Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol ; 38(8): 1653-1659, 2017 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28572150

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Despite the growing use of percutaneous ablation therapy for the treatment of metastatic spine disease, several issues have yet to be fully addressed. Our aims were to determine whether the vertebral body cortex protects against ablation-induced spinal cord injury; correlate radiofrequency, cryo-, and microwave ablation parameters with resulting spinal ablation zone dimensions and describe normal spinal marrow postablation changes on MR imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten thoracolumbar vertebrae in 3 sheep were treated with radiofrequency ablation, cryoablation, or microwave ablation under fluoroscopic guidance. Technique parameters were chosen to produce ablation zones that exceeded the volume of the vertebral bodies in sheep 1 and were confined to the vertebrae in sheep 2 and 3. Expected ablation zone dimensions were based on data provided by the device manufacturers. Postablation MR imaging was performed at 48 hours (sheep 1) or 7 days (sheep 2 and 3). RESULTS: In sheep 1, cryoablation and microwave ablations extended into the spinal canal and caused histologically confirmed neurologic injury, but radiofrequency ablation did not. The mean difference between the lengths of the radiofrequency ablation zone dimensions measured on gross pathology compared with those expected was 9.6 ± 4.1 mm. The gross pathologic cryo- and microwave ablation zone dimensions were within 1 mm of those expected. All modalities produced a nonenhancing ablation zone with a rim of enhancement, corresponding histologically to marrow necrosis and hemorrhagic congestion. CONCLUSIONS: An intact cortex appears to protect against radiofrequency ablation-induced spinal cord injury, but not against non-impedance-based modalities. Ablation dimensions produced by microwave and cryoablation are similar to those expected, while radiofrequency ablation dimensions are smaller. Ablation of normal marrow produces a rim of enhancement at the margin of the ablation zone on MR imaging.


Subject(s)
Ablation Techniques/methods , Neurosurgical Procedures/methods , Spine/surgery , Animals , Bone Marrow/diagnostic imaging , Bone Marrow/injuries , Female , Fluoroscopy , Lumbar Vertebrae/diagnostic imaging , Lumbar Vertebrae/surgery , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Microwaves , Postoperative Complications/diagnostic imaging , Postoperative Complications/pathology , Radio Waves , Sheep , Spinal Injuries/diagnostic imaging , Spinal Injuries/etiology , Spinal Injuries/pathology , Spine/diagnostic imaging , Surgery, Computer-Assisted/methods , Thoracic Vertebrae/diagnostic imaging , Thoracic Vertebrae/surgery
2.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol ; 38(5): 852-861, 2017 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28183835

ABSTRACT

Minimally invasive percutaneous imaging-guided techniques have been shown to be safe and effective for the treatment of benign tumors of the spine. Techniques available include a variety of tumor ablation technologies, including radiofrequency ablation, cryoablation, microwave ablation, alcohol ablation, and laser photocoagulation. Vertebral augmentation may be performed after ablation as part of the same procedure for fracture stabilization or prevention. Typically, the treatment goal in benign spine lesions is definitive cure. Painful benign spine lesions commonly encountered in daily practice include osteoid osteoma, osteoblastoma, vertebral hemangioma, aneurysmal bone cyst, Paget disease, and subacute/chronic Schmorl node. This review discusses the most recent advancement and use of minimally invasive percutaneous therapeutic options for the management of benign spine lesions.


Subject(s)
Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/methods , Orthopedic Procedures/methods , Spinal Diseases/surgery , Humans , Spine/surgery
3.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol ; 37(4): 759-65, 2016 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26635286

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Combination radiofrequency ablation and vertebral augmentation is an emerging minimally invasive therapy for patients with metastatic spine disease who have not responded to or have contraindications to radiation therapy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the rate of radiographic local control of spinal metastases treated with combination radiofrequency ablation and vertebral augmentation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed our tumor ablation database for all patients who underwent radiofrequency ablation and vertebral augmentation of spinal metastases between April 2012 and July 2014. Tumors treated in conjunction with radiation therapy were excluded. Tumor characteristics, procedural details, and complications were recorded. Posttreatment imaging was reviewed for radiographic evidence of tumor progression. RESULTS: Fifty-five tumors met study inclusion criteria. Radiographic local tumor control rates were 89% (41/46) at 3 months, 74% (26/35) at 6 months, and 70% (21/30) at 1 year after treatment. Clinical follow-up was available in 93% (51/55) of cases. The median duration of clinical follow-up was 34 weeks (interquartile range, 15-89 weeks), during which no complications were reported and no patients had clinical evidence of metastatic spinal cord compression at the treated levels. CONCLUSIONS: Combination radiofrequency ablation and vertebral augmentation appears to be an effective treatment for achieving local control of spinal metastases. A prospective clinical trial is now needed to replicate these results.


Subject(s)
Pulsed Radiofrequency Treatment/methods , Spinal Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Spinal Neoplasms/secondary , Spine/pathology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Combined Modality Therapy , Disease Progression , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Male , Middle Aged , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures , Positron-Emission Tomography , Pulsed Radiofrequency Treatment/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Spinal Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Spine/diagnostic imaging , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL