Inhibition of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase improves nitric oxide-mediated vasodilatation and reduces inflammation in hypercholesterolemia.

BACKGROUND: Oxidized low-density lipoprotein reduces endothelial nitric oxide production (an important mediator of vasoregulation) and activates p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), a mediator of vascular inflammation. Animal models of vascular stress have previously predicted improvements in vascular function after p38 MAPK inhibition. We hypothesized that a selective p38α/ß MAPK inhibitor (losmapimod; GW856553) would improve compromised nitric oxide-mediated vasoregulation in patients with hypercholesterolemia. METHODS AND RESULTS: Untreated hypercholesterolemic patients (low-density lipoprotein cholesterol >4.1 mmol/L) were randomized to receive losmapimod 7.5 mg (n=27) or placebo (n=29) twice daily for 28 days. Patients with known vascular disorders (eg, diabetes mellitus, coronary heart disease) were excluded. Forearm blood flow was measured by venous occlusion plethysmography in response to serial intra-arterial infusion of acetylcholine, sodium nitroprusside, and N(G)-monomethyl-L-arginine (L-NMMA). Acetylcholine and L-NMMA responses were significantly impaired (P=0.01 and P=0.03) compared with responses in control subjects (n=12). In hypercholesterolemic patients treated with losmapimod, responses to acetylcholine were improved by 25% (95% confidence interval, 5 to 48; P=0.01), to sodium nitroprusside by 20% (95% confidence interval, 3 to 40; P=0.02), and to L-NMMA by 10% (95% confidence interval, -1 to 23; P=0.07) compared with placebo. C-reactive protein was reduced by 57% (95% confidence interval, -81 to -6%; P<0.05) in patients treated with losmapimod compared with placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Losmapimod improves nitric oxide-mediated vasodilatation in hypercholesterolemic patients, which is consistent with findings in previous translational animal models. These data support the hypothesis that attenuating the inflammatory milieu by inhibiting p38 MAPK activity improves NO activity. This suggests p38 MAPK as a novel target for patients with cardiovascular disease.

Simvastatin prevents inflammation-induced aortic stiffening and endothelial dysfunction.

AIMS: The aim of this study was to determine whether simvastatin would protect against inflammation-induced aortic stiffening and endothelial dysfunction. METHODS: Aortic pulse wave velocity (aPWV) and flow-mediated dilatation (FMD) were assessed three times, at baseline, after a 14 day administration of simvastatin or placebo and 8 h after Salmonella typhi vaccination in 50 healthy subjects. RESULTS: Following vaccination there was a significant increase in aPWV in the placebo group (5.80 ± 0.87 vs. 6.21 ± 0.97 m s⁻¹, 95% CI 0.19, 0.62, P= 0.002) but not the simvastatin group (5.68 ± 0.73 vs. 5.72 ± 0.74 m s⁻¹, 95% CI -0.19, 0.27, P= 0.9; P= 0.016 for comparison). Whereas FMD response was reduced in the placebo group (6.77 ± 4.10 vs. 5.27 ± 2.88%, 95% CI -2.49, -0.52, P= 0.02) but not in the simvastatin group (7.07 ± 4.37 vs. 7.17 ± 9.94%, 95% CI -1.1, 1.3. P= 0.9, P < 0.001 for comparison). There was no difference in the systemic inflammatory response between groups following vaccination. However, there was a significant reduction in serum apolipoprotein A-I (Apo A-I) in the placebo, but not in the simvastatin, group. CONCLUSIONS: Simvastatin prevents vaccination-induced aortic stiffening and endothelial dysfunction. This protective mechanism may be due to preservation of the Apo A-I lipid fraction, rather than pleiotropic anti-inflammatory effects of statins.

Prolonged pharmacodynamic effects of S-0139, an intravenously administered endothelin A (ET) antagonist, in the human forearm blood flow model.

AIMS: To estimate the pharmacologically active dose range of a new investigational compound S-0139, a selective endothelin A (ET(A)) receptor antagonist, in man, and to examine the duration of its pharmacodynamic effect. METHODS: Venous occlusion plethysmography was performed to assess changes in forearm blood flow following intra-brachial administration of endothelin-1 (ET-1). ET(A) antagonists have been shown to block ET-1-induced vasoconstriction in this model. The study was conducted in three parts: (1) a pilot study to explore dose-response (dose range 0.08-13.33 microg kg(-1) min(-1)), (2) a randomized study to confirm dose-response (placebo, 2.5, 6.67 and 15 microg kg(-1) min(-1)), and (3) a delayed administration study (15.7 microg kg(-1) min(-1)) to explore the duration of the pharmacodynamic effect. In all studies a 3-h infusion of S-0139 was given and during the last 90 min of the infusion, ET-1 was infused concurrently for 90 min. In study (3) a second ET-1 infusion was given starting 3 h after completion of the first. RESULTS: Intravenously administered S-0139 resulted in significant inhibition of ET-1-induced vasoconstriction in the forearm (plasma concentration 800-2000 ng ml(-1)). In the delayed administration study, the same extent of inhibition was still present when ET-1 was administered 3 h after the end of infusion of S-0139, even though the S-0139 plasma concentrations (mean 17 ng ml(-1)) were well below pharmacologically active concentrations as determined in studies 1 and 2. CONCLUSIONS: S-0139 dose-dependently blocks ET-1-mediated vasoconstriction in the forearm and has a prolonged duration of effect beyond that expected from its pharmacokinetic profile.

The effects of urotensin II and urantide on forearm blood flow and systemic haemodynamics in humans.

AIMS: (i) To compare the effects of intra-arterial administration of urotensin II in patients with CVD with healthy volunteers, and (ii) to study the haemodynamic effects of intra-arterial infusion of the urotensin II receptor antagonist, urantide. METHODS: Ten healthy volunteers and 10 patients with CVD received a dose-ramped brachial artery infusion of urotensin II. A further six healthy male volunteers received a prolonged urotensin II infusion and 11 healthy male volunteers received a dose-ramped infusion of urantide. Forearm blood flow (FBF) was measured every 20 min and blood pressure and heart rate were assessed every 20 min. RESULTS: In healthy volunteers and patients with CVD, intra-arterial infusion of urotensin II had no effect on FBF ratio. A dose-ramped infusion of urantide similarly had no effect on FBF ratio. During dose-ramped infusions of urotensin II and urantide, systolic and mean arterial blood pressure increased significantly. In healthy volunteers, urotensin II and urantide, respectively, increased systolic blood pressure from 133 +/- 6 to 137 +/- 5 mmHg (P < 0.01) and from 113 +/- 4 to 120 +/- 4 mmHg (P < 0.01). In patients with CVD, heart rate also significantly increased during dose-ramped infusion of urotensin II from 59 +/- 3 to 62 +/- 4 bpm (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: We have shown no in vivo effect of urotensin II or urantide on human forearm resistance vessels. Previous discrepancies do not seem to relate to either the age or CVD status of subjects. Changes in systemic cardiovascular haemodynamics during the dose-ramped infusion studies are unlikely to be caused by urotensin II receptor modulation.

Inducible nitric oxide synthase activity is increased in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and contributes to endothelial dysfunction.

BACKGROUND: Recent in vitro studies suggest that inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) activity mediates endothelial dysfunction. Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic inflammatory condition and is associated with endothelial dysfunction and increased risk of cardiovascular disease. The aim of the study was to establish the contribution of iNOS to endothelial function. METHODS: Forearm blood flow (FBF) was measured during intra-arterial infusions of acetylcholine (ACh), sodium nitroprusside (SNP), N(G)-monomethyl-l-arginine (l-NMMA) and aminoguanidine (AG) in 12 RA patients and 13 healthy control subjects. Levels of C-reactive protein (CRP) and myeloperoxidase (MPO) were assessed. FBF data are presented as mean percentage changes in the ratio (infused/control arm) of FBF + or - SEM. RESULTS: FBF response to ACh was reduced in patients with RA compared to controls (179 + or - 29 v. 384 + or - 72%, respectively; P=0.01), but SNP response was not (P=0.5). FBF response to AG differed between patients and controls (-15 + or - 2% v. 13 + or - 4%, respectively; P<0.001), whereas the response to l-NMMA did not (P=0.4). In a multiple regression model log CRP, AG response and LDL were found to be independent predictors of endothelial function (R(2)=0.617, P<0.001). CONCLUSION: RA patients have endothelial dysfunction and increased iNOS activity in comparison to controls. Furthermore, CRP and iNOS activity were independently associated with endothelial function. Our data demonstrates that inflammation is a key mediator in a process of endothelial dysfunction possibly via activation of iNOS and increased production of MPO.

Methodological approaches to optimize reproducibility and power in clinical studies of flow-mediated dilation.

OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to determine reproducibility of the flow-mediated dilation (FMD) response profile, and discriminatory ability of the components. BACKGROUND: Brachial FMD is widely used to study conduit artery endothelial function. Automated B-mode image edge detection (B-ED) provides a full response profile. Reproducibility and biological relevance of these additional components have not been fully explored. METHODS: Forty-two healthy adults underwent FMD using B-ED repeated at fixed time intervals up to 3 months. The FMD profile was assessed for diameter changes, area under the curve, and time course. Measures were compared in 25 adults with hypercholesterolemia, 25 subjects with diabetes, and 50 matched control subjects. RESULTS: The maximum change in FMD was the most reproducible (coefficient of variation = 9.8%, 10.6%, 6.6%, and 9.2% at 4 to 6 h, 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months, respectively). Most of the variability occurred between subjects rather than within. All FMD measures except time course were significantly reduced in hypercholesterolemia and diabetes. Power curves were generated to indicate the appropriate number of subjects for parallel and crossover study designs. CONCLUSIONS: Maximum FMD percentage change from baseline is the most reproducible of the response curve measures and best identifies those with risk factors. Flow-mediated dilation measured by B-ED is robust and practical to assess the effect of interventions on endothelial function in clinical trials.

Ezetimibe and simvastatin reduce inflammation, disease activity, and aortic stiffness and improve endothelial function in rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of simvastatin and ezetimibe on inflammation, disease activity, endothelial dysfunction, and arterial stiffness in a cohort of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. BACKGROUND: Rheumatoid arthritis is a chronic inflammatory condition associated with increased cardiovascular risk. Statins reduce inflammation and disease activity in RA patients, but whether this is due to pleiotropism or cholesterol lowering per se is unclear. METHODS: Twenty patients received 20 mg simvastatin or 10 mg ezetimibe each for 6 weeks in a randomized double-blind crossover study. Disease activity, blood pressure, aortic pulse wave velocity (PWV), brachial artery flow-mediated dilation (FMD), and serum inflammatory markers were measured before and after each treatment. RESULTS: Both ezetimibe and simvastatin significantly reduced total cholesterol (-0.62 +/- 0.55 mmol/l and -1.28 +/- 0.49 mmol/l, respectively; p < 0.001), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (-0.55 +/- 0.55 mmol/l and -1.28 +/- 0.49 mmol/l; p < 0.0001), and C-reactive protein (-5.35 +/- 9.25 mg/l and -5.05 +/- 6.30 mg/l; p < 0.001). Concomitantly, Disease Activity Score (-0.55 +/- 1.01 and -0.67 +/- 0.91; p = 0.002), aortic PWV (-0.69 +/- 1.15 m/s and -0.71 +/- 0.71 m/s; p = 0.001), and FMD (1.37 +/- 1.17% and 2.51 +/- 2.13%; p = 0.001) were significantly improved by both drugs. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that both ezetimibe and simvastatin reduce disease activity and inflammatory markers to a similar extent in patients with RA. Therapy is also associated with a concomitant reduction in aortic PWV and improvement in endothelial function. This suggests that cholesterol lowering per se has anti-inflammatory effects and improves vascular function in RA.

Isolated systolic hypertension is characterized by increased aortic stiffness and endothelial dysfunction.

Isolated systolic hypertension is associated with increased cardiovascular risk. It is thought to result from large artery stiffening, which is determined by structural components within the vasculature but also by functional factors including NO and endothelin-1. We hypothesized that endothelial dysfunction would account for increased arterial stiffness in patients with isolated systolic hypertension. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between endothelial function and arterial stiffness in these patients along with control subjects. We studied 113 subjects: 35 patients with isolated systolic hypertension (mean age+/-SD: 68+/-6 years), 30 age-matched control subjects (65+/-5 years), and 48 young control subjects (37+/-9 years). Aortic pulse wave velocity (PWV) was derived by sequential carotid/femoral waveform recordings. Conduit artery endothelial function was determined by flow-mediated dilatation. Aortic PWV was higher (9.65+/-2.56 m/s versus 8.26+/-0.85 m/s; P=0.009), and flow-mediated dilatation was lower (2.67+/-1.64% versus 4.79+/-3.1%; P=0.03) in patients with isolated systolic hypertension compared with age-matched control subjects. Similarly, aortic PWV was also higher, and flow-mediated dilatation lower, in older versus young control subjects (8.26+/-0.85 m/s versus 7.09+/-1.01 m/s and 4.79+/-3.1% versus 6.94+/-2.7%; P=0.004 for both). Overall, aortic PWV correlated inversely with flow-mediated dilatation (r=-0.3; P=0.001), which remained significant after adjustment for confounding factors (P=0.01). Patients with isolated systolic hypertension have higher aortic PWV and decreased endothelial function compared with age-matched control subjects. Our results suggest that endothelial function contributes significantly to increased arterial stiffness in patients with isolated systolic hypertension and with age.

Rheumatoid arthritis is associated with increased aortic pulse-wave velocity, which is reduced by anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha therapy.

BACKGROUND: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is associated with increased cardiovascular risk, which is not explained by traditional cardiovascular risk factors but may be due in part to increased aortic stiffness, an independent predictor of cardiovascular mortality. In the present study, our aim was to establish whether aortic stiffness is increased in RA and to investigate the relationship between inflammation and aortic stiffness. In addition, we tested the hypothesis that aortic stiffness could be reduced with anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) therapy. METHODS AND RESULTS: Aortic pulse-wave velocity (PWV), augmentation index, and blood pressure were measured in 77 patients with RA and in 142 healthy individuals. Both acute and chronic inflammatory measures and disease activity were determined. The effect of anti-TNF-alpha therapy on PWV and endothelial function was measured in 9 RA patients at 0, 4, and 12 weeks. Median (interquartile range) aortic PWV was significantly higher in subjects with RA than in control subjects (8.35 [7.14 to 10.24] versus 7.52 [6.56 to 9.18] m/s, respectively; P = 0.005). In multiple regression analyses, aortic PWV correlated independently with age, mean arterial pressure, and log-transformed C-reactive protein (R2 = 0.701; P < 0.0001). Aortic PWV was reduced significantly by anti-TNF-alpha therapy (8.82+/-2.04 versus 7.94+/-1.86 versus 7.68+/-1.56 m/s at weeks 0, 4, and 12, respectively; P < 0.001); concomitantly, endothelial function improved. CONCLUSIONS: RA is associated with increased aortic stiffness, which correlates with current but not historical measures of inflammation, suggesting that increased aortic stiffness may be reversible. Indeed, anti-TNF-alpha therapy reduced aortic stiffness to a level comparable to that of healthy individuals. Therefore, effective control of inflammation may be of benefit in reducing cardiovascular risk in patients with RA.