Gastrointestinal thickness, duration, and leak pressure of five intestinal anastomosis techniques in cats.

OBJECTIVE: To compare time to construct completion and resistance to leakage for five intestinal anastomosis techniques in cats and to report normal feline gastrointestinal thickness. STUDY DESIGN: Experimental study. SAMPLE POPULATION: Grossly normal intestinal segments (n = 120) from 10 fresh cat cadavers. METHODS: A total of 8 cm segments of fresh feline cadaveric intestine were collected, and mural thickness was recorded. Segments were randomly allocated between a control group (n = 20 segments) and five treatment groups (20 segments/group with 2 segments/construct = 10 constructs per group): (1) hand-sewn anastomosis - simple interrupted (HSA-SI), (2) hand-sewn anastomosis - simple continuous (HSA-SC), (3) functional end-to-end stapled anastomosis (FEESA), (4) functional end-to-end stapled anastomosis with oversew (FEESA-O), (5) skin stapled anastomosis (SS). Time to construct completion, leakage location, initial leak pressure (ILP), and maximum intraluminal pressure (MIP) were compared. RESULTS: Mean mural thickness ± SD (mm) for the stomach, duodenum, jejunum, and ileum were 1.66 ± 0.28, 2.05 ± 0.18, 2.28 ± 0.30, and 2.11 ± 0.39, respectively. ILPs (mean ± SD) for HSA-SI (165 ± 122 mmHg), HSA-SC (149 ± 83), FEESA-O (63 ± 25, FEESA (84 ± 59), SS (77 ± 56), and control segments (>500) were compared. There was no statistically significant difference in ILP (p > .08) or MIP (p > .084) between any treatment groups. Nonoversewn FEESAs were 2.4 times faster to perform compared to oversewn FEESA and SS groups, and 4.7 times faster than HSA (p < .001). CONCLUSION: All anastomosis techniques provide resistance to leakage that is supraphysiological to that of the normal maximum intraluminal pressure. HSA take longer to complete than stapled anastomoses. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: All anastomotic techniques may be appropriate in cats. Hand-sewn anastomoses result in a longer surgical time.

Comparison of surgeon experience using simple interrupted and simple continuous suture patterns in intestinal resection and anastomosis.

This experimental study compared leak pressures and completion time of intestinal anastomoses performed by novice veterinarians and a Board-certified surgeon using simple interrupted and simple continuous suture patterns. Grossly normal jejunal segments (n = 108) from 6 fresh canine cadavers were used to harvest 8-cm cooled canine cadaveric jejunal segments that were randomly assigned to a control group (12 segments) and 4 treatment groups (24 segments/group, 12 constructs/group): i) simple interrupted anastomoses performed by a Board-certified surgeon (BSI); ii) simple continuous anastomoses performed by a Board-certified surgeon (BSC); iii) simple interrupted anastomoses performed by novice veterinarians (NSI); and iv) simple continuous anastomoses performed by novice veterinarians (NSC). Median (range) initial leak pressure (ILP) for control was 400.2 mmHg (226.0 to 500.0 mmHg), BSI 37.4 (14.4 to 124.0), BSC 32.5 (13.4 to 91.0), NSI 36.5 (22.9 to 62.0), and NSC 47.5 (8.9 to 120.0). No difference was noted between experience (P = 0.73, P = 0.53), suture technique (P = 0.07, P = 0.38), or across treatment groups (P = 0.17, P = 0.94), for ILP or MIP (maximum intraluminal pressure), respectively. Time to construct completion differed based on suture technique (P < 0.0001) and experience (P < 0.0001). The median and mean ILP of all anastomoses exceeded physiologic intraluminal peristaltic pressures. Simple continuous anastomoses were faster to complete overall. Both handsewn anastomosis techniques are appropriate for intestinal anastomoses.

Cette étude expérimentale a comparé les pressions de fuite et le temps de complétion d'anastomoses intestinales réalisées par des vétérinaires novices et un chirurgien certifié comme spécialiste en utilisant des schémas de suture simples interrompus et continus simples. Des segments jéjunaux grossièrement normaux (n = 108) de six cadavres canins frais ont été utilisés pour prélever des segments jéjunaux cadavériques canins refroidis de 8 cm qui ont été assignés au hasard à un groupe témoin (12 segments) et à quatre groupes de traitement (24 segments/groupe, 12 constructions/groupe) : i) anastomoses simples interrompues réalisées par un chirurgien agréé par le Board (BSI); ii) des anastomoses continues simples réalisées par un chirurgien certifié par le Board (BSC); iii) les anastomoses simples interrompues réalisées par des vétérinaires novices (NSI); et iv) des anastomoses continues simples réalisées par des vétérinaires novices (NSC). La pression de fuite initiale médiane (plage) pour le témoin était de 400,2 mmHg (226,0 à 500,0 mmHg), BSI 37,4 (14,4 à 124,0), BSC 32,5 (13,4 à 91,0), NSI 36,5 (22,9 à 62,0) et NSC 47,5 (8,9 à 120,0). Aucune différence n'a été notée entre l'expérience (P = 0,73, P = 0,53), la technique de suture (P = 0,07, P = 0,38) ou entre les groupes de traitement (P = 0,17, P = 0,94), pour l'ILP ou la MIP (pression intraluminale maximale), respectivement. Le temps de complétion de l'assemblage différait en fonction de la technique de suture (P < 0,0001) et de l'expérience (P < 0,0001). L'ILP médian et moyen de toutes les anastomoses dépassait les pressions péristaltiques intraluminales physiologiques. Les anastomoses continues simples étaient globalement plus rapides à réaliser. Les deux techniques d'anastomose cousues à la main conviennent aux anastomoses intestinales.(Traduit par Docteur Serge Messier).

Ex vivo comparison of leak testing of canine jejunal enterotomies: Saline infusion versus air insufflation.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the ability to detect leakage of enterotomy closures by intraluminal injection of saline or air. STUDY DESIGN: Ex vivo study. ANIMALS: Grossly normal jejunal segments (n = 60) from five fresh canine cadavers. METHODS: Eight-centimeter jejunal segments were randomly assigned to two control (saline control [n = 5], air control [5]) and two treatment groups (injection of saline [n = 25] or air [25] after enterotomies were closed in a simple continuous pattern using 4-0 glycomer 631). Initial leak pressure (ILP, mean ± SD), maximum intraluminal pressure (MIP), and leakage location were compared. For all air insufflation constructs, the volume of air insufflated at the time of initial leakage was recorded. RESULTS: The ILPs of control segments did not differ whether injected with saline (405.71 ± 56.97 mmHg) or air (376.84 ± 42.54, p = 1.00). Enterotomy closures leaked at lower pressures when injected with air (ILP: 68.52 ± 6.56) compared to saline (87.76 ± 5.20, p = .03). Similar results were obtained when comparing MIPs. A moderate association (r = .51) was identified between volume of air infused and ILPs. The strength of the association improved when stratified by cadaver. The location of leakage-most commonly suture tracks-was identified for all air constructs and for 14 of 25 saline constructs. CONCLUSION: Enterotomy closures leaked at lower pressures after intraluminal injection of air compared to saline. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Intraoperative leak testing of small intestinal enterotomy closures may be rendered more sensitive and precise by the use of air instead of saline as the infusate.

Gastrointestinal thickness, duration, and leak pressure of six intestinal anastomoses in dogs.

OBJECTIVE: To compare leak pressures and construct completion time of six intestinal anastomoses and report normal canine gastrointestinal thickness. STUDY DESIGN: Experimental study. ANIMALS: Grossly normal jejunal segments (n = 140) from 10 fresh canine cadavers. METHODS: Gastrointestinal thickness was recorded. Eight-centimeter cooled canine cadaveric jejunal segments were randomly assigned to a control group (20 segments) and six treatment groups (20 segments/group [10 constructs/group]): (1) handsewn anastomosis (HSA), (2) functional end-to-end stapled anastomosis (FEESA)-blue thoracoabdominal (TA; FEESA-TAB), (3) FEESA-green TA (FEESA-TAG), (4) FEESA TA-gastrointestinal anastomosis (GIA), (5) FEESA with suture oversew (FEESA-O), and (6) skin staples (SS). Construct assembly time, initial leak pressure (ILP), maximum intraluminal pressure (MIP), and leakage location were compared. RESULTS: Initial leak pressures (mean ± SD) for control (308.38 ± 115.91 mm Hg), HSA (41.96 ± 15.97), FEESA-TAB (31.71 ± 15.71), FEESA-TAG (27.24 ± 14.11), FEESA-GIA (25.62 ± 11.22), FEESA-O (31.01 ± 17.38), and SS (44.42 ± 28.88) groups were compared. No difference in ILP (P > .24) or MIP (P > .17) was detected between treatment groups. Sutured anastomoses took up to 10 times longer to complete (P = .0025). The stomach, duodenum, jejunum, and ileum mural thicknesses (mean ± SD) were 3.99 ± 0.44 mm, 2.34 ± 0.16, 2.49 ± 0.28, and 2.30 ± 0.31, respectively. CONCLUSION: The ILP of all anastomoses exceeded maximum intraluminal peristaltic pressures. Stapled anastomoses were faster to complete. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: All anastomoses may be considered when performing an intestinal resection and anastomosis, with stapled anastomoses resulting in a shorter surgical time. Canine intestinal thickness may warrant use of a larger staple size.