Canadian ROS proto-oncogene 1 study (CROS) for multi-institutional implementation of ROS1 testing in non-small cell lung cancer.

Patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring ROS proto-oncogene 1 (ROS1) gene rearrangements show dramatic response to the tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) crizotinib. Current best practice guidelines recommend that all advanced stage non-squamous NSCLC patients be also tested for ROS1 gene rearrangements. Several studies have suggested that ROS1 immunohistochemistry (IHC) using the D4D6 antibody may be used to screen for ROS1 fusion positive lung cancers, with assays showing high sensitivity but moderate to high specificity. A break apart fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) test is then used to confirm the presence of ROS1 gene rearrangement. The goal of Canadian ROS1 (CROS) study was to harmonize ROS1 laboratory developed testing (LDT) by using IHC and FISH assays to detect ROS1 rearranged lung cancers across Canadian pathology laboratories. Cell lines expressing different levels of ROS1 (high, low, none) were used to calibrate IHC protocols after which participating laboratories ran the calibrated protocols on a reference set of 24 NSCLC cases (9 ROS1 rearranged tumors and 15 ROS1 non-rearranged tumors as determined by FISH). Results were compared using a centralized readout. The stained slides were evaluated for the cellular localization of staining, intensity of staining, the presence of staining in non-tumor cells, the presence of non-specific staining (e.g. necrosis, extracellular mater, other) and the percent positive cells. H-score was also determined for each tumor. Analytical sensitivity and specificity harmonization was achieved by using low limit of detection (LOD) as either any positivity in the U118 cell line or H-score of 200 with the HCC78 cell line. An overall diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of up to 100% and 99% respectively was achieved for ROS1 IHC testing (relative to FISH) using an adjusted H-score readout on the reference cases. This study confirms that LDT ROS1 IHC assays can be highly sensitive and specific for detection of ROS1 rearrangements in NSCLC. As NSCLC can demonstrate ROS1 IHC positivity in FISH-negative cases, the degree of the specificity of the IHC assay, especially in highly sensitive protocols, is mostly dependent on the readout cut-off threshold. As ROS1 IHC is a screening assay for a rare rearrangements in NSCLC, we recommend adjustment of the readout threshold in order to balance specificity, rather than decreasing the overall analytical and diagnostic sensitivity of the protocols.

Canadian Multicenter Project on Standardization of Programmed Death-Ligand 1 Immunohistochemistry 22C3 Laboratory-Developed Tests for Pembrolizumab Therapy in NSCLC.

INTRODUCTION: The programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) immunohistochemistry (IHC) assay is used to select patients for first or second-line pembrolizumab monotherapy in NSCLC. The PD-L1 IHC 22C3 pharmDx assay requires an Autostainer Link 48 instrument. Laboratories without this stainer have the option to develop a highly accurate 22C3 IHC laboratory-developed test (LDT) on other instruments. The Canadian 22C3 IHC LDT validation project was initiated to harmonize the quality of PD-L1 22C3 IHC LDT protocols across 20 Canadian pathology laboratories. METHODS: Centrally optimized 22C3 LDT protocols were distributed to participating laboratories. The LDT results were assessed against results using reference PD-L1 IHC 22C3 pharmDx. Analytical sensitivity and specificity were assessed using cell lines with varying PD-L1 expression levels (phase 1) and IHC critical assay performance controls (phase 2B). Diagnostic sensitivity and specificity were assessed using whole sections of 50 NSCLC cases (phase 2A) and tissue microarrays with an additional 50 NSCLC cases (phase 2C). RESULTS: In phase 1, 80% of participants reached acceptance criteria for analytical performance in the first attempt with disseminated protocols. However, in phase 2A, only 40% of participants reached the desired diagnostic accuracy for both 1% and 50% tumor proportion score cutoff. In phase 2B, further protocol modifications were conducted, which increased the number of successful laboratories to 75% in phase 2C. CONCLUSIONS: It is possible to harmonize highly accurate 22C3 LDTs for both 1% and 50% tumor proportion score in NSCLC across many laboratories with different platforms. However, despite a centralized approach, diagnostic validation of predictive IHC LDTs can be challenging and not always successful.

Screening History in 313 Cases of Invasive Cancer: A Retrospective Review of Cervical Cancer Screening in Alberta, Canada.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the screening history of invasive cervical cancer (ICC) cases in Alberta, Canada to identify areas for improvement of the population-based cervical cancer screening program. METHODS: Retrospective review of ICC cases diagnosed in 2 cities in Alberta between 2007 and 2012. Cancer morphology and staging were elicited from the Alberta Cancer Registry; cancer screening history and Pap test results were extracted from the Provincial Cervical Cancer Screening database. Women were classified as adequately screened, underscreened, and unscreened depending on time from last screening Pap test to diagnosis. RESULTS: Of the 280 cases that occurred in women eligible for screening, 125 (44.6%) were adequately screened, 18 (6.4%) were underscreened, and 137 (49%) were unscreened. Among the adequately screened, 71 (56.8%) had normal Pap test results, but 48 (38%) had less than 3 previous Pap tests (p = .003). Cancer stages I to II were diagnosed in 48.8% and 44.1% of adequately screened and unscreened women and cancer stages III to IV in 30.6% and 66.1% in each group, respectively (p = .0058). Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) was diagnosed in 189 women (67.5%). The proportion of SCCs was similar in adequately screened and unscreened women. CONCLUSIONS: The proportion of SCCs and advanced stages of ICC seems to be decreased. The results of quality improvement initiatives such as enhanced surveillance of high-grade Pap test results and histology-cytology correlation will be monitored and are expected to result in better outcomes for adequately screened women.

Colorectal glandular-neuroendocrine mixed tumor: pathologic spectrum and clinical implications.

Colorectal glandular-neuroendocrine mixed tumor is an uncommon entity with ill-defined clinicopathologic characteristics. We describe the clinicopathology of 23 new cases and review 67 previously reported cases. Clinically, patients (mean age, 61.9 y; male: female, 1.0:1.1) presented with a positive fecal occult blood test or visible rectal bleeding (44%), abdominal pain or change in bowel movement pattern (25%), bowel obstruction (19%), or weight loss (19%). Endoscopically, the tumors presented as a polypoid lesion (57%), a mass lesion (30%), or an ulcerating lesion (9%). Tumors were located in the right colon (56%), transverse colon (3%), and left colon (41%). Surgical resection was the treatment of choice in 83% of cases. After follow-up for an average of 20 months, the tumor-related death rate was 68%. Histologically, 42% were classified as composite tumors and 58% were classified as collision tumors. An adenoma to carcinoma, and then carcinoma to mixed tumor progression through the APC/ß-catenin pathway was seen in a majority of cases. Both the glandular and the neuroendocrine components of the mixed tumor can show a spectrum of differentiation, and each component can metastasize separately regardless of its percentage volume. On the basis of the combined analysis of the pathologic spectrum and the clinical behavior of our series and previously reported cases, we propose a new classification system that reflects the differentiation of each component in colorectal glandular-neuroendocrine mixed tumor to facilitate uniform reporting and to better predict its clinical behavior.

Sudden unexpected death due to a brainstem glioma in an adult.

Sudden death due to undiagnosed central nervous system tumors is an uncommon, but well-described occurrence. Most of the tumors in these circumstances are supratentorial and occur in a wide spectrum of ages. Brainstem tumors are more rare and occur predominantly in the pediatric and adolescent populations. We present the case of a 48-year-old man who died suddenly and unexpectedly of a brainstem glioma. This case is unusual because of his age and the paucity of antecedent symptoms.