Building Interest in Cardiothoracic Surgery at an Osteopathic Medical School: Results of an Institutional Study and a Guide for Medical Schools.

Objective A previous study at this institution revealed a connection between interest group involvement and specialty interest while identifying the negative perceptions of cardiothoracic (CT) surgery. This study aimed to build interest and ameliorate the negative perceptions of CT surgery by exposing pre-clinical students to the field through engaging events. Methods Students at a US osteopathic institution who attended CT surgery committee events were invited to complete an online survey after each event. Associations between the number of events attended and ranked responses to survey questions were assessed by two-tailed Spearman correlations. Statistical comparisons in ranked responses between the events attended and the survey questions were assessed by a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Pre-clinical students actively enrolled at the institution during the 2022-2023 academic year were eligible for inclusion. Results There were 83 surveys completed over seven events. There was a significant association between the number of events a student attended and their perception of CT surgeon's work/life balance with a correlation coefficient of .258 (P=0.019) and whether CT surgeons have time for their families with a correlation coefficient of .235 (P=0.035). Residents and medical student events as well as wet lab events increased interest the most and helped students feel equipped to apply for CT surgery. Conclusions While negative perceptions associated with CT surgery exist, these may be ameliorated with more exposure to the field. Unique events that expose pre-clinical students to multiple facets of CT surgery, including physicians and trainees in the field, as well as offering hands-on activities, may increase interest in the field and further pursuit of the field during clinical years.

Assessing interest in cardiothoracic surgery at an osteopathic medical school: Results of an institutional survey.

Objective: Cardiothoracic surgery is a surgical subspecialty that attracts few medical students. As integrated surgical residency programs continue to grow in number, there is increased interest in what factors influence specialty selection during undergraduate medical education. Previous institutional studies have studied allopathic medical schools affiliated with academic institutions. This study aimed to assess the interest and perception of cardiothoracic surgery at an osteopathic institution. Methods: Active medical students at a US osteopathic institution were invited to complete an original online survey. Means and 95% confidence intervals were calculated and graphed for questions using Likert scale responses. Comparison of mean responses for preclinical versus clinical students was assessed by a Kruskal-Wallis nonparametric analysis of variance. Results: There were 166 surveys (22%) completed, and interest in cardiothoracic surgery was indicated by 7.8% of respondents. Work/life balance, personality of cardiothoracic surgeons, and lack of family time were negative factors associated with cardiothoracic surgery. Clinical exposure, shadowing, mentorship, and significant personal/life events before medical school were strong factors in establishing students' interest in cardiothoracic surgery. Preclinical students noted exposure to cardiothoracic surgery would further increase their interest when compared with clinical students (µ = 3.39 vs µ = 2.69, P = .008). Conclusions: All factors that established interest in cardiothoracic surgery occurred before students entered medical school. Although there are negative perceptions associated with cardiothoracic surgery, these may be ameliorated with more exposure to the field. Further research is needed to explore how early exposure in preclinical years of medical school affects students' perceptions and ultimate interest in cardiothoracic surgery.

Time From First Contact With Heart Team to Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in the COVID-19 Era.

OBJECTIVE: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has become the dominant form of aortic valve replacement in the United States. During the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, access to elective surgical care was decreased, particularly for TAVR patients. In this study, we examine the impact of each COVID-19 "wave," on our patient's access to TAVR procedures and their associated outcomes.  Methods: After institutional review board approval, we conducted a retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database and a review of our own center's database to assess time to TAVR pre-COVID-19 and during internally defined COVID-19 "waves." Statistical analysis was conducted via a t-test. RESULTS: We measured the time from first contact to TAVR and compared each COVID-19 wave to our institution's pre-COVID-19 data. During Wave 1 and 2 of COVID-19, our mean time to TAVR increased significantly to 68.44 ± 48.66 days (p = 0.05) and 68.94 ± 53.16 days (p = 0.02), respectively. All three COVID-19 waves demonstrated a statistically significant increase in all-cause mortality post-operatively (PO) with mean PO mortality of 2.5 (p = 0.0035), 1.33 (p = 0.0009), and 0.67 (p = 0.006), respectively, compared to pre-COVID-19 data.  Conclusions: Multiple studies have shown that increased time from first contact to TAVR results in increased morbidity and mortality. COVID-19 increased our institution's time to TAVR significantly across two waves with an increase in all-cause mortality in each wave. This study highlights the importance that institutions should develop mechanisms to ensure access to care during crises so that patients do not face potentially avoidable harm.

Outcomes of acute type A aortic dissection during the COVID-19 pandemic: An analysis of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Database.

PURPOSE: There have been reported reductions of hospital presentation for acute cardiovascular conditions such as myocardial infarction and acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) in the United States during the COVID-19 pandemic. This study examined presentation patterns and outcomes of ATAAD in North America immediately before, and during, the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database (STS ACSD) was queried to identify patients presenting with ATAAD in the 12 months pre-pandemic (March 2019-February 2020), and during the early pandemic (March through June 2020). Demographics and operative characteristics were compared using χ² test and Wilcoxon Rank-sum test. The median annual case volume designated low-volume centers versus high-volume centers (>10 cases per month). Step-wise variable selection was used to create a risk set used for adjustment of all multivariable models. RESULTS: There were 5480 patients identified: 4346 pre-pandemic and 1134 during pandemic. There was significantly lower volume of median cases per month during the COVID-19 pandemic period (286 interquartile range [IQR]: 256-306 vs. 372 IQR: 291-433,p = .0152). In historically low-volume centers (<10 cases per year), there was no difference in volume between the two periods (142 IQR: 133-166 vs. 177 IQR: 139-209, p = NS). In high-volume centers, there was a decline during the pandemic (140 IQR: 123-148 vs. 212 IQR: 148-224, p = .0052). There was no difference in overall hospital-to-hospital transfers during the two time periods (54% of cases pre-pandemic, 55% during). Patient demographics, operative characteristics, malperfusion rates, and cardiac risk factors were similar between the two time periods. There was no difference in unadjusted operative mortality (19.01% pre-pandemic vs. 18.83% during, p = .9) nor major morbidity (52.42% pre-pandemic vs. 51.24% during, p = .5). Risk-adjusted multivariable models showed no difference in either operative mortality nor major morbidity between time periods. CONCLUSIONS: For patients presenting to the hospital with ATAAD during the first surge of the pandemic, operative outcomes were similar to pre-pandemic despite a 30% reduction in volume. Out-of-hospital mortality from ATAAD during the pandemic remains unknown. Further understanding these findings will inform management of ATAAD during future pandemics.

Safety of cerebrospinal fluid drainage for spinal cord ischemia prevention in thoracic endovascular aortic repair.

Objective: Spinal cord ischemia (SCI) after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is associated with permanent neurologic deficit and decreased survival. Prophylactic cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) drainage (CSFD) in TEVAR is controversial. We evaluated the usage of CSFD in TEVAR at our tertiary aortic center. Methods: Our institutional TEVAR database was reviewed to determine the frequency of CSFD usage/complications. Complications were categorized as mild (headache/CSF leak not requiring intervention, urinary retention), moderate (headache/CSF leak requiring intervention, drain malfunction requiring replacement), or severe (intrathecal hemorrhage, CSFD-attributable neurologic deficit). The relationships between CSFD complications and patient/procedural characteristics, CSFD placement timing, and survival were analyzed. Results: Nine hundred thirty-six TEVAR procedures were performed in 869 patients from 2011 to 2020. Three hundred ninety CSFD drains were placed in 373 (41.7%) TEVAR patients. Most CSFD drains (89.5%) were pre-TEVAR. Most post-TEVAR drains were placed for new SCI symptoms (n = 21). Twenty-five patients (6.4%) suffered 32 CSFD complications. Most (n = 17) were mild in severity. Severe CSFD complications occurred in 5/432 (1.1% CSF drains) patients. No patient/procedural characteristics were predictive of CSFD complications. Post implant CSFD placement for new SCI symptoms conferred an increased risk of CSFD complication (odds ratio, 6.9; 95% CI, 2.42-19.6; P < .01). The long-term survival of the CSFD complication cohort did not differ from the overall population. Conclusions: Post-TEVAR CSFD placement for new SCI symptoms was associated with substantially greater risk of CSFD complications. Avoidance of post-implant therapeutic drain placement might be the key to prevention of CSFD complications, favoring a strategy of selective pre-implant drain placement in patients at higher risk for SCI.

COVID-19 and cardiothoracic surgery: Effects on training and workforce utilization in a global pandemic.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted all aspects of healthcare, including cardiothoracic surgery (CTS). We sought to determine the pandemic's impact on CTS trainees' educational experiences. METHODS: A survey was developed and distributed to members of the Thoracic Surgery Residents Association and other international CTS trainees. Trainees were asked to evaluate their cumulative experiences and share their overall perceptions of how CTS training had been impacted during the earliest months of the COVID-19 pandemic (i.e., since March 01, 2020). Surveys were distributed and responses were recorded June 25-August 05, 2020. In total, 748 surveys were distributed and 166 responses were received (overall response rate 22.2%). Of these, 126 of 166 responses (75.9%) met inclusion criteria for final analysis. RESULTS: Final responses analyzed included 45 of 126 (35.7%) United States (US) and 81 of 126 (64.3%) international trainees, including 101 of 126 (80.2%) senior and 25 of 126 (19.8%) junior trainees. Most respondents (76/126, 43.2%) lost over 1 week in the hospital due to the pandemic. Juniors (12/25, 48.0%) were more likely than seniors (20/101, 19.8%) to be reassigned to COVID-19-specific units (p < .01). Half of trainees (63/126) reported their case volumes were reduced by over 50%. US trainees (42/45, 93.3%) were more likely than international trainees (58/81, 71.6%) to report reduced operative case volumes (p < .01). Most trainees (104/126, 83%) believed their overall clinical acumen was not adversely impacted by the pandemic. CONCLUSIONS: CTS trainees in the United States and abroad have been significantly impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic, with time lost in the hospital, decreased operative experiences, less time on CTS services, and frequent reassignment to COVID-19-specific care settings.

Successful Preoperative Optimization for Lung Transplantation With Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair.

Surgically treatable valvular heart disease is common in patients with end-stage lung disease. Nevertheless, advanced lung disease is often seen as a contraindication to cardiac surgery, and severe valvular disease is seen as a contraindication to lung transplantation. This report describes the case of a patient presenting with very severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and severe mitral regurgitation who was managed with transcatheter mitral valve repair and who subsequently underwent successful lung transplantation. Critical valvular heart disease in patients with chronic respiratory failure may be amenable to transcatheter therapy, which may favorably affect lung transplantation candidacy.

Successful bridge to lung transplantation with transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

End-stage lung disease and advanced cardiac conditions are frequently seen together and represent a clinical dilemma. Even though both issues may be amenable to surgical management, combining lung transplant with surgical valve repair is rarely done and theoretically associated with increased morbidity and mortality risks, especially in elderly patients. Here, we describe 2 patients presenting with end-stage lung disease and significant aortic stenosis who were successfully bridged to lung transplant via transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Patient 1 was a 66-year-old man who underwent a double lung transplant 56 days after transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Patient 2 was a 70-year-old man who underwent a single right lung transplant 103 days after transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Both patients had uneventful postoperative courses and are alive at the 1-year time point with excellent performance status. This report suggests that transcatheter aortic valve replacement may favorably impact lung transplant candidacy for patients with end-stage lung disease in the setting of severe aortic stenosis, likely representing a better alternative to concomitant aortic valve replacement and lung transplant in elderly patients.

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement 24 years after cardiac transplantation.

As patient survival after cardiac transplantation has improved over the course of the last several decades, clinicians are now faced with late complications. This includes aortic stenosis which, traditionally, has been treated with reoperative sternotomy and aortic valve replacement. Transcather aortic valve replacement (TAVR) offers a minimally invasive alternative in this high-risk population. A small but growing number of cases of TAVR after heart transplantation in high-risk patients have been reported in the last 10 years; we now present a case of aortic valve replacement via a transcatheter approach 24 years after cardiac transplantation.

Failure to Rescue in Humanitarian Congenital Cardiac Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac surgeons have a significant history of participating in humanitarian work; however, the outcomes in this arena are not well delineated. We sought to define and describe failure to rescue (FTR) in this setting by analyzing the outcomes of the International Children's Heart Foundation. METHODS: From 2008 to 2017, 3009 patients underwent operations during the course of an International Children's Heart Foundation mission. Of these, 1165 patients had at least one complication. These patients were divided into those who ultimately died (FTR group, n = 107) and those who survived (survivor group, n = 1058). Clinical presentation and outcomes were compared. RESULTS: The overall FTR rate was 10%. Patients in the FTR group were significantly younger, weighed less, and were shorter. Children who required a preoperative admission to the intensive care unit were more likely to be in the FTR group. Intraoperative data demonstrated significantly longer cardiopulmonary bypass time among FTR patients, with similar use of intraoperative blood product. Postoperatively, patients in the FTR group had more reintubations than survivors. Cardiopulmonary bypass and intensive care unit times were shown to be significant predictors of FTR. There was a trend between program volume and FTR rate. Program volume appeared to be correlated with FTR. CONCLUSIONS: Failure to rescue occurs at a rate of 10% in the humanitarian congenital cardiac surgery setting. The FTR patients were younger, required more intubations, and had significantly more diagnoses of transposition of the great arteries. Longer cardiopulmonary bypass time and intensive care unit admission were associated with increased risk of FTR.

Sternal wound complications in patients undergoing orthotopic heart transplantation.

PURPOSE: The incidence and management of sternal wound complications in patients undergoing orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT) is not well studied. We report outcomes in heart transplant patients who developed sternal infections requiring reoperations. METHODS: From 2004 to 2013, 437 patients underwent OHT at a single institution. In a retrospective review, patients who developed sternal infections (Infection group, n = 27) were compared with those without (Control group, n = 410). RESULTS: Sternal infection rate was 6.2% (n = 27). Demographics were similar (Table 1). Infection group had higher rates of COPD 25% vs 13%, P = 0.03, and previous cardiac surgery via median sternotomy 28% vs 15%, P = 0.03. Infection group had a greater incidence of prolonged ventilation, 44% vs 31%, P = 0.2, renal failure 56% vs 24%, P = 0.001, dialysis requirement 30% vs 10%, P = 0.006, permanent stroke 11% vs 2%, P = 0.02, perioperative myocardial infarction 4% vs 0.2%, P = 0.09. The infection group had a longer ICU stay (524 + 410 vs 187 + 355 hours, P = 0.001) and hospitalization (59 + 28 vs 0.29 + 43 days, P = 0.001). In-hospital/30-day mortality was 30% vs 19%, P = 0.2. The mean time for sternal reoperation at 44 + 50 days. Deep wound infection (41%) and sternal dehiscence (22%) were common presentations. Causative organisms were Enterobacter (22%), Klebsiella (15%), and Pseudomonas (15%). Vancomycin (44%), 4th generation cephalosporin (37%), and fluoroquinolones (30%) were the most commonly used antibiotics. Surgical treatment included sternal debridement with pectoralis muscle flap (52%), primary closure (18%), and omental flap (11%). CONCLUSION: Sternal wound infections impart a significant burden on patients with OHT. Causative organisms are predominantly virulent gram-negative bacteria. Therefore, a high index of suspicion must be maintained for early detection and treatment.

Tricuspid valve endocarditis in the era of the opioid epidemic.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: We reviewed our institutional experience with tricuspid valve endocarditis to understand the impact of the opioid epidemic on the incidence of right heart endocarditis. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all cases of tricuspid endocarditis managed surgically from January of 2011 to May of 2017. There were no exclusion criteria. RESULTS: A total of 126 patients were identified. There were seven cases in 2011 and 36 in 2016. The average age of the patients decreased from 52.85 ± 19.6 years in 2011 to 39.2 ± 12.9 in 2017. Caucasians comprised 71% of the patients in 2011 and 75% in 2016. Tricuspid valve replacement was performed in 74 patients (58.73%) and repair was performed in 52 (41.27%). Thirty-day mortality was 11.11%. Reoperation, stroke and renal failure requiring dialysis during the index hospitalization were 5.6%, 0.8%, and 8%, respectively. Staphylococcus aureus, found in 43% of cases, was the most common isolate throughout the study period. Streptococcus was the second most common causative agent. CONCLUSIONS: In a span of 5 years, our institution has noted a fivefold increase in surgical volume for tricuspid endocarditis, most likely related to the impact of the opioid epidemic.

Hybrid arch surgery challenges other forms of arch treatment.

INTRODUCTION: The gold standard for aortic arch replacement remains total arch replacement (TAR) procedure. Hybrid techniques, utilizing a combination of open and endovascular approaches, have been developed with goal of lowering postoperative mortality and morbidity, as well as providing an alternative therapy for patients who are elderly, have significant comorbid burden, or patients in whom circulatory arrest may pose significant risk. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: To date, there are no prospective randomized trials comparing hybrid aortic ach procedures to TAR. Further, many case series describing the outcomes of hybrid procedures involve cohorts with significant comorbidities and, thus, comparison with historical, total arch replacement controls is difficult. However, retrospective studies comparing hybrid arch procedures to TAR are accruing including a Society of Thoracic Surgery Database review conducted by our institution. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Review of the literature demonstrates that the optimal surgical management of aortic arch pathology remains a clinical challenge. Several institutions, including our own, have demonstrated that hybrid arch procedures can be safely performed with acceptable postoperative outcomes and improvements in aortic remodeling. However, many other groups have advocated for the use of hybrid procedures only in the setting of high risk patients due to concerns for increased risk as compared to total arch replacement. At present, the majority of the available data suggests that hybrid arch procedures are most frequently reserved for patients who are of significant operative risk. CONCLUSIONS: Hybrid arch procedures are frequently employed for high risk patients. The available data demonstrates that in this population these procedures produce satisfactory outcomes.

Programmatic Changes to Reduce Mortality and Morbidity in Humanitarian Congenital Cardiac Surgery.

BACKGROUND: This report documents the outcomes of cardiac surgical mission trips organized by the International Children's Heart Foundation (ICHF), a nongovernmental organization that provides congenital heart surgery services to the developing world, and discusses factors associated with a reduction of mortality and morbidity in this setting. METHODS: A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database was conducted to identify any patient who underwent surgical intervention during the course of an ICHF mission trip. RESULTS: From 2008 to 2016, a total of 223 trips were made to 23 countries and 3,783 operations were performed. Over 40 unique types of operations were performed with repairs of atrial septal defects (ASDs; n = 479), ventricular septal defects (VSDs; n = 760), teratology of Fallot (n = 473), and ligation of patient ductus arteriosus (PDA; n = 242), comprising the majority of cases. Several organizational policy changes were instituted in 2015. These include the requirement of the host site to have a fully functional blood bank and access to medical subspecialties, the ICHF providing 24-hour intensivist coverage, and not performing surgery on patients weighing less than 10 kg until local capacity has been developed. The overall mortality rate fell to 2.3% from 8.1% after the implementation of these policies. The mortality for ASD repair, VSD repair, PDA ligation, and the repair of tetralogy of Fallot fell from 1.2% to 0%, 1.8% to 0%, 0% to 0%, and 5.6% to 5.1%, respectively. The reoperation rate fell from 11% to 3% and reoperation for a bleeding indication fell from 6% to 2%. CONCLUSIONS: Programmatic-level changes have been associated with reduced rates of mortality and morbidity in humanitarian congenital cardiac surgery.

Concomitant antegrade stent grafting of the descending thoracic aorta during transverse hemiarch reconstruction for acute DeBakey I aortic dissection repair improves aortic remodeling.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Concomitant endovascular stent grafting of the descending thoracic aorta during open repair for acute DeBakey I aortic dissection can be performed in patients with extensive dissection and malperfusion. We analyzed the effects of this strategy on distal aortic remodeling. METHODS: From 2006-2014, acute DeBakey I dissection patients without primary aortic arch tear undergoing open distal hemiarch reconstruction (Standard group) versus those undergoing hemiarch with descending thoracic aorta (DTA) thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR group) were retrospectively reviewed. We studied aortic remodeling only in patients with three-dimensional computed tomography scans available at 1 and 12 months following surgery (Standard group n = 26; Stent group n = 21). RESULTS: At 1 month, abdominal aortic diameters were similar, but true lumen (TL) and true lumen to total diameter ratios (TL index [TLI]) in the DTA were significantly improved in the TEVAR group (P < 0.05). Mean number of fenestrations were similar (1.8 ± 1.5 vs. 2.4 ± 1.9, P = 0.32). At 12 months, DTA true lumen and TLI remained significantly improved in the TEVAR group at all locations (P < 0.01). This translated to increased complete false lumen thrombosis rates in the thoracic aorta (83% vs. 32%, P = 0.01) in the TEVAR group. In the Standard group, DTA true lumen diameter and TL index were significantly decreased at 12 months compared to 1 month time period (P < 0.05). In the TEVAR group, DTA true lumen diameters and TLI were significantly improved at 12 months (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Antegrade TEVAR during open repair for DeBakey I dissection improves DTA remodeling by increasing true lumen diameter without enlargement of the total aortic diameter and by promoting false lumen thrombosis.

Central cannulation strategy for extent I thoracoabdominal aneurysm repair of chronic type B aortic dissection.

INTRODUCTION: We evaluated the safety profile of a central cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) cannulation strategy for repair of extent I thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAA) with chronic type B dissection in comparison to traditional peripheral CPB cannulation strategies. METHODS: Patients undergoing extent I TAAA repair for chronic type B dissection from 2002 to 2011 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were grouped by their CPB cannulation strategy. Patients in Group I underwent central aortic cannulation (n = 28) through a left thoracotomy incision. The true lumen of the descending thoracic aorta was cannulated using an echocardiogram-guided Seldinger wire technique. The right atrium was directly accessed for venous drainage. In Group II (n = 31), arterial and venous cannulation of the femoral vessels was achieved using a left-sided groin incision. All patients underwent deep hypothermic circulatory arrest for proximal aortic reconstruction. RESULTS: Preoperative aortic dimensions (6.5 ± 0.79 cm in Group I vs 7.0 ± 1.15 cm in Group II p = 0.8) were similar between groups. CPB time (240 ± 37 min in Group I vs 174 ± 68 min in Group II p < 0.01) was significantly higher in the central cannulation group whereas circulatory arrest times (43 ± 5 min Group I vs 37 ± 7 min in Group II p = 0.1) were similar between the two groups. In-hospital 30-day mortality (N = 0, 0% in Group I; N = 2, 6.5% in Group II), stroke (N = 1, 3.5% in Group I; N = 0, 0% in Group II), paraplegia (N = 1, 3.5% in Group I; N = 1, 3.2% in Group II), reoperation for bleeding (N = 1, 3.5% in Group I; N = 1, 3.2% Group II), tracheostomy rate (N = 2, 7% in Group I; N = 3, 9.7% Group II), and mean length of stay (19 days in Group I vs 17 days in Group II) were similar (p > 0.05). Median follow-up was 3.6 ± 2.0 in Group I and 5.6 ± 2.6 years in Group II. Actuarial survival at 5 years was 84.6 % for Group I and 77.6% for Group II (p = 0.52). CONCLUSIONS: Central true lumen cannulation through a left thoracotomy incision for repair of extent I TAAA with chronic type B dissection is an acceptable approach with equivalent early and midterm outcomes compared to more standard femoral cannulation techniques. It may provide a safe alternative cannulation site for patients with diseased femoral vessels.

Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery utilizing heart port technology.

OBJECTIVE: To determine operative outcomes of right mini-thoracotomy mitral valve surgery utilizing port access technology in first-time and reoperative cardiac surgery patients. METHODS: From 2002 to 2011, 881 patients underwent minimally invasive mitral valve surgery. Of these, 154 patients had previous cardiac operations via sternotomy (Group 1), of which 18 (12%) had two previous operations. Seven hundred and twenty-seven patients had no previous cardiac operations (Group 2). RESULTS: Patient demographics were similar in both groups. In Group 1, 76 (49%) patients had previous coronary artery bypass grafting, 13 (8%) had previous aortic valve surgery, and 57 (37%) had previous mitral valve surgery. Preoperative echo findings for Groups 1 and 2 included severe mitral regurgitation (MR) (88%, n = 135; 94%, n = 687), mitral stenosis (MS) (4%, n = 6; 2%, n = 12), MS + MR (8%, n = 13; 4%, n = 28), and ejection fraction (48%, 56%). Operative procedures in Groups 1 and 2 were MV repair (54%, n = 84; 89%, n = 645) and MV replacement (46%, n = 70; 11%, n = 82). Circulatory management techniques for Groups 1 and 2 included endoballoon (75%, n = 116; 79%, n = 576), Chitwood clamp (8%, n = 12; 20%, n = 147), and fibrillatory arrest (17%, n = 30; 0.5%, n = 4). Perioperative outcomes were: stroke: 2.5%, 1.6%; reoperation for bleeding: 5%, 6%; valvular reoperation rate: 0.6%, 2%; aortic dissection: 2.5%, 1%; and wound infection: 0%, 0%. Transfusion requirement was 49% (n = 76) and 31% (n = 232), respectively. Median hospital stay was seven and seven days, respectively. On postoperative echocardiography, 98% (n = 151) and 99% (n = 718) of patients had zero or trace MR (1+) with 100% freedom from MR > 2+. In-hospital mortality was 3% (n = 5) and 1% (n = 8). CONCLUSIONS: Operative outcomes with minimally invasive mitral valve surgery utilizing port access technology can be performed safely. Stroke rate was higher in the reoperative cases (p = NS) although similar to reports evaluating redo sternotomy in mitral valve cases.

Root stabilization of the repaired bicuspid aortic valve: subcommissural annuloplasty versus root reimplantation.

BACKGROUND: At our institution, type I bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) patients with aortic insufficiency (AI) who are candidates for valve preservation are stratified into two groups by aortic root pathology: nonaneurysmal root undergoing primary cusp repair+subcommissural annuloplasty (repair group) vs aneurysmal root undergoing primary cusp repair+root reimplantation (reimplantation group). We report outcomes of this surgical reconstructive strategy for the repaired type I BAV. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of 71 patients with a type I BAV undergoing primary valve repair from 2005 to 2012. The repair group (n=40) underwent annular stabilization by subcommissural annuloplasty, and the reimplantation group (n=31) underwent robust annular stabilization provided by root reimplantation. RESULTS: Preoperative characteristics and root anatomy were similar, except for increased root dimensions in the reimplantation group (p<0.001). Mortality, stroke, valve reoperation, and pacemaker requirement were zero in both groups. Postoperative peak (19±10 vs 11±5 mm Hg, p<0.001) and mean gradients (10±5 vs 5±3 mm Hg, p<0.001) favored root reimplantation. Freedom from AI greater than 1+ was 100% in both groups. Mean follow-up was 40 months in the reimplantation group and 38 months in the repair group. At 5 years, overall survival was 100% in both groups. Freedom from aortic reoperation and AI exceeding 2+ were similar in both groups. Freedom from AI exceeding 1+ was significantly better in the reimplantation group (92%±6% vs 62%±10%, p=0.03). The 2-year peak (14±6 vs 19±9 mm Hg, p=0.009) and mean (7±4 vs 11±5 mm Hg, p=0.001) gradients favored root reimplantation. CONCLUSIONS: Root stabilization with the reimplantation technique significantly improves the durability of the repaired type I BAV compared with subcommissural annuloplasty. It also provides improved and sustained valve mobility (transvalvular gradients).