Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
2.
Anticancer Res ; 35(9): 4841-7, 2015 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26254376

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/AIM: Uterine carcinosarcomas (UCSs) are highly aggressive, rare, biphasic tumors composed of epithelial and mesenchymal elements. Surgery remains the mainstay of treatment in early-stage disease. Adjuvant pelvic radiotherapy improves locoregional control without proven overall survival (OS) benefit. Although adjuvant ifosfamide-based combination chemotherapy with cisplatin or paclitaxel has shown superiority to radiotherapy or single-agent chemotherapy in randomized controlled trials, there is no consensus on a standard regimen due to toxicities. The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the efficacy and toxicity of a novel combination chemotherapy using carboplatin, ifosfamide and mesna (CIM) and compare with other regimens for patients with UCSs in both the adjuvant and palliative setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1997 and 2010, 60 patients with UCS, 70% of whom with international federation of gynecology and obstetrics (FIGO) stage III/IV disease, were treated with adjuvant or palliative chemotherapy. Two groups were identified: Group1 (n=22) included patients receiving CIM chemotherapy; and group 2 (n=38) receiving other regimens (carboplatin/paclitaxel/cisplatin/doxorubicin/epirubicin). RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 60 months, disease in seven patients in group 1 (CIM) and 20 patients in group 2 had progressed/relapsed. Out of these, six patients in group 1 and 13 patients in group 2 had died. The progression-free survival (PFS) and OS for patients treated with adjuvant or palliative CIM was 35 months [95% confidence interval (CI) =0.26-0.43] and 47 months (95% CI=0.38-0.56; log-rank, p=0.001) respectively, whereas for group 2 patients treated with other regimens, PFS was 27.48 months (95% CI=0.20-0.33) and OS was 30 months (95% CI=0.21-0.38; log-rank, p=0.001). While none of the patients in group 1 experienced neurotoxicity or other grade 3 or 4 toxicities, 3/38 patients in group 2 experienced grade 3 neutropenia, 4/38 had peripheral sensory neuropathy, 6/38 patients had treatment deferred due to toxicities or allergic reaction to paclitaxel. CONCLUSION: In the phase III randomized controlled trial combination of ifosfamide and taxanes has shown PFS and OS benefit when compared to single-agent ifosfamide at the expense of significant toxicities. Results from our study show that the combination of CIM is an effective and safe alternative regimen for patients with advanced UCSs. In addition to improved OS and PFS, the main advantage of this regimen over taxane-based regimens includes minimal neuropathy, less use of steroids, and low risk of allergic reaction. CIM should be considered in future prospective studies looking at the treatment of UCS.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Carboplatin/therapeutic use , Carcinosarcoma/drug therapy , Ifosfamide/therapeutic use , Mesna/therapeutic use , Uterine Neoplasms/drug therapy , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Carboplatin/adverse effects , Demography , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Humans , Ifosfamide/adverse effects , Mesna/adverse effects , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
6.
Breast ; 17(4): 423-5, 2008 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18479923

ABSTRACT

Current practice precludes patients with pre-existing cardiac dysfunction from trastuzumab therapy. A 57-year-old patient with HER2 positive metastatic breast cancer and anthracycline-induced cardiac failure was safely treated with trastuzumab. At 46 months, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) did fall to 38.3%, but 8 months later has recovered to 47%. She remains disease free and asymptomatic from cardiac dysfunction more than 6 years following breast cancer recurrence. We review the evidence for the use of trastuzumab in patients with controlled cardiac dysfunction, and suggest this group of patients should be considered for treatment with trastuzumab if no other or only less efficacious therapeutic options are available.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Agents/administration & dosage , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/drug therapy , Heart Failure/complications , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/drug therapy , Anthracyclines/adverse effects , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Breast Neoplasms/complications , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/complications , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/pathology , Drug Administration Schedule , Female , Heart Failure/chemically induced , Humans , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/complications , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology , Trastuzumab
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...