Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Language
Publication year range
1.
Diabetes Metab Syndr ; 16(10): 102617, 2022 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36174477

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) has been increasingly used in recent years to evaluate glycemic control and variability in individuals with diabetes observing Ramadan fasting. However, the effectiveness of the Ramadan Nutrition Plan (RNP) in individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2D) using CGM-derived measures has not been investigated. The study aimed to evaluate the effects of structured RNP versus standard care using CGM in individuals with T2D. METHODS: This parallel non-randomized interventional study with patients' preference design involved 21 individuals with T2D (mean age: 49 ± 10 years, BMI: 30.0 ± 6.2 kg/m2). Participants chose to receive either structured RNP (sRNT; structured Ramadan Nutrition Therapy group; n = 14) or standard care (SC; n = 7). Participants wore CGM 5 days before Ramadan and during Ramadan. CGM-derived measures of glycemic variability were calculated using Glyculator version 2.0. RESULTS: Compared to the SC group, the sRNT group significantly reduced their fasting blood glucose levels, HbA1c, total cholesterol, diastolic blood pressure, and increased dietary fiber intake. CGM data showed the sRNT group had significantly lower average sensor glucose, peak sensor value, estimated A1c, percentage and duration of time-above-range, J-index, mean amplitude of glycemic excursion (MAGE), and continuous overall net glycemic action (CONGA); and a significantly higher percentage of time-in-range (TIR). CONCLUSIONS: The structured RNP significantly improved clinical outcomes, glycemic control and variability in individuals with T2D. The study highlights the importance of utilizing CGM sensor data to monitor glycemic excursions during Ramadan fasting. Adequately powered randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm the findings.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 , Humans , Adult , Middle Aged , Glycemic Control , Blood Glucose , Glycated Hemoglobin/analysis , Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring , Pilot Projects , Glucose , Dietary Fiber , Cholesterol
2.
Diabetes Res Clin Pract ; 172: 108530, 2021 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33157118

ABSTRACT

AIMS: This narrative review aimed to synthesize the evidence on the effects of Ramadan-focused nutrition therapy for people with diabetes. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE (via PubMed) and Science Direct databases for articles that included the component of nutrition for adult patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D), published in English between 2010 and 2020. RESULTS: Fourteen studies met the criteria. Eight of 14 studies had an intervention with a control arm. In comparison to the control group, all studies (n = 8) showed a reduction in hypoglycemic events. However, only half of these studies (n = 4) had shown at least one positive clinical outcome. Features of nutrition therapy that appeared to have favorable clinical outcomes include individualized caloric prescription; distributing carbohydrates equally between Suhoor, Iftar and snacks; providing meal plans; adjusting food intake to suit Ramadan; and incorporating diabetes-specific formula as part of Suhoor or snack. CONCLUSIONS: The review provides evidence for the effectiveness of Ramadan-focused nutrition therapy among people with T2D and identifies key features of nutrition therapy that may provide favourable clinical outcomes. Additional data on dietary quality and adequacy during Ramadan fasting warrants further studies.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/drug therapy , Fasting/physiology , Nutrition Therapy/methods , Female , Humans , Hypoglycemic Agents/therapeutic use , Islam , Male
3.
Nutrients ; 12(3)2020 Mar 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32204476

ABSTRACT

(1) Background: Structured nutrition therapy (NT) is essential for the management of type 2 diabetes (T2D), but the optimal delivery during Ramadan fasting remains unclear. The present study aimed to evaluate the effect of structured NT program versus standard care in patients with T2D during Ramadan. (2) Methods: The present study was an 8-week, parallel, non-randomized study with patients' preference design involving 64 patients with T2D. The participants were asked to choose their preferred group, i.e., structured NT (Structured Ramadan NT, sRNT) or standard care (SC). The participants in the sRNT group received a Ramadan-focused nutrition plan, including a diabetes-specific formula throughout the study, whereas the patients in the SC group received standard nutrition care. Study outcomes included clinical outcomes and quality of life (QoL). Data was analyzed using two-way repeated-measures ANOVA and linear mixed-effects model. (3) Results: More than half of the participants (n = 38, 63%) chose sRNT as their preferred group. Both groups had comparable baseline characteristics. After 8-weeks of the respective intervention, participants in the sRNT group had lower levels of fasting plasma glucose (-0.9 ± 0.3 mmol/L vs. 0.2 ± 0.3 mmol/L, p < 0.05), triglycerides (-0.21 ± 0.08 mmol/L vs. 0.20 ± 0.17 mmol/L, p < 0.05), and self-monitoring glucose at pre-dawn (6.9 mmol/L vs. 7.8 mmol/L, p < 0.05) and pre-bedtime (7.6 mmol/L vs. 8.6 mmol/L, p < 0.05) than participants in the SC group. Although not different between groups, HbA1c levels decreased significantly in the sRNT (-0.72 ± 0.16%, p < 0.001) but not in the SC group (-0.35 ± 0.24%, p = 0.155). QoL and satisfaction scores improved significantly in sRNT group, but not in SC group. (4) Conclusions: The structured NT regimen for Ramadan is a feasible and beneficial program for T2D patients observing Ramadan fasting as it showed an improvement in clinical outcomes and QoL.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/diet therapy , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/epidemiology , Islam , Nutrition Therapy , Religion , Adult , Aged , Biomarkers , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/metabolism , Diet , Disease Management , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Outcome Assessment , Quality of Life , Standard of Care , Young Adult
4.
Article in English | WPRIM (Western Pacific) | ID: wpr-825402

ABSTRACT

@#Infective endocarditis during breastfeeding is rare. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the second recorded case of infective endocarditis in a lactating mother. It is known that women of child-bearing age are susceptible to infective endocarditis during pregnancy when the immune system is compromised.1 Nevertheless, past cases were also exposed to a systemic infection via milk infected by their infant’s oral commensal. Streptococcus mitis (S.Mitis) endocarditis in pregnancy has also been reported, whereby a lady delivered via caesarean section and underwent mitral valve reconstruction and annuloplasty.1 S. mitis is considered a pioneer streptococci commensal in human oral mucosa, appearing as early as 1-3 days after delivery.2 As a child grows, their oral mucosa will be colonized by more viridans streptococci, including the teeth, oropharynx and nasopharynx. In a mother who breastfeeds, a crack in the nipple and breast engorgement can be predisposing factors for systemic infection stemming from an infant’s oral commensal. Both cases of breastfeeding-related infective endocarditis caused by pioneer streptococcus viridans, S.mitis in our report and S.salivarius3 in the previous report, affected the left-sided valves

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...