Postoperative Radiation Therapy Is Indicated for "Low-Risk" Pathologic Stage I Merkel Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck Region but Not for Other Locations.

Purpose: The role of postoperative radiation therapy (PORT) in early stage Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is controversial. We analyzed the role of PORT in preventing local recurrences (LR) among patients with low-risk, pathologic stage I MCC based on the location of the primary tumors: head/neck (HN) versus non-HN sites. Methods and Materials: One hundred forty-seven patients with MCC were identified that had "low risk" disease (pathologic T1 primary tumor, negative microscopic margins, negative pathologic node status, no immunosuppression or prior systemic therapy). LR was defined as tumor recurrence within 2 cm of the primary surgical bed, and its frequency was estimated with the cumulative incidence method. Results: Seventy-nine patients received PORT (30 HN, 49 non-HN) with a median dose of 50 Gy (range, 8-64 Gy) and 68 patients were treated with surgery alone (30 HN, 38 non-HN). Overall, PORT was associated with a decreased risk of LR (5-year rate: 0% vs 9.5%; P = .004) with 6 LRs observed in the surgery alone group. Although the addition of PORT significantly reduced LR rates among patients with HN MCC (0% vs. 21%; P = .034), no LRs were observed in patients with non-HN MCC managed with surgery alone. There was no significant difference in MCC-specific survival comparing HN versus non-HN groups, with or without PORT. Conclusions: For low-risk, pathologic stage I MCC of the extremities and trunk, excellent local control rates were achieved with surgery, and PORT is not indicated. However, PORT was associated with a significant reduction in LRs among low-risk MCC of the HN.

Extreme coronary radiation doses from intravascular brachytherapy.

PURPOSE: To evaluate coronary artery integrity after very high radiation doses from intravascular brachytherapy (IVBT) in the setting of source asymmetry. METHODS: Ten patients treated for right coronary artery (RCA) in-stent restenosis (ISR) between 2017 and 2021 and for whom follow-up angiograms were available were identified from departmental records. Procedural angiograms, taken to document source position, were used to estimate vascular wall doses. The 2.5 mm proximal source marker was used to estimate the distance from source center to the media and adventitia. Distances were converted to dose (Gy) using the manufacturers' dose fall-off table, measured in water. Follow-up films were scrutinized for any sign of late vascular damage. RESULTS: The average minimal distance from catheter center to the adjacent media and the adventitia was 0.9 mm (±0.2) mm and 1.4 mm (±0.2), respectively. The average maximum media and adventitial doses adjacent to the source were 75 Gy (±26) and 39 Gy (±14), respectively. Follow-up angiograms were available from 0.6 years to 3.9 years following IVBT (median: 1.6 years). No IVBT-treated vascular segment showed signs of degeneration, dissection or aneurysm. CONCLUSION: IVBT vascular wall doses are frequently far higher than prescribed. The lack of complications in this unselected group of patients gives a modicum of reassurance that raising the prescription dose is unlikely to lead to a sudden appearance of complications.

Increased prescription dose for large vessel intravascular brachytherapy.

BACKGROUND: Most randomized studies testing the effectiveness of IVBT were limited to vessels less than 4 mm diameter. In fact, it is now common to treat vessels larger than 4 mm. Accordingly, the authors instituted a prescription dose increase to 34 Gy at 2 mm from source center for vessels greater than 4.0 mm. The increase in prescription dose to 34 Gy at 2 mm from center is substantial, being 50% higher than the conventional maximum of 23 Gy. AIM: To take a close look at group of patients treated to 34 Gy, and for whom follow-up angiograms are available. METHODS: Ten patients treated for ISR with a prescription dose of 34 Gy and for whom follow-up angiograms were available were studied. Beta-radiation brachytherapy was performed with a Novoste Beta-Cath System using a strontium-90 (beta) source (Best Vascular, Springfield, VA). Source lengths of 40 or 60 mm were used. A dose of 34 Gy was prescribed at 2 mm from the source center. RESULTS: Patients were re-catheterized from 2 to 21 months (median: 16 months) following IVBT, all for symptoms suggested of restenosis. All patients had some degree of ISR of the target vessel, but no IVBT-treated vascular segment showed angiographic signs of degeneration, dissection or aneurysm. CONCLUSION: The authors' clinical impression, along with detailed review of the 10 cases, suggest that using a 34 Gy prescription dose at 2 mm from source center does not result in increased toxicity.

Improved safety and quality in intravascular brachytherapy: A multi-institutional study using failure modes and effects analysis.

PURPOSE: Highlight safety considerations in intravascular brachytherapy (IVBT) programs, provide relevant quality assurance (QA) and safety measures, and establish their effectiveness. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Radiation oncologists, medical physicists, and cardiologists from three institutions performed a failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA) on the radiation delivery portion of IVBT. We identified 40 failure modes and rated the severity, occurrence, and detectability before and after consideration of safety practices. Risk priority numbers (RPN) and relative risk rankings were determined, and a sample QA safety checklist was developed. RESULTS: We developed a process map based on multi-institutional consensus. Highest-RPN failure modes were due to incorrect source train length, incorrect vessel diameter, and missing prior radiation history. Based on these, we proposed QA and safety measures: ten of which were not previously recommended. These measures improved occurrence and detectability: reducing the average RPN from 116 to 58 and median from 84 to 40. Importantly, the average RPN of the top 10% of failure modes reduced from 311 to 172. With QA considered, the highest risk failure modes were from contamination and incorrect source train length. CONCLUSIONS: We identified several high-risk failure modes in IVBT procedures and practical safety and QA measures to address them.

Radiation therapy for low- and high-risk perineural invasion in head and neck cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: Clinical outcomes and patterns of failure.

BACKGROUND: Perineural invasion (PNI) in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) portends poor prognosis. Extent of treatment of nerve pathways with varying degrees of PNI and patterns of failure following elective neural radiotherapy (RT) remain unclear. METHODS: Retrospective review of HNSCC patients with high-risk (clinical/gross, large-nerve, extensive) or low-risk (microscopic/focal) PNI who underwent curative-intent treatment from 2010 to 2021. RESULTS: Forty-four patients (mean follow-up 22 months; 59% high-risk, 41% low-risk PNI) were included. Recurrence following definitive treatment occurred in 31% high-risk and 17% low-risk PNI patients. Among high-risk patients, 69% underwent surgery with post-operative RT and 46% underwent elective neural RT. Local control (83% low-risk vs. 75% high-risk), disease-free, and overall survival did not differ between groups. CONCLUSIONS: High local control rates were achieved in high-risk PNI patients treated with adjuvant or primary RT, including treatment of both involved and uninvolved, communicating cranial nerves, with few failures in electively treated regions.

Image-guided intravascular brachytherapy dose escalation.

PURPOSE: Coronary stents reduce IVBT radiation dose with a single layer by 10-30%. However, the impact of multiple stent layers and stent expansion remains unexplored. Individualized dose adjustments considering variations in stent layers and expansion could improve radiation delivery effectiveness. METHODS: EGSnrc was used to compute the delivered vessel wall dose in various IVBT scenarios. Stent effects were modeled for the stent density of 25%, 50%, and 75% with 1, 2, and 3 layers respectively. Doses were calculated at 1.75 to 5.00 mm away from the source center, normalized to 100% at 2 mm. RESULTS: Dose fall-off increased with increasing stent density. With a single layer, the dose at 2 mm from source fell from 100% of prescription to 92%, 83% and 73% at 25%, 50% and 75% density, respectively. The computed dose to points with increasing radial distance from the source decreased progressively with increasing stent layers. With three layers, at 75% stent density, the dose at 2 mm from source center fell to 38%. CONCLUSIONS: A schema for image-guided IVBT dose adjustment is described. While it would be an improvement over current standard of care, myriad factors remain to be addressed in a comprehensive effort to optimize IVBT.

Matching Protocol and Practice: The Challenge of Meeting Lung and Kidney Total Body Irradiation Constraints for Scleroderma.

PURPOSE: Total body irradiation (TBI), a form of immunomodulation, improves treatment outcomes for rapidly progressive scleroderma. The landmark Scleroderma: Cyclophosphamide or Transplantation (SCOT) trial used strict 200-cGy lung and kidney dose restrictions to limit the likelihood of normal tissue toxicity. The protocol as written did not specify how or where the 200-cGy limit was to be measured, opening the door to variable techniques and outcomes. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Following the SCOT protocol, a validated 18-MV TBI beam model was used to evaluate lung and kidney doses with varying Cerrobend half-value layers (HVLs). Block margins were constructed per the SCOT protocol. RESULTS: Using the 2 HVL SCOT block guidelines, the average central point dose under the lung block center was 353 (±27) cGy, almost double the mandated 200 cGy. The mean lung dose was 629 (±30) cGy, triple the mandated 200 cGy. No block thickness could achieve the mandated 2 Gy due to contribution from unblocked peripheral lung tissue. With 2 HVLs, the average kidney dose was 267 (±7) cGy. Three HVLs were needed to reduce it <200 cGy, meeting the mandated SCOT limit. CONCLUSIONS: There is considerable ambiguity (and inaccuracy) in lung and kidney dose modulation for TBI. It is not possible to achieve the mandated lung doses using the protocol-specified block parameters. Future investigators are encouraged to take these findings into account to develop more explicit, achievable, reproducible, and accurate TBI methodology.

(Potential) Mishaps of High-Dose-Rate Vaginal Cuff Brachytherapy.

Considering how commonly vaginal cuff brachytherapy is used, there is relatively little literature regarding the potential, albeit low, risk for complications. We present 3 potentially serious mishaps involving cylinder misplacement, dehiscence, and excessive normal tissue irradiation due to unique anatomy. Three patients with potentially serious treatment errors were encountered in the authors' usual clinical practice. Each patient's records were reviewed for this report. For patient 1, computed tomography (CT) simulation revealed grossly inadequate cylinder insertion, which was most obvious on the sagittal view. For patient 2, CT simulation revealed that the cylinder extended beyond the perforated vaginal cuff and was surrounded by bowel. For patient 3, CT images were used only to verify cylinder depth. A standard library plan based on cylinder diameter and active length was used. In retrospect, the images revealed an unusually thin rectovaginal septum, with the lateral and posterior vaginal wall thickness estimated to be <2 mm. This patient's fractional normal tissue doses were calculated for this report, revealing a rectal maximum dose (per fraction) of 10.8 Gy, maximum dose that 2 cc of the organ receives of 7.4 Gy, and volume of the organ that receives the prescription dose or higher of 2.8 cc. All doses were far in excess of those anticipated for a minimal 0.5-cm vaginal wall depth. Vaginal cuff high-dose-rate brachytherapy is a high-volume, routine procedure. Even in experienced hands, however, it carries a risk of improper cylinder placement, cuff dehiscence, and excessive normal tissue dose, all of which could seriously affect outcomes. These potential mishaps would be better appreciated and avoided with more extensive use of CT-based quality assurance measures.

Failure patterns after intravascular brachytherapy for in-stent coronary restenosis.

INTRODUCTION: One strategy to improve the effectiveness of intravascular brachytherapy (IVBT) is to study its failures. Previous investigations described mostly discrete, focal recurrences, typically at the proximal or distal edges of the irradiated segment after plain angioplasty or bare metal stents. We reviewed failure patterns of 30 unselected drug-eluting stent (DES) patients who had follow-up angiograms for recurrence within their IVBT-treated vessel. METHODS: Records of 53 unselected IVBT patients treated between 2016 and 2021 were reviewed. Thirty of the 53 patients had at least one subsequent percutaneous intervention (PCI) for in-stent restenosis (ISR) after IVBT. Angiographic findings of those 30 patients with ISR within their previously irradiated vessel are reported here. RESULTS: Of the 30 patients, 21 (70%) developed recurrent ISR within the irradiated segment. Six of the 21 patients who failed within the irradiated segment also experienced ISR proximal or distal to the irradiated segment. Only 15 patients (50%) failed exclusively within the irradiated segment. In nine patients (30%), restenosis occurred proximally and/or distally to the irradiated segment, but not inside of the irradiated segment itself. CONCLUSIONS: We have shown here that 50% of failures after coronary IVBT for DES ISR occur exclusively within the irradiated segment. An additional 20% of patients had failure within and outside of the irradiated segment. These percentages suggest that a higher radiation dose might improve the long-term patency rates, a conclusion that should be tempered by the lack of universal follow-up.

Impact of lung block shape on cardiac dose for total body irradiation.

Evaluating cardiac dose during total body irradiation (TBI) is of increasing interest. A three-dimensional beam model for TBI was commissioned and lung shielding was simulated in a treatment planning system with the cardiac silhouette partially blocked and unblocked. When blocked, the median heart dose decreased by 6% (IQR = 6%) and the median cardiac V12Gy decreased by 27% (IQR = 17%). The median left anterior descending artery dose decreased 20% (IQR = 12%) for blocked cases. Because using partial heart shielding may result in considerable changes in dose to cardiac structures, TBI protocols should explicitly consider lung block design parameters and their potential effects.

Conundrums of coronary brachytherapy.

PURPOSE: In the 1998-2005 heyday of intravascular coronary brachytherapy, a variety of delivery devices were developed and marketed. As the industry shrank, only one device, the Novoste Beta-Cath 3.5F System (Best Vascular, Norcross, GA) remained in commercial production. The 2008 instruction manual, the only official source of technical guidance, lacks recommendations for various common scenarios. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The clinical conundrums described here were encountered during regular use of the Novoste system in 81 patients treated from January to December of 2020 in the course of using the Novoste device in accordance with the 2008 manufacturer's instruction manual. Our experience and strategies are reported and critiqued. RESULTS: Ambiguous patient selection factors include vein grafts, multiple affected vessels, large vessels, retreatment, multiple overlapping stents and prior radiation. Procedural ambiguities include vessel size determination, proper prescription dose, very long lesions and eccentric source positioning. Potential procedural mishaps include stuck sources and the risk of contamination. CONCLUSIONS: The Novoste intravascular coronary brachytherapy system is the only commercially available brachytherapy delivery catheter, and may remain so for some time. The issues detailed here provide insight and guidance for current users and may prompt research into areas lacking adequate information.

Effect of total body irradiation lung block parameters on lung doses using three-dimensional dosimetry.

PURPOSE: Total body irradiation (TBI) is an integral part of stem cell transplant. However, patients are at risk of treatment-related toxicities, including radiation pneumonitis. While lung dose is one of the most crucial aspects of TBI dosimetry, currently available data are based on point doses. As volumetric dose distribution could be substantially altered by lung block parameters, we used 3D dosimetry in our treatment planning system to estimate volumetric lung dose and measure the impact of various lung block designs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We commissioned a TBI beam model in RayStation that matches the measured tissue-phantom ratio under our clinical TBI setup. Cerrobend blocks were automatically generated in RayStation on thoracic Computed Tomography (CT) scans from three anonymized patients using the lung, clavicle, spine, and diaphragmatic contours. The margin for block edge was varied to 0, 1, or 2 cm from the superior, lateral, and inferior thoracic borders, with a uniform margin 2.5 cm lateral to the vertebral bodies. The lung dose was calculated and compared with a prescription dose of 1200 cGy in six fractions (three with blocks and three without). RESULT: The point dose at midplane under the block and the average lung dose are at the range of 73%-76% and 80%-88% of prescription dose respectively regardless of the block margins. In contrast, the percent lung volume receiving 10 Gy increased by nearly two-fold, from 31% to 60% over the margins from 0 to 2 cm. CONCLUSIONS: The TPS-derived 3D lung dose is substantially different from the nominal dose assumed with HVL lung blocks. Point doses under the block are insufficient to accurately gauge the relationship between dose and pneumonitis, and TBI dosimetry could be highly variable between patients and institutions as more descriptive parameters are not included in protocols. Much progress remains to be made to optimize and standardize technical aspects of TBI, and better dosimetry could provide more precise dosimetric predictors for pneumonitis risk.

Intravascular coronary brachytherapy combined with a drug-coated balloon.

BACKGROUND: Coronary artery disease leads to stenosis of the major cardiac vessels, resulting in ischemia and infarction. Percutaneous intervention (PCI) with balloon angioplasty can re-open stenosed vessels. Drug eluting stents (DES) and intravascular brachytherapy (IVBT) and drug-coated balloons (DCBs) are proven to decrease the likelihood of another restenosis after PCI, but neither is completely effective. Due to the limited long-term effectiveness of IVBT or DCB used separately for salvage PCI, we combined the two in some poor prognosis patients. METHODS: Combined IVBT+DCB was intended for a total of 36 patients from 2015-2020. PCI with some combination of ballooning, laser and directional/rotational atherectomy was used to maximally open the stenotic region prior to IVBT+DCB. Beta-radiation brachytherapy for all patients was done with a Novoste Beta-Cath. Lutonix 4.0 x 40 mm paclitaxel-coated balloons (Bard, Murray Hill, NJ) were employed. RESULTS: Overall survival at two years was 88%. Nine patients had follow-up angiograms, all for cardiac symptoms. Time from IVBT+DCB to follow-up angiography ranged from 4 to 33 months. The average months PCI-free interval before brachy therapy was 11.1 mos (95% CI 1.03-23.25) versus 23.3 mos after VBT (23.3 95% CI 12.3-32.3). The mean difference was 11.2 mos (95% CI 1.06-21.4, p < 0.031). None of the follow-up angiographic procedures displayed evidence of what could be interpreted as radiation damage. CONCLUSIONS: In this uncontrolled series, IVBT plus DCB appeared to lengthen the ISR-free interval relative to what had been achieved prior to the combined intervention. We view these results as mildly encouraging, worthy of further study.

Medical malpractice and brachytherapy.

PURPOSE: On average, physicians spend 10 years embroiled in malpractice litigation, exacerbating burnout and depression. Only a limited number of studies regarding medical malpractice in radiation oncology have been published, mostly in the last few years. We undertook this review with the goal of looking specifically at brachytherapy-related medical malpractice literature. BASIC PROCEDURES: We used the PubMed search engine using the terms radiation oncology medical malpractice. The search yielded 34 references published between 1988 and 2019. FINDINGS: The incidence of radiation oncology malpractice claims was roughly similar to other specialties, with fairly typical payouts of $100,000-$200,000. Consistent with overall national medical malpractice statistics, a trend toward lesser numbers of radiation oncology claims from 1985 through 2017 has occurred. Medical malpractice data related specifically to brachytherapy are very, very limited. No author has provided sufficient details regarding precisely what leads to brachytherapy malpractice cases. CONCLUSION: Hopefully, the recent spate of publications will segue into a more concerted effort to provide practitioners with detailed actionable descriptions of events leading to malpractice allegations.

Does supplemental external beam radiation therapy impact urinary, bowel, and erectile function following permanent prostate brachytherapy?: results of two prospective randomized trials.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of supplemental external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) prior to permanent prostate brachytherapy on long term urinary, bowel, and erectile function. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patient administered urinary, bowel, and erectile quality of life (QoL) instrument were obtained prior to treatment and following brachytherapy. The study population was comprised of the 457 patients who were alive as of June 2016, had been randomized to two markedly different supplemental EBRT dose regimens and a third arm without supplemental EBRT, and had completed the June 2016 QoL survey. The need for urinary or bowel surgical intervention was prospectively recorded during routine follow-up. Multiple parameters were evaluated for effect on outcomes. RESULTS: The urinary catheter was removed on day 0 in 92.1% of patients and 0.4% required a post-implant transurethral prostatic resection (TURP). On average, the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) normalized at week 14. The 10-year rate of urethral strictures was 5.3%. No significant differences were discerned between baseline and post-implant rectal function assessment score (RFAS), and no patient developed a rectal ulcer or fistula. The 10-year potency preservation rate was 50.3%. Supplemental EBRT did not affect urinary, bowel, or erectile function. Urethral strictures were most closely related to bulbomembranous urethral brachytherapy doses, post-implant rectal function to pre-implant hemorroidal bleeding, and RFAS and erectile function to pre-brachytherapy international index of erectile function and age. CONCLUSIONS: Supplemental EBRT did not significantly effect catheter dependency, IPSS resolution, urethral stricture rate, the need for post-implant TURP, bowel, or erectile function. Careful attention to brachytherapy dose distributions appears to be most important in minimizing post-brachytherapy morbidity.

Is supplemental external beam radiation therapy essential to maximize brachytherapy outcomes in patients with unfavorable intermediate-risk disease?

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether supplemental external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) is essential to maximize Pd-103 brachytherapy outcomes in patients with unfavorable intermediate-risk (IR) disease. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 630 patients were assessed from two prospective randomized brachytherapy trials evaluating the role of supplemental EBRT in patients with higher risk features. Patients were stratified into unfavorable IR (primary Gleason pattern 4, ≥50% positive biopsies, or ≥2 IR features), favorable IR, and high-risk (HR) cohorts. Median follow-up was 7.5 years. The brachytherapy prescription dose was prescribed to the prostate gland with generous periprostatic margins. Biochemical failure (BF) was defined as a prostate-specific antigen >0.40 ng/mL after nadir. Patients with metastatic prostate cancer or nonmetastatic castrate-resistant disease who died of any cause were classified as dead of prostate cancer. Multiple parameters were evaluated for effect on outcomes. RESULTS: The 10-year BF for favorable IR, unfavorable IR, and HR was 1.7%, 6.6%, and 15.5% (p < 0.001). At 10 years, prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM) and overall mortality (OM) were 0% and 20.4%, 2.1% and 23.2%, and 4.3% and 42.4% for favorable IR, unfavorable IR, and HR. Although unfavorable IR patients had a greater incidence of BF, PCSM, and OM when compared with favorable IR, neither the addition nor dose of supplemental EBRT influenced outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Outcomes for favorable IR were superior to those with unfavorable IR. Within the confines of this study, neither the addition nor dose of supplemental EBRT influenced BF, PCSM, or OM in patients with IR disease.

Is supplemental external beam radiation therapy necessary for patients with higher risk prostate cancer treated with 103Pd? Results of two prospective randomized trials.

PURPOSE: To determine the necessity and/or dose of supplemental external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) in conjunction with palladium-103 ((103)Pd) brachytherapy for high-risk prostate cancer patients. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Trial 44/20 randomized patients to 44 Gy plus 90 Gy (103)Pd vs. 20 Gy with 115 Gy (103)Pd, and the subsequent trial randomized patients to the 20 Gy arm vs. 125 Gy (103)Pd without EBRT (20/0 trial). Eligibility criteria included clinically organ-confined disease with Gleason scores 7-9 and/or a pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) 10-20 ng/mL. The brachytherapy prescription dose was prescribed to the prostate gland with generous periprostatic margins. Biochemical failure (BF) was defined as a PSA >0.40 ng/mL after nadir. Median Day 0 minimum dose covering 90% of the prostate volume (D90) was >121.0% of the prescription dose. Multiple parameters were evaluated for effect on outcomes. RESULTS: In 44/20 trial, 13-year BF, prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM), and overall mortality (OM) were 8.2%, 4.0%, and 42.8% vs. 8.0%, 1.0%. and 40.3% for the 44 and 20 Gy arms. In 20/0 trial, 8-year BF, PCSM, and OM were 2.1%, 0%, and 14.4% vs. 3.6%, 0%, and 16.1% in the 20 vs. 0 Gy arms. When stratified by either pretreatment PSA or by Gleason score, supplemental EBRT dose did not impact BF, PCSM, or OM. In multivariate analysis, BF was most closely related to percent positive biopsies and prostate volume. In both trials, patients with biochemically controlled disease had a median PSA of <0.02 ng/mL. CONCLUSIONS: With high-quality brachytherapy dose distributions, supplemental EBRT did not influence BF or PCSM for patients with intermediate-risk disease. The number of patients with Gleason score 8-9 was too small to determine the role of supplemental EBRT in that cohort.

Severe rectal complications after prostate brachytherapy.

PURPOSE: Some investigators have reported severe rectal complications after brachytherapy. Due to the low number of such events, their relationship to dosimetric parameters has not been well characterized. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 3126 patients were treated with low dose rate brachytherapy from 1998 through 2010. 2464 had implant alone, and 313 had implant preceded by 44-46Gy supplemental external beam radiation (EBRT). Post-implant dosimetry was based on a CT scan obtained on the day of implant, generally within 30min of the procedure. Every patient's record was reviewed for occurrence of rectal complications. RESULTS: Eight of 2464 patients (0.32%) treated with brachytherapy alone developed a radiation-related rectal fistula. Average prostatic and rectal dose parameters were moderately higher for fistula patients than for patients without a severe rectal complication. For instance, the average R100 was 1.2±0.75cc for fistula patients, versus 0.37±0.88cc for non-fistula patients. However, the fistula patients' values were well within the range of values for patients without a rectal complication. Four patients had some attempt at repair or reconstruction, but long-term functional outcomes were not favorable. CONCLUSIONS: Rectal fistulas are a very uncommon potential complication of prostate brachytherapy, which can occur even in the setting of acceptable day 0 rectal doses. Their occurrence is not easily explained by standard dosimetric or clinical factors.

The case for hypofractionation of localized prostate cancer.

An optimal treatment regimen for localized prostate cancer (PCa) is yet to be determined. Increasing evidence reveals a lower α/ß ratio for PCa with hypofractionated radiation therapy (HFRT) regimens introduced to exploit this change in therapeutic ratio. HFRT also results in shortened overall treatment times of 4 to 5 weeks, thus reducing staffing and machine burden, and, more importantly, patient stress. This review evaluates pretreatment characteristics, outcomes, and toxicity for 15 HFRT studies on localized PCa. HFRT results in comparable or better biochemical relapse-free survival and toxicity and is a viable option for localized PCa.