Working class role models in academic medicine - Professor Philip Quirke.

This article was migrated. The article was marked as recommended. Representation of researchers from underprivileged backgrounds in unknown in academic medicine. We present the inspiring experiences of Professor Philip Quirke describing his humble beginnings in the East End of London to becoming an internationally acclaimed academic clinician. Importantly he offers his advice on what someone from a similar background should consider with similar aspirations.

Comparison of quantity and quality of muscle as clinical prognostic markers in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy.

OBJECTIVE: The measurement of muscle area is routinely utilised in determining sarcopaenia in clinical research. However, this simple measure fails to factor in age-related morphometric changes in muscle quality such as myosteatosis. The aims of this study were to: firstly investigate the relationship between the masseter area (quantity) and density (quality), and secondly compare the prognostic clinical relevance of each parameter. METHODS: Cross-sectional CT head scans were reviewed for patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy. The masseter was manually delineated and the total masseter area (TMA) and the total masseter density (TMD) calculated. Measurements of the TMA were standardised against the cranial circumference. Observer variability in measurements were assessed using Bland-Altman plots. The relationship between TMA and TMD were evaluated using Pearson's correlation and linear regression analyses. The prognostic value of TMA and TMD were assessed using receiver operator curves and cox-regression analyses. RESULTS: In total, 149 patients who had undergone routine CT scans prior to a carotid endarterectomy were included in this study. No significant observer variations were observed in measuring the TMA, TMD and cranium circumference. There was a significant positive correlation between standardised TMA and TMD (Pearson's correlation 0.426, p < 0.001, adjusted R-squared 17.6%). The area under the curve for standardised TMA in predicting all-cause mortality at 30 days, 1 year and 4 years were higher when compared to TMD. Standardised TMA was only predictive of post-operative overall all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio 0.38, 95% confidence interval 0.15-0.97, p = 0.043). CONCLUSION: We demonstrate a strong relationship between muscle size and density. However, the utilisation of muscle area is likely to be limited in routine clinical care. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Our study supports the utilisation of muscle area in clinical sarcopaenia research. We did not observe any additional prognostic advantage in quantifying muscle density.

Ten tips for foundation doctors when making inpatient referrals to surgical specialties.

Making referrals to another specialty is an underemphasised skill in the undergraduate medical curriculum. As a result, many new foundation doctors find themselves ill-equipped to make effective referrals to other specialties as part of their day-to-day responsibilities. This can often be frustrating to the foundation doctor, the specialist and contribute to critical delays in patient care. Surgical registrars are required to triage patients (for urgent review or even to take to theatre) often under time and high patient volume pressures. As such, it is imperative for foundation doctors to make referrals as efficiently as possible to facilitate surgical specialty decision making and, ultimately, to expedite medical care to patients. In this article, we describe 10 tips for the foundation doctor in making inpatient referrals to surgical specialties.

Validation of two-dimensional vertebral body parameters in estimating patient height in elderly patients.

OBJECTIVES: Standardised comparison of abdominal muscle and adipose tissue is often utilised in morphometric clinical research. Whilst measurements are traditionally standardised against the patient's height, this may not be always practically feasible. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between measurements of the vertebral body and patient height. METHODS: We analysed cross-sectional CT scans. Measurements of the vertebral body area (VBA), anteroposterior vertebral body diameter (APVBD) and lateral vertebral body diameter (LVBD) were made by two independent investigators by manual tracing. Patients were randomly divided into two groups: Group 1 standardisation and Group 2 validation. We compared height and vertebral body parameters from patients in Group 1 and mathematically modelled this relationship. We then utilised the model to predict the height of patients in Group 2 and compared this with their actual height. Observer variability was assessed using Bland-Altman plots and t-tests of differences. RESULTS: CT scans from 382 patients were analysed. No significant intraobserver or interobserver differences were apparent when measuring vertebral body parameters. We describe models which enable the prediction of the patients' height using the measured VBA, APVBD and LVBD. No significant differences were observed between the patients predicted and actual heights in the validation group. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate an important relationship between measurements of the patient's height and the vertebral body. This can be utilised in future research when the patient's height has not been measured. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: In the absence of the patient's height, we demonstrate that two-dimensional vertebral body parameters may be reliably used to standardise morphometric measurements.

Volumetric versus single slice measurements of core abdominal muscle for sarcopenia.

OBJECTIVE: We investigated whether total psoas muscle area (TPMA) was representative of the total psoas muscle volume (TPMV). Secondly, we assessed whether there was a relationship between the two commonly used single slice measurements of sarcopenia, TPMA and total abdominal muscle area (TAMA). METHODS: Pre-operative CT imaging of 110 patients undergoing elective endovascular aneurysm repair were analyzed by two trained independent observers. TPMA was measured at individual vertebral levels between the second lumbar vertebrae and sacrum. TPMV was also estimated between the second lumbar vertebrae and sacrum. TAMA was measured at the third lumbar vertebrae (L3). Observer differences were assessed using Bland-Altman plots. Associations between the different measures were assessed using linear regression and Pearson's correlation. RESULTS: We found single slice measurements of the TPMA to be representative of the TPMV at individual levels between L2 to the sacrum. The strongest association was seen at L3 [adjusted regression coefficient 16.7, 95% confidence interval (12.1 to 21.4), p < 0.001]. There was no association between TPMA and TAMA [adjusted regression coefficient -0.7, 95% confidence interval (-4.1 to 2.8), p = 0.710]. CONCLUSION: We demonstrate that measurements of the TPMA between L2 to the sacrum are representative of the TPMV, with the greatest association at the third lumbar vertebrae. There was no association between the TPMA and TAMA. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: We demonstrate that a single slice measurement of TPMA at L3 is representative of the muscle volume, contrary to previous criticism. Future sarcopenia studies can continue to measure TPMA which is representative of the TPMV.

Twelve Tips for Applicants from a Disadvantaged Background Considering a Career in Medicine.

This article was migrated. The article was marked as recommended. A minority of medical school entrants draw from disadvantaged backgrounds, which remain significantly under-represented within the medical workforce. Whilst multifactorial, this may in part relate to relative lack of information about the admissions process amongst these groups. In this article, Mohammed Abdul Waduud and colleagues offer their twelve essential tips to support students from disadvantaged backgrounds who are considering applying to medical school. The authors, all of whom are from disadvantaged backgrounds, have experience in applying to medical schools within the United Kingdom. The tips within this article should support students from disadvantaged backgrounds to decide whether a career in medicine is right for them and succeed in their applications to study medicine.

Twelve tips for Applying to Clinical Academic Training in the United Kingdom.

This article was migrated. The article was marked as recommended. MAW and colleagues offer their advice on applying for academic clinical training posts including the do's and don'ts. The authors all have experience of the national Integrated Academic Training (IAT) pathway in the United Kingdom. Whilst all the following top tips are not mandatory to attain a clinical academic role, we believe they would put a potential applicant in a good position to succeed, regardless of whether they were applying for an academic foundation post, academic clinical fellowship or a clinical lectureship. We have tailored our advice so that it may be considered when constructing an application as well as helping applicants for the interview.

Dyslexic doctors, an observation on current United Kingdom practice.

This article was migrated. The article was marked as recommended. Dyslexic doctors, an observation on current United Kingdom practice. ISSUE: Dyslexia is a common learning difficulty with an estimated prevalence of ten percent within the general population and two percent among junior doctors training in the United Kingdom. Despite dyslexia being common, there are still many challenges sufferers face in modern medical practice. EVIDENCE: Multiple case studies have found there to be barriers that dyslexic doctors face throughout their training. Common activities that required reading or writing in time pressured situations in front of an audience can impose an additional pressure for dyslexic doctors. In addition to the difficulties with day to day work, criticism and mockery from other staff members can make suffers of dyslexia feel undermined. From personal experiences, the authors of this article have found barriers are particularly present with regards to sitting post- graduate examinations and getting support in a modern time pressure health service. IMPLICATIONS: The discrepancy in the prevalence of learning difficulties between the general population and doctors in training might be due to barriers in training and difficulties when starting work. Addressing challenges will help support current dyslexic doctors and also help support future generations. Rapidly developing technology in health care makes it easier to accommodate doctors with additional needs but the impact of this are yet to be studied. If the barriers are addressed it is likely to support not only doctors with dyslexia diagnosis but all health care professionals.

Basic surgical skills course - Why is it so costly?

•Courses can be expensive and are often criticised for the transparency of associated costs.•It is important to appreciate the organisational costs of running high quality courses.•The three Royal Colleges in the UK do not use courses as profit making vehicles.

Endovascular aneurysm repair: is imaging surveillance robust, and does it influence long-term mortality?

PURPOSE: Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is the dominant treatment strategy for abdominal aortic aneurysms. However, as a result of uncertainty regarding long-term durability, an ongoing imaging surveillance program is required. The aim of the study was to assess EVAR surveillance in Scotland and its effect on all-cause and aneurysm-related mortality. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of all EVAR procedures carried out in the four main Scottish vascular units. The primary outcome measure was the implementation of post-EVAR imaging surveillance across Scotland. Patients were identified locally and then categorized as having complete, incomplete, or no surveillance. Secondary outcome measures were all-cause mortality and aneurysm-related mortality. Cause of death was obtained from death certificates. RESULTS: Data were available for 569 patients from the years 2001 to 2012. All centers had data for a minimum of 5 contiguous years. Surveillance ranged from 1.66 to 4.55 years (median 3.03 years). Overall, 53 % had complete imaging surveillance, 43 % incomplete, and 4 % none. For the whole cohort, all-cause 5-year mortality was 33.5 % (95 % confidence interval 28.0-38.6) and aneurysm-related mortality was 4.5 % (.8-7.3). All-cause mortality in patients with complete, incomplete, and no imaging was 49.9 % (39.2-58.6), 19.1 % (12.6-25.2), and 47.2 % (17.7-66.2), respectively. Aneurysm-related mortality was 3.7 % (1.8-7.4), 4.4 % (2.2-8.9), and 9.5 % (2.5-33.0), respectively. All-cause mortality was significantly higher in patients with complete compared to incomplete imaging surveillance (p < 0.001). No significant differences were observed in aneurysm-related mortality (p = 0.2). CONCLUSION: Only half of EVAR patients underwent complete long-term imaging surveillance. However, incomplete imaging could not be linked to any increase in mortality. Further work is required to establish the role and deliverability of EVAR imaging surveillance.