Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Publication year range
1.
Ann Pathol ; 40(4): 324-328, 2020 Jul.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32001033

ABSTRACT

We report the case of a 13-year-old young lady with a one year reccuring bullous dermatitis history for which the diagnostic hypothesis of dermatitis arterfacta was made. This hypothesis was made by the pathologist, without it being suggested by the dermatologist, after observing singular histological lesions coresponding to a cutaneous blister associated with epidermic necrosis with multinucleated keratinocytes. When dermatitis artefacta is suspected, a biopsy is usually conducted to rule out differential diagnosis such as auto-immmune dermatitis when there is a blister. Confession from patients is rarely obtained. Therefore, having positive histogical clues for dermatitis artefacta would be of a great use to help making the diagnosis in difficult cases.


Subject(s)
Skin Diseases, Vesiculobullous/diagnosis , Adolescent , Biopsy , Dermatitis/diagnosis , Dermatitis/pathology , Diagnosis, Differential , Female , Humans , Keratinocytes/pathology , Skin Diseases, Vesiculobullous/pathology
2.
Presse Med ; 42(12): e409-15, 2013 Dec.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24210641

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Dermatologists, both as hospital and as resident practitioners, are often requested to see emergencies of their discipline, although appointment planning are already fully booked months in advance. Orleans Regional Hospital (ORH) has opened a department of dermatological emergency consultation to try to help with this issue. A prospective, descriptive and consecutive study on patient characteristics was conducted during its first year operating. METHOD: In September 2011, we opened a department of dermatological emergency consultation. Reception is skin disorders evaluated by physicians or nurses as "emergencies", according to predefined criteria. Follow-up visits are performed in the afternoon. RESULTS: Within one year, 2209 medical visits were conducted, with an average of 8,7 emergency visits per day. The maximum numbers of patients treated by our dermatological emergency unit in one single morning was 19. Mondays were the busiest day of the week. The average age of a patient attending the department was 33 years, with 29% of pediatric patients (under 15 years old). The majority of patients presented spontaneously (43%), or were referred by general practitioners (25%). Adult and pediatric emergency departments sent 8% of patients. The two main reasons for consultation were rash (48%) and pruritus (16%). Diagnoses observed were mainly infections (24%) and eczema (14%). Scabies accounted for 9% of all diagnoses. In the aftermath of an emergency dermatological consultation, 84 patients were hospitalized, including 74 in the dermatology department of Orleans hospital totalling 505 days of hospitalization. CONCLUSION: The value of a dermatological emergency consultation is well demonstrated in areas where more medical services are available (such as cities with University hospitals available). It is even more justified in areas with a deficit of healthcare service availability such as Central France.


Subject(s)
Dermatology/organization & administration , Emergencies , Hospital Departments/organization & administration , Referral and Consultation , Skin Diseases/diagnosis , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , France/epidemiology , Health Services Accessibility , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Middle Aged , Skin Diseases/therapy , Workforce , Young Adult
3.
Ann Pathol ; 33(4): 273-7, 2013 Aug.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23954123

ABSTRACT

Cutaneous lymphoid hyperplasia (pseudolymphoma) on tattoo is rare. The diagnosis is histological. We report a case of cutaneous lymphoid hyperplasia within the red ink of a tattoo found on a 35-year-old man presenting multiple infiltrated nodules confined to the red areas of his tattoo, which he had done 2 months ago. The pathological examination showed a diffuse lympho-histiocytic dermo-hypodermal infiltrate, associated with a lichenoid reaction. Immunohistochemistry displayed T-cell infiltration (CD3+, CD5+, CD8+). The treatment is difficult, knowing that the spontaneous regression seems possible, and the progression into a lymphoma is exceptional in the case of a chronic evolution over a number of years.


Subject(s)
Coloring Agents/adverse effects , Lichenoid Eruptions/chemically induced , Pseudolymphoma/chemically induced , Tattooing , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/therapeutic use , Adult , Biopsy , Diagnosis, Differential , Drug Eruptions/diagnosis , Drug Eruptions/etiology , Drug Eruptions/pathology , Gene Rearrangement, T-Lymphocyte , Humans , Hydroxychloroquine/therapeutic use , Lichenoid Eruptions/diagnosis , Lichenoid Eruptions/drug therapy , Lichenoid Eruptions/pathology , Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin/diagnosis , Male , Pseudolymphoma/diagnosis , Pseudolymphoma/drug therapy , Pseudolymphoma/pathology , Skin Neoplasms/diagnosis , T-Lymphocytes/pathology , Treatment Failure
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...