Association between First-pass Intubation Success and Enhanced PPE Use during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

OBJECTIVES: We evaluated first-pass endotracheal intubation (ETI) success within the critical care transport (CCT) environment using a natural experiment created by the COVID-19 pandemic. Our primary objective was to evaluate if the use of personal protective equipment (PPE) or the COVID-19 time period was associated with differences in first-pass success rates of ETI within a large CCT system with a high baseline ETI first-pass success rate. We hypothesized that pandemic-related challenges would be associated with decreased first-pass success rates. METHODS: We performed a retrospective before-after cohort study of airway management by CCT personnel relative to the COVID-19 pandemic. We used a mixed effects logistic regression to evaluate the association between enhanced PPE (N95 mask, eye protection) use and the pandemic time period on first-pass intubation success, while controlling for other factors potentially associated with intubation success. Variables in the final model included patient demographics (age, sex, and race), body mass index, medical category (trauma versus non-trauma), interfacility or scene response, blade size (Macintosh 3 versus 4), use of face mask, use of eye protection, and crew member length of service. RESULTS: We identified 1279 cases involving intubation attempts on adult patients during the study period. A total of 1133 cases were included in the final analysis, with an overall first-pass success rate of 95.7% (96.4% pre-COVID-19 and 94.8% during COVID-19). In our final mixed effects logistic regression model, enhanced PPE use and the COVID-19 time period were not associated with first-pass intubation success rate. CONCLUSION: In a large regional CCT system with a high ETI first-pass success rate, neither PPE use nor the COVID-19 time period were associated with differences in ETI first-pass success while controlling for relevant patient and operational factors. Other emergency medical services (EMS) systems may have encountered different effects of pandemic-related PPE use on intubation success rates. Further studies are needed to evaluate the influence of sustained use of enhanced PPE or changes in training or procedural experience on post-pandemic ETI first-pass success rates for non-CCT EMS clinicians.

Characterizing Air Medical Transport Experiences in Emergency Medicine Residency Training Programs.

OBJECTIVE: Air medical transportation (AMT) of patients plays a critical role in the prehospital care of the ill patient. Despite its importance, there is no requirement in emergency medicine training programs to have direct experience or education on the topic, and data detailing current AMT experiences across programs are limited. METHODS: A survey detailing program characteristics, AMT experience characteristics, and curriculum factors relating to AMT experience was sent to all 275 credentialed emergency medicine residency training programs in the United States. Our outcomes were to describe the characteristics of AMT and non-AMT programs (proportions) and to evaluate associations (odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals) between program characteristics and 1) AMT experience opportunity and 2) level of resident participation among AMT programs. RESULTS: Two hundred (73%) programs responded, with 135 of 200 (68%) offering some type of AMT experience. The majority of programs offering AMT were 3 years (113 [84%]), university based (63 [47%]), and located in small urban areas (57 [42%]). When AMT was offered, most programs reported that the overall resident participation was low (≤ 20%). Programs that did not offer shift reduction or additional pay for participation in AMT were significantly more likely to have low participation than those with incentives (odds ratio = 4.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.8-15.3). Around one third of AMT experiences allowed for direct patient care. Less than half of the responding programs reported a dedicated AMT curriculum. CONCLUSION: The majority of emergency medicine residency training programs offer an AMT experience, but this experience is highly variable, and overall participation by residents is low. Given the importance of AMT in the care of emergency patients, standardization and increased access to AMT experience and education should be considered by emergency medicine training programs moving forward.