Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Transfusion ; 53(11): 2681-9, 2013 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23451834

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Scientific progress in the biology of hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) provides opportunities for advances in therapy for different diseases. While stem cell sources such as umbilical cord blood (UCB) are unproblematic, other sources such as human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) raise ethical concerns. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: In a prospective survey we established the ethical acceptability of collection, research, and therapy with UCB HSCs versus hESCs among health care professionals, pregnant women, patients undergoing in vitro fertilization therapy, parents, and HSC donors and recipients in Switzerland. RESULTS: There was overall agreement about an ethical justification for the collection of UCB for research and therapy in the majority of participants (82%). In contrast, research and therapy with hESCs was acceptable only by a minority (38% of all responders). The collection of hESCs solely created for HSC collection purposes met overall with the lowest approval rates. Hematologists displayed among the participants the highest acceptance rates for the use of hESCs with 55% for collection, 63% for research, and 73% for therapy. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study assessing the perception of hESCs for research and therapy in comparison with UCB HSCs in different target groups that are exposed directly, indirectly, or not at all to stem cell-based medicine. Our study shows that the debate over the legitimacy of embryo-destructive transplantation medicine is far from over as particularly hESC research continues to present an ethical problem to an overwhelming majority among laypersons and even among health care professionals.


Subject(s)
Biomedical Research , Cord Blood Stem Cell Transplantation , Embryonic Stem Cells/transplantation , Fetal Blood/cytology , Health Personnel , Adult , Cell Separation , Female , Humans , Nuclear Transfer Techniques , Pregnancy , Prospective Studies , Switzerland
2.
Transfusion ; 53(7): 1510-9, 2013 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23067293

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Two competitive concepts of umbilical cord blood (UCB) banking are currently available: either allogeneic UCB is donated to a public bank or autologous cells are stored in a private bank. Allogeneic-autologous hybrid banking is a new concept that combines these two approaches. However, acceptance of hybrid UCB banking among potential donors is unknown to date. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: In a prospective survey, we aimed to establish the acceptance of the hybrid banking model among actual and potential UCB donors in Switzerland. The study groups consisted of parents and pregnant women with or without children. As control group, women at reproductive ages were investigated. RESULTS: The majority of participants agreed fundamentally with UCB donation, and overall acceptance of private banking was 47%. If a possibility for hybrid banking were to be made available, 49% would opt for such a public-private model and only 13% would choose private banking alone. Among the proponents of hybrid banking, a majority of participants chose donor cell splitting over the sequential banking mode. Fifty-six percent of responders wished prior notification before the release of their donated UCB to a foreign recipient. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study which compared the acceptance of allogeneic, autologous, and hybrid allogeneic-autologous UCB banking in different target groups. We demonstrated that hybrid cord blood banking is the preferred model of banking among actual and potential UCB donors. With increasing demand for UCB in the future, health care providers should therefore consider offering hybrid banking as a viable storage option.


Subject(s)
Blood Banks , Fetal Blood , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Blood Banks/economics , Blood Banks/legislation & jurisprudence , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Prospective Studies , Transplantation, Autologous , Transplantation, Homologous
3.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 203(4): 399.e1-7, 2010 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20723871

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Preeclampsia is associated with perinatal brain injury. Autologous placenta stem cell transplantation represents a promising future treatment option for neuroregeneration. The aim of this study was to compare the neuroregenerative capacity of preeclampsia-placenta stem cells to previously characterized placentas from uncomplicated pregnancies. STUDY DESIGN: Placenta stem cells from amnion (epithelium, mesenchyme) and chorion were assessed for cell surface markers and the formation of neuronal-like cells, oligodendrocytes and their progenitors in culture. RESULTS: Markers of preeclampsia-placenta stem cells were different from uncomplicated pregnancies-placenta stem cells in amnion epithelium and chorion, but not in amnion mesenchyme. Similarly to uncomplicated pregnancies-placenta stem cells, preeclampsia-placenta stem cells derived from amnion and chorion differentiated preferably into nestin-positive stem/progenitor cells and Tuj-1-positive neurons. However, other important markers were varying after neurogenic differentiation of uncomplicated pregnancies- and preeclampsia-placenta stem cells. CONCLUSION: Surface marker expression patterns of preeclampsia-placenta stem cell's and uncomplicated pregnancies-placenta stem cell's differ. In vitro differentiation assays, however, provide evidence that both preeclampsia-placenta stem cells and uncomplicated pregnancies-placenta stem cells are comparably suitable for neuroregeneration purposes.


Subject(s)
Neurons/cytology , Placenta/cytology , Pre-Eclampsia/pathology , Stem Cells/cytology , Amnion/cytology , Cell Differentiation , Cells, Cultured , Chorion/cytology , Female , Humans , Intermediate Filament Proteins/metabolism , Nerve Tissue Proteins/metabolism , Nestin , Neurons/metabolism , Pregnancy , Tubulin/metabolism
4.
Blood ; 105(7): 2988-90, 2005 Apr 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15576479

ABSTRACT

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is associated with significant posttransplantation gonadotoxicity. This deficit has been mainly attributed to pretransplantation conditioning, but lower sperm counts in humans also appear to be associated with graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) following allogeneic HSCT. However, the mechanisms leading to diminished spermatocyte levels during GVHD remain unknown. Here we demonstrate that injury to intratesticular cells occurs in unconditioned F1 mice following the infiltration of donor alloreactive T cells during an acute graft-versus-host reaction (GVHR). Using computer-aided quantitative microscopic morphometry we demonstrate that the nadir of Leydig cell volume density coincides with the peak of intratesticular infiltration by donor T cells. Injury to Leydig cells correlates with an intratesticular inflammatory response characterized by interferon-gamma and tumor necrosis factor-alpha production. These results demonstrate impairment of testosterone-producing Leydig cells during a local alloresponse, thus representing a mechanism that contributes to gonadal insufficiency following allogeneic HSCT.


Subject(s)
Graft vs Host Disease/complications , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Hypogonadism/etiology , Leydig Cells/pathology , Acute Disease , Animals , Graft vs Host Disease/immunology , Graft vs Host Disease/pathology , Hypogonadism/immunology , Hypogonadism/pathology , Leydig Cells/immunology , Male , Mice , Mice, Inbred C57BL , Mice, Inbred DBA , Spermatogenesis , T-Lymphocytes/pathology , Testosterone/blood
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...