Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Nerv Ment Dis ; 210(1): 2-5, 2022 01 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34731092

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT: Structural racism has received renewed focus over the past year, fueled by the convergence of major political and social events. Psychiatry as a field has been forced to confront a legacy of systemic inequities. Here, we use examples from our clinical and supervisory work to highlight the urgent need to integrate techniques addressing racial identity and racism into psychiatric practice and teaching. This urgency is underlined by extensive evidence of psychiatry's long-standing systemic inequities. We argue that our field suffers not from a lack of available techniques, but rather a lack of sustained commitment to understand and integrate those techniques into our work; indeed, there are multiple published examples of strategies to address racism and racial identity in psychiatric clinical practice. We conclude with recommendations geared toward more firmly institutionalizing a focus on racism and racial identity in psychiatry, and suggest applications of existing techniques to our initial clinical examples.


Subject(s)
Psychiatry , Systemic Racism , Humans , Implementation Science , Social Determinants of Health
2.
J Nerv Ment Dis ; 209(11): 779-782, 2021 11 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34468441

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT: Public trust in the credibility of medicine and physicians has been severely tested amid the COVID-19 pandemic and growing sociopolitical fissures in the United States. Physicians are being asked to be ambassadors to the public of scientific information. Psychiatrists have an opportunity to help the public understand and accept a "new normal" during a time of such uncertainty. Using a case example, we review the impact of uncertainty and fear on scientific and medical credibility. Although the pandemic provides an opportunity for systemic change, the consequences of any change remain unknown. To help patients navigate the uncertainty, we conclude by offering four guidelines to clinicians: the public has little interest in understanding the scientific method; we need to acknowledge that we do not have all the answers; credibility and trustworthiness are linked to our ability to be trusted, believable messengers; and we can retain scientific credibility while acknowledging uncertainty.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/psychology , Physician's Role , Psychiatry/methods , COVID-19/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Male , Pandemics , Psychiatry/standards , SARS-CoV-2 , Trust/psychology , Uncertainty , United States/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...