Decision-making about hormone replacement therapy by women in England and Scotland.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to explore women's decision-making about the balance of risks and benefits of taking hormone replacement therapy (HRT) based on the latest evidence from the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) trial of combined HRT. METHODS: Women aged 50-69 years, who were eligible for the Women's International Study of long Duration Oestrogen after Menopause (WISDOM) trial, were invited to participate in one of eight focus groups. Participants were asked to discuss their views about taking HRT based on the latest international evidence. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Eighty-two women participated overall. Qualitative content analysis was applied to the discussion transcripts. Women regarded the decisions they make about taking HRT as highly personal, and, for women currently taking HRT, the overwhelming reason for continuation was perceived improvement in quality of life regardless of either the risks or the benefits in the longer term.

Vertebral morphometry: repeat scan precision using the Lunar Expert-XL and the Hologic 4500A. A study for the 'WISDOM' RCT of hormone replacement therapy.

On radiation safety grounds there is concern about the morbidity attributable to routine radiographs of the spine for the identification of new fractures in large-scale trials of fracture prevention. However, the role of the potentially safer low-radiation-dose technique of vertebral morphometry performed by third generation dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry equipment requires evaluation for use in clinical trials. We have therefore investigated the short-term inter-scan imprecision as well as the imprecision attributable to different-day analyses by the same operator and differences in analyses by different operators. The volunteer subjects were participants in a pilot study for a randomized controlled trial of hormone replacement therapy (Women's International Study of long Duration Oestrogen after Menopause, WISDOM). Each subject had two morphometric X-ray analysis scans separated by 2-4 weeks. Exclusions were women with densitometrically defined osteoporosis, as defined by the WHO criterion, and women with a body mass index exceeding 30.9 kg/m2. On average, the women were 58.7 years of age and had bone mineral density values in the lumbar spine which were about 0.7 SD units higher than a reference US female age-matched population. Scans were assessed from vertebrae T7 through L4. In the study there were no clinically significant differences in performance between the Hologic QDR 4500A and the Lunar Expert XL equipment. Between-scan imprecision was significantly worse than imprecision attributable to reanalysis of the same scan by a different operator or the same operator after an interval. Vertebral level had an effect on measurement uncertainty, especially at the level of the diaphragm and at T7. Coefficients of variation, expressed as percentages of mean values, were better for absolute height measurements than for height ratios, ranging from 1.75% to 3.40% for the three heights measured on three separate machines and from 2.34% to 4.11% for the two height ratios. These results compared favorably with the equivalent figures from a parallel study of morphometry precision undertaken using standard lateral radiographs of the thoracic and lumbar spine (3.1-3.6% and 3.8-3.9%, respectively). We conclude that in trials of prevention therapy in women (or men) selected for not having osteoporosis, low-dose vertebral morphometry using the Hologic 4500A, the Lunar Expert XL or similar equipment is preferable on safety grounds to the classical technique based on standard radiographs, although conventional radiology may still be required in those with prevalent or incident deformities to exclude causes other than osteoporosis. The place of this low-dose technique in trials performed on patients with osteoporosis requires further study.

Terminal cancer care and patients' preference for place of death: a prospective study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the preference of terminally ill patients with cancer for their place of final care. DESIGN: Prospective study of randomly selected patients with cancer from hospital and the community who were expected to die within a year. Patients expected to live less than two months were interviewed at two week intervals; otherwise patients were interviewed monthly. Their main carer was interviewed three months after the patient's death. SETTING: District general hospital, hospices, and patients' homes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Stated preferred place of final care; actual place of death; reason for final hospital admission for those in hospital; community care provision required for home care. RESULTS: Of 98 patients approached, 84 (86%) agreed to be interviewed, of whom 70 (83%) died during the study and 59 (84%) stated a preferred place of final care: 34 (58%) wished to die at home given existing circumstances, 12 (20%) in hospital, 12 (20%) in a hospice, and one (2%) elsewhere. Their own home was the preferred place of care for 17 (94%) of the patients who died there, whereas of the 32 patients who died in hospital 22 (69%) had stated a preference to die elsewhere. Had circumstances been more favourable 67% (41) of patients would have preferred to die at home, 16% (10) in hospital, and 15% (9) in hospice. CONCLUSION: With a limited increase in community care 50% more patients with cancer could be supported to die at home, as they and their carers would prefer.