Lack of allergy to timothy grass pollen is not a passive phenomenon but associated with the allergen-specific modulation of immune reactivity.

BACKGROUND: Timothy grass (TG) pollen is a common seasonal airborne allergen associated with symptoms ranging from mild rhinitis to severe asthma. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to characterize changes in TG-specific T cell responses as a function of seasonality. METHODS: Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) obtained from allergic individuals and non-allergic controls, either during the pollen season or out of season, were stimulated with either TG extract or a pool of previously identified immunodominant antigenic regions. RESULTS: PBMCs from allergic subjects exhibit higher IL-5 and IL-10 responses in season than when collected out of season. In the case of non-allergic subjects, as expected we observed lower IL-5 responses and robust production of IFN-γ compared to allergic individuals. Strikingly, non-allergic donors exhibited an opposing pattern, with decreased immune reactivity in season. The broad down-regulation in non-allergic donors indicates that healthy individuals are not oblivious to allergen exposure, but rather react with an active modulation of responses following the antigenic stimulus provided during the pollen season. Transcriptomic analysis of allergen-specific T cells defined genes modulated in concomitance with the allergen exposure and inhibition of responses in non-allergic donors. CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Magnitude and functionality of T helper cell responses differ substantially in season vs. out of season in allergic and non-allergic subjects. The results indicate the specific and opposing modulation of immune responses following the antigenic stimulation during the pollen season. This seasonal modulation reflects the enactment of specific molecular programmes associated with health and allergic disease.

Grass-specific CD4(+) T-cells exhibit varying degrees of cross-reactivity, implications for allergen-specific immunotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Conceptually, allergic responses may involve cross-reactivity by antibodies or T-cells. While IgE cross-reactivity among grass-pollen allergens has been observed, cross-reactivity at the allergen-specific T-cell level has been less documented. Identification of the patterns of cross-reactivity may improve our understanding, allowing optimization of better immunotherapy strategies. OBJECTIVES: We use Phleum pratense as model for the studying of cross-reactivity at the allergen-specific CD4(+) T cell level among DR04:01 restricted Pooideae grass-pollen T-cell epitopes. METHODS: After in vitro culture of blood mono-nucleated cells from grass-pollen-allergic subjects with specific Pooideae antigenic epitopes, dual tetramer staining with APC-labelled DR04:01/Phleum pratense tetramers and PE-labelled DR04:01/Pooideae grass homolog tetramers was assessed to identify cross-reactivity among allergen-specific DR04:01-restricted T-cells in six subjects. Direct ex vivo staining enabled the comparison of frequency and phenotype of different Pooideae grass-pollen reactive T-cells. Intracellular cytokine staining (ICS) assays were also used to examine phenotypes of these T-cells. RESULTS: T-cells with various degrees of cross-reactive profiles could be detected. Poa p 1 97-116 , Lol p 1 221-240 , Lol p 5a 199-218 , and Poa p 5a 199-218 were identified as minimally cross-reactive T-cell epitopes that do not show cross-reactivity to Phl p 1 and Phl p 5a epitopes. Ex vivo tetramer staining assays demonstrated T-cells that recognized these minimally cross-reactive T-cell epitopes are present in Grass-pollen-allergic subjects. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that not all Pooideae grass epitopes with sequence homology are cross-reactive. Non-cross-reactive T-cells with comparable frequency, phenotype and functionality to Phl p-specific T-cells suggest that a multiple allergen system should be considered for immunotherapy instead of a mono-allergen system.

Allergen-specific CD4+ T cell responses in peripheral blood do not predict the early onset of clinical efficacy during grass pollen sublingual immunotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Surrogate biomarkers of efficacy are needed in support of allergen-specific immunotherapy. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to relate changes in peripheral CD4(+) T cell responses to clinical efficacy during sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT). METHODS: Allergen-specific CD4(+) T cell responses were assessed in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from 89 grass pollen-allergic individuals enrolled in a double-blind placebo-controlled SLIT study conducted in an allergen exposure chamber (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00619827). Surface phenotype, proliferative responses, cytokine production and gene expression were analysed in coded samples at baseline, and after 2 and 4 months of SLIT, in PBMCs after in vitro allergen stimulation or among MHC class II/peptide (pMHCII)-tetramer-positive CD4(+) T cells. RESULTS: SLIT induced a 29.3% improvement of the average rhinoconjunctivitis total symptom score in the active group, when compared to the placebo group. In parallel, only minor changes in proportions of CD4(+) T cells expressing Th1 (CCR5(+), CXCR3(+)), Th2 (CRTh2(+), CCR4(+)) and Treg (CD25(+), CD127(-), Foxp3(+)) markers were detected. A down-regulation of IL-4 and IL-10 gene expression and IL-10 secretion (P < 0.001) were observed, as well as a decrease in the frequency of potential "pro-allergic" CD27(-) Th2 cells from patients receiving active tablets (P < 0.001), but without any correlation with clinical benefit. pMHCII-tetramer analyses failed to document any major impact in both numbers and polarization of circulating Phl p 1- and Phl p 5-specific CD4(+) T cells, confirming that early clinical improvement during SLIT is not associated with dramatic alterations in T lymphocyte responses. CONCLUSION & CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Changes in patterns of peripheral CD4(+) T cells are not markers for the early onset of efficacy during SLIT.

Comparison between major histocompatibility complex class II tetramer staining and surface expression of activation markers for the detection of allergen-specific CD4⁺ T cells.

BACKGROUND: Major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II tetramers (tetramers) allow to detect allergen-specific CD4(+) T cells at a single-cell level. Limits to this technology include HLA restriction and the need to identify immunodominant T cell epitopes. OBJECTIVE: Assessing the expression of various activation markers following allergen stimulation to replace tetramer staining. METHODS: Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from 25 birch pollen, grass pollen or house dust mite allergic individuals were stimulated with peptide mixes encompassing immunodominant epitopes from corresponding major allergens. After 2 weeks of in vitro amplification, cells were stained with both the appropriate tetramer and antibodies directed to CD25, CD30, CD39, CD69, CD137, CD154, GITR, HLA-DR and ICOS, before FACS analysis. RESULTS: Following allergen stimulation, percentages of tetramer(+) cells among CD4(+) CD154(+) cells range from 5% to 87%, depending upon donors. As for CD154, a large inter-individual variability is observed in terms of surface expression for all activation markers tested in allergen-stimulated PBMCs. T cells reactive with either tetramers (0.4-10.4% CD4(+) T cells) or anti-marker antibodies (2.2-32.7% CD4(+) T cells), but not both, are observed, reflecting the presence of anergic as well as non-specifically activated cells. Tetramer(+) /marker(+) , tetramer(+) /marker(-) and tetramer(-) /marker(+) cells were compared for their capacity to express cytokines, demonstrating that only the former represent bona fide allergen-specific activated CD4(+) T cells, based upon a higher expression of cytokines or corresponding genes in presence of the allergen. CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: No strict correlation exists between tetramer staining and the expression of multiple activation markers in stimulated CD4(+) T cells. Dual staining allows to discriminate functional tetramer(+) /marker(+) vs. anergic (tetramer(+) /marker(-) ) allergen-specific T cells or non-specifically activated (tetramer(-) /marker(+) ) T cells. Combining tetramer staining with the detection of activation markers helps understanding patient heterogeneity regarding specific CD4(+) T cell responses. This approach has immediate relevance for monitoring immune changes induced during specific immunotherapy.

Distinct characteristics of seasonal (Bet v 1) vs. perennial (Der p 1/Der p 2) allergen-specific CD4(+) T cell responses.

BACKGROUND: A better understanding of allergen-specific CD4(+) T cell responses is needed to help improving immunological therapies. Objective To compare CD4(+) T cell responses against seasonal (Bet v 1) and perennial (Der p 1, Der p 2) allergens. METHODS: Major histocompatibility complex class II peptide tetramers were engineered to monitor allergen-specific T cell responses. After in vitro expansion, tetramer(+) cells were tested for surface markers using cytofluorometry. Cytokine gene expression and production were assessed using quantitative PCR and cytokine surface capture assays, respectively. RESULTS: Tetramer(+) cells were detected in 19 patients allergic to house dust mites (HDM), seven allergic to birch pollen, 13 allergic to both and nine non-allergics with either an HLA-DRB1(*) 0101, (*) 0301, (*) 1501 or an HLA-DPB1(*) 0401 background. High-avidity T cells are elicited against the immunodominant Bet v 1(141-155) epitope, whereas broader low-avidity T cell responses are induced against Der p 1(16-30) ,(110-124) ,(171-185) and Der p 2(26-40,107-121) epitopes. Responses against Bet v 1 involve effector (CDL62 low, CCR7 low) or central (CD62L(+) , CCR7(+) ) memory cells in allergic and non-allergic individuals, respectively, whereas central memory cells are mostly detected against mite allergens. In non-allergics, both mite and Bet v 1-specific T cells produce IFN-γ and IL-10. In contrast to Bet v 1-driven Th2 responses, mite allergens induce highly polymorphic responses in allergics, including Th1, Th2/Th17 or mixed Th1/Th2 profiles. Mite-specific T cell frequencies in the blood remain in the range of 1-6 × 10(-4) CD4(+) T cells throughout the year. CONCLUSION: Different memory CD4(+) T cell responses are elicited in the context of chronic vs. seasonal stimulation with the allergen(s). The heterogeneity in the patterns of CD4(+) T cell responses observed in patients allergic to HDMs should be taken into account for specific immunotherapy.

Production of native and modified recombinant Der p 1 molecules in tobacco plants.

BACKGROUND: As a complex molecule requiring post-translational processing, it has been difficult to produce the Der p 1 major allergen from the Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus house dust mite in a recombinant form. OBJECTIVE: Here, we tested whether transgenic tobacco plants are suitable to express Der p 1, either as a wild-type molecule or as variants lacking N-glycosylation sites (Gly(-)) and/or cysteine protease activity (Enz(-)). Methods Using Agrobacterium tumefaciens-based transformation, pro Der p 1 molecules bearing mutations within either the N-glycosylation sites (N34Q, N150Q) and/or the cysteine protease-active site (C132V) were expressed in tobacco plants. After purification by ion exchange chromatography, allergens were characterized using immunoblotting, circular dichroism (CD), as well as basophil and T lymphocyte stimulation assays. RESULTS: Four forms of recombinant Der p 1 (i.e. wild-type Gly(+)/Enz(+), as well as Gly(-)/Enz(+), Gly(+)/Enz(-) or Gly(-)/Enz(-) variants) were successfully expressed in tobacco leaves as pro Der p 1 molecules. Spontaneous cleavage of the pro-peptide was observed in tobacco leaf extracts for all forms of recombinant Der p 1 (r Der p 1). CD confirmed that all r Der p 1 molecules, with the exception of the Gly(-)/Enz(-) variant, exhibited secondary structures comparable to the natural protein. A cysteine protease activity was associated only with the Gly(+)/Enz(+) form. All these molecules exhibit a profile similar to natural Der p 1 with respect to IgE immunoreactivity, basophil activation and T cell recognition. CONCLUSION: A tobacco plant expression system allows the production of various forms of mature Der p 1, which could be used for diagnostic or immunotherapeutic purposes.