ABSTRACT
Background: People who inject drugs (PWID) are at high risk for HIV infection, yet in rural areas PWID are understudied with respect to prevention strategies. Kentucky is notable for heavy rural HIV burden and increasing rates of new HIV diagnoses attributable to injection drug use. Despite high need and the strong evidence for Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) as a gold-standard biomedical HIV prevention tool, scale up has been limited among PWID in Kentucky and elsewhere. This paper explores individual, environmental, and structural barriers and facilitators of PrEP care from the perspective of PWID in rural Kentucky. Methods: Data are drawn from an ongoing NIH-funded study designed to adapt and integrate a PrEP initiation intervention for high-risk PWID at point of care in two rural syringe service programs (SSPs) in southeastern Kentucky. As part of this initiative, a qualitative study guided by PRISM (Practical, Robust, Implementation, and Sustainability Model) was undertaken to gather SSP client perspectives on intervention needs related to PrEP, competing needs related to substance use disorder, as well as tangible supports for and barriers to PrEP uptake. Recruitment and interviews were conducted during September-November 2021 with 26 SSP clients, 13 from each of the two SSP sites. A semi-structured guide explored injection behaviors, SSP use, knowledge of PrEP, perceived barriers to PrEP, as well as aspects of the risk environment (e.g., housing instability, community stigma) that may impact PrEP uptake. Interviews were digitally recorded, transcribed verbatim and verified by project staff. A detailed coding scheme was developed and applied by independent coders using NVivo. Coded transcripts were synthesized to identify salient themes in the data using the principles of thematic analysis All study procedures were approved by the University IRB. Results: Participants were 96% white, 42% female, with a median age of 41 years (range 21-62); all reported injection use within the past month. Overall, we found low PrEP awareness among this sample, yet interest in PrEP was high, with several indicating PrEP is urgently needed. Clients reported overwhelmingly positive experiences at the SSPs, considering them trusted and safe locations to receive health services, and were enthusiastic about the integration of co-located PrEP services. Lack of basic HIV and PrEP knowledge and health literacy were in evidence, which contributed to common misperceptions about personal risk for HIV. Situational risks related to substance use disorder, particularly in the context of withdrawal symptoms and craving, often lead to heightened HIV injection and sexual risk behaviors. Stigma related to substance use and HIV arose as a concern for PrEP uptake, with several participants reflecting that privacy issues would impact their preferences for education, prescribing and monitoring of PrEP. Noted tangible barriers included inconsistent access to phone service and transportation. Primary supports included high levels of insurance coverage, consistent pharmacy access, and histories with successful medication management for other health conditions. Conclusions: Drawing on the critical perspectives of people with substance use disorder, our findings provide important and actionable information on individual and environmental barriers and facilitators of PrEP uptake among rural PWID at high risk for HIV infection. These data will drive the adaptation and implementation of a client-centered approach to integrated PrEP care within rurally located SSP settings to address unmet needs for PrEP care.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To compare the mechanical properties of two types of external skeletal fixation of the lumbar spine with polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA)/Steinmann pin fixation in a canine unstable spine model. STUDY DESIGN: Cadaver study. SAMPLE POPULATION: Lumbar spines of 17 mature large-breed dogs. METHODS: Spine stiffness (N-m/deg) in flexion, extension, and rotation under physiological loading conditions and spine strength (N-m) in flexion were determined. Spines were destabilized at L3-L4, instrumented and retested. Fixation techniques included four-pin PMMA (PMMA4), eight-pin PMMA (PMMA8), eight-pin biplanar type I external skeletal fixator (ESF) (SK), and eight-pin spinal arch ESF (ARCHES). RESULTS: All fixation groups were as stiff as intact spines in extension and rotation and were significantly stiffer in flexion. In flexion, both PMMA8 and ARCHES were significantly stiffer than SK, and PMMA8 was significantly stiffer than PMMA4. In rotation, PMMA8 and ARCHES were significantly stiffer than SK, and in flexion to failure, PMMA8 and ARCHES were significantly stiffer than PMMA4. CONCLUSIONS: External skeletal spinal fixation (ESSF) has mechanical properties comparable to more commonly used PMMA/pin internal fixation techniques. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: External fixation of the canine spine has several potential advantages over internal fixation including minimal dissection for pin placement, the ability to span affected vertebrae with placement of implants distant from the site of injury, postoperative adjustability, and complete removal of implants after healing. This study supports the biomechanical stability ESSF of the canine lumbar spine. Further studies are indicated to evaluate zones of consistently safe and secure placement of pins and clinical efficacy.
