ABSTRACT
Screening of plant species with an ability to grow on contaminated soil is the most critical step in the planning of a phytoremediation program. While flourishing growth of Impatiens balsamina L. and Crotalaria retusa L. has been observed in areas adjacent to automobile service stations in Sri Lanka, no systematic study of their tolerance to used lubricating oil (ULO) contaminated soil has been carried out. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to investigate the comparative responses of I. balsamina L. and C. retusa L. to soil contaminated with ULO. Both species exhibited 100% seed germination in soils treated with 1%-5% w/w ULO. After 120â¯h exposure, root lengths and biomass of germinated seedlings of both species were significantly (pâ¯<â¯0.05) reduced in all treatments above 3% w/w ULO. The measured growth parameters of plants following 90â¯d exposure to 0.5-3% w/w ULO, indicated significant (pâ¯<â¯0.05) negative effects on I. balsamina and C. retusa at >1% w/w and >2% w/w ULO, respectively. There were no significant effects on chlorophyll content or root anatomy of either species under any treatments. Therefore, we concluded that I. balsamina can tolerate up to 1% of ULO and C. retusa up to 2% w/w ULO without displaying any negative effects. Comparatively higher biodegradation of ULO in the rhizosphere, root nodule formation, increases in root length and root hair density are all possible strategies for the exhibited higher tolerance of C. retusa. Therefore, the overall results indicate that C. retusa has the greater potential to be used in phytoremediation of ULO contaminated soils. The findings of the present study will be beneficial in planning phytoremediation program for ULO contaminated soil.
