The severity of trauma determines the immune response to PF4/heparin and the frequency of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.

Heparin can induce heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). The combined effect of type of surgery (major vs minor) and heparin on this prothrombotic immune reaction to platelet factor 4 (PF4)/heparin was analyzed. In a randomized, double-blind study, trauma patients receiving low-molecular-weight (LMWH) or unfractionated heparin (UFH) for thrombosis prophylaxis were assessed for PF4/heparin-antibody seroconversion, HIT, and thrombosis according to type of surgery. The risk for seroconversion was higher than major versus minor surgery odds ratio, 7.98 [95% confidence interval, 2.06-31.00], P = .003, controlled for potential confounders, as was the risk for HIT (2.2% [95% confidence interval, 0.3%-4.1%] vs 0.0%, P = .010). During LMWH compared with UFH thromboprophylaxis, HIT (1 of 298 vs 4 of 316; P = .370) and PF4/heparin seroconversion (1.7% vs 6.6%; P = .002) were less frequent, driven by differences in patients undergoing major surgery (incidence of HIT: LMWH 0.8% vs UFH 4.0%; P = .180; seroconversion rates: 4.0% vs 17.0%; P = .001). After minor surgery, no case of HIT occurred. The severity of trauma and the need for major surgery strongly influence the risk of an anti-PF4/heparin immune response, which is then increased by UFH. In major trauma certoparin may be safer than UFH because it induces HIT-antibody seroconversion, and the corresponding risk of HIT, less frequently.

[Successful decolonisation of MRSA-positive patients]. / Sanierung von MRSA-positiven Patienten.

The increasing number of patients colonised or infected with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is one of the major clinical and epidemiological problems worldwide. Besides the consistent prevention of further spread of resistant strains, decolonisation of MRSA carriers is crucial to curb the problem. Today, a wide range of highly effective, well-tolerated and relatively cost-effective antiseptics and disinfectants as well as a permanently increasing knowledge about colonization routes and critical points in therapy is available. Nevertheless, the prospects for sustainable decolonisation of carriers has been often evaluated as disappointing, in the past. This shows that a successful, sustainable decolonisation can only succeed if the antiseptic treatment is embedded in a sound overall concept. This article is meant to assist in finding safe, effective and successful decolonisation regimes for inpatient and outpatient MRSA-carriers based on current literature and authors' experience.

Benefit and risk of heparin for maintaining peripheral venous catheters in neonates: a placebo-controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: Heparin addition to infusion fluids is used to prolong catheter patency in newborns. Heparin may also induce adverse effects such as bleeding complications and immune-mediated heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). One objective was peripheral venous catheter patency with heparinization of continuous infusions (0.5 IU/mL). Secondary objectives were incidences of bleeding, clinically manifest HIT, HIT antibodies, and catheter-related complications. STUDY DESIGN: Inclusion criteria were anticipated need for intravenous peripheral infusion (>or=5 days for HIT-related endpoints) and postnatal age <28 days at study entry. Exclusion criteria were bodyweight <1000 g, congenital malformation, need for therapeutic anticoagulation or mechanical ventilation, and severe bleeding. HIT antibodies were assessed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. RESULTS: A total of 145 infants received heparin, and 151 infants received saline. Patient characteristics, number of additional drugs, duration of treatment, and location and size of catheters did not differ. Patency of catheters was 7.4 hours longer in the heparin group (33.8 hours vs 26.4 hours, P<.0001), but the total numbers of catheters did not differ (565 vs 692, P=.3). No infant developed HIT antibodies. Incidences of bleeding complications and thrombocytopenia were comparable between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Balancing the benefits against the risks of heparin addition and the rare complication of HIT, we will not use 0.5 IU/mL heparin addition to parenteral fluids.