Automated extraction of lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) and N-demethyl-LSD from blood, serum, plasma, and urine samples using the Zymark RapidTrace with LC/MS/MS confirmation.

A forensic procedure for the quantitative confirmation of lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) and the qualitative confirmation of its metabolite, N-demethyl-LSD, in blood, serum, plasma, and urine samples is presented. The Zymark RapidTrace was used to perform fully automated solid-phase extractions of all specimen types. After extract evaporation, confirmations were performed using liquid chromatography (LC) followed by positive electrospray ionization (ESI+) mass spectrometry/mass spectrometry (MS/MS) without derivatization. Quantitation of LSD was accomplished using LSD-d3 as an internal standard. The limit of quantitation (LOQ) for LSD was 0.05 ng/mL. The limit of detection (LOD) for both LSD and N-demethyl-LSD was 0.025 ng/mL. The recovery of LSD was greater than 95% at levels of 0.1 ng/mL and 2.0 ng/mL. For LSD at 1.0 ng/mL, the within-run and between-run (different day) relative standard deviation (RSD) was 2.2% and 4.4%, respectively.

[Fine needle cytopuncture of the pancreas. Apropos of 45 cases]. / Cytoponction pancréatique à l'aiguille fine. A propos de 45 observations.

In this report, we examined the sensitivity and specificity of pancreatic fine needle aspiration cytology in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. Aspiration cytodiagnosis was performed in 45 patients (36 cancers and 9 benign pancreatic lesions) using a 22 Gauge fine needle either percutaneously in 25 patients with real-time ultrasonic guidance or during surgery in 20 patients. Cytologic examination included a precise description and the classification in one of the 4 Papanicolaou classes, the fourth only being considered as positive in terms of cancer. No complication occurred with either technic. Overall sensitivity was 75 p. 100, 74 p. 100 percutaneously and 77 p. 100 intraoperatively, but specificity was 78 p. 100 due to two false-positive results recorded among the 9 benign lesions. Retrospective analysis of cytologic examinations of the 29 class IV lesions led us to differentiate cases with "sure malignancy" (20 cases) from those with "strong suspicion of malignancy" (9 cases including the 2 false-positives). Only class IV lesions with "sure malignancy" call for aggressive treatment, whereas a "strong suspicion of malignancy", which may result from carcinoma or severe cellular abnormalities occasionally found in inflammatory pancreatic lesions, should lead to a second pancreatic aspiration.

Intraoperative manometry--a useful tool in biliary surgery?

Intraoperative manometry was performed in 771 patients undergoing cholecystectomy with (n = 158) and without (n = 613) interventions on the common bile duct and papilla. The method measures the resting pressure (RP) and pressure increase (PI) after injection of 1 ml NaCl/s as well as the time (TR) used for return to the initial pressure, using a Statham transducer. All values are recorded and statistically processed by the two-tailed t test. All three manometric parameters (RP, PI and TR) were statistically different (p less than or equal to 0.0001) between patients with and without alterations of the bile duct and papilla respectively. There was also a clear difference (p = 0.0001) of the TR (which is an indirect measure of the bile flow) between patients with stenosis of papilla (n = 55) and those who showed calculi in the bile duct (n = 103). In a further study we could demonstrate that histopathological changes of the papilla (specimen was taken during transduodenal papilloplasty because of isolated papilla stenosis) led to a prolonged TR, whereas TR in patients with negative histology was decreased. The sensitivity and specifity of this manometric method was very high, 92.4 and 98.6% respectively. This method of manometry enables to obtain precise data about pressure and flow in the bile duct uninfluenced by subjective reading errors in a simple and reproducible way. In our opinion it should complete other intraoperative diagnostic methods during cholecystectomy, particularly as manometry was the only method which led to the correct final diagnosis in 2% of 771 patients.