Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Am J Gastroenterol ; 96(4): 1256-60, 2001 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11316179

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Recent surveys of physician practice have suggested the existence of excessive, inappropriate use of the fecal occult blood test (FOBT). We studied the implementation of this test in hospitalized patients. METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review of 1000 randomly selected patients who had been discharged from the Medicine service at four teaching hospitals. Patient demographics, clinical presentation, presence or absence of overt GI bleeding, and use of medications that might affect the FOBT were recorded. Reviewers assessed whether patients who had FOBT would have been candidates for colon resection if asymptomatic colon cancer had been found. RESULTS: Digital rectal examination was documented in 44.8% of patients; the findings were recorded in only 9%. A total of 421 patients had FOBT on admission, usually on stool obtained at digital rectal examination. Of the patients with a positive FOBT, 17% had active GI bleeding. Only 41.1% of patients with a positive FOBT were referred to the gastroenterology service. In 70.5% of patients, FOBT could be considered inappropriate because of factors such as age, active GI bleeding, or use of aspirin or other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. CONCLUSIONS: The FOBT, which is validated only for colorectal cancer screening, is often performed inappropriately in patients admitted to the hospital. This test should be restricted in hospital practice. It would be preferable to identify patients who are appropriate candidates for colorectal cancer screening at the time of hospital discharge and to advise them about the appropriate performance of the FOBT at home.


Subject(s)
Hematologic Tests/statistics & numerical data , Medical Audit , Occult Blood , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Colonic Neoplasms/diagnosis , Colonoscopy , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Hospitals, Teaching , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , United States , Unnecessary Procedures , Utilization Review
2.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother ; 45(5): 1511-4, 2001 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11302819

ABSTRACT

Previous studies of the antibiotic susceptibility of Streptococcus milleri group organisms have distinguished among species by using phenotypic techniques. Using 44 isolates that were speciated by 16S rRNA gene sequencing, we studied the MICs and minimum bactericidal concentrations of penicillin, ampicillin, ceftriaxone, and clindamycin for Streptococcus intermedius, Streptococcus constellatus, and Streptococcus anginosus. None of the organisms was resistant to beta-lactam antibiotics, although a few isolates were intermediately resistant; one strain of S. anginosus was tolerant to ampicillin, and another was tolerant to ceftriaxone. Six isolates were resistant to clindamycin, with representation from each of the three species. Relatively small differences in antibiotic susceptibilities among species of the S. milleri group show that speciation is unlikely to be important in selecting an antibiotic to treat infection caused by one of these isolates.


Subject(s)
Ampicillin Resistance/genetics , Streptococcus/genetics , Ampicillin/pharmacology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Ceftriaxone/pharmacology , Clindamycin/pharmacology , Humans , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Penicillins/pharmacology , Streptococcus/drug effects
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...