Changes in Anesthesia Can Reduce Periprocedural Urinary Retention After EVAR.

BACKGROUND: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs provide a streamlined approach for expedient postoperative care of high-volume procedures. Endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) has become standard treatment for abdominal aortic aneurysms and implementation of an early recovery program is warranted. Postoperative urinary retention (POUR) remains a problem lending to longer hospital stays and patient discomfort. We aim to demonstrate the utility of monitored anesthetic care (MAC) plus local anesthesia as a modality to minimize urinary retention following EVAR. METHODS: Single-center retrospective review from January 2017 to March 2020 of all patients undergoing standard elective EVAR under general anesthesia or MAC anesthesia. Local anesthetic at vessel access sites was used in all patients under MAC. Ruptured pathology and female sex were excluded from analysis. Patient characteristics, operative details, prostate measurements, and outcomes were abstracted from the electronic medical record. Urinary retention was defined as any requirement of straight catheterization, urinary catheter replacement, or discharge with urinary catheter. Chi square tests and logistic regression were used to determine predictors associated with POUR and increased hospital length of stay. RESULTS: Among 138 patients who underwent EVAR, eight (5.8%) were excluded due to ruptured pathology. Of the cohort, 113 (86.9%) were male with mean age of 73 years. Excluding female patients, 63 (55.8%) male patients underwent general anesthesia and 50 (44.3%) underwent MAC. Male patients under general anesthesia were more likely to have intra-operative urinary catheter placement when compared to MAC (82.5% vs. 36%, respectively; P < 0.001). POUR was identified in 17 patients (13.1%) of the entire study population with 15 events (88.2%) occurring in males. Excluding patients who were admitted to the ICU, twenty-two (19.5%) male patients stayed past postoperative day (POD) one, of which those who developed POUR were more likely to experience compared to those without POUR (45.6% vs. 9.7%, respectively; P = 0.001). On multivariable analysis, male patients who received MAC had a lower risk of developing POUR (OR 0.09, 95% CI 0.02-0.50). POUR was not associated with elective urinary catheter placement nor with pre-existing conditions such as diabetes, urinary retention, benign prostatic hypertrophy (BPH), or use of BPH medications. Additionally, neither prostate size nor volume was associated with developing POUR among male patients. CONCLUSION: MAC plus local anesthesia is associated with decreased rates of POUR after elective EVAR in male patients. ERAS pathways during elective EVAR interventions should implement MAC plus local anesthesia as an acceptable anesthetic option, where appropriate, in order to reduce urinary retention rates and subsequently decrease hospital length of stay in this patient cohort.

Thoracic endovascular aortic repair with true-false-true lumen deployment.

Endovascular treatment of aortic dissection may be complicated by challenges to navigating the true lumen. In this report, we describe treatment of a type B dissection after open type A repair with aneurysmal degeneration, a short-segment occluded true lumen, and a distal re-entry tear near the celiac artery origin. Endovascular septal fenestration and subsequent thoracic endovascular aortic repair were used to bypass the short-segment midthoracic aortic occlusion, successfully excluding the thoracic aortic aneurysm. The patient was discharged without complications, and follow-up imaging demonstrated favorable aortic remodeling. The case demonstrates feasibility of an endovascular bypass of an intervening short-segment occluded true lumen using a thoracic endovascular aortic repair with true-false-true lumen deployment.

Identifying a Safe Carotid Stump Pressure Threshold for Selective Shunting During Carotid Endarterectomy.

BACKGROUND: There is no current consensus on the best criteria for selective shunting during carotid endarterectomy (CEA). The choice of continuous neurologic assessment during awake CEA, intraoperative electroencephalogram, or carotid stump pressure monitoring as the basis for shunt placement is primarily dependent on surgeon preference. Our goal is to define a safe stump pressure threshold as a guide for selective shunting. METHODS: The study is a single-surgeon retrospective review of consecutive patients who underwent CEA under general anesthesia with selective shunting based on intraoperative stump pressure measurements from 2001 to 2019. Demographic and periprocedural variables were analyzed using standard statistical techniques. RESULTS: Among 399 patients, 68% were male with a mean age of 70. One-third of the patients were symptomatic, with amaurosis fugax in 12%, transient ischemic attack in 7%, and stroke in 16%. In total, 60 (15%) patients underwent shunting: 34 for a confirmed preoperative acute ischemic stroke, 22 for a stump pressure <30 mm Hg, and 4 for other indications. Overall 30-day death, ischemic ipsilateral stroke, myocardial infarction, and cranial nerve palsy rates were 0.5%, 0.8%, 1.8%, and 1.0%, respectively. No strokes occurred due to hypoperfusion, and all stroke symptoms resolved prior to discharge with a mean length of stay of 1.6 days. CONCLUSIONS: This is one of the largest contemporary series of CEA using a 30 mm Hg threshold for selective shunting that demonstrated exceedingly low 30-day death and stroke events. Intraoperative carotid stump pressure measurements are a useful guide for selective shunting and reduction in perioperative stroke complications after CEA.

The Use of Smart Phone Thermal Imaging for Assessment of Peripheral Perfusion in Vascular Patients.

BACKGROUND: Ankle-brachial index (ABI) is a reliable method to evaluate extremity perfusion but can be prohibitive to obtain secondary to patient discomfort or extremity trauma. This study investigates smart phone-based forward looking infrared imaging to assess peripheral perfusion using thermal ABI (tABI). METHODS: ABIs were measured by a certified vascular laboratory. Thermographs of each extremity (hands/feet) were obtained, and maximum surface temperature was recorded. tABI was calculated by dividing the lower extremity (LE) temperature by the upper extremity (UE). ABI and tABI were compared using Pearson's correlation and Bland-Altman plot. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients (45 limbs) had ABI's and thermographs recorded on the same day. Median ABI was 0.89 (range 0.33-1.46, IQR 0.4). Median LE temperature was 83.0°F (range 60.7-96.9°F, IQR 14.1). Median UE temperature was 91.2°F (range 81.9-94.6°F, IQR 3.4). Median tABI was 0.93 (range 0.33-1.4, IQR 0.2). Positive correlation was seen between ABI and tABI with Pearson analysis (r = 0.83, P < 0.0001) and Bland-Altman plot (bias -0.01, LOA -0.13 to -0.12). CONCLUSIONS: Thermal imaging correlates with ABI in the evaluation of extremity perfusion. Smart phone-based FLIR can be used to determine peripheral perfusion in clinical settings where ABI is difficult to obtain.

Intravascular ultrasound is a critical tool for accurate endograft sizing in the management of blunt thoracic aortic injury.

BACKGROUND: Accurate measurement of true aortic luminal diameter (ALD) is critical for endograft sizing in endovascular treatment of blunt thoracic aortic injury (BTAI), but ALD is dynamic and changes with respect to patients' hemodynamic status. This study aimed to characterize how ALD at the time of diagnosis of BTAI compares with ALD at the time of endovascular repair and later at follow-up. METHODS: This is an Institutional Review Board-approved, single-institution retrospective analysis of prospectively obtained data. Patients were included who presented between July 2007 and December 2012 with computed tomography angiography (CTA)-diagnosed BTAI; who underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR); and who underwent preoperative CTA, intraoperative intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), and postimplantation CTA. Comparison measurements of the ALD were made among CTA and IVUS images at the level of the left subclavian artery (LSCA) and between initial CTA and postimplantation CTA at 10, 15, and 20 cm distal to the LSCA. Theoretical endograft sizes were determined and compared for each ALD at the LSCA. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients were included in the analysis. Mean age was 38 ± 14 years (range, 17-61 years), with 82% men and mean Injury Severity Score of 43 ± 11 (range, 24-66). Mean time from emergency department admission to initial CTA was -1.2 ± 5 hours (range, -13 to 11.5 hours; negative time implies imaging at an outside facility before admission). Mean time from initial CTA to IVUS was 1.2 ± 1.4 days (range, 2.5 hours-5.7 days) and from IVUS to postimplantation CTA 33 ± 45 days (range, 17 hours-169 days). Overall, ALD measured by IVUS was significantly larger than that by initial CTA (Δ2.5 ± 3.1 mm; P < .05). ALD was also larger at 10, 15, and 20 cm distal to the LSCA in comparing the postimplantation CTA with the initial CTA (Δ2.4, 2.0, and 2.0 mm, respectively; all P < .05). More than half the devices would be sized differently with ALD measured by IVUS at the time of TEVAR vs initial CTA. CONCLUSIONS: The ALD of patients with BTAI is significantly larger when it is measured by IVUS at the time of TEVAR compared with at the time of initial CTA. This difference in ALD may translate to undersizing of endografts used in TEVAR for BTAI. IVUS at the time of TEVAR provides a more accurate measurement of the actual ALD and should be used for endograft sizing for patients with BTAI.

Favorable discharge disposition and survival after successful endovascular repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm.

OBJECTIVE: Endovascular repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rEVAR) has been shown to improve perioperative outcomes compared with open surgical repair (OSR). Follow-up of these patients, however, is lacking. In this study, we compare the discharge disposition and midterm survival of ruptured aneurysm patients who survived treatment with either rEVAR or OSR. METHODS: We performed an institutional review board-approved, single-institution, retrospective review of all patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (rAAAs) admitted from July 2007 to February 2012. Primary outcomes were discharge disposition and midterm survival (>30 days after the index operation). We also evaluated compliance with follow-up and prevalence of endoleak. RESULTS: A total of 118 patients were analyzed. Eight patients received only comfort care, 10 died in the operating room, 39 underwent OSR, and 61 had rEVAR. Average age and sex were similar (OSR, 77 ± 7.8 years, 85% male; rEVAR, 74 ± 7.4 years, 79% male). Seventy-two survived to discharge (54% OSR [21/39]; 84% rEVAR [51/61]; P = .001). OSR patients had longer lengths of intensive care unit and total length of stay than rEVAR (11.8 ± 10.4/23 ± 16.4 days vs 6.3 ± 8.5/12.3 ± 13.0 days; P = .002/.02). Only 19% (4/21) of patients were discharged home after OSR, rather than to a skilled nursing facility. Significantly more rEVAR patients were discharged to home rather than a skilled nursing facility (65%; 33/51) (P = .0004). Overall, the follow-up rate for determination of survival for patients who lived past 30 days was 86% (56/65; median, 14 months; 25th-75th interquartile, 3.1-27.8). Multivariable logistic regression revealed only the type of procedure performed and perioperative hypotension predicted discharge destination. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed a significant midterm survival benefit for patients after rEVAR compared with OSR (P = .01, log-rank). Subgroup analysis of survivors past 30 days revealed similar rates of midterm survival (P = .7, log-rank). Overall, midterm relative risk reduction for death after rEVAR vs OSR was 35% (95% confidence interval, 0.06-0.59). CONCLUSIONS: We have previously demonstrated that successful utilization of rEVAR improves the early survival of rAAA patients compared with OSR. This study shows that more patients are able to be discharged to home after rEVAR and that the early survival advantage is continued in midterm follow-up, suggesting that rEVAR should be attempted first when feasible. Further studies are needed to determine the long-term durability of endovascular repair in the management of rAAA as well as the impact on cost and long-term quality of life.