Development of an implementation-focused network to improve healthcare delivery as informed by the experiences of the SCI knowledge mobilization network.

Context: Implementing research findings into clinical practice is challenging. This manuscript outlines the experiences and key learnings from a network that operated as a community of practice across seven Canadian Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) rehabilitation centers. These learnings are being used to inform a new implementation-focused network involving SCI rehabilitation programs based in Ontario, Canada. Methods: The SCI KMN adapted and applied implementation science principles based on the National Implementation Research Network's (NIRN) Active Implementation Frameworks in the implementation of best practices in pressure injury and pain prevention and management. Results: The SCI KMN was successful in implementing best practices in both pressure ulcer and pain prevention and management across the various participating sites. Other key objectives met were building capacity in implementation methods in site personnel so that project scaling could occur with these skills and expertise applied to numerous other initiatives. Additionally, various papers, abstracts and conference presentation as well as an implementation guide were disseminated to inform the field of implementation science. Conclusion: The key lessons learned from this experience are being used to develop a new implementation-focused network. Features felt to be especially important for the SCI KMN includes a highly representative governance structure, the use of indicators within an overall evaluation framework and the systematic application of implementation processes with shared learnings supporting each site.

Facilitators and Barriers for Implementing an Internet Clinic for the Treatment of Pressure Injuries.

Background: Pressure injuries (PIs) represent a frequent, often preventable, secondary complication of spinal cord injury (SCI) with serious consequences to health, societal participation, and quality of life. Specialized knowledge and service delivery related to treatment and prevention are typically located within major health centers.Introduction: For persons with SCI living at home, it can be challenging to access specialized PI care. A telehealth approach could help mitigate this challenge. This multisite pilot investigation assessed the feasibility of integrating information technologies within the management of PIs.Materials and Methods: Each study site formed a specialized interdisciplinary care team that identified components of their standard clinical care pathway and examined how they could be integrated with study technologies. A monitoring system was utilized to enable patients and caregivers to exchange clinical information with the care team.Results: Clinician and patient focus groups were completed to identify facilitators and barriers for long-term implementation. Findings demonstrate that this method of service delivery is feasible but requires further development.Discussion: This model of care requires refinement to address technological, regulatory, and clinician acceptance barriers; however, increased access to these services has the potential for improving PI healing or prevention rates in comparison with those not able to access specialized services.Conclusions: This project demonstrates that PI treatment services can be delivered effectively through the internet. Future trials can investigate efficacy and cost-effectiveness of this model of care to inform sustained implementation.

An inclusive, online Delphi process for setting targets for best practice implementation for spinal cord injury.

RATIONALE, AIMS, AND OBJECTIVES: The Spinal Cord Injury Knowledge Mobilization Network is a pan-Canadian community of practice composed of seven rehabilitation hospitals. The goal of this network is to utilize implementation science processes to facilitate the adoption of best practice in spinal cord injury (SCI) rehabilitation. In addition to selecting specific practices for implementation, a key aspect of effective implementation is the engagement of stakeholders in decision-making processes. To achieve this, the network utilized a Delphi process to reach consensus on two pressure ulcer prevention and management practices to be implemented in SCI inpatient rehabilitation. A diverse, multidisciplinary panel of clinicians, researchers, sponsoring agency representatives, and persons with SCI participated in this process. METHOD: An online Delphi process was conducted in order to prioritize pressure ulcer prevention and management best practice recommendations and performance indicators for implementation. The process was conducted in six stages: (1) steering committee selection; (2) identification and selection of evidence; (3) participant selection and recruitment; (4) survey development; (5) identification of voting criteria; and (6) five rounds of voting. RESULTS: The Delphi process resulted in the selection of two best practices: (1) comprehensive risk assessment and (2) education for pressure ulcer prevention and management in persons with SCI. CONCLUSIONS: In this Delphi process, a large expert panel achieved consensus on best practice recommendations and associated performance indicators for implementation. This process was undertaken as a first step towards optimization of service delivery and outcomes for persons with SCI across Canada.

Implementation of Pressure Injury Prevention Best Practices Across 6 Canadian Rehabilitation Sites: Results From the Spinal Cord Injury Knowledge Mobilization Network.

OBJECTIVE: To use the theoretical frameworks of implementation science to implement pressure injury (PI) prevention best practices in spinal cord injury (SCI) rehabilitation. DESIGN: Quality improvement. SETTING: Six Canadian SCI rehabilitation centers. PARTICIPANTS: Inpatients (N=2371) admitted from 2011 to 2015. INTERVENTIONS: The SCI Knowledge Mobilization Network (SCI KMN) selected and implemented 2 PI prevention best practices at 6 Canadian SCI rehabilitation centers: (1) completing a comprehensive PI risk assessment comprised of a structured risk assessment instrument followed by an individualized, interprofessional risk factor determination and prevention plan; and (2) providing structured and individualized PI prevention patient education. Active Implementation Frameworks provided a systematic approach to best practice implementation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Implementation indicators (completion rates) and patient outcomes (PI incidence, patient education survey). RESULTS: After implementation, risk assessment completion rates improved from 46% to 94% (P<.05). Between initial (2012-2013) and full (2014-2015) implementation stages, completion rates improved for both interprofessional risk factor determination (67% to 96%) and prevention plans (67% to 94%). Documentation of patient education also increased to 86% (vs. 71% preimplementation). At rehabilitation admission 22% of patients had PIs, with 14% of individuals developing new PIs during rehabilitation. The overall PI prevalence was 30%. Considering only PIs of stage 2 or greater, prevalence was 21% and incidence 7%. There were no statistically significant differences in PI incidence between pre- and postimplementation. Patient education surveys indicated that PI education improved patients' knowledge of prevention strategies. CONCLUSIONS: Active Implementation Frameworks supported successful implementation of PI prevention best practices across the 6 participating SCI KMN sites. Achieving a reduction in PI incidence will require additional measures, and there is an ongoing need to strengthen the evidence base underpinning PI prevention guidelines.

SCI-U: e-learning for patient education in spinal cord injury rehabilitation.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: To develop an online patient education resource for use in spinal cord injury rehabilitation. PARTICIPANTS: The development process involved more than 100 subject-matter experts (SMEs) (rehabilitation professionals and consumers) from across Canada. Preliminary evaluation was conducted with 25 end-users. METHODS: An iterative development process was coordinated by a project team; SMEs (including patients) developed the content in working groups using wiki-based tools. Multiple rounds of feedback based on early prototypes helped improve the courses during development. RESULTS: Five courses were created, each featuring more than 45 minutes of video content and hundreds of media assets. Preliminary evaluation results indicate that users were satisfied by the courses and perceived them to be effective. CONCLUSIONS: This is an effective process for developing multimedia patient education resources; the involvement of patients in all parts of the process was particularly helpful. Future work will focus on implementation, integration into clinical practice and other delivery formats (smart phones, tablets).