Increasing arterial oxygen partial pressure during cardiopulmonary resuscitation is associated with improved rates of hospital admission.

AIM: As recent clinical data suggest a harmful effect of arterial hyperoxia on patients after resuscitation from cardiac arrest (CA), we aimed to investigate this association during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), the earliest and one of the most crucial phases of recirculation. METHODS: We analysed 1015 patients who from 2003 to 2010 underwent out-of-hospital CPR administered by emergency medical services serving 300,000 inhabitants. Inclusion criteria for further analysis were nontraumatic background of CA and patients >18 years of age. One hundred and forty-five arterial blood gas analyses including oxygen partial pressure (paO2) measurement were obtained during CPR. RESULTS: We observed a highly significant increase in hospital admission rates associated with increases in paO2 in steps of 100 mmHg (13.3 kPa). Subsequently, data were clustered according to previously described cutoffs (≤ 60 mmHg [8 kPa]], 61-300 mmHg [8.1-40 kPa], >300 mmHg [>40 kPa]). Baseline variables (age, sex, initial rhythm, rate of bystander CPR and collapse-to-CPR time) of the three compared groups did not differ significantly. Rates of hospital admission after CA were 18.8%, 50.6% and 83.3%, respectively. In a multivariate analysis, logistic regression revealed significant prognostic value for paO2 and the duration of CPR. CONCLUSION: This study presents novel human data on the arterial paO2 during CPR in conjunction with the rate of hospital admission. We describe a significantly increased rate of hospital admission associated with increasing paO2. We found that the previously described potentially harmful effects of hyperoxia after return of spontaneous circulation were not reproduced for paO2 measured during CPR. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: n/a.

Comparison of 3 different multianalyte point-of-care devices during clinical routine on a medical intensive care unit.

PURPOSE: Multianalyte point-of-care (POC) devices are important to guide clinical decisions in critical care. However, the use of different devices in one hospital might cause problems. Therefore, we evaluated 3 commonly used POC devices and analyzed accuracy, reliability, and bias. METHODS: Seventy-four arterial blood samples were analyzed by 3 POC devices (Cobas, Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany; ABL800 Flex, Radiometer GmbH, Germany; Gem Premiere, Instrumentation Laboratory, Germany). For selected parameters, samples were also analyzed in the central laboratory. pCO2, pO2, SO2, bicarbonate and standard bicarbonate, sodium, potassium, calcium, pH, lactate, base excess (BE[B] and BEecf), glucose, hemoglobin, and hematocrit were compared. RESULTS: For most parameters, only minor, although statistically significant, changes were observed between the POC devices. For pO2, BE(B), hemoglobin, and hematocrit, clinically significant differences were found. CONCLUSION: Although POC devices are of high standard and overall comparability between devices is high, there might be a clinically relevant bias between devices, as found in our study for pO2, BE(B), hemoglobin, and hematocrit. This can be of importance when interpreting results of the same patient obtained from different POC devices, as it could happen when a patient is transferred within a hospital where different devices are used.