Impact of tumor location on prognosis for patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma managed by radical nephroureterectomy.

BACKGROUND: There is a lack of consensus regarding the prognostic significance of ureteral versus renal pelvic upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association of tumor location on outcomes for UTUC in an international cohort of patients managed by radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A retrospective review of institutional databases from 10 institutions worldwide identified patients with UTUC. INTERVENTION: The 1249 patients in the study underwent RNU with ipsilateral bladder cuff resection between 1987 and 2007. MEASUREMENTS: Data accrued included age, gender, race, surgical approach (open vs laparoscopic), tumor pathology (stage, grade, lymph node status), tumor location, use of perioperative chemotherapy, prior endoscopic therapy, urothelial carcinoma recurrence, and mortality from urothelial carcinoma. Tumor location was divided into two groups (renal pelvis and ureter) based on the location of the dominant tumor. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: The 5-yr recurrence-free and cancer-specific survival estimates for this cohort were 75% and 78%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, only pathologic tumor (pT) classification (p<0.001), grade (p<0.02), and lymph node status (p<0.001) were associated with disease recurrence and cancer-specific survival. When adjusting for these variables, there was no difference in the probability of disease recurrence (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.22; p=0.133) or cancer death (HR: 1.23; p=0.25) between ureteral and renal pelvic tumors. Adding tumor location to a base prognostic model for disease recurrence and cancer death that included pT stage, tumor grade, and lymph node status only improved the predictive accuracy of this model by 0.1%. This study is limited by biases associated with its retrospective design. CONCLUSIONS: There is no difference in outcomes between patients with renal pelvic tumors and with ureteral tumors following nephroureterectomy. These data support the current TNM staging system, whereby renal pelvic and ureteral carcinomas are classified as one integral group of tumors.

The changing distribution of pT stage in testicular germ cell tumours from 1976 to 2005: a single-centre analysis of histopathological reports.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the changing distribution of stage in seminoma and nonseminomatous germ cell tumours (NSGCTs), as recent reports contained no detailed information on pT stage and vascular invasion, important factors in the decision for further treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Histopathological reports from 1976 to 2005, from patients who had surgery for testicular tumours at the authors' institution, were investigated with special focus on pT stage and its distribution. The whole study period was divided into six 5-year periods. The incidence of seminoma was compared with NSGCT, defined according to the Tumour-Nodes-Metastasis (TNM) classification. RESULTS: In each 5-year period the median number of tumours treated surgically was 86; the distribution of seminomas and NSGCTs remained stable during the study period (P = 0.201). pT4 and pT3 tumours declined or disappeared in both histopathological groups, while pT2 and pT1 tumours increased during the study period. Since 1996-2000, pT1 tumours decreased, whereas pT2 tumours increased in seminomas (P = 0.085) and NSGCTs (P = 0.003). CONCLUSION: The incidence of seminoma and NSGCT has not changed over the last 30 years in Vienna. With the establishment of vascular invasion in the TNM classification in 1997, the incidence of pT1 decreased while that of pT2 increased. Since then, the incidence of pT1 tumours in seminomas was 45.8% and 29.1% in NSGCT. According to generally accepted treatment guidelines, these patients might need no adjuvant treatment after surgery.