Impact of reduced duty hours on residents' educational satisfaction at the University of California, San Francisco.

PURPOSE: To assess the impact of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education duty-hour limitations on residents' educational satisfaction. METHOD: In 2003, the authors surveyed 164 internal medicine residents at three clinical training sites affiliated with the University of California, San Francisco, after system changes were introduced to reduce duty hours. On a questionnaire that used various rating scales, residents reported the value of educational activities, frequency of administrative tasks interfering with education, and educational satisfaction after duty hours were reduced. The authors compared univariate statistics and developed multivariable models to discern the relationship between hours worked and educational outcomes. RESULTS: In all, 125 residents (76%) responded. Residents rated the educational activities, morning report, and teaching others most highly. Answering pages and tasks related to scheduling were the most frequent barriers to educational activities. Residents reported that time spent in administrative activities did not change after duty-hour restrictions, and 68% said that decreased duty hours had no impact or a negative impact on education. In multivariable models, postgraduate year (PGY)-1 residents (p = .004), residents who reported feeling overwhelmed at work (p < .0001), and residents who reported working more than 80 hours per week (p < .05) had lower work satisfaction. However, only PGY-1 residents (p < .05) and those who felt overwhelmed with work (p = .01) were less satisfied with their education. CONCLUSIONS: In this residency program, duty-hour reduction did not improve educational satisfaction. Educational satisfaction may be more a function of workload than hours worked; therefore, systematic changes to residents' work-life may be necessary to improve educational satisfaction.

Managing discontinuity in academic medical centers: strategies for a safe and effective resident sign-out.

BACKGROUND: Restrictions in the hours residents can be on duty have resulted in increased sign-outs, that is, transfer of patient care information and responsibility from one physician to a cross-coverage physician, leading to discontinuity in patient care. This sign-out process, which occurs primarily in the inpatient setting, traditionally has been informal, unstructured, and idiosyncratic. Although studies show that discontinuity may be harmful to patients, this is little data to assist residency programs in redesigning systems to improve sign-out and manage the discontinuity. PURPOSE: This article reviews the relevant medical literature, current practices in non-health professions in managing discontinuity, and summarizes the existing practice and experiences at 3 academic internal medicine hospitalist-based programs. CONCLUSIONS: We provide recommendations and strategies for best practices to design safe and effective sign-out systems for residents that may also be useful to hospitalists working in academic and community settings.

Comparison of supine and prone scanning separately and in combination at CT colonography.

PURPOSE: To compare colonic distention, adequacy of colonic preparation, and colorectal polyp detection as assessed with supine and prone scanning separately and in combination at computed tomographic (CT) colonography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: CT colonography and colonoscopy were performed in 182 patients. Distention and preparation of eight colonic segments were rated separately on a scale of 1-4 (1, segment completely distended or no residual material; 4, segment collapsed or large amounts of residual material). The distention, preparation, and polyp detection data were compared with regard to each position alone and then in combination. CT findings were correlated with colonoscopic findings. RESULTS: The percentage of colonic segments with grade 1 distention and preparation was 93.7% (1,364 of 1,456) and 66.6% (969 of 1,456), respectively, with combined scanning; 86.4% (1,258 of 1,456) and 52.1% (759 of 1,456), respectively, with supine scanning alone; and 85.6% (1,246 of 1,456) and 57.1% (831 of 1,456), respectively, with prone scanning alone. The sensitivity for detection of colorectal polyps 10 mm or larger, 5.0-9.9 mm, and smaller than 5 mm and polyps of all sizes was 92.7%, 79.8%, 60.3%, and 69.9%, respectively, with combined scanning. Sensitivity was 58.5%, 47.2%, 36.3%, and 42.1%, respectively, with supine scanning and 51.2%, 41.6%, 30.2%, and 36.3%, respectively, with prone scanning. The improved sensitivities for use of combined versus individual scanning positions were highly significant (P <.001) for polyps in all size categories. CONCLUSION: Colonic distention and preparation at CT colonography were significantly improved by using supine and prone scanning in combination, and results correlated directly with improved sensitivity of polyp detection.