Differences in performance between Oticon MultiFocus Compact and ReSound BT2-E hearing aids.

Differences in performance were evaluated between binaural fittings of the Oticon MultiFocus (MF) and ReSound BT2-E on 25 hearing-impaired subjects across two sites. Subjects were initially fit using each manufacturer's algorithm and adjustments were made at 1 week based on subjects' responses to diary questions. Performance was assessed after a 4- to 6-week trial period with each hearing aid set using the Speech Perception in Noise (SPIN) test administered at 50, 65, and 80 dB SPL, the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB) questionnaire, loudness judgments of female connected discourse at 65 and 80 dB SPL, and an overall preference selection. The MF yielded significantly better SPIN scores at 50 and 65 dB SPL, while the BT2-E yielded a significantly better score at 80 dB SPL. No statistically significant differences were found in the APHAB benefit scores between the hearing aid sets, but both sets were significantly better than the subjects' own hearing aids on three of the four subscales. The MF produced slightly higher mean loudness judgments at both input levels than the BT2-E. Finally, 12 subjects preferred the BT2-E, 10 subjects preferred the MF, and three subjects stated no preference. The results are discussed in terms of audiogram effects on preference and effects of differences in signal processing approaches between the devices.

Down syndrome: a multidisciplinary perspective.

Trisomy 21, a genetic disorder resulting from a chromosomal abnormality, is one of the most common forms of mental disability in the United States. Individuals with Down syndrome frequently present with a constellation of medical problems including conductive hearing loss and, to a lesser degree, sensorineural hearing loss. As part of a health care team, audiologists must be sensitive to and aware of medical conditions prior to establishing intervention strategies. Medical conditions, by necessity, precede audiologic interventions and, therefore, a close working relationship among team members is critical. Yet, audiologic and communication interventions should be established at the earliest possible time for maximizing an individual's development potential. This article stresses the importance of a multidisciplinary team in the provision of services so that prevention of further disabilities, improved outcomes of medical interventions, and appropriate habilitative and educational planning may ensue.