast self-examination and 16% rated clinical breast examination as very effective. Three fourths of the physicians showed great interest in learning more about breast palpation, breast self-examination instruction, and mammography. Individual instruction in the office was preferred over a group workshop format, and a trained nonphysician health professional was considered as acceptable as a physician to provide the instruction. Results suggest that breast cancer screening education for family physicians is a high priority, and that physicians will welcome such training, particularly if it is office-based.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Breast Neoplasms/prevention & control , Education, Medical, Continuing , Physicians, Family/psychology , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Breast , Female , Humans , Mammography/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Palpation , Surveys and Questionnaires , Vermont
18.
Am Fam Physician ; 37(3): 231-5, 1988 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-3258115

ABSTRACT

With 3.2 serious events per million doses, the risks associated with pertussis vaccination are greater than for any other routine immunization. The most significant side effects are neurologic, but these are rare when compared with the neurologic effects of pertussis infection itself. High fever, persistent or high-pitched cry, seizures, encephalopathy and shock are absolute contraindications to further pertussis vaccination. A new acellular vaccine shows promise.


Subject(s)
Pertussis Vaccine/adverse effects , Animals , Diphtheria Toxoid/administration & dosage , Diphtheria Toxoid/adverse effects , Diphtheria-Tetanus-Pertussis Vaccine , Drug Combinations/administration & dosage , Drug Combinations/adverse effects , Humans , Nervous System Diseases/etiology , Pertussis Vaccine/administration & dosage , Risk Factors , Tetanus Toxoid/administration & dosage , Tetanus Toxoid/adverse effects
20.
Am J Med Sci ; 276(2): 153-8, 1978.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-104623

ABSTRACT

Five patients with bacterial endocarditis who were allergic to penicillin were treated successfully with vancomycin. The causative microorganisms were Streptococcus bovis, S faecalis, S agalactiae, S intermedius, and Staphylococcus aureus. Except for the strain of S faecalis, vancomycin was bactericidal against these organisms at easily achievable serum concentrations. To insure a bactericidal serum titer of 1:8 or greater, streptomycin was added in the therapy of the case caused by S faecalis. There was no toxicity from vancomycin therapy in our patients except for mild phlebitis at the infusion site. Vancomycin appears to be an effective alternative to penicillin in individuals with endocarditis due to susceptible organisms. Vancomycin in combination with an aminoglycoside may be appropriate therapy for enterococcal endocarditis.


Subject(s)
Endocarditis, Bacterial/drug therapy , Vancomycin/therapeutic use , Adult , Aged , Drug Hypersensitivity/etiology , Endocarditis, Bacterial/etiology , Enterococcus faecalis/isolation & purification , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Penicillins/adverse effects , Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification , Streptococcus/isolation & purification , Streptococcus agalactiae/isolation & purification
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...