Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 54
Filter
1.
Accid Anal Prev ; 31(5): 485-96, 1999 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10440546

ABSTRACT

This study has assessed seat belt use and factors which may influence seat belt use among high school students from three types of schools. The inner city schools had high proportions of African American and Hispanic American students from low income families, whereas the middle class school and private schools had high proportions of non-Hispanic white students from middle class families with college educated parents. Students from the inner city schools reported less seat belt use than students from the middle class school or private schools. Our analyses evaluated several hypotheses concerning possible reasons why inner city youth had lower rates of seat belt use. In accord with the social influences hypothesis, inner city youth reported lower rates of parental seat belt use and less often being told by parents to use their seat belts, and our regression results indicate that less parental modeling and encouragement of seat belt use was an important cause of inner city youth's lower rates of seat belt use. Our other hypotheses received weaker support, but we did find evidence for two hypothesized differences in attitudes which influence seat belt use. Specifically, inner city youth were more likely to agree with the statement, 'there is no point in wearing seat belts since you have no control over your fate or destiny', and inner city youth attributed less importance to safety concerns as a motivation for seat belt use. These attitudes appeared to contribute to lower rates of seat belt use by inner city youth.


Subject(s)
Ethnicity/statistics & numerical data , Seat Belts/statistics & numerical data , Socioeconomic Factors , Students/statistics & numerical data , Urban Population/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Cross-Cultural Comparison , Female , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Humans , Male , Pennsylvania
2.
J Subst Abuse ; 10(2): 185-98, 1998.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9854703

ABSTRACT

This study utilizes data from four nationally representative subsamples of white high school seniors to analyze the relationships of alcohol consumption, marijuana use, and other illicit drug use to attitudes toward gender roles, family, and cohabitation. These analyses provide evidence concerning two hypotheses: the Gender Roles Hypothesis and Deviance Hypothesis. As predicted by the Gender Roles Hypothesis, among males, traditional gender role attitudes were associated with greater alcohol consumption. Contrary to the predictions of the Gender Roles Hypothesis, for females, nontraditional gender role attitudes were not associated with greater alcohol consumption or drug use in analyses which controlled for confounding factors such as family structure, socioeconomic status, and religiosity. As predicted by the Deviance Hypothesis, nontraditional attitudes toward cohabitation and family were associated with greater alcohol consumption and illicit drug use among both males and females.


Subject(s)
Attitude , Family , Gender Identity , Sexual Behavior , Substance-Related Disorders/psychology , Adolescent , Adult , Alcoholism/psychology , Female , Humans , Illicit Drugs , Male , Marijuana Abuse/psychology , Marriage , Psychotropic Drugs , Social Conformity , Social Values
3.
J Health Soc Behav ; 39(3): 216-36, 1998 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9785695

ABSTRACT

Our study tests several hypotheses concerning the effects of employment, marriage, and motherhood on women's general physical health. These hypotheses predict how the health effect of each role varies, depending on specific role characteristics and the other roles a woman holds. Our analyses utilize longitudinal panel data for 3,331 women from the National Longitudinal Surveys of Young Women (follow-up intervals: 1978-83 and 1983-88). The Role Substitution Hypothesis proposes that employment and marriage provide similar resources (e.g., income and social support), and consequently, employment and marriage can substitute for each other in their beneficial effects on health. As predicted, we found that employment had beneficial effects on health for unmarried women, but little or no effect for married women. Similarly, marriage had beneficial effects on health only for women who were not employed. The Role Combination Strain Hypothesis proposes that employed mothers experience role strain, resulting in harmful effects on health. However, we found very little evidence that the combination of employment and motherhood resulted in harmful health effects. Contrary to the predictions of the Quantitative Demands Role Strain Hypothesis, it appears that neither longer hours of employment nor having more children resulted in harmful effects on health. As predicted by the Age-Related Parental Role Strain Hypothesis, younger age at first birth, particularly a teenage birth, appeared to result in more harmful health effects.


Subject(s)
Employment , Health Status , Marriage , Women's Health , Adolescent , Adult , Female , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Maternal Age , Mother-Child Relations , Pregnancy , Workload
4.
Soc Sci Med ; 45(9): 1387-97, 1997 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9351156

ABSTRACT

To test whether the effects of marital status on health differ between never married women and divorced and separated women, this study utilizes prospective panel data for a large national sample of non-institutionalized young women in the U.S. (the National Longitudinal Surveys of Young Women). The women were aged 24-34 at the beginning of two successive five-year follow-up intervals (1978-1983 and 1983-1988). The health effects of marital status were evaluated in regressions which assessed the relationships between initial marital status and subsequent health trends in each follow-up interval. In the first follow-up interval, never married women tended to have worse health trends than divorced and separated women for physical impairments and for overall health problems. However, there were no differences between never married women and divorced and separated women in health trends for psychosomatic symptoms in either follow-up interval or for any health measure in the second follow-up interval. Our analyses of cross-sectional data showed few significant differences in health between never married women and divorced and separated women. Taken together, the evidence from our study and previous studies suggests that differences between never married women and divorced and separated women may vary by age and/or cohort. Evidence for the 1970s and 1980s suggests that, among older women, divorced and separated women may have experienced more harmful health effects than never married women; however, among younger women, this difference may have been absent or possibly reversed.


Subject(s)
Divorce/statistics & numerical data , Health Status Indicators , Marital Status/statistics & numerical data , Single Person/statistics & numerical data , Women's Health , Adult , Cohort Studies , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Middle Aged , Morbidity , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , United States/epidemiology
5.
Soc Sci Med ; 43(1): 113-23, 1996 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8816016

ABSTRACT

Married adults are generally healthier than unmarried adults. It has been hypothesized that marriage is associated with good health because marriage has beneficial effects on health (marriage protection effects) and/or because healthier individuals are more likely to marry and to stay married (marriage selection effects). To investigate these hypotheses, this study analyzes prospective panel data for a large national sample of women in the U.S. (the National Longitudinal Surveys of Young Women). The women were aged 24-34 yr at the beginning of two successive five-year follow-up intervals. Analyses of the prospective data indicate that there were significant marriage protection effects, but only among women who were not employed. Specifically, for women who were not employed, married women had better health trends than unmarried women in each follow-up interval. It appears that marriage had beneficial effects on health for women who did not have a job which could provide an alternative source of financial resources and social support. In addition, analyses of the prospective data provide limited evidence for marriage selection effects. Specifically, women who had better health initially were more likely to marry and less likely to experience marital dissolution, but only for women who were not employed full-time and only during the first follow-up interval. Thus, the prospective evidence suggests that, for women who were not employed, both marriage protection and marriage selection effects contributed to the marital status differential in health observed in cross-sectional data. In contrast, neither marriage protection nor marriage selection effects were observed for women who were employed full-time. As would be expected, the cross-sectional data show that marital status differentials in health were large and highly significant for women who were not employed, whereas marital status differentials in health were much smaller and often not significant for employed women. Women who were neither married nor employed had particularly poor health. Additional evidence indicates that the women who were neither married nor employed suffered from multiple interacting disadvantages, including poor health, low incomes, and sociodemographic characteristics which contributed to difficulty in obtaining employment.


Subject(s)
Health Status , Marriage/statistics & numerical data , Women's Health , Adult , Black or African American/statistics & numerical data , Causality , Confidence Intervals , Cross-Sectional Studies , Employment , Female , Humans , Income , Marital Status/statistics & numerical data , Odds Ratio , Prospective Studies , Regression Analysis , Sampling Studies , United States/epidemiology , White People/statistics & numerical data
6.
Soc Sci Med ; 36(8): iii-iv, 1993 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8475415
7.
Soc Sci Med ; 36(4): 451-62, 1993 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8434270

ABSTRACT

This paper analyzes changes in sex mortality ratios between 1979 and 1987 for adults in 23 developed countries. (A sex mortality ratio is the ratio of male to female death rates.) Previous analyses have shown that during the mid-twentieth century sex mortality ratios increased for all adult age groups. During the 1980s sex mortality ratios continued to increase for 25-34 year olds, but showed mixed trends for other adult age groups. For example, for older adults aged 55-64, sex mortality ratios increased in Southern and Eastern European countries and Japan, but sex mortality ratios decreased in Northern European and Anglophone countries. Trends in several causes of death contributed to these trends in sex mortality ratios. For example, for 25-34 year olds, increases in men's suicide rates and HIV or AIDS mortality contributed to the increases in sex mortality ratios. For older adults, it was hypothesized that decreasing sex differences in cigarette smoking in recent decades would result in decreasing sex differences in lung cancer and ischemic heart disease mortality during the 1980s. The predicted decrease in sex differences in lung cancer mortality was observed in many countries; women had more unfavorable lung cancer mortality trends than men in the Anglophone countries and Northern and Central Western European countries. In contrast, very little evidence was found for the predicted decrease in sex differences in ischemic heart disease. The paper presents additional data concerning the contributions of trends in specific causes of death to changes in sex mortality ratios and briefly reviews evidence concerning probable causes of the observed mortality trends. It appears that recent trends in sex mortality ratios have been influenced by changing sex differences in smoking and a variety of additional factors, such as the effects of improvements in health care interacting with inherent sex differences in vulnerability to ischemic heart disease.


Subject(s)
Mortality/trends , Sex Ratio , Women's Health , Adult , Cause of Death , Female , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/mortality , Male , Middle Aged , Myocardial Infarction/mortality , Myocardial Ischemia/mortality , Suicide
8.
Women Health ; 17(2): 65-90, 1991.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1871990

ABSTRACT

This study analyzes the patterns and correlates of gender differences in cigarette smoking in a national sample of white high school seniors in 1985. More females than males were smokers, because females had higher rates for the early stages of smoking adoption. Specifically, females were more likely to have tried smoking at least once and, among those who had tried smoking, females were more likely to have smoked more than once or twice. Gender differences in smoking varied, depending on the students' characteristics. For example, the female excess in the early stages of smoking adoption was small or absent among rural students or very religious students, apparently because traditional values inhibit smoking adoption more among females than among males. We estimated the contributions of gender differences in students' characteristics to gender differences in smoking adoption. For example, males were more involved in sports, and this appears to be one reason why males had lower rates of smoking adoption than females. On the other hand, males had more deviant behavior and attitudes, and this would be expected to contribute to greater smoking adoption by males. The findings of this study indicate important gender differences in the determinants of smoking adoption.


Subject(s)
Adolescent , Smoking/epidemiology , Attitude , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Sex Factors , Smoking/psychology , Social Behavior Disorders , Social Values , Sports , Students/psychology , Surveys and Questionnaires , United States/epidemiology
9.
Soc Sci Med ; 32(9): 989-1005, 1991.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2047903

ABSTRACT

In the early twentieth century in the United States and other Western countries, women were much less likely than men to smoke cigarettes, due in part to widespread social disapproval of women's smoking. During the mid-twentieth century, growing social acceptance of women's smoking contributed to increased smoking adoption by women. Increased social acceptance of women's smoking was part of a general liberalization of norms concerning women's behavior, reflecting increasing equality between the sexes. These historical trends were due in part to increases in women's employment. However, in the contemporary period employment appears to have little or no effect on women's smoking. Sex role norms and general expectations concerning gender-appropriate behavior have had a variety of effects on gender differences in smoking. First, general characteristics of traditional sex roles, including men's greater social power and generally greater restrictions on women's behavior, contributed to widespread social pressures against women's smoking. Second, traditional sex role norms and expectations have fostered gender differences in personal characteristics and experiences which influence smoking adoption. For example, rebelliousness has been more expected and accepted for males, and greater rebelliousness among adolescent males has contributed to greater smoking adoption by males. Finally, certain aspects of sex roles have contributed to gender differences in appraisal of the costs and benefits of smoking. For example, physical attractiveness is emphasized more for females and the contemporary beauty ideal is very slender, so females are more likely to view weight control as a benefit of smoking. Several other hypotheses concerning the causes of gender differences in smoking are not supported by the available evidence. For example, it appears that women's generally greater concern with health has not contributed significantly to gender differences in the prevalence of smoking. Similarly, it appears that sex differences in physiological responses to smoking have made only minor contributions to gender differences in smoking adoption or cessation.


Subject(s)
Gender Identity , Smoking/psychology , Women's Rights , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Attitude to Health , Diffusion of Innovation , Europe/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Models, Psychological , North America/epidemiology , Power, Psychological , Prevalence , Sex Factors , Smoking/epidemiology , Social Change
10.
s.l; El Salvador. Miniserio de Salud Pública y Asistencia Social. Escuela de Capacitación Sanitaria; mar. 1990. 147 p. ilus.
Monography in Spanish | LILACS | ID: lil-89670

ABSTRACT

Provee información sobre la administración de suministros a nivel central. Responde a las preguntas: ¿cuánto y cuándo comparar?, ¿a dónde, a quién, cómo y en cuánto? En la segunda parte, el autor enfoca todas las actividades que hay que desarrollar en la administración de suministros; explica detalladamente, los pasos a seguir para cubrir todo el proceso y lograr que los resultados de dicha gestión sean normales y satisfactorios, que los presupuestos de suministros se inviertan adecuadamente y asímismo, que la calidad y cantidad, sean los requeridos para responder a las necesidades del sistema de suministros en los servicios de salud


Subject(s)
Materials Management, Hospital/economics , Hospital Distribution Systems , Equipment and Supplies, Hospital/standards
11.
Soc Sci Med ; 30(3): 305-10, 1990.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2309128

ABSTRACT

This study has assessed gender differences in smoking and the use of smokeless tobacco for younger adults and their parents in samples from five ethnic groups in Kenya. These samples were from two groups of pastoralists (the Maasai and the Samburu), a group engaged in fishing and farming (the Luo), and two groups of relatively Westernized Kenyans primarily involved in commercial occupations (from the Kisii and the Gikuyu ethnic groups). In four of the five study groups, there was little or no difference in the prevalence of smokeless tobacco use in either the younger or older generation. Similarly, in four of the study groups there was little or no gender difference in the prevalence of smoking for the older generation. In contrast, for the younger generation in every study group except the Luo, men were much more likely than women to smoke cigarettes. The attitudes toward tobacco use reported by the younger generation showed similar patterns. In every study group except the Luo, the younger adults reported that smokeless tobacco use was socially acceptable for both men and women, but smoking was acceptable only for men. Many of the younger women reported that they did not smoke because it would not be socially acceptable. The interview data suggest that the social prohibition against women's smoking was one component of more general restrictions on women's behavior, and the absence of restrictions on men's smoking was related to men's greater social power. The Luo were the only study group in which respondents reported that women should have as much influence as men in decision making. Correspondingly, the Luo were the only study group in which most respondents considered it acceptable for women to smoke and women were as likely as men to smoke cigarettes.


Subject(s)
Nicotiana , Plants, Toxic , Smoking/epidemiology , Tobacco, Smokeless , Age Factors , Female , Humans , Kenya/epidemiology , Male , Rural Population , Sex Factors , Smoking/ethnology , Smoking/psychology , Urban Population
12.
Women Health ; 16(3-4): 23-46, 1990.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2267807

ABSTRACT

This study analyzes the relationships of cigarette smoking to attitudes toward equal opportunities for women, attitudes toward appropriate roles for women and men, and attitudes toward marriage, sex and family. Our analyses utilize data for white high school seniors from the 1985 Monitoring the Future national survey. Smoking was not related to attitudes toward equal opportunities for women, attitudes toward sex roles, or attitudes concerning the parental role. However, students who had favorable attitudes toward cohabitation by unmarried couples and unfavorable attitudes toward marriage were more likely to smoke than students who had more traditional attitudes toward sex and marriage. The association between smoking and non-traditional attitudes toward sex and marriage was observed for both females and males. Additional findings suggest that rejection of conventional values and acceptance of deviance contribute both to non-traditional attitudes toward sex and marriage and to teenage smoking, and this is one reason why non-traditional attitudes toward sex and marriage are associated with smoking.


Subject(s)
Attitude , Psychology, Adolescent , Smoking/psychology , Women's Rights , Adolescent , Family , Female , Gender Identity , Humans , Male , Marriage , Role , Social Values , Surveys and Questionnaires
13.
J Subst Abuse ; 2(2): 201-15, 1990.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2136110

ABSTRACT

This study analyzes data for white high school seniors from the 1985 Monitoring the Future national survey. Students who had less educated parents or lower educational aspirations were more likely to have tried a cigarette, more likely to have adopted cigarette smoking, and less likely to have quit smoking. These students also had more favorable attitudes toward smoking, and reported greater acceptance of smoking by their friends. In addition, the students with less educated parents or lower educational aspirations appeared to be more rejecting of adult authority and more predisposed to adopt adult behaviors, and these characteristics, in turn, were associated with smoking more. The results of multivariate analyses support the hypothesis that these students have experienced less success in school and are more likely to adopt behaviors characteristic of adults as an alternative source of status and gratification, and this contributes to their higher rates of smoking.


Subject(s)
Achievement , Aspirations, Psychological , Child of Impaired Parents/psychology , Smoking/psychology , Adolescent , Female , Humans , Male , Prospective Studies , Social Environment , Socioeconomic Factors
14.
Am J Prev Med ; 5(3): 142-9, 1989.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2742795

ABSTRACT

This study analyzes the relationships of cigarette smoking and smoking histories to employment status and occupation. Data from a large, representative sample of U.S. adults in 1985 were analyzed separately for white men, white women, black men, and black women, with controls for age, education, and marital status included in all analyses. It has been hypothesized that women who adopt traditional male roles are more likely to become smokers. However, our data indicate that participation of women in the labor force or employment of women in male-dominated occupations have had little or no effect on women's smoking adoption or cessation. Unemployed men and women (those who were not employed but were seeking work) were substantially more likely than employed men and women to be smokers. Among employed whites, the percentage of smokers was high for industrial manual workers and service workers and low for professionals and farmers. Similar differences were observed in the proportion who had ever adopted smoking. These differences in smoking adoption had begun at young ages, before most people have adopted adult roles, which suggests that the differences in smoking adoption were not caused by unemployment or occupation. Rather, it appears that certain personal characteristics or early experiences influenced both smoking adoption and adult unemployment or occupation. In addition, unemployment may decrease smoking cessation, and employment in professional occupations may increase smoking cessation.


Subject(s)
Employment , Occupations , Smoking/psychology , Adult , Black or African American , Female , Gender Identity , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Stress, Psychological/etiology , Unemployment , White People
15.
Am J Prev Med ; 5(3): 136-41, 1989.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2787160

ABSTRACT

This study analyzes the relationships of cigarette smoking and smoking histories to marital and parental status. Data from a large, representative sample of U.S. adults in 1985 were analyzed separately for white men, white women, black men, and black women, with controls for age, education, and marital status included in the analyses. Divorced and separated adults were the most likely to be current smokers or ever to have adopted smoking; currently married adults and widowed adults were intermediate; and never married adults were the least likely to be current smokers or ever to have adopted smoking. (There were some exceptions to these patterns for never married and widowed blacks). The differences in smoking adoption had begun during adolescence, before the usual age of marriage, which suggests that the differences in smoking, adoption were not caused by marriage or divorce. Rather, it appears that personal characteristics or early experiences influenced both the likelihood of smoking adoption and the likelihood of marriage or divorce. Currently married adults were more likely to have quit smoking than never married, divorced and separated, or widowed adults. It may be that the social support provided by marriage increases smoking cessation. In contrast to the strong relationships between marital status and smoking, relationships between parental status and smoking were relatively weak and variable. Among white women, mothers of preschoolers were less likely to be smokers than women without children. The mothers of preschoolers were more likely to have quit smoking, possibly as a result of increased smoking cessation during pregnancy.


Subject(s)
Family , Role , Smoking/psychology , Adult , Black or African American , Aged , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Marriage , Middle Aged , Parents/psychology , Smoking/epidemiology , Social Support , White People
16.
Women Health ; 15(1): 3-19, 1989.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2750174

ABSTRACT

This study analyzes longitudinal data for a national sample of older middle-aged women in order to assess the health effects of three roles--labor force participant, spouse and parent. Women who held more roles had better health trends. The effect of each specific role varied, depending on race and the other roles a woman held. For example, our evidence indicates that labor force participation had beneficial effects on health for white women who were not married and for black women who had children at home, but not for other women. The findings of this study do not support the hypothesis that involvement in multiple roles contributes to role overload and role conflict with consequent harmful effects on women's health. Rather, it appears that involvement in multiple roles generally contributed to better health, due to the beneficial effects of labor force participation and marriage for some women.


Subject(s)
Health Status , Health , Women , Adult , Female , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Marriage , Middle Aged , Parents , Probability , Sampling Studies , United States , Women, Working
17.
J Occup Med ; 30(12): 977-83, 1988 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-3230451

ABSTRACT

Effects of labor force participation on women's health are evaluated in analyses of longitudinal data for a national sample of older middle-aged women. Our findings indicate that labor force participation had beneficial effects on health for unmarried women and for married black women, but, on the average, labor force participation had no significant effect on health for married white women. Analyses by occupational category suggest that labor force participation had beneficial effects on health for some blue collar married women, but, on the average, labor force participation had harmful effects on health for white collar married women. Our findings, taken together with previous evidence, suggest that employment may increase social support, and job-related social support may have particularly beneficial effects on health for unmarried women and for married women whose husbands are not emotionally supportive confidants. Additional results from this study showed no significant difference in the health effects of part-time and full-time employment.


Subject(s)
Health Status , Health , Women, Working , Women , Adult , Black or African American , Female , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Single Person , Social Support
18.
Soc Sci Med ; 27(11): 1269-75, 1988.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-3206258

ABSTRACT

This paper reviews historical, anthropological and contemporary survey data concerning gender differences in tobacco use in Africa, Asia, the Pacific, and Latin America. In many cultural groups in these regions, tobacco use has been substantially more common among men than among women. In some groups, tobacco use has been about equally common for both sexes. No evidence was found of any group in which tobacco use has been substantially more common among women. The widespread pattern of greater tobacco use by men appears to be linked to general features of sex roles. For example, men have often had greater social power than women, and this has been expressed in greater restrictions on women's behavior, including social prohibitions against women's smoking. These social prohibitions against women's smoking have strongly inhibited women's tobacco use and thus have been a major cause of gender differences in tobacco use. Gender differences in tobacco use have varied in magnitude, depending on the type of tobacco use and the particular cultural group, age group and historical period considered. Causes of the variation in gender differences in tobacco use include variation in women's status and variation in the social significance and benefits attributed to particular types of tobacco use in different cultures. Contact with Western cultures appears to have increased or decreased gender differences in smoking, depending on the specific circumstances. The patterns of gender differences in tobacco use in non-Western societies are similar in many ways to the patterns observed in Western societies, but there are several important differences.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


Subject(s)
Cross-Cultural Comparison , Gender Identity , Identification, Psychological , Nicotiana , Plants, Toxic , Smoking/epidemiology , Africa , Asia , Attitude to Health , Female , Humans , Latin America , Male , Pacific Islands , Sex Factors , Smoking/psychology , Social Environment
19.
J Am Geriatr Soc ; 35(4): 365-6, 1987 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-3559028

Subject(s)
Longevity , Sex Factors , Humans
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL