ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: To evaluate the utility of robot-assisted laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal repair (R-TAPP) of postprostatectomy inguinal hernia (PIH) in patients who underwent robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a prospective, single-centre retrospective cohort study. R-TAPP was conducted in 74 consecutive patients from September 2016 to March 2020. With the exception of women and patients who underwent previous abdominal surgery, 70 patients were classified into two groups based on the absence or presence of PIH. Their data were retrospectively compared to those who had not undergone RALP. RESULTS: The median operative time for the PIH group was longer compared to the non-PIH group. However, postoperative complications, including seroma formation, haematoma and surgical site infections, were not significantly different between the groups. The estimated blood loss was small, and hospitalisation duration was 1 day in all cases. Moreover, there were no hernia recurrences within the 90-day follow-up period in either group. CONCLUSION: R-TAPP is a feasible and safe approach for inguinal hernia repair, even in patients who undergo RALP for prostate cancer.
Subject(s)
Hernia, Inguinal , Laparoscopy , Robotics , Female , Hernia, Inguinal/etiology , Hernia, Inguinal/surgery , Humans , Laparoscopy/adverse effects , Male , Prospective Studies , Prostatectomy/adverse effects , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: This study investigated the prevalence of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in patients with hepatobiliary-pancreatic (HBP) cancer in a prospective nationwide survey. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred patients with HBP cancer (biliary tract cancer; n=70, hepatocellular carcinoma; n=20, and pancreatic cancer; n=10) who received chemotherapy for the first time were analyzed. Medical personnel were surveyed to examine the accuracy of their predicted frequency of CINV. RESULTS: The compliance rate with the Japanese guideline with highly emetogenic chemotherapy was 36/89 (40%). Although the prevalence of CINV in patients with HBP cancer was significantly lower than that of the total 1,910 patients with cancer, the prevalence of delayed CINV in patients with HBP cancer was as high as 28%. The survey results suggested that the medical staff tended to overestimate the incidence of CINV. CONCLUSION: CINV appears to be controlled under management according to the guidelines, but delayed nausea remains prevalent and requires further investigation.