Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Dent Res ; 97(6): 691-700, 2018 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29227715

ABSTRACT

We conducted a critical review of human papillomavirus (HPV) integration into the host genome in oral/oropharyngeal cancer, reviewed the literature for HPV-induced cancers, and obtained current data for HPV-related oral and oropharyngeal cancers. In addition, we performed studies to identify HPV integration sites and the relationship of integration to viral-host fusion transcripts and whether integration is required for HPV-associated oncogenesis. Viral integration of HPV into the host genome is not required for the viral life cycle and might not be necessary for cellular transformation, yet HPV integration is frequently reported in cervical and head and neck cancer specimens. Studies of large numbers of early cervical lesions revealed frequent viral integration into gene-poor regions of the host genome with comparatively rare integration into cellular genes, suggesting that integration is a stochastic event and that site of integration may be largely a function of chance. However, more recent studies of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCCs) suggest that integration may represent an additional oncogenic mechanism through direct effects on cancer-related gene expression and generation of hybrid viral-host fusion transcripts. In HNSCC cell lines as well as primary tumors, integration into cancer-related genes leading to gene disruption has been reported. The studies have shown that integration-induced altered gene expression may be associated with tumor recurrence. Evidence from several studies indicates that viral integration into genic regions is accompanied by local amplification, increased expression in some cases, interruption of gene expression, and likely additional oncogenic effects. Similarly, reported examples of viral integration near microRNAs suggest that altered expression of these regulatory molecules may also contribute to oncogenesis. Future work is indicated to identify the mechanisms of these events on cancer cell behavior.


Subject(s)
Genome, Human/genetics , Genome, Viral/genetics , Head and Neck Neoplasms/virology , Papillomaviridae/genetics , Virus Integration/genetics , Head and Neck Neoplasms/etiology , Head and Neck Neoplasms/genetics , Humans , Mouth Neoplasms/etiology , Mouth Neoplasms/genetics , Mouth Neoplasms/virology , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/etiology , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/genetics , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/virology , Papillomavirus Infections/complications
2.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol ; 34(5): 1062-6, S1-2, 2013 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23370473

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma tumors positive for laboratory biomarkers hrHPV and p16 and negative for EGFR often respond better to nonsurgical organ-preservation therapy than hrHPV-negative, p16-negative, and EGFR overexpressing tumors. CTP has been shown to distinguish which locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinomas will respond to induction chemotherapy or chemoradiation. Our purpose was to determine whether a relationship exists between CTP measures and the expression of these laboratory biomarkers, because both appear to separate head and neck squamous cell carcinoma tumors into similar groups. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted an institutional review board-approved, Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant retrospective review of head and neck CTP in 25 patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma who had signed informed consent. Eight women and 17 men, 41-80 years of age, constituted a pretreatment group of 18 patients and a palliative group of 7 patients. Tumor biopsy samples were analyzed for overexpression of hrHPV, p16, and EGFR. The hrHPV, p16, and EGFR status of the tumors was correlated with CTP parameters (MTT, BV, BF, CP) by using the Wilcoxon evaluation and Fischer exact test. RESULTS: There were significantly lower CP values in pretreatment tumors overexpressing EGFR (P = .04). CP values ≤17.23 were significantly correlated with EGFR overexpression (P = .015). A trend toward higher CP values was present in hrHPV-positive and p16-overexpressing pretreatment tumors (P = .14). CONCLUSIONS: A significant correlation exists between CTP measures and EGFR overexpression in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas, suggesting an association between certain imaging findings and molecular biomarkers. These results may be related to a tumor cell survival mechanism linking perfusion and biomarker expression.


Subject(s)
Alphapapillomavirus/isolation & purification , Biomarkers, Tumor/analysis , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/metabolism , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/virology , ErbB Receptors/analysis , Head and Neck Neoplasms/metabolism , Neoplasm Proteins/analysis , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/diagnosis , Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16 , Female , Head and Neck Neoplasms/diagnosis , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Perfusion Imaging/methods , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...