Intrarenal Doppler ultrasonography in patients with HFrEF and acute decompensated heart failure undergoing recompensation.

OBJECTIVES: Renal venous congestion due to backward heart failure leads to disturbance of renal function in acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF). Whether decongestion strategies have an impact on renal venous congestion is unknown. Objective was to evaluate changes in intrarenal hemodynamics using intrarenal Doppler ultrasonography (IRD) in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and ADHF undergoing recompensation. METHODS: Prospective observational study in patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LV-EF) ≤ 35% hospitalized due to ADHF. IRD measurement was performed within the first 48 h of hospitalisation and before discharge. Decongestion strategies were based on clinical judgement according to heart failure guidelines. IRD was used to assess intrarenal venous flow (IRVF) pattern, venous impedance index (VII) and resistance index (RI). Laboratory analyses included plasma creatinine, eGFR and albuminuria. RESULTS: A number of 35 patients with ADHF and LV-EF ≤ 35% were included into the study. IRD could be performed in 30 patients at inclusion and discharge. At discharge, there was a significant reduction of VII from a median of 1.0 (0.86-1.0) to 0.59 (0.26-1.0) (p < 0.01) as well as improvement of IRVF pattern categories (p < 0.05) compared to inclusion. Albuminuria was significantly reduced from a median of 78 mg/g creatinine (39-238) to 29 mg/g creatinine (16-127) (p = 0.02) and proportion of patients with normoalbuminuria increased (p = 0.01). Plasma creatinine and RI remained unchanged (p = 0.73; p = 0.43). DISCUSSION: This is the first study showing an effect of standard ADHF therapy on parameters of renal venous congestion in patients with HFrEF and ADHF. Doppler sonographic evaluation of renal venous congestion might provide additional information to guide decongestion strategies in patients with ADHF.

[Hypernatremia and polyuria in a female patient with an initial diagnosis of secondary acute myeloid leukemia]. / Hypernatriämie und Polyurie bei einer Patientin mit Erstdiagnose einer sekundären akuten myeloischen Leukämie.

A 66-year-old female patient with the initial diagnosis of acute myeloid leukemia is reported. Paraneoplastic syndrome manifested as hypernatremia due to central diabetes insipidus (CDI), which could be controlled with the administration of desmopressin. After initiation of the induction therapy, the required desmopressin administration could be reduced and terminated. In the further course, the early increasing polyuria and hypernatremia indicated the primary refractory acute myeloid leukemia.

[Acute kidney injury: from creatinine to KIM­1?] / Akute Nierenschädigung: von Kreatinin zu KIM­1?

In addition to the early detection of an acute kidney injury (AKI), several problems or questions have to be addressed. These include the identification of the etiology, the severity (functional or structural), the prognosis (recovery or transition to chronic renal failure), the course of the disease (dialysis or not), and the identification of specific treatment options for AKI. The following article provides an overview of established and new AKI biomarkers as well as an outlook on the potential of future biomarker-associated models of AKI.

[Baroreflex activation therapy : Indication and evidence in resistant hypertension and heart failure]. / Barorezeptoraktivierungstherapie : Indikation und Evidenz bei therapieresistenter Hypertonie und Herzinsuffizienz.

Baroreflex activation therapy (BAT) is a sympathoinhibitory procedure for treatment of therapy-resistant hypertension (rsHTN) and severe heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) that been available for several years. The double-blind, randomized Rheos Pivotal Trial demonstrated a blood pressure lowering effect in patients with rsHTN for the first-generation BAT device. A smaller randomized study in heart failure showed that the Barostim Neo system is safe and can improve heart failure symptoms and decrease neuroendocrine activation. However, for this unilateral system, which is currently in clinical use, no data from large randomized trials exist. Despite existing data for BAT in rsHTN and HFrEF, large randomized trials, showing reduction of blood pressure and cardiovascular events are still lacking. Therefore, BAT's efficacy and safety cannot be conclusively assessed.

[Therapy-resistant and therapy-refractory arterial hypertension]. / Therapieresistente und -refraktäre arterielle Hypertonie.

Therapy-resistant and therapy-refractory arterial hypertension differ in prevalence, pathogenesis, prognosis and therapy. In both cases, a structured approach is required, with the exclusion of pseudoresistance and, subsequently, secondary hypertension. Resistant hypertension has been reported to be more responsive to intensified diuretic therapy, whereas refractory hypertension is presumed to require sympathoinhibitory therapy. Once the general measures and the drug-based step-up therapy have been exhausted, interventional procedures are available.

[Baroreceptor activation therapy for therapy-resistant hypertension: indications and patient selection : Recommendations of the BAT consensus group 2017]. / Barorezeptorakivierungstherapie bei therapierefraktärer Hypertonie: Indikation und Patientenselektion : Empfehlungen der BAT-Konsensusgruppe 2017.

Baroreceptor activation therapy (BAT) has been available for several years for treatment of therapy-refractory hypertension (trHTN). This procedure is currently being carried out in a limited number of centers in Germany, also with the aim of offering a high level of expertise through sufficient experience; however, a growing number of patients who are treated with BAT experience problems that treating physicians are confronted with in routine medical practice. In order to address these problems, a consensus conference was held with experts in the field of trHTN in November 2016, which summarizes the current evidence and experience as well as the problem areas in handling BAT patients.

Effects of baroreflex activation therapy on arterial stiffness and central hemodynamics in patients with resistant hypertension.

BACKGROUND: High central blood pressure, augmentation index and pulse wave velocity are independent cardiovascular risk factors. Little is known of the effect of baroreflex activation therapy on central hemodynamics. METHOD: In this prospective clinical trial, radial artery applanation tonometry and pulse wave analysis were used to derive central aortic pressure and hemodynamic indices (i.e. augmentation pressure, augmentation index, pulse wave velocity, systolic and diastolic pressure time integral, subendocardial viability index) at baseline and 6 months after starting baroreflex activation therapy in 25 patients with resistant hypertension. RESULTS: Apart from peripheral blood pressure reduction, 6 months of baroreflex activation therapy significantly reduced mean central aortic blood pressure from 109.7 ±â€Š20.5 to 97.4 ±â€Š18.8 mm Hg (P < 0.01) and aortic pulse pressure from 62.9 ±â€Š18.6 to 55.2 ±â€Š16.0 mm Hg (P < 0.01). Aortic augmentation pressure and augmentation index at a heart rate of 75 b.p.m. were significantly reduced by 4.3 ±â€Š7.9 mm Hg (P = 0.01) and 3.5 ±â€Š6.8% (P = 0.02). Additionally, pulse wave velocity decreased from 10.3 ±â€Š2.6 to 8.6 ±â€Š1.3 m/s (P < 0.01) 6 months after starting baroreflex activation therapy. Systolic pressure time integral was significantly reduced (P = 0.03), whereas subendocardial viability index remained unchanged. CONCLUSION: Apart from peripheral blood pressure, baroreflex activation therapy reduces central blood pressure, augmentation index at a heart rate of 75 b.p.m. and pulse wave velocity in patients with resistant hypertension, suggesting strong potential to reduce cardiovascular risk.