[Hand infections]. / Infections de la main.

HAND INFECTIONS. Hand and finger infections are very common. They result from the inoculation of a germ through the skin barrier. They can range from simple paronychia to extremely serious necrotizing fasciitis. Certain infections, such as those resulting from bites, have their own specific characteristics, which will determine how they are managed. While management can be medical in the early stages, it is important not to ignore the need for surgical treatment, otherwise serious complications may arise, leading to functional and aesthetic sequelae. Delays in treatment cannot be made up. Any infectious lesion can be potentially serious and must be treated in an appropriate department if there is the slightest doubt.

INFECTIONS DE LA MAIN. Les infections de la main et des doigts sont très fréquentes. Elles résultent de l'inoculation d'un germe à travers la barrière cutanée. Elles vont du simple panaris à la gravissime fasciite nécrosante. Certaines infections, comme celles faisant suite aux morsures, ont des caractéristiques propres dont dépend la prise en charge. Si elle peut être médicale au stade initial, il est important de ne pas méconnaître le moment du traitement chirurgical sous peine de voir survenir des complications graves responsables de séquelles fonctionnelles et esthétiques. Le retard à la prise en charge ne peut être rattrapé. Toute lésion infectieuse peut être potentiellement grave et, au moindre doute, doit être prise en charge dans un service adapté.

[Severe and complex traumatic hand]. / Main traumatique grave et complexe.

SEVERE AND COMPLEX TRAUMATIC HAND . Serious and complex traumatic injuries of the hand are multiple tissue injuries (skin, vascular, bone and nerves), requiring urgent surgical management. They are responsible for significant functional and aesthetic sequelae. Their incidence is clearly decreasing thanks to information, prevention and security measures. The absolute emergencies are injections under pressure, amputations-devascularizations, and serious mutilations. The objective of the management is to make a functional and aesthetic hand: restoration of the opposition of the thumb with a key-pinch, a sufficient length thumb, and restoration of the sensitivity of the reconstructed hand. This calls for numerous surgical and microsurgical techniques and must be undertaken by trained teams in specialized centers.

MAIN TRAUMATIQUE GRAVE ET COMPLEXE. Les lésions traumatiques graves et complexes de la main sont des lésions tissulaires multiples (cutanées, vasculaires, osseuses et nerveuses), nécessitant une prise en charge chirurgicale urgente. Elles sont responsables de séquelles fonctionnelles et esthétiques importantes. Leur incidence est en nette diminution grâce aux mesures d'information, de prévention et de sécurité. Les principales urgences absolues sont les injections sous pression, les amputations-dévascularisations et les mutilations graves. L'objectif de la prise en charge de ces traumatismes est de rendre une main fonctionnelle et esthétique : restauration d'opposition du pouce, d'un pouce de longueur suffisante, d'une pince pollici-digitale termino-latérale, rétablissement de la sensibilité de la main reconstruite. Ceci fait appel à de nombreuses techniques chirurgicales et microchirurgicales et doit être entrepris par des équipes entraînées en centres spécialisés.

Comparison of clinical outcomes of three-corner arthrodesis and bicolumnar arthrodesis for advanced wrist osteoarthritis.

We retrospectively compared results of 27 wrists with bicolumnar arthrodesis with mean follow-up of 67 months to 28 wrists with three-corner arthrodesis adding triquetral excision with mean follow-up of 74 months in 54 patients (55 wrists). Minimal follow-up was 2 years for all patients. Capitolunate nonunion occurred in three wrists with bicolumnar arthrodesis and six wrists with three-corner arthrodesis, and radiolunate arthritis developed in four wrists with three-corner arthrodesis. Among patients with bicolumnar arthrodesis, hamatolunate arthritis occurred in seven wrists, all with a Viegas type II lunate; and pisotriquetral arthritis occurred in three wrists. At mean 5 years after surgery, 45 wrists had not needed revision surgery, and both groups had similar revision rates. The wrists with three-corner arthrodesis and bicolumnar arthrodesis had similar functional outcomes, and range of wrist motion was not significantly different between the two groups. We concluded that bicolumnar arthrodesis results in greater longevity than three-corner arthrodesis for a type I lunate. We do not recommend bicolumnar arthrodesis for type II lunate. We also concluded that three-corner arthrodesis has a greater incidence of radiolunate arthritis and capitolunate nonunion.Level of evidence: III.

Arthrodesis Versus Carpometacarpal Preservation in Key-Grip Procedures in Tetraplegic Patients: A Comparative Study of 40 Cases.

PURPOSE: Constructing a lateral key pinch (KP) is a universal aim of any functional upper limb surgery program for tetraplegia. Three stages are required: (1) activating the pinch mechanism by flexor pollicis longus tenodesis to the radius or by tendon transfer to the flexor pollicis longus, (2) simplifying the polyarticular chain, and (3) positioning the thumb column. We compared 2 techniques for accomplishing the latter stage, 1 utilizing arthrodesis of the carpometacarpal joint (CMC) and 1 that did not require arthrodesis of the CMC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed 40 cases of KP reconstruction at a mean follow-up of 7.4 years: 17 who had undergone CMC arthrodesis and 23 without CMC arthrodesis. In this group, an abductor pollicis longus tenodesis was necessary to properly position the thumb column in 17 patients. RESULTS: Active KP cases with CMC arthrodesis were significantly stronger than those without an arthrodesis. For passive KP cases, the difference between those cases with CMC arthrodesis and those without was not significant. Regarding opening, for active KP cases with CMC preservation alone, the mean distance between the thumb pulp and the index finger was 4.0 cm at rest and 5.8 cm when passively grasping large objects; for active KP cases without arthrodesis, these values were 3.4 and 6.8 cm, respectively, with the wrist in flexion. For passive KP cases, these values were 2.2 and 3.5 cm with CMC arthrodesis compared with 2.4 and 6.9 cm without arthrodesis. Overall, 23.5% of patients with CMC arthrodesis could not maintain contact between the thumb and the index finger compared with 30.4% without arthrodesis. CONCLUSIONS: Active KP is stronger with than without CMC arthrodesis; however, the KP reconstruction does not open as far when grasping large objects. For passive KP, CMC arthrodesis significantly limits passive opening, with no gain in strength. Neither technique is superior in terms of KP stability. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.

Nerve stress during reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a cadaveric study.

BACKGROUND: Neurologic lesions are relatively common after total shoulder arthroplasty. These injuries are mostly due to traction. We aimed to identify the arm manipulations and steps during reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) that affect nerve stress. METHODS: Stress was measured in 10 shoulders of 5 cadavers by use of a tensiometer on each nerve from the brachial plexus, with shoulders in different arm positions and during different surgical steps of RTSA. RESULTS: When we studied shoulder position without prostheses, relative to the neutral position, internal rotation increased stress on the radial and axillary nerves and external rotation increased stress on the musculocutaneous, median, and ulnar nerves. Extension was correlated with increase in stress on all nerves. Abduction was correlated with increase in stress for the radial nerve. We identified 2 high-risk steps during RTSA: humeral exposition, particularly when the shoulder was in a position of more extension, and glenoid exposition. The thickness of polyethylene humeral cups used was associated with increased nerve stress in all but the ulnar nerve. CONCLUSION: During humeral preparation, the surgeon must be careful to limit shoulder extension. Care must be taken during exposure of the glenoid. Extreme rotation and oversized implants should be avoided to minimize stretch-induced neuropathies.

Suprascapular Nerve Block Versus Interscalene Block as Analgesia After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A Randomized Controlled Noninferiority Trial.

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of suprascapular nerve block (SSB) and interscalene block (ISB) as postoperative analgesia within the first 24 hours after arthroscopic supraspinatus and/or infraspinatus tendon repair. METHODS: A single-blind, randomized controlled study was performed between 2013 and 2014. The inclusion criteria were arthroscopic supraspinatus and/or infraspinatus tendon repair confirmed intraoperatively, with or without associated procedures, and informed consent. The exclusion criteria were a previously operated shoulder, repair of the subscapularis tendon, and an allergy to local anesthetics. ISB was performed under ultrasound guidance by an anesthesiologist, whereas SSB was performed based on specific anatomic landmarks by a surgeon. The primary evaluation criterion was mean shoulder pain score during the first postoperative 24 hours assessed on a visual analog scale by the patient. The secondary criteria were complications of locoregional anesthesia, the use of analgesics in the recovery room (the first 2 hours) until postoperative day 7, and pain (visual analog scale) during the first week. Forty-four patients were needed for this noninferiority study. An institutional review board approved the study. RESULTS: Seventy-four patients were randomized, and 59 met the intraoperative inclusion criteria. Six patients were excluded (1 for pneumothorax after ISB, 1 for unsuccessful SSB, and 4 for incomplete questionnaires). None of the patients were lost to follow-up. There was no significant difference between the SSB and ISB groups in mean pain score for the first 24 hours (P = .92) or the first 7 days (P = .05). However, there was significantly less pain in the ISB group in the recovery room (P = .01). Consumption of analgesics was comparable between the groups, but the SSB group took significantly more morphine in the recovery room. CONCLUSIONS: In this prospective, randomized controlled study, SSB was as effective as ISB for mean pain control within the first 24 hours but ISB was more effective in relieving pain in the recovery room after arthroscopic supraspinatus and/or infraspinatus tendon repair. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I, therapeutic, randomized controlled study.

Combined Treatment of Wrist and Trapeziometacarpal Joint Arthritis.

Background Combined thumb basal and wrist joint arthritis (excluding scaphotrapeziotrapezoid arthritis) is rare considering the frequency of arthritis of either joint alone. Combined surgical treatment has never been described in the literature. Furthermore, the scaphoidectomy common to all interventions for Watson stage 2 or 3 wrist arthritis theoretically makes it impossible to perform a trapeziectomy for thumb basal joint arthritis. Question/Purpose The aim of this study was to present and analyze the results of two types of surgical treatment when both wrist and thumb arthritis was present. Materials and Methods Our retrospective series included 11 patients suffering from Eaton Stage III thumb basal joint arthritis and scapholunate advanced collapse (SLAC) II and III-type wrist arthritis. Five patients (group A) underwent trapeziectomy and palliative surgery for their wrist with conservation of the distal pole of the scaphoid (one proximal row carpectomy [PRC] and four four-corner fusions), and six (group B) patients had a trapeziometacarpal arthroplasty either with PRC (two cases) or four-corner arthrodesis (four cases) including total scaphoidectomy. Results The mean follow-up was 57 months. The overall visual analog scale (VAS) score for pain was 1.5 at rest, with no difference between the trapeziectomy and arthroplasty groups. The average Kapandji score was 9.3 (9 in group A and 9.5 in group B). The flexion/extension range of motion for the wrist was 64° following four-corner arthrodesis and 75° following PRC. Only one case of algodystrophy was observed. The radiological analysis revealed no complications. Discussion This study shows that thumb basal joint arthritis and SLAC type wrist arthritis may be treated by combined treatment during the same intervention without any complications. The results of palliative surgery for the wrist, either with trapeziectomy or with a trapeziometacarpal arthroplasty, are comparable. With a trapeziectomy, the distal pole of the scaphoid must be fused to the capitate to help stabilize the thumb column. Level of Evidence Level IV.

Universal Dorsal Approach of the Wrist.

The ideal dorsal wrist approach has to provide the best exposure while preserving sensitive dorsal nerve branches, dorsal veins, and skin integrity. Longitudinal incision is mostly used in the wrist surgery. Few anatomic or clinical studies have described transverse dorsal approach following Langer's lines. We present a universal transversal skin incision, the design of which meets the requirements of a dorsal wrist approach. It is adjustable with the radial and ulnar extension and respects Langer's lines, nerves, and veins. We conducted both an anatomic, clinical, and a retrospective study. For the anatomic part, we performed a cadaveric study on the wrist. For the clinical part of the study, we analyzed clinical results for 10 consecutive patients who underwent a universal dorsal wrist approach for various surgical procedures by the same surgeon. For the last part, we reviewed the patients operated during the past 5 years with this approach for different procedures in the wrist.

Radiocapitate congruency as a predictive factor for the results of proximal row carpectomy.

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether the congruency between the joint surfaces of the lunate fossa of the distal radius and the proximal capitate might be a prognostic factor for functional, clinical, or radiographic results after proximal row carpectomy (PRC). METHODS: After reconstructing the computed tomographic arthrogram of patients with PRC, we evaluated the shape of the proximal capitate by measuring the radius of curvature of the tip of the capitate. The congruency of the future radiocapitate joint was then evaluated by the radiocapitate index in the frontal and sagittal planes. This was calculated by dividing the radius of curvature of the tip of the capitate by the mean radius of curvature of the lunate fossa. We determined the relationship between these morphological results and the functional (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand [DASH] score, Mayo Wrist score, and pain relief), clinical (mobility and strength) and x-ray results (radiocapitate arthrosis). RESULTS: A total of 27 patients were reviewed at a mean follow-up of 59 months. The shape of the proximal capitate did not affect outcomes. In the frontal plane, a better radiocapitate congruency was significantly associated with an increase in wrist flexion and better functional results for the DASH. There was a non-significant relationship between congruency and improvement of Mayo Wrist score and pain relief. In the sagittal plane, the DASH score tended to improve when congruency was better. CONCLUSIONS: The shape of the capitate was not a prognostic factor for functional outcome after PRC. The radiocapitate index seems more relevant in predicting results at last follow-up. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic II.