Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
1.
PLoS One ; 18(10): e0291860, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37797039

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This study described the demographic characteristics, clinical presentation, treatment, and outcomes of solid organ transplant recipients who were admitted to our center for infection. It also determined factors associated with a poor outcome, and compares early and late period infections. METHODS: In this retrospective observational study, conducted at a tertiary care center in France between October 2017 and March 2019, infectious outcomes of patients with solid organ transplant where studied. RESULTS: A total of 104 patients were included with 158 hospitalizations for infection. Among these 104 patients, 71 (68%) were men. The median age was 59 years old. The most common symptoms on admission were fever (66%) and chills (31%). Lower respiratory tract infections were the most common diagnosis (71/158 hospitalizations). Urinary tract infections were frequently seen in kidney transplant recipients (25/60 hospitalizations). One or more infectious agents were isolated for 113 hospitalizations (72%): 70 bacteria, 36 viruses and 10 fungi, with predominance of gram-negative bacilli (53 cases) of which 13 were multidrug-resistant. The most frequently used antibiotics were third generation cephalosporins (40 cases), followed by piperacillin-tazobactam (26 cases). We note that 25 infections (16%) occurred during the first 6 months (early post-transplant period). Patients admitted during the early post-transplant period were more often on immunosuppressive treatment with prednisone (25/25 VS 106/133) (p = 0.01), mycophenolic acid (22/25 VS 86/133) (p = 0.03), presented for an urinary tract infection (10/25 VS 25/133) (p = 0.04) or a bacterial infection (17/25 VS 53/133) (p = 0.01). Patients with later infection had more comorbidities (57/83 VS 9/21) (p = 0.03), cancer (19/83 VS 0/21) (p = 0.04) or were on treatment with everolimus (46/133 VS 0/25) (p = 0.001). During 31 hospitalizations (20%), patients presented with a serious infection requiring intensive care (n = 26; 16%) or leading to death (n = 7; 4%). Bacteremia, pulmonary and cardiac complications were the main risk factors associated with poor outcome. CONCLUSION: Infections pose a significant challenge in the care of solid organ transplant patients, particularly those with comorbidities and intensive immunosuppression. This underscores the crucial importance of continuous surveillance and epidemiologic monitoring within this patient population.


Subject(s)
Bacterial Infections , Organ Transplantation , Urinary Tract Infections , Male , Humans , Adult , Middle Aged , Female , Paris , Retrospective Studies , Organ Transplantation/adverse effects , Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Urinary Tract Infections/drug therapy
2.
Int J Antimicrob Agents ; 61(3): 106736, 2023 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36690120

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of adults with uncomplicated streptococcal bacteremia who received either oral (PO) step-down or continued intravenous (IV) therapy. METHODS: This was a retrospective, single-center, cohort study, including adults admitted with Streptococcal bloodstream infection between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2020. Only patients with uncomplicated Streptococcal bloodstream infections were included. Patients who transitioned to PO therapy within 5 days from bacteremia onset were compared to patients receiving continued IV therapy. The primary outcome was clinical failure, defined by either 90-day hospital readmission or mortality. Secondary outcomes included hospital length of stay (LOS) and antibiotic-related adverse events (AAEs). RESULTS: Of the 264 patients included, 42% were transitioned to PO therapy. Group B Streptococcus (22.7%) was the most common isolate. The most common sources of infection were skin and soft tissue (35%) and pulmonary (25%). Intensive care unit (ICU) stay was more common in the continued IV therapy group (22.2%) than in the PO step-down group (5.4%). The frequency of clinical failure was similar in the IV and PO groups (24.2% vs. 18.0%, P=0.23). The IV group had longer hospital LOS (median, [interquartile range (IQR)]) compared with the PO group (7 [5-13.5] vs. 4 [3-5] days, P<0.001). The incidence of AAEs was similar in the IV and PO groups (1.3% vs. 1.8%, P=0.74). CONCLUSION: Oral antibiotic step-down therapy may be appropriate for the treatment of uncomplicated Streptococcal bacteremia, with consideration of factors such as patient comorbidities, type of infection, source control and clinical progress.


Subject(s)
Bacteremia , Sepsis , Streptococcal Infections , Adult , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Cohort Studies , Streptococcal Infections/drug therapy , Bacteremia/drug therapy , Sepsis/drug therapy , Anti-Bacterial Agents
3.
Infect Dis Clin North Am ; 36(3): 655-670, 2022 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36116841

ABSTRACT

Babesiosis is caused by intraerythrocytic parasites that are transmitted primarily by ticks, infrequently through blood transfusion, and rarely through transplacental transmission or organ transplantation. Human babesiosis is found throughout the world, but the incidence is highest in the Northeast and upper Midwestern United States. Babesiosis has clinical features that resemble malaria and can be fatal in immunocompromised and older patients. Diagnosis is confirmed by identification of Babesia parasites on blood smear or Babesia DNA with polymerase chain reaction. Standard treatment consists of atovaquone and azithromycin or clindamycin and quinine for 7 to 10 days.


Subject(s)
Babesiosis , Atovaquone/therapeutic use , Azithromycin/therapeutic use , Babesiosis/diagnosis , Babesiosis/drug therapy , Babesiosis/epidemiology , Clindamycin/therapeutic use , Humans , Quinine/therapeutic use
4.
J Infect Dev Ctries ; 15(6): 791-797, 2021 06 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34242188

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: We lack data on the epidemiology and management of brain abscesses in the Middle East. The aim of this study is to report a case series of brain abscesses admitted at a tertiary care center in Lebanon, between January 2008 and December 2018. METHODOLOGY: This retrospective study aimed at determining the demographic data, treatment, and correlations between different studied variables with prognosis of patients that received treatment. RESULTS: Forty-one patients (30 males) were included with a median age of 37 years (2-85). The analysis showed that the classic triad of fever, headache and neurologic deficit was only present in 12% of patients on admission. The source of infection was contiguous in 36.5%, post surgical in 32%, and distant in 17% of cases. Stereotactic biopsy was performed in 41.5% of patients, and craniotomy in 19.5%. A microorganism was isolated in 63% of patients (26 cases). The most used antibiotics were carbapenems (46%) and glycopeptides (66%). Eighty percent of patient (33) had a good outcome. A worse prognosis was significantly correlated with immunosuppression and multiple cerebral abscesses. CONCLUSIONS: Brain abscess remains a relatively rare condition.


Subject(s)
Brain Abscess/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Brain Abscess/therapy , Child , Child, Preschool , Craniotomy , Demography , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Lebanon/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Tertiary Care Centers , Young Adult
5.
J Infect Public Health ; 14(5): 570-576, 2021 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33848886

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To report available information in the literature regarding frequency, indications, types of antibiotic usage, duration, and their efficacy in Covid-19 infected patients. METHODS: The search was conducted on April 30 and May 7, 2020, using Ovid database and Google search. Patients' characteristics, clinical outcomes, as well as selected characteristics regarding antibiotic use (indication, class used, rates and types of bacterial secondary and co-infection, and duration of treatment) were analyzed. RESULTS: Nineteen clinical studies reporting data from 2834 patients were included. Mean rate of antibiotic use was 74.0 % of cases. Half the studies reported occurrence of a bacterial co-infection or complication (10 studies). Amongst the latter, at least 17.6 % of patients who received antibiotics had secondary infections. Pooled data of 4 studies show that half of patients receiving antibiotics were not severe nor critical. Detailed data on antibiotic use lack in most articles. CONCLUSIONS: The present review found a major use of antibiotics amongst Covid-19 hospitalized patients, mainly in an empirical setting. There is no proven efficacy of this practice. Further research to determine relevant indications for antibiotic use in Covid-19 patients is critical in view of the significant mortality associated with secondary infections in these patients, and the rising antimicrobial resistance.


Subject(s)
Bacterial Infections , COVID-19 , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Bacterial Infections/epidemiology , Humans , SARS-CoV-2
6.
J Infect Dev Ctries ; 14(12): 1461-1465, 2020 12 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33378291

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The objectives of the present study were to investigate epidemiology, correlations, severity, and therapeutic response of Clostridioides difficile infections in a Lebanese tertiary care hospital. METHODOLOGY: In this retrospective cohort study, patients having at least one positive Clostridioides difficile test (antigen glutamate dehydrogenase/GDH with toxins, or PCR) were studied. RESULTS: Among 58 patients, 20 (34.5%) and 53 (91.4%) had positive antigen GDH and toxins, respectively. PCR was performed in 25 (43.1%) patients without any positive ribotype 027. Fifteen (25.9%) patients were immunocompromised, 35 (60.3%) patients received antibiotics prior to the infection and 34 (58.6%) on proton pump inhibitors. Fifty-four (93%) patients had a resolution of their symptoms after a mean period of 4.2 days of treatment. Twenty-two (38%) participants were treated with oral vancomycin, 11 (19%) with intravenous metronidazole and 23 (39.6%) with both antibiotics. Resolution of symptoms was significantly more rapid with monotherapy (p = 0.007) with no significant difference between vancomycin and metronidazole (p = 0.413). A positive correlation was found between ATLAS score and delay to symptoms resolution (r = 0.553; p < 0.001; N = 54), as well as between ATLAS score and prevalence of complications (p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: History of treatment with antibiotics, proton pump inhibitors, and hospital admission during the previous year were prevalent among our patient cohort. Rates of symptomatic resolution were similar with monotherapy and dual therapy.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Clostridioides/drug effects , Clostridium Infections/drug therapy , Clostridium Infections/epidemiology , Severity of Illness Index , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Clostridioides/genetics , Enterocolitis, Pseudomembranous/drug therapy , Enterocolitis, Pseudomembranous/epidemiology , Enterocolitis, Pseudomembranous/microbiology , Female , Humans , Lebanon/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Tertiary Care Centers/statistics & numerical data , Treatment Outcome
7.
Eur J Case Rep Intern Med ; 7(10): 001922, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33083371

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The coronavirus disease COVID-19 is considered a pandemic disease that has developed rapidly all over the world. As of today, it is unclear whether immunosuppression confers an increased risk for pulmonary complications, or conversely, whether it can be a protective factor with respect to a cytokine storm. CASE DESCRIPTION: We report the case of a 55-year-old male patient with granulomatosis with polyangiitis treated with rituximab who was infected with COVID-19 pneumonia. To the best of our knowledge, only 1 case has been reported in the literature with similar characteristics. The patient had a non-classic evolution of clinical symptoms with persistent fever and viral shedding, in addition to a negative serology. CONCLUSION: This case emphasizes the management and immunity response to COVID-19 pneumonia in such patients. Data are still needed regarding patients who have prolonged B-cell depletion, which may put the patient at a higher risk for reinfection. LEARNING POINTS: Demonstration of the immunity response to COVID-19 pneumonia in an immunosuppressed patient.To highlight the management and evolution of such rare cases during this pandemic.

8.
IDCases ; 19: e00729, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32140412

ABSTRACT

Escherichia coli is a rare cause of endocarditis. This article reports an 82-year-old male with a mechanical aortic valve replacement who was admitted for fever and fatigue. He was diagnosed with a tricuspid valve endocarditis caused by an extended spectrum beta lactamase producing Escherichia coli following positive blood cultures and echocardiography. He received six weeks of imipenem / cilastatin and subsequently improved and was discharged with ambulatory follow ups with his infectious disease specialist.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...