ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To describe upper-limb function in children with mild and severe traumatic brain injury (TBI), by using both quantitative and qualitative measures. DESIGN: Controlled, prospective cohort study with assessment points initially, at 6 months, and at 2 years after TBI. SETTING: A tertiary pediatric trauma center in Australia. PATIENTS: Fifty-one children, ranging in age up to 14 years, who were consecutive admissions with TBI. On the basis of initial and persisting abnormal coma score and persistence of posttraumatic amnesia, they were assigned to either a mild (n = 26) or a severely injured (n = 25) group. Thirty children admitted with non-TBI trauma were recruited as a control group. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Quantitative measures included Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency and Peabody Developmental Motor Scales. Qualitative measures included Brunnstrom Recovery Stages (adapted), categoric scales of muscle tone, grasp used when handwriting, quality of writing product, bilateral activity, and splint use. RESULTS: There was little difference between the groups on the standardized assessments for subjects who could complete the tests. Qualitative measures showed the severe TBI group to have more difficulties with gross arm control, hand control, and hand function. CONCLUSION: Children with severe TBI experience more and persisting difficulties with upper-limb function. It is essential to include both quantitative and qualitative measures in this type of research.
Subject(s)
Arm/physiopathology , Brain Injuries/physiopathology , Motor Activity , Adolescent , Australia/epidemiology , Brain Injuries/epidemiology , Brain Injuries/rehabilitation , Child , Child, Preschool , Disability Evaluation , Female , Humans , Incidence , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Motor Activity/physiology , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Time Factors , Trauma Severity IndicesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To measure functional outcome in the 2 years after traumatic brain injury (TBI) in 2 groups of children and to determine the usefulness of a TBI severity classification system for resource allocation. DESIGN: Prospective inception cohort study with 3 assessment points during the 2 years after trauma. SETTING: Tertiary pediatric trauma center in Sydney, Australia. PARTICIPANTS: Eighty-one consecutive admissions aged 0 to 14 years. Fifty-one were allocated to the Mild (n = 26) or Severe (n = 25) TBI groups, according to preset determinants of severity; 30 admissions with non-TBI trauma constituted the control group. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Standardized psychometric and clinical assessments of cognition, communication and feeding ability, motor performance (ambulation, fine and gross motor), neurologic status, self-care independence, and school/academic performance. RESULTS: Those with Mild TBI severity had no significant deficits at the 2-year data point. In contrast, those in the Severe TBI group demonstrated continued problems with fine motor performance, neurologic status, self care, and school/academic performance. CONCLUSIONS: A classification system has been developed that may be useful in the allocation of children with a TBI, age younger than 15 years, to 1 of 2 severity groups early in their rehabilitation. This classification system may be useful in determining areas of high and low resource prioritization.
