Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 12 de 12
Filter
1.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 67(4): 125-130, 2018 Feb 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29389914

ABSTRACT

Total release foggers (TRFs) (also known as "bug bombs") are pesticide products often used indoors to kill insects. After an earlier report found that TRFs pose a risk for acute illness (1), the Environmental Protection Agency required improved labels on TRFs manufactured after September 2012 (2). To examine the early impact of relabeling, the magnitude and characteristics of acute TRF-related illness were evaluated for the period 2007-2015. A total of 3,222 TRF-related illnesses were identified in 10 participating states, based on three data sources: Sentinel Event Notification System for Occupational Risk-Pesticides (SENSOR) programs, the California Department of Pesticide Regulation (CDPR) program, and poison control centers (PCCs) in Florida, Texas, and Washington. No statistically significant decline in the overall TRF-illness incidence rate was found. Failure to vacate treated premises during application was the most commonly reported cause of exposure. To reduce TRF-related illness, integrated pest management strategies (3) need to be adopted, as well as better communication about the hazards and proper uses of TRFs. Redesigning TRFs to prevent sudden, unexpected activation might also be useful.


Subject(s)
Acute Disease/epidemiology , Fumigation/adverse effects , Pesticides/adverse effects , Wounds and Injuries/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Middle Aged , United States/epidemiology , Young Adult
2.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 63(55): 11-16, 2016 Oct 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27736824

ABSTRACT

CDC's National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) collects data on acute pesticide-related illness and injury reported by 12 states (California, Florida, Iowa, Louisiana, Michigan, Nebraska, North Carolina, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Texas, and Washington). This report summarizes the data on illnesses and injuries arising from occupational exposure to conventional pesticides from 2007 through 2011. This report is a part of the Summary of Notifiable Noninfectious Conditions and Disease Outbreaks - United States, which encompasses various surveillance years but is being published in 2016 (1). The Summary of Notifiable Noninfectious Conditions and Disease Outbreaks appears in the same volume of MMWR as the annual Summary of Notifiable Infectious Diseases (2). In a separate report, data on illnesses and injuries from nonoccupational exposure to pesticides during 2007-2011 are summarized (3).


Subject(s)
Occupational Diseases/chemically induced , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Occupational Injuries/chemically induced , Pesticides/toxicity , Population Surveillance , Acute Disease , Female , Humans , Male , Occupational Diseases/epidemiology , Occupational Injuries/epidemiology , United States/epidemiology
3.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 63(55): 5-10, 2016 Oct 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27736825

ABSTRACT

CDC's National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) collects data on acute pesticide-related illness and injury reported by 12 states (California, Florida, Iowa, Louisiana, Michigan, North Carolina, Nebraska, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Texas, and Washington). This report summarizes the data on illnesses and injuries arising from nonoccupational exposure to conventional pesticides that were reported during 2007-2011. Conventional pesticides include insecticides, herbicides, fungicides, and fumigants. They exclude disinfectants (e.g., chlorine and hypochlorites) and biological pesticides (1). This report is a part of the Summary of Notifiable Noninfectious Conditions and Disease Outbreaks - United States, which encompasses various surveillance years but is being published in 2016 (2). The Summary of Notifiable Noninfectious Conditions and Disease Outbreaks appears in the same volume of MMWR as the annual Summary of Notifiable Infectious Diseases (3). In a separate report, data on illnesses and injuries from occupational exposure to conventional pesticides during 2007-2011 are summarized (4).


Subject(s)
Acute Disease/epidemiology , Pesticides/toxicity , Population Surveillance , Wounds and Injuries/chemically induced , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Male , United States/epidemiology
4.
Environ Res ; 146: 191-9, 2016 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26775000

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Paraquat and diquat are among the most commonly used herbicides in the world. OBJECTIVES: Determine the magnitude, characteristics, and root causes for acute paraquat- and diquat-related illnesses in the US METHODS: Illnesses associated with paraquat or diquat exposure occurring from 1998 through 2011 were identified from the Sentinel Event Notification System for Occupational Risks (SENSOR)-Pesticides Program, the California Department of Pesticide Regulation (CDPR) Pesticide Illness Surveillance Program (PISP), and the Incident Data System (IDS). Cases identified by the National Poison Data System (NPDS) were reviewed for the years 1998-2003 and 2006-2013. RESULTS: A total of 300 paraquat- and 144 diquat-related acute illnesses were identified by SENSOR, PISP, and IDS. NPDS identified 693 paraquat- and 2128 diquat-related acute illnesses. In SENSOR/PISP/IDS, illnesses were commonly low severity (paraquat=41%; diquat=81%); however, SENSOR/PISP/IDS identified 24 deaths caused by paraquat and 5 deaths associated with diquat. Nineteen paraquat-related deaths were due to ingestion, seven of which were unintentional, often due to improper storage in beverage bottles. In SENSOR/PISP/IDS, paraquat and diquat-related acute illnesses were work-related in 68% (n=203) and 29% (n=42) of cases, respectively. When herbicide application site was known, the vast majority of acute paraquat-related illnesses (81%) arose from agricultural applications. Common root causes of illness were failure to use adequate personal protective equipment (PPE), application equipment failure, and spill/splash of herbicide. CONCLUSIONS: Although the magnitude of acute paraquat/diquat-related illnesses was relatively low, several fatalities were identified. Many illnesses could be prevented through stricter compliance with label requirements (e.g. ensuring proper herbicide storage and PPE use), and through enhanced training of certified applicators.


Subject(s)
Diquat/poisoning , Environmental Exposure , Herbicides/poisoning , Paraquat/poisoning , Accidents, Occupational , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Child , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , Middle Aged , Occupational Exposure , United States , Young Adult
6.
Am J Ind Med ; 57(1): 15-30, 2014 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23788228

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Excluding disinfectants, pyrethrins and pyrethroids are the pesticides used most commonly in and around homes. Respiratory effects and paresthesia are among the concerns about pyrethrin/pyrethroid exposures. METHODS: Acute pesticide-related illness/injury cases were identified from the Sentinel Event Notification System for Occupational Risks-Pesticides Program and the California Department of Pesticide Regulation from 2000-2008. Characteristics and incidence rates were determined for acute pyrethrin/pyrethroid-related illness/injury cases. Logistic regression analyses were performed to determine odds of respiratory and dermal symptoms in persons with illness/injury following pyrethrin/pyrethroid exposure compared to persons with illness/injury following exposure to other pesticides. RESULTS: A total of 4,974 cases of acute pyrethrin/pyrethroid-related illness were identified. Incidence rates increased over time, reaching 8 cases/million population in 2008. The majority of cases were low severity (85%) and 34% were work-related. Respiratory effects were the most common symptoms reported (48%). Risk of acute respiratory effects were significantly elevated among persons exposed only to pyrethrins (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.79; 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 1.49-2.16), only to pyrethroids (aOR 1.99 95% CI: 1.77-2.24), to a mixture of pyrethroids (aOR 2.36; 95% CI: 1.99-2.81) or to a mixture containing both pyrethrins and pyrethroids (aOR 2.99; 95% CI: 2.33-3.84) compared to those with illness arising from exposure to other pesticides. The most common factors contributing to pyrethrin/pyrethroid-related illness included exposure from spills/splashes, improper storage, and failure to evacuate during pesticide application. CONCLUSIONS: The magnitude of acute pyrethrin/pyrethroid-related illness/injury is relatively low but is increasing. As such, additional measures to prevent them are needed.


Subject(s)
Environmental Exposure/statistics & numerical data , Insecticides/toxicity , Occupational Diseases/epidemiology , Occupational Exposure/statistics & numerical data , Pyrethrins/toxicity , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Child, Preschool , Environmental Exposure/adverse effects , Eye Diseases/chemically induced , Eye Diseases/epidemiology , Female , Gastrointestinal Diseases/chemically induced , Gastrointestinal Diseases/epidemiology , Humans , Incidence , Infant , Insecticides/poisoning , Male , Middle Aged , Nervous System Diseases/chemically induced , Nervous System Diseases/epidemiology , Occupational Diseases/chemically induced , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Poisoning/epidemiology , Pyrethrins/poisoning , Residence Characteristics/statistics & numerical data , Respiratory Tract Diseases/chemically induced , Respiratory Tract Diseases/epidemiology , Skin Diseases/chemically induced , Skin Diseases/epidemiology , United States/epidemiology , Young Adult
7.
Am J Ind Med ; 55(7): 571-83, 2012 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22495938

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Farmworkers have a high risk for acute pesticide-related illness and injury, and the rate among female farmworkers is approximately twice as high as that among males. Surveillance data were used to identify reasons for this gender difference. METHODS: We identified acute pesticide-related illness and injury cases among farmworkers from the Sentinel Event Notification System for Occupational Risks (SENSOR)-Pesticides Program and the California Department of Pesticide Regulation. Gender-specific associations with acute pesticide-related illness and injury were assessed using chi-square tests. National Agricultural Workers Survey data were also examined. RESULTS: The over-representation of females among farmworker illness and injury cases was confined to females who did not handle pesticides (non-handlers). Female non-handler farmworkers who were affected were more likely to be working on fruit and nut crops, to be exposed to off-target pesticide drift, and to be exposed to fungicides and fumigants compared to males. CONCLUSIONS: Although there is an increased risk for acute pesticide-related illness and injury among female farmworkers, the absolute number of farmworkers with acute pesticide-related illness and injury is far higher among males than females. Furthermore, farmworkers have little or no control over many of the identified contributing factors that led to illness and injury. Stringent enforcement of existing regulations and enhanced regulatory efforts to protect against off-target drift exposures may have the highest impact in reducing acute pesticide-related illness and injury among farmworkers.


Subject(s)
Agriculture/statistics & numerical data , Occupational Diseases/epidemiology , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Occupational Health , Pesticides/toxicity , Acute Disease , Adolescent , Adult , Chi-Square Distribution , Confidence Intervals , Female , Gender Identity , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Occupational Diseases/chemically induced , Occupational Exposure/statistics & numerical data , Population Surveillance , Risk , Risk Factors , Sex Factors , Statistics as Topic , United States/epidemiology , Young Adult
8.
Environ Health Perspect ; 119(8): 1162-9, 2011 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21642048

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Pesticides are widely used in agriculture, and off-target pesticide drift exposes workers and the public to harmful chemicals. OBJECTIVE: We estimated the incidence of acute illnesses from pesticide drift from outdoor agricultural applications and characterized drift exposure and illnesses. METHODS: Data were obtained from the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health's Sentinel Event Notification System for Occupational Risks-Pesticides program and the California Department of Pesticide Regulation. Drift included off-target movement of pesticide spray, volatiles, and contaminated dust. Acute illness cases were characterized by demographics, pesticide and application variables, health effects, and contributing factors. RESULTS: From 1998 through 2006, we identified 2,945 cases associated with agricultural pesticide drift from 11 states. Our findings indicate that 47% were exposed at work, 92% experienced low-severity illness, and 14% were children (< 15 years). The annual incidence ranged from 1.39 to 5.32 per million persons over the 9-year period. The overall incidence (in million person-years) was 114.3 for agricultural workers, 0.79 for other workers, 1.56 for nonoccupational cases, and 42.2 for residents in five agriculture-intensive counties in California. Soil applications with fumigants were responsible for the largest percentage (45%) of cases. Aerial applications accounted for 24% of cases. Common factors contributing to drift cases included weather conditions, improper seal of the fumigation site, and applicator carelessness near nontarget areas. CONCLUSIONS: Agricultural workers and residents in agricultural regions had the highest rate of pesticide poisoning from drift exposure, and soil fumigations were a major hazard, causing large drift incidents. Our findings highlight areas where interventions to reduce off-target drift could be focused.


Subject(s)
Agricultural Workers' Diseases/epidemiology , Agriculture/statistics & numerical data , Pesticides/toxicity , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Agricultural Workers' Diseases/etiology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Young Adult
9.
Clin Toxicol (Phila) ; 48(7): 737-44, 2010 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20849331

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Fipronil is a broad-spectrum phenylpyrazole insecticide widely used to control residential pests and is also commonly used for flea and tick treatment on pets. It is a relatively new insecticide and few human toxicity data exist on fipronil. OBJECTIVE: This paper describes the magnitude and characteristics of acute illnesses associated with fipronil exposure. METHODS: Illness cases associated with exposure to fipronil-containing products from 2001 to 2007 were identified from the Sentinel Event Notification System for Occupational Risks (SENSOR)-Pesticides Program and the California Department of Pesticide Regulation. RESULTS: A total of 103 cases were identified in 11 states. Annual case counts increased from 5 in 2001 to 30 in 2007. Of the cases, 55% were female, the median age was 37 years, and 11% were <15 years old. The majority (76%) had exposure in a private residence, 37% involved the use of pet-care products, and 26% had work-related exposures. Most cases (89%) had mild, temporary health effects. Neurological symptoms (50%) such as headache, dizziness, and paresthesia were the most common, followed by ocular (44%), gastrointestinal (28%), respiratory (27%), and dermal (21%) symptoms/signs. Exposures usually occurred from inadvertent spray/splash/spill of products or inadequate ventilation of the treated area before re-entry. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that exposure to fipronil can pose a risk for mild, temporary health effects in various body systems. Precautionary actions should be reinforced to prevent fipronil exposure to product users.


Subject(s)
Insecticides/poisoning , Pyrazoles/poisoning , Acute Disease , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , Middle Aged , Occupational Exposure/prevention & control , Protective Devices , Time Factors , United States
10.
Public Health Rep ; 124(1): 149-59, 2009.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19413037

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Pyrethrin and pyrethroid insecticides are commonly applied in homes and businesses and on some agricultural crops. This research used a two-state regional approach to analyze reports of acute pesticide poisonings due to pyrethrin and pyrethroid insecticides. METHODS: The Washington State Department of Health and the Oregon Public Health Division collected pesticide poisoning surveillance data from 2001 through 2005. Cases were included if they involved exposure to at least one pyrethrin or pyrethroid insecticide. Descriptive statistics were calculated; differences between categories were assessed using Chi-square analysis. RESULTS: A total of 407 cases fit our definition. Overall, the rate of poisoning in Oregon was significantly higher than in Washington (incidence rate ratio 1.70, 95% confidence interval 1.40, 2.07), and rates for both states generally increased during the time period. For both states, most exposures resulted in low severity illnesses (92%), and most were classified as possible cases (73%). Only about one-fourth of cases were related to a person's work. The most common category of clinical signs and symptoms of illness was respiratory (52% of cases), followed by neurological (40% of cases). Exposure route was predominantly inhalation; there was no association between route and case severity. There was a significant association between illness severity and losing time from work or regular activities (p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Although the majority of pyrethrin and pyrethroid poisoning cases were low in severity, adverse reactions have occurred, as transpired in Oregon in 2005. Regional analysis has the potential to improve the surveillance system and provide unique opportunities for targeting preventive interventions.


Subject(s)
Insecticides/poisoning , Pyrethrins/poisoning , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Employment , Environmental Exposure/adverse effects , Environmental Exposure/analysis , Female , Humans , Insecticides/chemistry , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Middle Aged , Oregon/epidemiology , Poisoning/epidemiology , Poisoning/etiology , Poisoning/physiopathology , Population Surveillance , Pyrethrins/chemistry , Washington/epidemiology , Young Adult
11.
Am J Med ; 121(1): 66-71, 2008 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18187075

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Published case reports have associated the therapeutic use of methadone with the occasional occurrence of sudden cardiac death. Because of the established utility of this drug and with the eventual goal of enhancing safety of use, we performed a community-based study to evaluate this association. METHODS: During a 4-year period, we prospectively evaluated all patients who consecutively had sudden cardiac death and underwent investigation by the medical examiner in the metropolitan area of Portland, Ore. Case subjects of interest were those with a therapeutic blood level of methadone (<1 mg/L), and case comparison subjects were those with no methadone identified. Patients with recreational drug use or any drug overdose were excluded from either group. Detailed autopsies were conducted, including the detection and quantification of all substances in the blood. RESULTS: A total of 22 sudden cardiac death cases with therapeutic levels of methadone (mean 0.48+/-0.22 mg/L; range 0.1-0.9 mg/L) were identified (mean age 37.0+/-10 years, 68% were male) and compared with 106 consecutive sudden cardiac death cases without evidence of methadone (mean age 42+/-13 years, 69% were male). The most common indication for methadone use was pain control (n=12, 55%). Among cases receiving methadone therapy, sudden death-associated cardiac abnormalities were identified in only 23% (n=5), with no clear cause of sudden cardiac death in the remaining 77% (n=17). Among cases with no methadone, sudden death-associated cardiac abnormalities were identified in 60% (n=64, P=.002). CONCLUSION: The significantly lower prevalence of cardiac disease in the case group implicates methadone, even at therapeutic levels, as a likely cause of sudden death. These findings point toward an association between methadone and occurrence of sudden death in the community. Clinical safeguards and further prospective studies specifically designed to enhance safety of methadone use are warranted.


Subject(s)
Analgesics, Opioid/adverse effects , Death, Sudden, Cardiac/etiology , Methadone/adverse effects , Adult , Analgesics, Opioid/administration & dosage , Autopsy , Death, Sudden, Cardiac/epidemiology , Death, Sudden, Cardiac/pathology , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Drug Overdose , Female , Humans , Male , Methadone/administration & dosage , Oregon/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Survival Rate
12.
J Am Coll Cardiol ; 47(6): 1161-6, 2006 Mar 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16545646

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: We sought to evaluate the contribution of left ventricular (LV) dysfunction toward occurrence of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in the general population, and to identify distinguishing characteristics of SCD in the absence of LV dysfunction. BACKGROUND: Patients who manifest warning symptoms and signs are more likely to undergo evaluation before SCD. Although prevalence of LV dysfunction in this subgroup may overestimate the prevalence in overall SCD, this is the only means of assessment in the general population. METHODS: All cases of SCD in Multnomah County, Oregon (population 660,486; 2002 to 2004) were prospectively ascertained in the ongoing Oregon Sudden Unexpected Death Study. We retrospectively assessed LV ejection fraction (LVEF) among subjects who underwent evaluation of LV function before SCD (normal: > or =55%; mildly to moderately reduced: 36% to 54%; and severely reduced: < or =35%). Of a total of 714 SCD cases (annual incidence 54 per 100,000), LV function was assessed in 121 (17%). RESULTS: The LVEF was severely reduced in 36 patients (30%), mildly to moderately reduced in 27 (22%), and normal in 58 (48%). Patients with normal LVEF were distinguishable by younger age (66 +/- 15 years vs. 74 +/- 10 years; p = 0.001), higher proportion of females (47% vs. 27%; p = 0.025), higher prevalence of seizure disorder (14% vs. 0%; p = 0.002), and lower prevalence of established coronary artery disease (50% vs. 81%; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In this community-wide study, only one-third of the evaluated SCD cases had severe LV dysfunction meeting current criteria for prophylactic cardioverter-defibrillator implantation. The SCD cases with normal LV function had several distinguishing clinical characteristics. These findings support the aggressive development of alternative screening methods to enhance identification of patients at risk.


Subject(s)
Death, Sudden, Cardiac/etiology , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left/complications , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Prospective Studies , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...