Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 13 de 13
Filter
Add more filters










Publication year range
1.
bioRxiv ; 2024 Jun 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38826245

ABSTRACT

Purpose: To develop multichannel transmit and receive arrays towards capturing the ultimate-intrinsic-SNR (uiSNR) at 10.5 Tesla (T) and to demonstrate the feasibility and potential of whole-brain, high-resolution human brain imaging at this high field strength. Methods: A dual row 16-channel self-decoupled transmit (Tx) array was converted to a 16Tx/Rx transceiver using custom transmit/receive switches. A 64-channel receive-only (64Rx) array was built to fit into the 16Tx/Rx array. Electromagnetic modeling and experiments were employed to define safe operation limits of the resulting 16Tx/80Rx array and obtain FDA approval for human use. Results: The 64Rx array alone captured approximately 50% of the central uiSNR at 10.5T while the identical 7T 64Rx array captured ∼76% of uiSNR at this lower field strength. The 16Tx/80Rx configuration brought the fraction of uiSNR captured at 10.5T to levels comparable to the performance of the 64Rx array at 7T. SNR data obtained at the two field strengths with these arrays displayed dependent increases over a large central region. Whole-brain high resolution T 2 * and T 1 weighted anatomical and gradient-recalled echo EPI BOLD fMRI images were obtained at 10.5T for the first time with such an advanced array, illustrating the promise of >10T fields in studying the human brain. Conclusion: We demonstrated the ability to approach the uiSNR at 10.5T over the human brain with a novel, high channel count array, achieving large SNR gains over 7T, currently the most commonly employed ultrahigh field platform, and demonstrate high resolution and high contrast anatomical and functional imaging at 10.5T.

3.
Magn Reson Med ; 2024 Apr 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38649922

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: We examined magnetic field dependent SNR gains and ability to capture them with multichannel receive arrays for human head imaging in going from 7 T, the most commonly used ultrahigh magnetic field (UHF) platform at the present, to 10.5 T, which represents the emerging new frontier of >10 T in UHFs. METHODS: Electromagnetic (EM) models of 31-channel and 63-channel multichannel arrays built for 10.5 T were developed for 10.5 T and 7 T simulations. A 7 T version of the 63-channel array with an identical coil layout was also built. Array performance was evaluated in the EM model using a phantom mimicking the size and electrical properties of the human head and a digital human head model. Experimental data was obtained at 7 T and 10.5 T with the 63-channel array. Ultimate intrinsic SNR (uiSNR) was calculated for the two field strengths using a voxelized cloud of dipoles enclosing the phantom or the digital human head model as a reference to assess the performance of the two arrays and field depended SNR gains. RESULTS: uiSNR calculations in both the phantom and the digital human head model demonstrated SNR gains at 10.5 T relative to 7 T of 2.6 centrally, ˜2 at the location corresponding to the edge of the brain, ˜1.4 at the periphery. The EM models demonstrated that, centrally, both arrays captured ˜90% of the uiSNR at 7 T, but only ˜65% at 10.5 T, leading only to ˜2-fold gain in array SNR in going from 7 to 10.5 T. This trend was also observed experimentally with the 63-channel array capturing a larger fraction of the uiSNR at 7 T compared to 10.5 T, although the percentage of uiSNR captured were slightly lower at both field strengths compared to EM simulation results. CONCLUSIONS: Major uiSNR gains are predicted for human head imaging in going from 7 T to 10.5 T, ranging from ˜2-fold at locations corresponding to the edge of the brain to 2.6-fold at the center, corresponding to approximately quadratic increase with the magnetic field. Realistic 31- and 63-channel receive arrays, however, approach the central uiSNR at 7 T, but fail to do so at 10.5 T, suggesting that more coils and/or different type of coils will be needed at 10.5 T and higher magnetic fields.

5.
IEEE Trans Med Imaging ; 42(9): 2643-2652, 2023 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37030782

ABSTRACT

For human brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), high channel count ( ≥ 32 ) radiofrequency receiver coil arrays are utilized to achieve maximum signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and to accelerate parallel imaging techniques. With ultra-high field (UHF) MRI at 7 tesla (T) and higher, dipole antenna arrays have been shown to generate high SNR in the deep regions of the brain, however the array elements exhibit increased electromagnetic coupling with one another, making array construction more difficult with the increasing number of elements. Compared to a classical dipole antenna array, a sleeve antenna array incorporates the coaxial ground into the feed-point, resulting in a modified asymmetric antenna structure with improved intra-element decoupling. Here, we extended our previous 16-channel sleeve transceiver work and developed a 32-channel azimuthally arranged sleeve antenna receive-only array for 10.5 T human brain imaging. We experimentally compared the achievable SNR of the sleeve antenna array at 10.5 T to a more traditional 32-channel loop array bult onto a human head-shaped former. The results obtained with a head shaped phantom clearly demonstrated that peripheral intrinsic SNR can be significantly improved compared to a loop array with the same number of elements- except for the superior part of the phantom where sleeve antenna elements are not located.


Subject(s)
Brain , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Brain/diagnostic imaging , Head/diagnostic imaging , Radio Waves , Phantoms, Imaging , Signal-To-Noise Ratio , Equipment Design
7.
IEEE Antennas Wirel Propag Lett ; 21(9): 1857-1861, 2022 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37020750

ABSTRACT

In this letter, we evaluate antenna designs for ultra-high frequency and field (UHF) human brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 10.5 tesla (T). Although MRI at such UHF is expected to provide major signal-to-noise gains, the frequency of interest, 447 MHz, presents us with challenges regarding improved B1 + efficiency, image homogeneity, specific absorption rate (SAR), and antenna element decoupling for array configurations. To address these challenges, we propose the use of both monopole and dipole antennas in a novel hybrid configuration, which we refer to as a mono-dipole hybrid antenna (MDH) array. Compared to an 8-channel dipole antenna array of the same dimensions, the 8-channel MDH array showed an improvement in decoupling between adjacent array channels, as well as ~18% higher B1 + and SAR efficiency near the central region of the phantom based on simulation and experiment. However, the performances of the MDH and dipole antenna arrays were overall similar when evaluating a human model in terms of peak B1 + efficiency, 10 g SAR, and SAR efficiency. Finally, the concept of an MDH array showed an advantage in improved decoupling, SAR, and B1 + near the superior region of the brain for human brain imaging.

8.
Sensors (Basel) ; 21(21)2021 Oct 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34770558

ABSTRACT

For ultra-high field and frequency (UHF) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), the associated short wavelengths in biological tissues leads to penetration and homogeneity issues at 10.5 tesla (T) and require antenna transmit arrays for efficiently generated 447 MHz B1+ fields (defined as the transmit radiofrequency (RF) magnetic field generated by RF coils). Previously, we evaluated a 16-channel combined loop + dipole antenna (LD) 10.5 T head array. While the LD array configuration did not achieve the desired B1+ efficiency, it showed an improvement of the specific absorption rate (SAR) efficiency compared to the separate 8-channel loop and separate 8-channel dipole antenna arrays at 10.5 T. Here we compare a 16-channel dipole antenna array with a 16-channel LD array of the same dimensions to evaluate B1+ efficiency, 10 g SAR, and SAR efficiency. The 16-channel dipole antenna array achieved a 24% increase in B1+ efficiency in the electromagnetic simulation and MR experiment compared to the LD array, as measured in the central region of a phantom. Based on the simulation results with a human model, we estimate that a 16-channel dipole antenna array for human brain imaging can increase B1+ efficiency by 15% with similar SAR efficiency compared to a 16-channel LD head array.


Subject(s)
Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Radio Waves , Brain/diagnostic imaging , Equipment Design , Humans , Phantoms, Imaging
9.
Sensors (Basel) ; 21(18)2021 Sep 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34577210

ABSTRACT

For human head magnetic resonance imaging at 10.5 tesla (T), we built an 8-channel transceiver dipole antenna array and evaluated the influence of coaxial feed cables. The influence of coaxial feed cables was evaluated in simulation and compared against a physically constructed array in terms of transmit magnetic field (B1+) and specific absorption rate (SAR) efficiency. A substantial drop (23.1% in simulation and 20.7% in experiment) in B1+ efficiency was observed with a tight coaxial feed cable setup. For the investigation of the feed location, the center-fed dipole antenna array was compared to two 8-channel end-fed arrays: monopole and sleeve antenna arrays. The simulation results with a phantom indicate that these arrays achieved ~24% higher SAR efficiency compared to the dipole antenna array. For a human head model, we observed 30.8% lower SAR efficiency with the 8-channel monopole antenna array compared to the phantom. Importantly, our simulation with the human model indicates that the sleeve antenna arrays can achieve 23.8% and 21% higher SAR efficiency compared to the dipole and monopole antenna arrays, respectively. Finally, we obtained high-resolution human cadaver images at 10.5 T with the 8-channel sleeve antenna array.


Subject(s)
Head , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Computer Simulation , Equipment Design , Head/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Phantoms, Imaging
10.
IEEE Trans Med Imaging ; 40(4): 1147-1156, 2021 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33360987

ABSTRACT

Multi-element transmit arrays with low peak 10 g specific absorption rate (SAR) and high SAR efficiency (defined as ( [Formula: see text]SAR [Formula: see text] are essential for ultra-high field (UHF) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) applications. Recently, the adaptation of dipole antennas used as MRI coil elements in multi-channel arrays has provided the community with a technological solution capable of producing uniform images and low SAR efficiency at these high field strengths. However, human head-sized arrays consisting of dipole elements have a practical limitation to the number of channels that can be used due to radiofrequency (RF) coupling between the antenna elements, as well as, the coaxial cables necessary to connect them. Here we suggest an asymmetric sleeve antenna as an alternative to the dipole antenna. When used in an array as MRI coil elements, the asymmetric sleeve antenna can generate reduced peak 10 g SAR and improved SAR efficiency. To demonstrate the advantages of an array consisting of our suggested design, we compared various performance metrics produced by 16-channel arrays of asymmetric sleeve antennas and dipole antennas with the same dimensions. Comparison data were produced on a phantom in electromagnetic (EM) simulations and verified with experiments at 10.5 Tesla (T). The results produced by the 16-channel asymmetric sleeve antenna array demonstrated 28 % lower peak 10 g SAR and 18.6 % higher SAR efficiency when compared to the 16-channel dipole antenna array.


Subject(s)
Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Radio Waves , Benchmarking , Equipment Design , Humans , Phantoms, Imaging
11.
Magn Reson Med ; 84(4): 1947-1960, 2020 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32187742

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Simultaneous multislab (SMSb) 4D flow MRI was developed and implemented at 7T for accelerated acquisition of the 3D blood velocity vector field in both carotid bifurcations. METHODS: SMSb was applied to 4D flow to acquire blood velocities in both carotid bifurcations in sagittal orientation using a local transmit/receive coil at 7T. B1+ transmit efficiency was optimized by B1+ shimming. SMSb 4D flow was obtained in 8 healthy subjects in single-band (SB) and multiband (MB) fashion. Additionally, MB data were retrospectively undersampled to simulate GRAPPA R = 2 (MB2_GRAPPA2), and both SB datasets were added to form an artificial MB dataset (SumSB). The band separation performance was quantified by signal leakage. Peak velocity and total flow values were calculated and compared to SB via intraclass correlation analysis (ICC). RESULTS: Clean slab separation was achieved yielding a mean signal leakage of 13% above the mean SB noise level. Mean total flow for MB2, SumSB, and MB_GRAPPA2 deviated less than 9% from the SB values. Peak velocities averaged over all vessels and subjects were 0.48 ± 0.11 m/s for SB, 0.47 ± 0.12 m/s for SumSB, 0.50 ± 0.13 m/s for MB2, and 0.53 ± 0.13 m/s for MB2_GRAPPA2. ICC revealed excellent absolute agreement and consistency of total flow for all methods compared to SB2. Peak velocity showed good to excellent agreement and consistency for SumSB and MB2 and MB2_GRAPPA2 method showed poor to excellent agreement and good to excellent consistency. CONCLUSION: Simultaneous multislab 4D Flow MRI allows accurate quantification of total flow and peak velocity while reducing scan times.


Subject(s)
Magnetic Resonance Angiography , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Blood Flow Velocity , Carotid Arteries/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Imaging, Three-Dimensional , Reproducibility of Results , Retrospective Studies
12.
IEEE Access ; 8: 203555-203563, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33747679

ABSTRACT

We evaluated a 16-channel loop + dipole (LD) transceiver antenna array with improved specific absorption rate (SAR) efficiency for 10.5 Tesla (T) human head imaging apsplications. Three different array designs with equal inner dimensions were considered: an 8-channel dipole antenna, an 8-channel loop, and a 16-channel LD antenna arrays. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and B1 + efficiency (in units of µT per √W) were simulated and measured in 10.5 T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) experiments. For the safety validation, 10 g SAR and SAR efficiency (defined as the B1 + over √ (peak 10 g SAR)) were calculated through simulation. Finally, high resolution porcine brain images were acquired with the 16-channel LD antenna array, including a fast turbo-spin echo (TSE) sequence incorporating B1 shimming techniques. Both the simulation and experiments demonstrated that the combined 16-channel LD antenna array showed similar B1 + efficiency compared to the 8-channel dipole antenna and the 8-channel loop arrays in a circular polarized (CP) mode. In a central 2 mm × 2 mm region of the phantom, however, the 16-channel LD antenna array showed an improvement in peak 10 g SAR of 27.5 % and 32.5 % over the 8-channel dipole antenna and the 8-channel loop arrays, respectively. We conclude that the proposed 16-channel head LD antenna array design is capable of achieving ~7% higher SAR efficiency at 10.5 T compared to either the 8-channel loop-only or the 8-channel dipole-only antenna arrays of the same dimensions.

13.
Magn Reson Med ; 59(4): 936-8, 2008 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18383292

ABSTRACT

This work investigates probe construction materials for their signal contribution to ultrashort echo time spectroscopy and imaging. (1)H, (13)C, and (31)P spectra were obtained at a field strength of 9.4 T for 16 materials considered for use in probe and holder design and construction. Four of the materials were found to be suited for the construction of NMR probes, housing of RF coils, and holders for in vivo experiments.


Subject(s)
Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy/instrumentation , Magnetics/instrumentation , Specimen Handling/instrumentation , Transducers , Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy/methods , Materials Testing , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity , Specimen Handling/methods
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...