Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 17 de 17
Filter
2.
Eur J Dent Educ ; 26(1): 36-44, 2022 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33527639

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Students experience difficulty working with indirect vision and often adopt inadequate working postures because of it. This study created and then assessed the effects of an indirect vision preclinical training programme on dental students' working posture. METHODS: The study enrolled students in the third year of the 5-year undergraduate programme in dentistry in the School of Dentistry of São Paulo State University (UNESP), Araraquara (N = 54). The programme consisted of four training sessions in which students performed different types of activities in which only a mirror was used to see the procedure they were performing. To evaluate posture, students were asked to perform class III cavity preparations (distal-palatal and mesial-palatal preparations) on upper central and lateral incisors in a dental mannequin (tooth numbers 11, 12, 21 and 22) both before and after the indirect vision training programme. Photographs were taken of the students' working postures. The photographs were assessed by a duly trained researcher using the Compliance Assessment of Dental Ergonomic Posture Requirements. A descriptive statistical analysis was performed, and the assumptions of normality were verified. Student's paired t test was also performed. The significance level adopted was 5%. RESULTS: A significant difference was found between the percentages of correct ergonomic postures adopted before and after the training programme (p = 0.039). CONCLUSIONS: The preclinical training programme for indirect vision was found to have a positive effect on the working postures of the students evaluated herein.


Subject(s)
Education, Dental , Students, Dental , Brazil , Dentistry , Ergonomics , Humans , Posture
3.
PLoS One ; 16(11): e0259524, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34735540

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the validity and reliability of the University Student Engagement Inventory (USEI) in its complete and reduced versions with Brazilian and USA students, and to evaluate the influence of gender and academic level on students' university engagement in both countries. METHODS: A cross-sectional observational study with a non-probability sample was conducted. The sample comprised dental students of both genders, 154 from a university in New York, USA (response rate 91.1%) and 459 from two universities in Brazil (response rate 79.1%). University engagement was measured using the USEI. The samples were characterized by gender and academic level. RESULTS: The refined reduced version of the USEI presented adequate fit to the samples from both countries. Gender was associated with the behavioral engagement factor of the USEI in Brazilian students. In the USA sample, gender was associated with the behavioral and cognitive engagement factors. There was a significant effect of academic level on behavioral and emotional engagement for the Brazilian and USA samples, respectively. CONCLUSION: The refined reduced USEI presented adequate psychometric qualities for the study samples.


Subject(s)
Emotions/physiology , Brazil , Cross-Sectional Studies , Educational Status , Female , Humans , Male , Reproducibility of Results , Surveys and Questionnaires , Universities
4.
PLoS One ; 16(11): e0259768, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34748614

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This study observed the effect of different magnification systems on dental students' real and perceived fine motor skills. METHODS: This was a laboratory-based experimental study. Students in the fifth year of an undergraduate dentistry program (N = 92) participated in this study. The dependent variables were real motor skills, perceived motor skills and time required to complete the fine motor skills test. The independent variable was the use of a magnification system under four conditions. For each condition, the Dental Manual Dexterity Assessment was performed, which consisted of inserting the #3195FF bur into targets positioned on a Styrofoam plate. The accuracy of each penetration of the targets was scored, using a point system with a maximum possible score of 246 points. Students' perceived fine motor skills were assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS) that ranged from zero for no skills to ten for maximum skills. A descriptive statistical analysis and the repeated measures ANOVA were performed (α = 0.05). RESULTS: The Galilean and Keplerian loupes were found to positively affect students' real fine motor skills (p<0.01); however, perceived fine motor skills and time were significantly better (p<0.01) under the naked eye. CONCLUSIONS: Dental students' real fine motor skills were better when Galilean and Keplerian loupes were used, but the perceived fine motor skills were not.


Subject(s)
Motor Skills , Students, Dental , Musculoskeletal Physiological Phenomena
5.
PeerJ ; 9: e11168, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33889444

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This study observed the effect of different magnification systems on working posture and neck angulation during cavity preparation procedures according to operator's experience. METHODS: This was a laboratory study. The response variables were the neck angulation and the working posture adopted during Class I cavity preparations (N = 640) that were performed under four conditions (unaided visualization, simple loupe, Galilean loupe and Keplerian loupe). Working postures were recorded and evaluated by the Compliance Assessment of Dental Ergonomic Posture Requirements (CADEP). The two-factor ANOVA and Games-Howell post-hoc test were performed (α = 0.05). RESULTS: For all treated teeth it was observed higher posture scores and lowest neck angulations while using the Galilean and Keplerian loupes (p < 0.01). No correlations were found between operator's experience and working posture (p = 0.71-0.88). CONCLUSION: It can be concluded that Galilean and Keplerian loupes helped operators to maintain an ergonomic posture and lower neck angulations for all teeth and the operator's experience provided better ergonomic posture for the mandibular teeth.

6.
Eur J Dent Educ ; 25(2): 305-309, 2021 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32976674

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The nature of the oral operating field makes it a challenge for dentists to work while maintaining musculoskeletal health. Strategies have been studied in recent years to improve visualisation of the operating field, and the use of magnification systems has been recommended for providing additional benefits. Despite the growing body of evidence suggesting that the use of magnification improves visual acuity, the dentist's posture and the quality of dental procedures, few studies have analysed users' perspectives on these devices in terms of their adaptation process. These types of studies are important because they provide insight into the reality of the adaptation process required by magnification systems so that adjustments and improvements can be made to adapt these systems to the users' reality. Thus, we sought to explore the perspectives held by second-year students in an undergraduate dental program on the use of dental loupes during pre-clinical laboratory activities. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 24 second-year dental students participated in semi-structured interviews exploring their perspectives of wearing dental loupes during their pre-clinical activities. Data collection and analysis were consistent with the qualitative content analysis methodology. All interview data were analysed using version 10 of the NVivo® analytical software. RESULTS: Participants described that magnification can lead to the improvement of their work postures, hand skills and quality of dental procedures. Nevertheless, they reported a need for an adaptation period and for adjustments to the technical features of the magnification system. CONCLUSION: The students had positive perspectives on the use of magnification in their dentistry training program, including improvements in posture, hand skills and procedure quality.


Subject(s)
Lenses , Students, Dental , Dentistry , Education, Dental , Humans , Posture
7.
Eur J Dent Educ ; 24(3): 425-432, 2020 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32080964

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of magnification on the quality of two pre-clinical procedures, class I cavity preparations and composite resin restorations, and to evaluate the working posture. METHODS: This was an experimental laboratory study. The response variables were the quality of cavity preparations and Class I restorations as well as the working posture adopted during the execution of these procedures. The independent variables were the magnification system under four levels (unaided visualisation, the use of a simple loupe, the use of a Galilean loupe and the use of a Keplerian loupe) and the artificial teeth treated. Class I cavity preparations and restorations (N = 320) were performed using standardised procedures, and the quality achieved was evaluated using pre-established criteria. Working posture was recorded using digital video cameras and was evaluated using the Compliance Assessment of Dental Ergonomic Posture Requirements (CADEP). A two-factor analysis of variance (ANOVA) and multiple comparison test were performed (α = 0.05). RESULTS: The quality of cavity preparation did not differ significantly amongst the different magnification systems (P = 0.082). Galilean and Keplerian systems had a positive impact on restoration quality only for the left mandibular first molar (P = 0.04). Higher posture scores were observed when Galilean and Keplerian loupes (P = 0.01) were used, regardless of the tooth being treated. CONCLUSION: The use of Galilean and Keplerian magnification lenses did not affect the quality of the pre-clinical procedures performed whilst improved the scores of ergonomic posture.


Subject(s)
Education, Dental , Lenses , Dental Care , Dental Cavity Preparation , Dental Restoration, Permanent , Ergonomics , Humans , Posture
8.
Microsc Res Tech ; 83(4): 393-401, 2020 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31868286

ABSTRACT

This study evaluates the bond strength of four self-etching adhesive systems with different acidity levels in normal and artificially hypermineralized dentin substrate. Healthy human molars were divided into groups: normal dentin-N (n = 36) and artificially hypermineralized dentin-H (n = 36). Self-etching adhesive systems Clearfil S3 Bond (n = 9), Optibond All in One (n = 9), Clearfil SE Bond (n = 9), and Adhese (n = 9) were used for both the N and H groups. Transparent cylindrical matrices were positioned on the treated dentin surfaces, filled with composite resin, and light-cured for 40 s. After the transparent cylindrical matrices were removed, the specimens were stored for 24 hr in a humid environment at 37°C and were subjected to a micro-shear bond strength test. For each group, a specimen was prepared and evaluated in scanning electron microscope for adhesive interface observation. Normality was confirmed and the two-way analysis of variance and Games-Howell post-tests were conducted (α = .05). The data demonstrated an interaction between the adhesive system and type of dentin substrate (p < .01). For normal dentin, all adhesive systems assessed were adequate; however, in the hypermineralized dentin, the Clearfil SE Bond two-step self-etching adhesive system with mild pH presented the highest immediate bond strength. There was a predominance of adhesive failures for all adhesive systems in the different dentin substrates evaluated. It was concluded that the self-etching adhesive systems evaluated were efficient for both substrates, and for the hypermineralized dentin, the Clearfil SE Bond presented a higher bond strength value.


Subject(s)
Acids , Dentin-Bonding Agents/pharmacology , Dentin/chemistry , Materials Testing/methods , Minerals/chemistry , Dentin/drug effects , Humans , Microscopy, Electron, Scanning , Molar/drug effects , Shear Strength , Stress, Mechanical , Tensile Strength
9.
Eur J Dent Educ ; 23(3): 373-377, 2019 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31038828

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine any correlations between difficulty in performing restorative procedures and the adoption of ergonomic posture by dental students in a preclinical course. METHODS: The sample was composed of second-year undergraduate students enrolled in the School of Dentistry of São Paulo State University (UNESP), Araraquara (n = 56). The data were collected from weekly records in which students who had participated in training in a preclinical restorative dentistry laboratory registered the difficulty they experienced performing given proposed preclinical procedures and adopting ergonomic posture (positioning of students' legs, thighs, spine, arms, and forearms, as well as the positioning of both the dental light and the dental mannequin's head, the distance between the operating field and the operator's eyes, and the location of the instruments used in the procedures). Answers were provided on a scale of zero to ten points (zero = no difficulty; 10 = maximum difficulty). A descriptive statistical analysis was performed. The correlation between the level of difficulty in performing the restorative procedures and in the adoption of ergonomic posture was estimated using the Pearson correlation coefficient (r), and its significance was tested using Student's t test. To evaluate the effect of time on students' perceived difficulties in implementing ergonomic posture, the first 2 weeks of training was defined as the initial time, whilst the last 2 weeks was defined as final time (scores from these periods were averaged). After the normality assumptions were verified, Student's t test for paired samples was performed. The significance level adopted was <5%. RESULTS: A correlation was found between the difficulty students experienced performing the preclinical procedures and their difficulties implementing ergonomic posture; the correlation was significant, though the correlation ranged from slight to moderate (P < 0.001; r = 0.38-0.63). In addition, the data also showed that the students' perceptions of how difficult it was to implement these posture items decreased significantly over time (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The correlation between perceived difficulty in performing the preclinical restorative dentistry procedures and the application of ergonomic posture was slight to moderate, and the students' perceived difficulties in maintaining ergonomic posture decreased over the course of the school year.


Subject(s)
Ergonomics , Students, Dental , Dental Care , Humans , Posture , Teaching Materials
10.
PLoS One ; 14(3): e0212793, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30917132

ABSTRACT

This study aimed to determine dental students' visual acuity and neck angulation when using magnification devices and distances from the operating field. Forty students from each of the second through fifth years of the five-year program at the School of Dentistry of Araraquara were selected (N = 160). Visual acuity was tested using a miniature Snellen eye chart under five different settings (naked eye; simple loupe; Galilean loupe; Keplerian loupe and an operating microscope). Photographs were taken during the visual acuity exam in order to evaluate the angulation of the subjects' necks in a neutral posture. The two-factor analysis of variance and the Games-Howell post-hoc test were performed (α = 0.05). A significant difference in visual acuity and neck angulation was found between the "magnification device" and "distance" factors in each of the graduating classes analyzed (p<0.05). At a standardized distance, the Keplerian loupe (535.93±133.69), the Galilean loupe (514.06±171.56), and the operating microscope (517.71±161.61) all provided greater visual acuity. At a subjectively comfortable distance, the Keplerian (521.35±157.99) and Galilean (515.00±156.32) loupes produced the best visual acuity. The angulation of the neck was greater when the simple loupes (56,59±10,88) and naked eye (56.51±13.55) were used at a subjectively comfortable distance. At both a standardized distance and a comfortable distance, the Galilean and Keplerian magnification systems provided the best visual acuity and the lowest angulation of the operator's neck. At a standardized distance of 30 cm to 40 cm, the operating microscopes produced similar results.


Subject(s)
Lenses , Microscopy , Students, Dental , Visual Acuity , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Pilot Projects
11.
Microsc Res Tech ; 81(10): 1087-1094, 2018 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30536668

ABSTRACT

This study presented a biosafety device for the hygienic storage of composite resin during restorative procedures in teaching clinics, RESTAURASAFE, and to compare the color stability, surface hardness, and degree of conversion of the composite resin made with the proposed device to those of conventionally made resins. Esthet-X HD composite was manipulated directly from the syringe, fractionated doses, dappen dish or RESTAURASAFE. Disc-shaped specimens were immersed in artificial saliva and coffee for 60 days and the color stability and the Vickers surface hardness were evaluated during 60 days. Degree of conversion was assessed after immersing specimens in saliva (baseline). The surface morphology analysis of composite resin has taken by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The data were evaluated statistically by repeated measures ANOVA (α=.05). No difference of color stability was observed for saliva and coffee regardless of storing devices. The resin manipulated directly from the syringe presented lower hardness, and fractionated doses presented lower degree of conversion than the RESTAURASAFE. SEM analysis showed that after artificial aging in coffee for 60 days, the specimens prepared with fractionated doses of resin displayed the fewest changes in surface morphology, followed by those prepared with the RESTAURASAFE. We conclude that RESTAURASAFE allows to obtain similar color stability, higher hardness, and degree of conversion of the composite in comparison to the other storing devices.


Subject(s)
Composite Resins/chemistry , Dental Restoration, Permanent/methods , Infection Control/methods , Materials Testing/methods , Resins, Plant/chemistry , Coffee/chemistry , Hardness/drug effects , Humans , Saliva/chemistry , Surface Properties
12.
Eur J Dent ; 12(4): 553-558, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30369802

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The main objective of this study is to assess the effect of the adhesive mode and chlorhexidine (CHX) on the microtensile strength of a universal bonding agent to sound and caries-affected dentins. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six intact third molars and six decayed third molars were sectioned to obtain two middle dentin specimens per tooth. Prime and Bond Elect Universal (Dentsply) was applied to specimens in two different modes: Etch-and-rinse (ER, phosphoric acid for 15s) and self-etch (SE, no phosphoric acid). 2% CHX (Cavity Cleanser, Bisco) was applied to both dentins for 30 s. Specimens were randomly assigned into eight groups (n = 3) according to the treatments applied to sound and caries-affected dentins: SE; ER; SE + CHX; and ER + CHX. All specimens were restored with TPH Spectra High Viscosity (Dentsply) composite resin and sectioned to obtain specimens of 0.8 ± 0.1 mm2. The microtensile bond strength test was conducted at 1 mm/min. The data were statistically analyzed by ANOVA and multiple comparisons' test (α = 0.05). RESULTS: There was no significant difference between sound dentin and caries-affected dentin (P = 0.132). The highest bond strength was obtained with the application of the ER (31.81MPa). SE + CHX promoted the lowest bond strength with no statistical difference to ER + CHX (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: ER mode for the universal bonding agent yielded the highest bond strength to sound and caries-affected dentins. CHX reduced the bond strength to both dentins regardless the application of phosphoric acid. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The universal bonding agent increased the bond strength to sound and caries-affected dentins when applied by the ER mode.

13.
J Educ Health Promot ; 7: 44, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29693025

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT: The ergonomic posture protocol is extremely important for the maintenance of occupational health in dentistry. The lack of compliance with this protocol results in a high risk of developing musculoskeletal disorders. AIMS: This study developed a direct observation method for the evaluation of dental student compliance with ergonomic posture protocol. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The method is named compliance assessment of dental ergonomic posture requirements (CADEP). During the development of the method, 14 items were elaborated considering the theory of dental ergonomics. Each item should be classified as appropriate, partially appropriate, or inappropriate. After evaluation, all item values should be added, and the final score expressed as the percent of compliance with correct postures, with a score range of 0%-100%. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: The reliability of CADEP was assessed through intra- and interobserver reproducibility. For the CADEP application, 73 senior year students from the undergraduate course in dentistry were evaluated. The intra- and interexaminer concordance was estimated using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ρ). A descriptive statistical analysis was performed. RESULTS: The reproducibility of evaluator 1 (ρ =0.90; confidence interval [CI] 95%: 0.83-0.94), evaluator 2 (ρ = 0.83; CI 95%: 0.70-0.90), the interexaminer in the first evaluation (ρ = 0.81; CI 95%:0.67-0.89), and in the second one (ρ = 0.76; CI 95%: 0.59-0.87) was classified as good. In the analysis of the compliance, it was verified that moderate compliance was the most prevalent among the evaluated students (65.6%, CI 95%: 60.3%-70.7%). CONCLUSIONS: CADEP was valid and reliable for the assessment of dentistry students' compliance regarding ergonomic posture requirements.

14.
J Dent Educ ; 82(1): 47-53, 2018 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29292325

ABSTRACT

The aims of this study were to adapt the Job Factors Questionnaire to the field of dentistry, evaluate its psychometric properties, evaluate dental students' perceptions of work/study risk factors for musculoskeletal disorders, and determine the influence of gender and academic level on those perceptions. All 580 students enrolled in two Brazilian dental schools in 2015 were invited to participate in the study. A three-factor structure (Repetitiveness, Work Posture, and External Factors) was tested through confirmatory factor analysis. Convergent validity was estimated using the average variance extracted (AVE), discriminant validity was based on the correlational analysis of the factors, and reliability was assessed. A causal model was created using structural equation modeling to evaluate the influence of gender and academic level on students' perceptions. A total of 480 students completed the questionnaire for an 83% response rate. The responding students' average age was 21.6 years (SD=2.98), and 74.8% were women. Higher scores were observed on the Work Posture factor items. The refined model presented proper fit to the studied sample. Convergent validity was compromised only for External Factors (AVE=0.47), and discriminant validity was compromised for Work Posture and External Factors (r2=0.69). Reliability was adequate. Academic level did not have a significant impact on the factors, but the women students exhibited greater perception. Overall, the adaptation resulted in a useful instrument for assessing perceptions of risk factors for musculoskeletal disorders. Gender was found to significantly influence all three factors, with women showing greater perception of the risk factors.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Dentistry , Musculoskeletal Diseases , Occupational Diseases , Self Report , Students, Dental , Brazil , Female , Humans , Male , Psychometrics , Risk Factors , Students, Dental/psychology , Young Adult
15.
Arch Environ Occup Health ; 73(4): 258-266, 2018 07 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28489519

ABSTRACT

This study aimed to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) scale in Brazilian and American dental students and assess the influence of demographic variables on disability in them. A cross-sectional observational study was conducted with a nonprobabilistic sample. The sample was composed of students of both genders from the School of Dentistry of Araraquara, State University of São Paulo (UNESP) (n = 288), and students from Stony Brook University, New York, NY, USA (n = 149). The disabilities of the upper limbs were estimated using the DASH scale. The samples were characterized by collecting information on gender, academic year, and sports and work activities. The refined bifactorial model presented goodness-of-fit indices for both countries. There was a significant effect of the variables gender and academic year for the Brazilian sample and the variable sports practices for the American sample. The refined bifactorial model was valid and reliable for the Brazilian and American populations. In this model, the removal of item 17 for the Brazilian sample and items 3, 13, and 23 for the American sample was necessary. Demographic variables such as gender, academic year, and sports practice contributed significantly to the level of disability in the study populations.


Subject(s)
Disability Evaluation , Musculoskeletal Diseases/diagnosis , Sports/statistics & numerical data , Students, Dental/statistics & numerical data , Work Capacity Evaluation , Brazil , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , New York , Reproducibility of Results , Sex Factors
16.
Med Lav ; 108(4): 314-323, 2017 08 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28853432

ABSTRACT

Work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WRMDs) interfere with workers' productivity and quality of life. Thus, early detection of disabilities caused by WRMDs is vital for preventing the aggravation of symptoms. Early detection aids and is aided by educational and preventive programs. WRMDs can be detected using the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) Scale. OBJECTIVES: The present study aimed to review the literature on the application of the DASH Scale through a consideration of the cultural adaptation process and an evaluation of the scale's psychometric properties. METHODS: The literature review was conducted using the terms "disabilities", "musculoskeletal disorders", "DASH" "questionnaire" and "upper limbs". RESULTS: Forty-eight articles were collected, and these included only articles available in English which contained the full version of the DASH Scale and which focused on the evaluation of its psychometric properties (n=25). CONCLUSION: Most of the studies partially evaluated the psychometric properties of the DASH instrument; however, these properties were typically evaluated using only a correlation analysis involving other instruments.


Subject(s)
Arm/physiopathology , Disability Evaluation , Hand/physiopathology , Shoulder/physiopathology , Humans
17.
J. res. dent ; 4(2): 31-36, mar.-apr2016.
Article in English | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1362959

ABSTRACT

Aim: This study aims to review the concepts and metalloproteinase activation mechanisms and cathepsin cysteine. Material and Methods: The literature review was conducted around the main keywords "cathepsin cysteine", "metalloproteinases", "dentin-adhesive interface" and "degradation". Results: Nineteen articles were collected and included only articles available in its entirety, on english. Conclusions: Many studies are still being conducted incorporating different substances that help by inhibiting the action of these enzymes, however, there is still no consensus on the best element to be used in restorative procedures.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...