Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Language
Publication year range
1.
Preprint in English | medRxiv | ID: ppmedrxiv-20045740

ABSTRACT

Initial cases of COVID-19 reported in Hong Kong were mostly imported from China. However, most cases reported in February 2020 were locally-acquired infections, indicating local community transmissions. We extracted the demographic, clinical and epidemiological data from 50 COVID-19 patients, who accounted for 53.8% of the cases in Hong Kong by February 2020. Whole-genome sequencing of the SARS-CoV-2 were conducted to determine the phylogenetic relatedness and transmission dynamics. Only three (6.0%) patients required ICU admission. Phylogenetic analysis identified six transmission clusters. All locally-acquired cases harboured a common mutation Orf3a G251V and were clustered in two subclades in global phylogeny of SARS-CoV-2. The estimated time to the most recent common ancestor of local COVID-2019 outbreak was December 24, 2019 with an evolutionary rate of 3.04x10-3 substitutions per site per year. The reproduction number value was 1.84. Social distancing and vigilant epidemiological control are crucial to the containment of COVID-19 transmission. Article summary linesA combined epidemiological and phylogenetic analysis of early COVID-19 outbreak in Hong Kong revealed that a SARS-CoV-2 variant with ORF3a G251V mutation accounted for all locally acquired cases, and that asymptomatic carriers could be a huge public health risk for COVID-19 control.

2.
Preprint in English | bioRxiv | ID: ppbiorxiv-993097

ABSTRACT

The World Health Organization has recently declared the ongoing outbreak of COVID-19, which is caused by a novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2, as pandemic. There is currently a lack of knowledge in the antibody response elicited from SARS-CoV-2 infection. One major immunological question is concerning the antigenic differences between SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV. We address this question by using plasma from patients infected by SARS-CoV-2 or SARS-CoV, and plasma obtained from infected or immunized mice. Our results show that while cross-reactivity in antibody binding to the spike protein is common, cross-neutralization of the live viruses is rare, indicating the presence of non-neutralizing antibody response to conserved epitopes in the spike. Whether these non-neutralizing antibody responses will lead to antibody-dependent disease enhancement needs to be addressed in the future. Overall, this study not only addresses a fundamental question regarding the antigenicity differences between SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV, but also has important implications in vaccine development.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...