Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Front Physiol ; 11: 554679, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33123021

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The pathophysiologic differences between methacholine-induced cough but normal airway sensitivity (COUGH) and healthy individuals (CONTROL) are incompletely understood and may be due to differences in the bronchodilating effect of deep inspirations (DIs). The purpose of this study is to compare the bronchodilating effect of DIs in individuals with classic asthma (CA), cough variant asthma (CVA), and COUGH with CONTROL and to assess impulse oscillometry (IOS) measures as predictors of the bronchodilating effect of DIs. METHODS: A total of 43 adults [18 female; 44.8 ± 12.3 years (mean ± SD); n = 11 CA, n = 10 CVA, n = 7 COUGH, n = 15 CONTROL] underwent modified high-dose methacholine challenge, with IOS and partial/maximal expiratory flow volume (PEFV/MEFV) maneuvers (used to calculate DI Index) to a maximum change (Δ) in FEV1 of 50% from baseline (MAX). Cough count and dyspnea were measured at each dose. The relation between IOS parameters and DI Index was assessed at baseline and MAX using multivariable linear regression analysis. RESULTS: Cough frequency, dyspnea intensity, and baseline peripheral resistance (R5-R20) were significantly greater in COUGH compared with CONTROL (p = 0.006, p = 0.029, and p = 0.035, respectively). At MAX, the DI Index was significantly lower in COUGH (0.01 ± 0.36) compared with CA (0.67 ± 0.97, p = 0.008), CVA (0.51 ± 0.73, p = 0.012), and CONTROL (0.68 ± 0.45, p = 0.005). Fres and R5-R20 were independent IOS predictors of the DI Index. CONCLUSION: The bronchodilating effect is impaired in COUGH and preserved in mild CA, CVA, and CONTROL. Increased peripheral airway resistance and decreased resonant frequency are associated with a decreased DI Index. COUGH is a clinical phenotype distinct from healthy normals and asthma.

2.
J Appl Physiol (1985) ; 126(2): 294-304, 2019 02 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30236044

ABSTRACT

The clinical relevance of cough during methacholine challenge in individuals with normal airway sensitivity is unknown. We compared responses of individuals with chronic cough who cough during high-dose methacholine bronchoprovocation and have normal versus increased airway sensitivity to healthy controls. Fifteen healthy participants (CONTROL) aged 26 ± 7 yr (mean ± SD) and 32 participants aged 42 ± 14 yr with chronic cough and suspected asthma completed high-dose methacholine challenge testing. Three participants who did not cough and had normal airway sensitivity were excluded. Spirometry and lung volumes were compared at the maximum response (MAX) among 1) ASTHMA [ n = 15, provocative concentration of methacholine causing a 20% fall in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) from baseline (PC20) 4.71 ± 1.37 mg/ml], 2) methacholine-induced cough with normal airway sensitivity (COUGH, n = 14, PC20 41.2 ± 18.7 mg/ml for 3 participants with a measurable PC20), and 3) CONTROL ( n = 15; PC20 93.4 ± 95.4 mg/ml for 4 participants with a measurable PC20). Esophageal pressure-derived pulmonary mechanics were compared at MAX for the ASTHMA and COUGH groups. From baseline to MAX, FEV1 and forced expiratory flow between 25% and 75% of forced vital capacity decreased more in ASTHMA (-36.2 ± 3.8 %pr; -47.1 ± 6.9 %pr, respectively) than COUGH (-12.2 ± 3.0 %pr ( P < 0.001); -24.7 ± 6.5 %pr ( P < 0.001), respectively) and CONTROL (-13.7 ± 2.0 %pr ( P < 0.001); -32.8 ± 5.4 %pr ( P < 0.017), respectively). In both ASTHMA and COUGH, inspiratory capacity decreased by 500-800 ml, and functional residual capacity and residual volume increased by ~800 ml. Individuals with COUGH develop dynamic hyperinflation and gas trapping comparable to individuals with ASTHMA despite less bronchoconstriction and smaller reductions in mid-to-late expiratory flows, which leads us to believe that COUGH is a distinct phenotype. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Healthy individuals and individuals with chronic cough who demonstrate normal airway sensitivity but cough during methacholine bronchoprovocation bronchoconstrict less than individuals with mild asthma. However, those who cough and have normal airway sensitivity develop dynamic hyperinflation and gas trapping comparable to individuals with mild asthma. Thus, methacholine-induced cough with normal airway sensitivity may be clinically relevant, related to reversible small airway obstruction and preservation of the bronchodilating and/or bronchoprotective effects of deep inspirations.


Subject(s)
Airway Obstruction/diagnosis , Asthma/diagnosis , Bronchial Provocation Tests , Bronchoconstriction , Bronchoconstrictor Agents/administration & dosage , Cough/diagnosis , Lung/physiopathology , Methacholine Chloride/administration & dosage , Respiratory Mechanics , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Airway Obstruction/physiopathology , Asthma/physiopathology , Case-Control Studies , Chronic Disease , Cough/physiopathology , Female , Forced Expiratory Volume , Humans , Inhalation , Male , Middle Aged , Predictive Value of Tests , Vital Capacity , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...