Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 61
Filter
1.
Nervenarzt ; 2024 May 17.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38758224

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Deprescribing of medication or psychotherapy represents a critical phase in treatment. The aim of the work is to systematically analyze recommendations for deprescribing medication and discontinuation of psychotherapy in the evidence- and consensus-based S3 guidelines of the German Association for Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics (DGPPN) to identify potential research gaps. METHODS: A systematic analysis of the DGPPN S3 guidelines to investigate and compare information and recommendations on deprescribing. RESULTS: Regarding deprescribing of medication, our analysis showed that eight of the 20 included S3 guidelines contain information both in the form of recommendations and background information. Regarding psychotherapy, only two guidelines provided information on deprescribing. CONCLUSION: Our results highlight the need to expand guidelines to include evidence-based recommendations for deprescribing medication or discontinuation of psychotherapy. Future research should focus on the development of specific, generic, and evidence-based guidelines that support both medical staff and patients during these critical phases of therapy.

2.
Expert Opin Drug Saf ; 23(6): 715-729, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38676922

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Effective side effects management present a challenge in antipsychotic treatment with second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs). In recent years, most of the commonly used SGAs, except for clozapine, have been shown to differ only slightly in their effectiveness, but considerably regarding perceived side effects, safety profiles, and compatibility to preexisting medical conditions. AREAS COVERED: The current state of available evidence on side-effect management in SGA treatment of patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSD) is reviewed. In addition, current guideline recommendations are summarized, highlighting evidence gaps. EXPERT OPINION: SGA safety and side effects needs to be considered in treatment planning. Shared decision-making assistants (SDMA) can support patients, practitioners and relatives to orient their decisions toward avoiding side effects relevant to patients' adherence. Alongside general measures like psychosocial and psychotherapeutic care, switching to better tolerated SGAs can be considered a relatively safe strategy. By contrast, novel meta-analytical evidence emphasizes that dose reduction of SGAs can statistically increase the risk of relapse and other unfavorable outcomes. Further, depending on the type and severity of SGA-related side effects, specific treatments can be used to alleviate induced side effects (e.g. add-on metformin to reduce weight-gain). Finally, discontinuation should be reserved for acute emergencies.


Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Schizophrenia , Humans , Antipsychotic Agents/adverse effects , Antipsychotic Agents/administration & dosage , Schizophrenia/drug therapy , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Decision Making, Shared , Medication Adherence
3.
Biol Psychiatry ; 2024 Apr 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38679358

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Optical coherence tomography (OCT) and electroretinography (ERG) studies have revealed structural and functional retinal alterations in individuals with schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSD). However, it remains unclear which specific retinal layers are affected, how the retina, brain, and clinical symptomatology are connected, and how alterations of the visual system are related to genetic disease risk. METHODS: OCT, ERG, and brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were applied to comprehensively investigate the visual system in a cohort of 103 patients with SSD and 130 healthy control individuals. The sparse partial least squares (SPLS) algorithm was used to identify multivariate associations between clinical disease phenotype and biological alterations of the visual system. The association of the revealed patterns with the individual polygenetic disease risk for schizophrenia was explored in a post hoc analysis. In addition, covariate-adjusted case-control comparisons were performed for each individual OCT and ERG parameter. RESULTS: The SPLS analysis yielded a phenotype-eye-brain signature of SSD in which greater disease severity, longer duration of illness, and impaired cognition were associated with electrophysiological alterations and microstructural thinning of most retinal layers. Higher individual loading onto this disease-relevant signature of the visual system was significantly associated with elevated polygenic risk for schizophrenia. In case-control comparisons, patients with SSD had lower macular thickness, thinner retinal nerve fiber and inner plexiform layers, less negative a-wave amplitude, and lower b-wave amplitude. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates multimodal microstructural and electrophysiological retinal alterations in individuals with SSD that are associated with disease severity and individual polygenetic burden.

4.
Brain Behav Immun ; 119: 353-362, 2024 Apr 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38608742

ABSTRACT

Neuroinflammation and blood-cerebrospinal fluid barrier (BCB) disruption could be key elements in schizophrenia-spectrum disorders(SSDs) etiology and symptom modulation. We present the largest two-stage individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis, investigating the association of BCB disruption and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) alterations with symptom severity in first-episode psychosis (FEP) and recent onset psychotic disorder (ROP) individuals, with a focus on sex-related differences. Data was collected from PubMed and EMBASE databases. FEP, ROP and high-risk syndromes for psychosis IPD were included if routine basic CSF-diagnostics were reported. Risk of bias of the included studies was evaluated. Random-effects meta-analyses and mixed-effects linear regression models were employed to assess the impact of BCB alterations on symptom severity. Published (6 studies) and unpublished IPD from n = 531 individuals was included in the analyses. CSF was altered in 38.8 % of individuals. No significant differences in symptom severity were found between individuals with and without CSF alterations (SMD = -0.17, 95 %CI -0.55-0.22, p = 0.341). However, males with elevated CSF/serum albumin ratios or any CSF alteration had significantly higher positive symptom scores than those without alterations (SMD = 0.34, 95 %CI 0.05-0.64, p = 0.037 and SMD = 0.29, 95 %CI 0.17-0.41p = 0.005, respectively). Mixed-effects and simple regression models showed no association (p > 0.1) between CSF parameters and symptomatic outcomes. No interaction between sex and CSF parameters was found (p > 0.1). BCB disruption appears highly prevalent in early psychosis and could be involved in positive symptoms severity in males, indicating potential difficult-to-treat states. This work highlights the need for considering BCB breakdownand sex-related differences in SSDs clinical trials and treatment strategies.

5.
World J Biol Psychiatry ; 25(4): 233-241, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38493362

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The evidence for repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) to treat negative symptoms in schizophrenia (SCZ) is increasing, although variable response rates remain a challenge. Subject´s sex critically influences rTMS´ treatment outcomes. Females with major depressive disorder are more likely to respond to rTMS, while SCZ data is scarce. METHODS: Using data from the 'rTMS for the Treatment of Negative Symptoms in Schizophrenia' (RESIS) trial we assessed the impact of sex on rTMS´ clinical response rate from screening up to 105 days after intervention among SCZ patients. The impact of resting motor threshold (RMT) on response rates was also assessed. RESULTS: 157 patients received either active or sham rTMS treatment. No significant group differences were observed. Linear mixed model showed no effects on response rates (all p > 0.519). Apart from a significant sex*time interaction for the positive subscale of the positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS) scores (p = 0.032), no other significant effects of sex on continuous PANSS scores were observed. RMT had no effect on response rate. CONCLUSION: In the largest rTMS trial on the treatment of SCZ negative symptoms we did not observe any significant effect of sex on treatment outcomes. Better assessments of sex-related differences could improve treatment individualisation.


Subject(s)
Schizophrenia , Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation , Humans , Schizophrenia/therapy , Schizophrenia/physiopathology , Female , Male , Adult , Middle Aged , Sex Factors , Treatment Outcome , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales
6.
Schizophr Res ; 266: 24-31, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38364730

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There is increasing evidence of immune dysregulation and neuroinflammation occurring in schizophrenia. The aim of this study is to combine studies on routine CSF parameters, as well as cytokines and inflammatory proteins, in individuals with schizophrenia spectrum disorders. METHODS: CSF parameters were summated and inverse variance meta-analyses using a random effects model were performed comparing mean difference or odds ratios. Between study heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic. Quality assessment and sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS: There were 69 studies of 5710 participants, including 3180 individuals with schizophrenia spectrum disorders. Averaged CSF parameters were within normal limits, however, between 3.1 % and 23.5 % of individual cases with schizophrenia spectrum disorders had an abnormal CSF result: Protein (abnormal in 23.5 % cases), albumin (in 18.5 %), presence of oligoclonal bands (in 9.3 %), white blood cell count (in 3.6 %), and IgG levels (3.1 %). Meta-analysis of 55 studies with non-psychiatric controls demonstrated a significant increase in CSF total protein (MD: 3.50, CI: 0.12-6.87), albumin ratio (MD: 0.55, CI: 0.02-0.09), white cell count (MD: 0.25, CI: 0.05-0.46), IL-6 (SMD: 0.53, CI: 0.29 to 0.77) and IL-8 (SMD: 0.56, CI: 0.11 to 1.01). Sensitivity analysis did not alter findings. CONCLUSION: Abnormal CSF parameters, cytokines and inflammatory proteins were found in a significant proportion of individuals with schizophrenia spectrum disorders. This may indicate alterations to blood brain barrier function and permeability, CSF flow dynamics or neuroinflammation. Further research is needed to explore these potential mechanisms.


Subject(s)
Schizophrenia , Humans , Neuroinflammatory Diseases , Cytokines/cerebrospinal fluid , Albumins
7.
Nervenarzt ; 95(5): 423-431, 2024 May.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38319320

ABSTRACT

Despite a very high prevalence and substantial impairments among affected individuals, treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS) has not been sufficiently researched in clinical research in the field of psychiatric disorders and the pathophysiology is still poorly understood. A better clinical and pathophysiological understanding of this heterogeneous and severely affected population of people with persistent symptoms in different domains is necessary in order not only to be able to intervene early but also to develop novel therapeutic strategies or individualized treatment approaches. This review article presents the state of the art criteria of the pharmacological TRS, neurobiological disease models and predictive factors for TRS as well as the phenomenon of pseudo-treatment resistance and the clinical management of TRS. In the future, not only the use of operationalized criteria and definitions of TRS in longitudinal studies and randomized-controlled trials (RCTs) are paramount, but also the observation of trajectories with the integration of multimodal longitudinal phenotyping and the longitudinal collection of clinical routine data in academic research, which will be possible in the newly created German Center for Mental Health (DZPG).


Subject(s)
Schizophrenic Psychology , Humans , Schizophrenia, Treatment-Resistant/therapy , Schizophrenia, Treatment-Resistant/drug therapy , Schizophrenia, Treatment-Resistant/physiopathology , Antipsychotic Agents/therapeutic use , Schizophrenia/therapy , Schizophrenia/drug therapy , Schizophrenia/physiopathology , Germany
8.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38165458

ABSTRACT

In the context of COVID-19 concerns related to the potential interactions between clozapine and vaccination arose. With the ultimate goal of deriving recommendations for clinical practice, we systematically reviewed the current evidence regarding altered vaccine effectiveness in clozapine-treated patients and safety aspects of vaccination, such as haematological changes and the impact of vaccines on clozapine blood levels, in clozapine-treated patients. A systematic PRISMA-conform literature search of four databases (PubMed, PsycINFO, EMBASE and Cochrane Library) complemented by a case-by-case analysis of the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) database was performed. We then systematically appraised the joint evidence and tried to derive recommendations for clinical practice. 14 records were included in this analysis. These records consisted of 5 original articles and 9 case reports. Among the original articles, two studies provided data on the association between clozapine use and antibody responses to vaccination, both indicating that clozapine use in schizophrenia may be associated with reduced levels of immunoglobulins. Additionally, three studies examined vaccine safety in clozapine-treated patients, with no clinically significant adverse effects directly attributable to the interplay between vaccinations and clozapine. VAERS Analysis encompassed 137 reports and showed no consistent evidence of an increased risk for clozapine blood level increases or adverse events. We found no evidence indicating that clozapine impairs the effectiveness of vaccines. Moreover, no serious safety concerns seem to apply when patients on clozapine are receiving vaccines. However, it is crucial to acknowledge that data on the interaction between clozapine and vaccines remain limited.

9.
Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr ; 92(4): 128-134, 2024 Apr.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36720233

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Inpatient psychiatric treatment of prisoners is organized differently in Germany, depending on the structural conditions of the federal state and prison. There are very few findings on the different possibilities of treatment and the view of the hospitals on this issue. OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to gain an up-to-date picture of inpatient treatment of prisoners in general psychiatric departments and hospitals and the challenges these institutions face. METHODS: We conducted an anonymous online survey of the frequency, extent, and challenges of inpatient treatment of prisoners. Approximately 460 chief physicians of German general psychiatric departments and hospitals were invited to participate in this survey. In addition to descriptive statistics, we calculated group differences by type of hospital and by subjective responsibility for inpatient care of prisoners. RESULTS: A total of 74 chief physicians surveyed participated; 51.4% of the surveyed hospitals provided psychiatric inpatient treatment to prisoners in 2020. Group differences between the different types of hospitals were found only for the presence of anticipated anxiety among regular inpatients. Various differences were found between responsible and non-responsible hospitals, especially with regard to organizational aspects. DISCUSSION: For the treatment of mentally ill prisoners, various organizational challenges as well as fears of hospital staff and fellow patients were mentioned by the participants. The type of hospital appears to play a subordinate role here, whereas the responsibility of the hospital for the inpatient treatment of mentally ill prisoners might be more decisive for anticipated concerns and barriers.

10.
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci ; 274(1): 181-193, 2024 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37020043

ABSTRACT

Obsessive-compulsive symptoms (OCS) are frequently observed in individuals with schizophrenia (SCZ) treated with clozapine (CLZ). This study aimed to analyze prevalence of OCS and obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) in this subgroup and find possible correlations with different phenotypes. Additionally, this is the first study to examine polygenetic risk scores (PRS) in individuals with SCZ and OCS. A multicenter cohort of 91 individuals with SCZ who were treated with CLZ was recruited and clinically and genetically assessed. Symptom severity was examined using the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale (PANSS), Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI), the Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS), Global Assessment of Functioning Scale (GAF) and Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS). Participants were divided into subgroups based on phenotypic OCS or OCD using Y-BOCS scores. Genomic-wide data were generated, and PRS analyses were performed to evaluate the association between either phenotypic OCD or OCS severity and genotype-predicted predisposition for OCD, SCZ, cross-disorder, and CLZ/norclozapine (NorCLZ) ratio, CLZ metabolism and NorCLZ metabolism. OCS and OCD were frequent comorbidities in our sample of CLZ-treated SCZ individuals, with a prevalence of 39.6% and 27.5%, respectively. Furthermore, the Y-BOCS total score correlated positively with the duration of CLZ treatment in years (r = 0.28; p = 0.008) and the PANSS general psychopathology subscale score (r = 0.23; p = 0.028). A significant correlation was found between OCD occurrence and PRS for CLZ metabolism. We found no correlation between OCS severity and PRS for CLZ metabolism. We found no correlation for either OCD or OCS and PRS for OCD, cross-disorder, SCZ, CLZ/NorCLZ ratio or NorCLZ metabolism. Our study was able to replicate previous findings on clinical characteristics of CLZ-treated SCZ individuals. OCS is a frequent comorbidity in this cohort and is correlated with CLZ treatment duration in years and PANSS general psychopathology subscale score. We found a correlation between OCD and PRS for CLZ metabolism, which should be interpreted as incidental for now. Future research is necessary to replicate significant findings and to assess possible genetic predisposition of CLZ-treated individuals with SCZ to OCS/OCD. Limitations attributed to the small sample size or the inclusion of subjects on co-medication must be considered. If the association between OCD and PRS for CLZ metabolism can be replicated, it should be further evaluated if CYP1A2 alteration, respectively lower CLZ plasma level, is relevant for OCD development.


Subject(s)
Clozapine , Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder , Schizophrenia , Humans , Schizophrenia/drug therapy , Schizophrenia/genetics , Schizophrenia/diagnosis , Clozapine/therapeutic use , Schizophrenic Psychology , Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder/drug therapy , Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder/epidemiology , Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder/genetics , Comorbidity , Genetic Risk Score , Phenotype
11.
Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol ; 17(1): 11-18, 2024 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38087450

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Developing novel antipsychotic mechanisms of action and repurposing established compounds for the treatment of schizophrenia is of utmost importance to improve relevant symptom domains and to improve the risk/benefit ratio of antipsychotic compounds. Novel trial design concepts, pathophysiology-based targeted treatment approaches, or even the return to old values may improve schizophrenia outcomes in the future. AREAS COVERED: In this review of the clinical trial landscape in schizophrenia, we present an overview of the challenges and gaps in current clinical trials and elaborate on potential solutions to improve the outcomes of people with schizophrenia. EXPERT OPINION: The classic parallel group design may limit substantial advantages in drug approval or repurposing. Collaborative approaches between regulatory authorities, industry, academia, and funding agencies are needed to overcome barriers in clinical schizophrenia research to allow for meaningful outcome improvements for the patients.


Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents , Schizophrenia , Humans , Antipsychotic Agents/pharmacology , Antipsychotic Agents/therapeutic use , Drug Approval , Schizophrenia/drug therapy , Clinical Trials as Topic
12.
Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr ; 92(1-02): 27-32, 2024 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37567248

ABSTRACT

The COVID-19 pandemic has posed unprecedented challenges for health care workers (HCWs) worldwide. While the adverse effects of the pandemic on the well-being of HCWs in general have now been established, little is known about the impact on HCWs of psychiatric hospitals (PHCWs). PHCWs are of special interest, given that they faced both an increase in infection rates among psychiatric patients as well as in mental strain of the general public due to consequences of the pandemic. The aim of the present study was to investigate how the pandemic affected PHCWs as well as possible differences between PHCWs and other health care workers (OHCWs) in Germany during the first wave of the pandemic. We conducted a country-wide anonymous online survey early during the first pandemic wave between April 15th and May 1st, 2020, to assess different aspects of subjective burden and perceived stress using 5-point Likert-scale questions. We analysed data of 1530 PHCWs and 2114 OHCWs and showed that PHCWs reported higher subjective burden and stress compared to OHCWs (p<0.001). Overall, nurses from both groups of HCWs showed higher ratings in subjective burden and stress than physicians. These higher ratings for subjective burden were even more pronounced for nurses working in psychiatric hospitals. Future research is needed to investigate the causes for PHCWs' increased stress and subjective burden, especially when taking into account the long-term effects of the pandemic, which may lead to further challenges and an ever-increasing workload, especially for PHCWs.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions , Humans , Pandemics , Health Personnel , Germany/epidemiology
13.
Pharmacopsychiatry ; 57(1): 4-12, 2024 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37722411

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) behaviour is frequently observed in children and adolescents with psychiatric conditions. Affected individuals are regularly treated with psychotropic drugs, although the impact of these agents on NSSI behaviour remains elusive. METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review from clinical routine data in a large cohort (N=1140) of adolescent inpatients with primary affective and non-affective psychiatric disorders according to ICD-10 (mean age=15.3±1.3 years; 72.6% female). Four separate mixed regression models compared the frequency of NSSI between treatment periods without any medication and four medication categories (benzodiazepines, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), high- and low-potency antipsychotics). RESULTS: In those individuals with affective disorders as the primary diagnosis, periods without medication were associated with significantly lower NSSI/day compared to all four other medication conditions (benzodiazepines p<10-8, antidepressants/SSRIs p=0.0004, high-potency antipsychotics p=0.0009, low-potency antipsychotics p<10 -4). In individuals with a primary diagnosis other than an affective disorder, NSSI was significantly lower during the period without medication compared to the treatment periods with benzodiazepines (p=0.005) and antidepressants/SSRIs (p=0.01). However, NSSI rates in the no-medication condition were comparable to NSSI rates under high-potency (p=0.89) and low-potency antipsychotics (p=0.53). CONCLUSIONS: The occurrence of NSSI correlates with the treatment with a psychotropic drug in children and adolescents with psychiatric disorders. Due to the retrospective design, it remains elusive to what extent psychotropic drugs might alter the frequency of NSSI in adolescents or if NSSI might indicate a transdiagnostic feature of more pronounced disease severity.


Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents , Self-Injurious Behavior , Child , Humans , Adolescent , Female , Male , Retrospective Studies , Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Self-Injurious Behavior/epidemiology , Self-Injurious Behavior/diagnosis , Self-Injurious Behavior/psychology , Mood Disorders/drug therapy , Mood Disorders/epidemiology , Psychotropic Drugs/therapeutic use , Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use , Antipsychotic Agents/therapeutic use , Benzodiazepines/therapeutic use
15.
Psychiatry Res ; 330: 115539, 2023 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37988817

ABSTRACT

Clozapine is often underused due to concerns about adverse drug reactions (ADRs) but studies into their prevalences are inconclusive. We therefore comprehensively examined prevalences of clozapine-associated ADRs in individuals with schizophrenia and demographic and clinical factors associated with their occurrence. Data from a multi-center study (n = 698 participants) were collected. The mean number of ADRs during clozapine treatment was 4.8, with 2.4 % of participants reporting no ADRs. The most common ADRs were hypersalivation (74.6 %), weight gain (69.3 %), and increased sleep necessity (65.9 %), all of which were more common in younger participants. Participants with lower BMI prior to treatment were more likely to experience significant weight gain (>10 %). Constipation occurred more frequently with higher clozapine blood levels and doses. There were no differences in ADR prevalence rates between participants receiving clozapine monotherapy and polytherapy. These findings emphasize the high prevalence of clozapine-associated ADRs and highlight several demographic and clinical factors contributing to their occurrence. By understanding these factors, clinicians can better anticipate and manage clozapine-associated ADRs, leading to improved treatment outcomes and patient well-being.


Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents , Clozapine , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions , Female , Humans , Male , Antipsychotic Agents/adverse effects , Clozapine/adverse effects , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/epidemiology , Prevalence , Sex Characteristics , Weight Gain , Multicenter Studies as Topic
16.
Psychiatry Res ; 328: 115480, 2023 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37716320

ABSTRACT

Current treatment methods do not achieve recovery for most individuals with schizophrenia, and symptoms such as negative symptoms and cognitive deficits often persist. Aerobic endurance training has been suggested as a potential add-on treatment targeting both physical and mental health. We performed a large-scale multicenter, rater-blind, parallel-group randomized controlled clinical trial in individuals with stable schizophrenia. Participants underwent a professionally supervised six-month training comprising either aerobic endurance training (AET) or flexibility, strengthening, and balance training (FSBT, control group), follow-up was another six months. The primary endpoint was all-cause discontinuation (ACD); secondary endpoints included effects on psychopathology, cognition, functioning, and cardiovascular risk. In total, 180 participants were randomized. AET was not superior to FSBT in ACD and most secondary outcomes, with dropout rates of 59.55% and 57.14% in the six-month active phase, respectively. However, both groups showed significant improvements in positive, general, and total symptoms, levels of functioning and in cognitive performance. A higher training frequency additionally promoted further memory domains. Participants with higher baseline cognitive abilities were more likely to respond to the interventions. Our results support integrating exercise into schizophrenia treatment, while future studies should aim to develop personalized training recommendations to maximize exercise-induced benefits.


Subject(s)
Cognition Disorders , Schizophrenia , Humans , Schizophrenia/complications , Schizophrenia/therapy , Exercise , Exercise Therapy/methods , Cognition Disorders/complications , Cognition
17.
Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr ; 91(9): 369-383, 2023 Sep.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37725988

ABSTRACT

Schizophrenia is a mental disorder characterized by marked heterogeneity at both the phenomenological and neurobiological levels. Its diagnostic disentanglement would lead to more precise treatment and improved prognosis in people with schizophrenia. For this, a deeper understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms of schizophrenia is needed.


Subject(s)
Psychotic Disorders , Schizophrenia , Humans , Schizophrenia/diagnosis , Schizophrenia/therapy , Neurobiology
18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37581691

ABSTRACT

This study aims to investigate the barriers and facilitators to guideline adherence for the print format of the German schizophrenia guideline as well as for the concept of a digital living guideline for the first time. For this purpose, the schizophrenia guideline was transferred to a digital guideline format within the web-based tool MAGICapp. An online survey was performed under participation of mental healthcare professionals (medical doctors, psychologists/psychotherapists, psychosocial therapists, caregivers) in 17 hospitals for psychiatry in Southern Germany and a professional association for German neurologists and psychiatrists. 524 participants opened the survey, 439 completed the demographic questions and commenced the content-related survey and 309 provided complete data sets. Results indicate a higher occurrence of knowledge-related barriers for the living guideline. The print version is associated with more attitude-related and external barriers. Older professionals reported more attitude-related barriers to a living guideline compared to younger professionals. Differences between professions regarding barriers were found for both formats. Various barriers exist for both guideline formats and a need for facilitators was expressed across professions. Many of the mentioned obstacles and facilitators can be more easily addressed with living guidelines. However, also living guidelines face barriers. Thus, the introduction of these new formats alone cannot lead to sustainable behavior change regarding guideline adherence. Yet, living guidelines seem to be a cornerstone to improved and tailored guideline implementation as they facilitate to keep recommendations up to date and to address the need of individual professional groups.

19.
Pharmacopsychiatry ; 56(5): 169-181, 2023 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37506738

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Quick symptomatic remission after the onset of psychotic symptoms is critical in schizophrenia treatment, determining the subsequent disease course and recovery. In this context, only every second patient with acute schizophrenia achieves symptomatic remission within three months of initiating antipsychotic treatment. The potential indication extension of clozapine-the most effective antipsychotic-to be introduced at an earlier stage (before treatment-resistance) is supported by several lines of evidence, but respective clinical trials are lacking. METHODS: Two hundred-twenty patients with acute non-treatment-resistant schizophrenia will be randomized in this double-blind, 8-week parallel-group multicentric trial to either clozapine or olanzapine. The primary endpoint is the number of patients in symptomatic remission at the end of week 8 according to international consensus criteria ('Andreasen criteria'). Secondary endpoints and other assessments comprise a comprehensive safety assessment (i. e., myocarditis screening), changes in psychopathology, global functioning, cognition, affective symptoms and quality of life, and patients' and relatives' views on treatment. DISCUSSION: This multicentre trial aims to examine whether clozapine is more effective than a highly effective second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs), olanzapine, in acute schizophrenia patients who do not meet the criteria for treatment-naïve or treatment-resistant schizophrenia. Increasing the likelihood to achieve symptomatic remission in acute schizophrenia can improve the overall outcome, reduce disease-associated burden and potentially prevent mid- and long-term disease chronicity.


Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents , Clozapine , Schizophrenia , Humans , Antipsychotic Agents/therapeutic use , Clozapine/therapeutic use , Multicenter Studies as Topic , Olanzapine/therapeutic use , Quality of Life , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Schizophrenia/drug therapy , Treatment Outcome
20.
Lancet Psychiatry ; 10(8): 644-652, 2023 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37329895

ABSTRACT

Treatment-resistant symptoms occur in about a third of patients with schizophrenia and are associated with a substantial reduction in their quality of life. The development of new treatment options for clozapine-resistant schizophrenia constitutes a crucial, unmet need in psychiatry. Additionally, an overview of past and possible future research avenues to optimise the early detection, diagnosis, and management of clozapine-resistant schizophrenia is unavailable. In this Health Policy, we discuss the ongoing challenges associated with clozapine-resistant schizophrenia faced by patients and health-care providers worldwide to improve the understanding of this condition. We then revisit several clozapine guidelines, the diagnostic tests and treatment options for clozapine-resistant schizophrenia, and currently applied research approaches in clozapine-resistant schizophrenia. We also suggest methodologies and targets for future research, divided into innovative nosology-oriented field trials (eg, examining dimensional symptom staging), translational approaches (eg, genetics), epidemiological research (eg, real-world studies), and interventional studies (eg, non-traditional trial designs incorporating lived experiences and caregivers' perspectives). Finally, we note that low-income and middle-income countries are under-represented in studies on clozapine-resistant schizophrenia and propose an agenda to guide multinational research on the cause and treatment of clozapine-resistant schizophrenia. We hope that this research agenda will empower better global representation of patients living with clozapine-resistant schizophrenia and ultimately improve their functional outcomes and quality of life.


Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents , Clozapine , Schizophrenia , Humans , Clozapine/therapeutic use , Schizophrenia/drug therapy , Antipsychotic Agents/therapeutic use , Quality of Life
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...