Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Agric Saf Health ; 18(1): 5-9, 2012 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22458012

ABSTRACT

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) nasal colonization has been documented in swine and swine workers. MRSA has also been found in the shower facilities of conventional swine farms. We previously conducted a review of the literature to identify measures used to reduce MRSA prevalence in athletic facilities. In this study, we evaluated those measures for adaptability to the pork production environment. A best practices protocol was developed to reduce MRSA levels in pork production shower facilities and implemented in two conventional swine production systems.


Subject(s)
Food Microbiology , Meat/microbiology , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification , Occupational Exposure/prevention & control , Staphylococcal Infections/prevention & control , Agricultural Workers' Diseases/prevention & control , Animals , Humans , Illinois , Iowa , Meat-Packing Industry , Occupational Health , Swine , Toilet Facilities
2.
Foodborne Pathog Dis ; 2(3): 263-73, 2005.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16156707

ABSTRACT

Swine can harbor Salmonella in their gastrointestinal tracts. It has been estimated that up to 48% of the U.S. swine herd may carry Salmonella. Housing sows in farrowing stalls has become controversial due to animal welfare-based criticisms. An alternative production system is to keep sows outdoors on pasture with access to individual farrowing huts. This study was designed to determine the effects of two production systems on indicator bacteria and Salmonella of sows housed indoors in farrowing stalls (n = 52) compared to sows housed outdoors (n = 52) in English style huts. Each farrowing radial contained one wallow, from which mud (n = 290) and water (n = 290) samples were collected weekly. All samples were analyzed for generic E. coli, coliforms and Salmonella. No differences (p > 0.05) were detected in Salmonella, generic E. coli and coliform populations between indoor farrowing stalls and outdoor farrowing huts. However, all 8 outdoor wallows contained Salmonella spp. at some point during the study (n = 49 Salmonella isolates). Salmonella genotypes persisted within some wallows for >5 months, and genetically indistinguishable Salmonella isolates were found in multiple wallows. Salmonella isolated from outdoor sow feces were genetically indistinguishable by PFGE from Salmonella isolated from wallows (n = 33) throughout the study, indicating that pathogenic bacteria were cycling between swine and their environment. In conclusion, the role of wallows in disseminating Salmonella within an outdoor swine herd appears to be significant.


Subject(s)
Disease Reservoirs/veterinary , Environmental Microbiology , Housing, Animal , Salmonella Infections, Animal/epidemiology , Swine Diseases/epidemiology , Animal Husbandry/methods , Animals , Consumer Product Safety , Feces/microbiology , Female , Food Microbiology , Meat/microbiology , Phylogeny , Poaceae , Pregnancy , Prevalence , Salmonella/classification , Salmonella/genetics , Salmonella/isolation & purification , Salmonella Infections, Animal/transmission , Swine , Swine Diseases/transmission
3.
Am J Vet Res ; 62(12): 1876-80, 2001 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11763174

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To document shedding of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS) virus in mammary gland secretions of experimentally inoculated sows, to evaluate effects of vaccination during gestation on virus shedding during the subsequent lactation, and to evaluate shedding of PRRS virus in milk of sows in commercial herds. ANIMALS: 6 sows seronegative for PRRS virus were used for experiment 1, and 2 sows were retained for experiment 2. For experiment 3, 202 sows in commercial herds were used. PROCEDURE: In experiment 1, 2 sows were inoculated with PRRS virus, 2 sows were vaccinated with modified-live PRRS virus vaccine, and 2 sows served as control pigs. Mammary gland secretions were assayed for PRRS virus. In experiment 2, pregnant vaccinated sows from experiment 1 were vaccinated with another modified-live PRRS virus vaccine. Mammary gland secretions were assayed in the same manner as for experiment 1. For experiment 3, milk collected from 202 sows in commercial herds was assayed for PRRS virus. RESULTS: In experiment 1, PRRS virus was detected in mammary gland secretions of both vaccinated and 1 of 2 virus-inoculated sows. In experiment 2, virus was not detected in samples from either vaccinated sow. In experiment 3, all samples yielded negative results. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Naïve sows inoculated late in gestation shed PRRS virus in mammary secretions. Previous vaccination appeared to prevent shedding during the subsequent lactation. Results for samples obtained from sows in commercial herds suggested that virus shedding in mammary gland secretions of such sows is uncommon.


Subject(s)
Colostrum/virology , Milk/virology , Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome/virology , Porcine respiratory and reproductive syndrome virus/growth & development , Animals , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Biological Assay/veterinary , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/veterinary , Female , Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical/veterinary , Male , Mammary Glands, Animal/metabolism , Mammary Glands, Animal/virology , Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome/immunology , Porcine respiratory and reproductive syndrome virus/immunology , Pregnancy , Vaccination/veterinary , Viral Vaccines/immunology , Viral Vaccines/standards , Virus Shedding
4.
Viral Immunol ; 13(3): 383-97, 2000.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11016601

ABSTRACT

Immune components present in mammary secretions are reviewed. In swine, the histological structure of the placenta prevents in utero transfer of immunoglobulins and mammary secretions are the sole source of maternal antibody for the neonate. In addition to immunoglobulins, porcine mammary secretions contain significant numbers of maternal cells of various types that may contribute to neonatal immunity, including phagocytes (neutrophils and macrophages), lymphocytes (B and T cells), and epithelial cells. Immunomodulating and/or antimicrobial substances, including lactoferrin, lysozyme, lactoperoxidase, and cytokines, are also present in mammary secretions and may contribute to the protection of the neonate. While the role of immunoglobulins in mammary secretions is well understood, the contribution of cellular components and non-specific immune factors to neonatal immunity remains to be defined.


Subject(s)
Colostrum/immunology , Mammary Glands, Animal/immunology , Milk/immunology , Swine/immunology , Animals , Female , Immunity, Maternally-Acquired , Lymphocytes , Mammary Glands, Animal/metabolism , Milk/cytology , Phagocytes , Pregnancy , Vaccination
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...