The Vascularity and Osteogenesis of a Vascularized Flap for the Treatment of Scaphoid Nonunion: The Pedicle Volar Distal Radial Periosteal Flap.

Background: Vascularized periosteal flaps from the distal radius have been previously proposed. The purpose of this study was to investigate the vascularity and osteogenic potential of a vascularized volar distal radial periosteal flap for the treatment of scaphoid nonunion. Methods: In 5 fresh frozen cadavers, a rectangular periosteal flap was elevated from the distal radius with the pedicle just proximal to the watershed line. Latex dye was injected into the radial artery proximally and the vascularity of the flap characterized by microscopic evaluation. Patients with scaphoid nonunion were then treated with open reduction, internal fixation, and distal radius cancellous bone graft. Two groups of patients with midwaist nonunion scaphoid were then evaluated. The first group received the vascularized periosteal flap and the second group received a nonvascularized periosteal flap. A third group of proximal pole nonunions also received the vascularized flap. Results: Cadaveric dissections revealed that all of the injected flaps demonstrated vascularity to the distal edge of the flap. Vascularized flaps formed visible bone on imaging in 55% of cases. None of the nonvascularized flaps formed visible bone. In group 1, 12/12 midwaist nonunions united. In group 2, union was achieved in 6/6 of patients who completed the follow-up. In group 3, 6/7 proximal pole fractures united. Conclusions: Previously proposed vascularized periosteal flaps from the distal radius appear to possess notable osteogenic potential that may be of interest to surgeons treating scaphoid nonunion.

Retrospective Analysis of the Accuracy of Ultrasound-Guided Magnetic Resonance Arthrogram Injections of the Hip in the Office Setting.

BACKGROUND: Ultrasound (US)-guided intra-articular hip injections have been proposed in the literature to be accurate, reliable, and safe alternatives to fluoroscopy-guided injections. PURPOSE: To evaluate the accuracy of US-guided magnetic resonance (MR) arthrogram injections of the hip performed in the office setting by a single orthopaedic surgeon and elucidate the potential effects that patient age, sex, and body mass index (BMI) have on contrast placement. STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: From a review of the senior author's office database, 89 patients (101 hips) who had US-guided MR arthrogram injections performed between December 2014 and June 2016 were identified. Official radiology reports were evaluated to determine whether extra-articular contrast was noted. Patient variables, including BMI, age, and sex, were evaluated between patients who had inappropriately placed contrast and those who did not. RESULTS: Of the 101 hip injections, there were 6 cases that demonstrated inadequate contrast placement within the joint, likely secondary to extravasation or incorrect placement; however, an MR arthrogram was adequately interpreted in all cases. There were no significant differences noted between those with appropriate versus inappropriate contrast placement when evaluating BMI (P = .57), age (P = .33), or sex (P = .67), and neither group had an adverse event. CONCLUSION: US-guided injections are safe and accurate alternatives to fluoroscopy-guided injections in the office setting, with 94% accuracy. Furthermore, BMI, age, and sex did not play a statistically significant role among patients with inappropriately placed contrast.

Pediatricians' weight assessment and obesity management practices.

BACKGROUND: Clinician adherence to obesity screening guidelines from United States health agencies remains suboptimal. This study explored how personal and career demographics influence pediatricians' weight assessment and management practices. METHODS: A web-based survey was distributed to U.S. pediatricians. Respondents were asked to identify the weight status of photographed children and about their weight assessment and management practices. Associations between career and personal demographic variables and pediatricians' weight perceptions, weight assessment and management practices were evaluated using univariate and multivariate modeling. RESULTS: 3,633 pediatric medical providers correctly identified the weight status of children at a median rate of 58%. The majority of pediatric clinicians were white, female, and of normal weight status with more than 10 years clinical experience. Experienced pediatric medical providers were less likely than younger colleagues to correctly identify the weight status of pictured children and were also less likely to know and use BMI criteria for assessing weight status. General pediatricians were more likely than subspecialty practitioners to provide diverse interventions for weight management. Non-white and Hispanic general practitioners were more likely than counterparts to consider cultural approaches to weight management. CONCLUSION: Pediatricians' perceptions of children's weight and their weight assessment and management practices are influenced by career and personal characteristics. Objective criteria and clinical guidelines should be uniformly applied by pediatricians to screen for and manage pediatric obesity.