Characterizing Refractive Errors, Near Accommodative and Vergence Anomalies and Symptoms in an Optometry Clinic.

Background: Refractive, accommodative and vergence parameters and associated anomalies cause symptoms of asthenopia. Patients consult eye care practitioners mainly due to symptoms they experience. To enhance targeted treatments from various anomalies, it is relevant to study symptoms with associating anomalies. Aim: To determine the frequencies of refractive error, accommodative and vergence anomalies, and their associations with symptoms in sample of Black South Africans. Method: This prospective, cross-sectional study comprised consecutive participants aged 10-40 years who attended the author's optometry practice in a Black population in South Africa. Visual acuity, refraction, accommodative and vergence tests were performed. Anomalies were classified as either single measure or syndromes based on the number of failed clinical signs. Results: Participants (n = 254) had mean age 22.6 ± 7.22 years. Ninety-four were male (37%) and 160 were female (63%). The frequencies of syndrome anomalies were accommodative insufficiency 17 [(6.6%) 95% CI 3.9-10.5%)], accommodative infacility 32 [(12.6%)] 8.7-17.3%] and convergence insufficiency 22 [(8.6%, 5.1-12.3%)]. Frequencies of coexisting anomalies were refractive error and accommodative 150 (60.0%), refractive error and vergence anomalies 136 (54.4%) and vergence and accommodative disorders 155 (62.0%). Most patients were symptomatic (70.9%). Headache was the most frequent symptom (41.1%). Conclusion: Accommodative anomalies were more frequent than refractive error and vergence anomalies. The high frequency of anomalies suggests a high uptake of optometric services for asthenopia. Accommodative anomalies were the most symptomatic. The study highlights the need for diagnosing visual symptoms and coexisting anomalies. Establishment of validated study protocols for all accommodative and vergence anomalies is recommended.

A review of paediatric vision screening protocols and guidelines.

Vision screening plays an important role in the early detection of children who have or probably are predisposed to have specific visual problems. The validity and reliability of the screening batteries in relation to the age group to be screened, and the person administering the test as well as the referral and follow-up criteria contribute to the overall outcome of the vision screening. Despite the long history of vision screening and significant improvement in the development of screening protocols, no agreement exists concerning the age at which children should be screened, the exact test batteries that should be included and who should conduct the screening. This review highlights some important aspects of the history of paediatric vision screening and available evidence in support of their use to detect visual conditions in children. It also examines some of the barriers against the development of paediatric vision screening models especially in low and medium income countries.

Visual problems: a review of prevalence studies on visual impairment in school-age children.

Childhood visual impairment (VI) have a significant impact on the educational achievement, career choices and social life of affected individual, and in children, is mainly due to either preventable or treatable causes. Reliable data on the prevalence and causes of VI in children will guide the development of a systematic vision screening program for its early detection and successful treatment of possible causes. The purpose of this literature review is to summarize the available data on prevalence and causes of VI in school-age children from various regions globally. A discussion on the major findings highlighting the definition criteria, classifications and limitations for further studies is also presented.

Vergence Profile and Prevalance of Non-Strabismic Vergence Anomalies Among School Children in Abia State, Nigeria.

PURPOSE: To determine the prevalence of non-strabismic vergence anomalies and their relationship with age, gender, and school level in children aged 10-16 years Method: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 537 children (255 male, 282 females; mean age 13.0 ± 2.0, years) selected from nine schools using stratified, cluster, and random sampling. The participants completed a Convergence Insufficiency Symptom Survey (CISS) and eye examinations, including the measurement of visual acuity, non-cycloplegic refraction, cover test, near point of convergence, fusional vergences, accommodative functions, and ocular health evaluation. All binocular tests were performed following the subjective refraction with the corrective lenses in place, if prescribed. RESULTS: The prevalence of low suspect, high suspect, and definite convergence insufficiency was 9.6%, 5.8%, and 4.1%, respectively. Other prevalence estimates included convergence excess (2.9%), fusional vergence dysfunction (2.6%), basic exophoria (1.7%), basic esophoria (2.8%), divergence insufficiency (0.8%), and divergence excess (0.6%). The prevalence of high suspect (p < 0.01) and definite (p < 0.01) convergence insufficiency was significantly higher in older than younger children, and as expected, in secondary more so than primary school children (p = 0.01). There was no statically significant association between gender and various vergence anomalies. CONCLUSION: The study showed that vergence anomalies are common vision conditions among Abia State school children. Given the importance of visual skills in learning and academic achievements, there is a need to develop screening and management strategies that will target those visual conditions to prevent educational and social progress being affected.