ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Pneumomediastinum is a rare complication of COVID-19 pneumonia, which may or may not be associated with invasive ventilatory support. Therefore, the report and findings associated with its evolution can be of great contribution in the management of this unknown disease. CASE PRESENTATION: Here, we present a series of four patients with severe pneumomediastinum requiring intensive care unit. These patients developed pneumomediastinum before or during orotracheal intubation (OTI) or without OTI. The four patients were three men and one woman with a mean age of 60.5 years (48-74 years). No patients had a known history of lung disease or traumatic events, except for one patient who had a history of smoking, but who was without parenchymal disease. All intubations were performed without complications. No cases of pneumomediastinum occurred after tracheostomy, and none of the patients had tomographic or bronchoscopic evidence of tracheal injury. Although the pneumomediastinum observed in our cases was apparently not related to a violation of the aerodigestive track, this complication was associated with a worse prognosis. CONCLUSION: Pneumomediastinum is a rare complication of COVID-19 pneumonia, and the most likely etiopathogenesis is severe pulmonary involvement, which may or may not be associated with invasive ventilatory support. Future studies with a greater number of cases should elucidate the relationship of pneumomediastinum to a probable prognostic factor.
Subject(s)
COVID-19/complications , Mediastinal Emphysema/etiology , Mediastinal Emphysema/therapy , Aged , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , COVID-19/therapy , Female , Humans , Male , Mediastinal Emphysema/diagnostic imaging , Middle Aged , Respiration, Artificial , Tomography, X-Ray ComputedABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of 2 bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) strains, BCG-Tice and BCG-Moreau, in the treatment of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed clinical data from patients treated with BCG for NMIBC at 3 academic centers. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW)-adjusted Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were used to compare recurrence-free (RFS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of patients in the 2 treatment groups. In addition, we performed exploratory analyses of treatment effect according to the receipt of adequate BCG treatment, high-risk disease, age, gender, smoking status, pathologic stage, and pathologic grade. RESULTS: A total of 321 (48.6%) patients were treated with BCG-Tice and 339 (51.4%) with BCG-Moreau. IPTW-adjusted Cox proportional hazard regression analysis did not show a difference in RFS (hazard ratio, 0.88; 95% confidence interval, 0.56-1.38; P = .58) or PFS (hazard ratio, 0.55; 95% confidence interval, 0.25-1.21, P = .14) between BCG-Tice and BCG-Moreau. On subgroup analyses, we could not identify an association of BCG strain with outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference in RFS and PFS between BCG-Tice and BCG-Moreau strains in the adjuvant treatment of NMIBC. However, we confirmed the importance of maintenance therapy for achieving a sustainable response in patients with intermediate- and high-risk NMIBC.
Subject(s)
Adjuvants, Immunologic/administration & dosage , BCG Vaccine/administration & dosage , Cystectomy , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/epidemiology , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/therapy , Administration, Intravesical , Aged , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant/methods , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant/statistics & numerical data , Disease Progression , Disease-Free Survival , Drug Administration Schedule , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Progression-Free Survival , Proportional Hazards Models , Retrospective Studies , Urinary Bladder/pathology , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/mortality , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/pathology , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/surgeryABSTRACT
Introdução: Classificações de risco baseadas em fatores preditivos de recorrência e progressão são essenciais para condutas no câncer de bexiga. Tabelas de risco combinam essas variáveis para uso clínico. As tabelas de risco da Organização Europeia para Pesquisa e Tratamento do Câncer (EORTC) são aceitas para esse propósito, mas nunca foram validadas no Brasil. Objetivos: Validar as tabelas de risco EORTC e criar uma classificação de risco baseada na população de pacientes acompanhados em um centro terciário de câncer. Métodos: Estudo retrospectivo de 561 pacientes submetidos a ressecção transuretral (RTU) de câncer de bexiga superficial de fevereiro de 2005 a junho de 2011. As variáveis analisadas foram as mesmas das tabelas de risco EORTC. A regressão logística foi realizada usando SPSS. A análise da curva COR determinou o limite de tamanho do tumor. Resultados: As tabelas de risco EORTC não conseguiram prever recorrência nem progressão. Na análise para prever recorrência isoladamente, estadio T e tamanho do tumor previram o desfecho. O limite de tamanho do tumor foi definido em <4cm vs ≥4cm (AUC=0,61; p=0,001). Criamos uma classificação: Ta/CIS=0 pontos, T1=4 pontos, tamanho do tumor=0 ou 3 pontos. A classificação de risco foi obtida somando os pontos. A taxa de recorrência em 2 anos foi: escore 0=11,2%; escore 3=20,7%; escore 4=29,2%; escore 7=37,9%. Para prever recorrência e progressão, estadio T e tamanho do tumor previram significativamente o desfecho. A classificação em escores foi: Ta/CIS=0 pontos, T1=2 pontos, tamanho do tumor = 0 ou 2 pontos. A classificação de risco foi obtida somando os pontos. A taxa de recorrência em 2 anos foi: escore 0=17%; escore 2=28,6%; escore 4=40,7%. Conclusões: Constatamos que as tabelas de risco EORTC não conseguiram prever recorrência ou progressão do câncer de bexiga na nossa população. Portanto, desenvolvemos uma classificação de risco para auxiliar urologistas a individualizar as condutas por paciente.
Introduction: Risk classification based on predictive factors of bladder cancer recurrence and progression is essential for management decision. Risk tables combine these variables for clinical practice use. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) risk tables are widely accepted for this purpose, however they were never validated in Brazil. Our aim was to validate the EORTC risk tables and create a risk classification based on our population. Methods: Retrospective study of 561 patients who underwent transurethral resection of superficial bladder from February 2005 to June 2011. Variables analyzed were the same as EORTC risk tables. Logistic regression was performed using SPSS. ROC curve analysis was used for determining the cut-off for tumor size. Results: EORTC risk tables were not able to predict neither disease recurrence nor progression. In our analysis for predicting bladder cancer recurrence alone, we found that T stage and tumor size predicted outcome. Tumor size cut-off was defined as < 4 cm vs ≥ 4 (AUC=0.61; p=0.001). We created a scoring classification: Ta/CIS=0 points, T1=4 points, tumor size=0 or 3 points. Risk classification was obtained by adding the points accordingly and the following recurrence rate at 2 yrs by group: score 0=11.2%; score 3=20.7%; score 4=29.2%; score 7=37.9%. The statistical model for bladder cancer recurrence or progression found that T stage and tumor size predicted the outcome. The scoring classification was: Ta/CIS=0 points, T1=2 points, tumor size=0 or 2 points. Risk classification was obtained by adding the points accordingly and the following recurrence rate at 2 yrs by group: score 0=17%; score 2=28.6%; score 4=40.7%. Conclusions: We found that EORTC risk tables could not predict bladder cancer recurrence or progression in our patient population, possibly due to differences in patient characteristics. Therefore, we developed a new risk classification to aid urologists to individualize the management decision per patient.
