Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 9 de 9
Filter
1.
Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther ; : 1-9, 2024 Jan 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38288986

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of NRICM101 in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study from 20 April 2021 to 8 July 2021, and evaluated the safety and outcomes (mortality, hospital stay, mechanical ventilation, oxygen support, diarrhea, serum potassium) in COVID-19 patients. Propensity score matching at a 1:2 ratio was performed to reduce confounding factors. RESULTS: A total of 201 patients were analyzed. The experimental group (n = 67) received NRICM101 and standard care, while the control group (n = 134) received standard care alone. No significant differences were observed in mortality (10.4% vs. 14.2%), intubation (13.8% vs. 11%), time to intubation (10 vs. 11 days), mechanical ventilation days (0 vs. 9 days), or oxygen support duration (6 vs. 5 days). However, the experimental group had a shorter length of hospitalization (odds ratio = 0.12, p = 0.043) and fewer mechanical ventilation days (odds ratio = 0.068, p = 0.008) in initially severe cases, along with an increased diarrhea risk (p = 0.035). CONCLUSION: NRICM101 did not reduce in-hospital mortality. However, it shortened the length of hospitalization and reduced mechanical ventilation days in initially severe cases. Further investigation is needed.

2.
J Clin Med ; 12(7)2023 Mar 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37048710

ABSTRACT

Targeted temperature management (TTM) is often considered to improve post-cardiac arrest patients' outcomes. However, the optimal timing to initiate cooling remained uncertain. This retrospective analysis enrolled all non-traumatic post-cardiac arrest adult patients with either out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) or in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) who received TTM from July 2015 to July 2021 at our hospital. The values of time delay before TTM and time to target temperature were divided into three periods according to optimal cut-off values identified using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. A total of 177 patients were enrolled. A shorter time delay before TTM (pre-induction time) was associated with a lower survival chance at 28 days (32.00% vs. 54.00%, p = 0.0279). Patients with a longer cooling induction time (>440 minis) had better neurological outcomes (1.58% vs. 1.05%; p = 0.001) and survival at 28 days (58.06% vs. 29.25%; p = 0.006). After COX regression analysis, the influence of pre-induction time on survival became insignificant, but patients who cooled slowest still had a better chance of survival at 28 days. In conclusion, a shorter delay before TTM was not associated with better clinical outcomes. However, patients who took longer to reach the target temperature had better hospital survival and neurological outcomes than those who were cooled more rapidly. A further prospective study was warranted to evaluate the appropriate time window of TTM.

3.
Expert Rev Respir Med ; 17(4): 319-328, 2023 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37002880

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The right time of high-flow nasal cannulas (HFNCs) application in COVID-19 patients with acute respiratory failure remains uncertain. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, COVID-19-infected adult patients with hypoxemic respiratory failure were enrolled. Their baseline epidemiological data and respiratory failure related parameters, including the Ventilation in COVID-19 Estimation (VICE), and the ratio of oxygen saturation (ROX index), were recorded. The primary outcome measured was the 28-day mortality. RESULTS: A total of 69 patients were enrolled. Fifty-four (78%) patients who intubated and received invasive mechanical ventilatory (MV) support on day 1 were enrolled in the MV group. The remaining fifteen (22%) patients received HFNC initially (HFNC group), in which, ten (66%) patients were not intubated during hospitalization were belong to HFNC-success group and five (33%) of these patients were intubated later due to disease progression were attributed to HFNC-failure group. Compared with those in the MV group, those in the HFNC group had a lower mortality rate (6.7% vs. 40.7%, p = 0.0138). There were no differences in baseline characteristics among the two groups; however, the HFNC group had a lower VICE score (0.105 [0.049-0.269] vs. 0.260 [0.126-0.693], p = 0.0092) and higher ROX index (5.3 [5.1-10.7] vs. 4.3 [3.9-4.9], p = 0.0007) than the MV group. The ROX index was higher in the HFNC success group immediately before (p = 0.0136) and up to 12 hours of HFNC therapy than in the HFNC failure group. CONCLUSIONS: Early intubation may be considered in patients with a higher VICE score or a lower ROX index. The ROX score during HFNCs use can provide an early warning sign of treatment failure. Further investigations are warranted to confirm these results.


High flow nasal cannulas (HFNCs) were widely used in patients with COVID-19 infection related hypoxemic respiratory failure. However, there were concerns about its failure and related delayed intubation may be associated with a higher mortality rate. This retrospective study revealed patients with higher baseline disease severity and higher VICE scores may be treated with primary invasive mechanical ventilation. On the contrary, if their baseline VICE score is low and ROX index is high, HFNCs treatment might be safely applied initially. The trends of serial ROX index values during HFNC use could be a reliable periscope to predict the HFNC therapy outcome, therefore avoided delayed intubation.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Noninvasive Ventilation , Respiratory Insufficiency , Adult , Humans , Oxygen , Cannula , Retrospective Studies , Oxygen Inhalation Therapy/methods , COVID-19/therapy , Noninvasive Ventilation/adverse effects , Noninvasive Ventilation/methods , Respiratory Insufficiency/diagnosis , Respiratory Insufficiency/therapy
4.
Front Med (Lausanne) ; 10: 1121465, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36844229

ABSTRACT

Background: The aim of our study was to externally validate the predictive capability of five developed coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-specific prognostic tools, including the COVID-19 Spanish Society of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology (SEIMC), Shang COVID severity score, COVID-intubation risk score-neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (IRS-NLR), inflammation-based score, and ventilation in COVID estimator (VICE) score. Methods: The medical records of all patients hospitalized for a laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 diagnosis between May 2021 and June 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Data were extracted within the first 24 h of admission, and five different scores were calculated. The primary and secondary outcomes were 30-day mortality and mechanical ventilation, respectively. Results: A total of 285 patients were enrolled in our cohort. Sixty-five patients (22.8%) were intubated with ventilator support, and the 30-day mortality rate was 8.8%. The Shang COVID severity score had the highest numerical area under the receiver operator characteristic (AUC-ROC) (AUC 0.836) curve to predict 30-day mortality, followed by the SEIMC score (AUC 0.807) and VICE score (AUC 0.804). For intubation, both the VICE and COVID-IRS-NLR scores had the highest AUC (AUC 0.82) compared to the inflammation-based score (AUC 0.69). The 30-day mortality increased steadily according to higher Shang COVID severity scores and SEIMC scores. The intubation rate exceeded 50% in the patients stratified by higher VICE scores and COVID-IRS-NLR score quintiles. Conclusion: The discriminative performances of the SEIMC score and Shang COVID severity score are good for predicting the 30-day mortality of hospitalized COVID-19 patients. The COVID-IRS-NLR and VICE showed good performance for predicting invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV).

5.
BMC Pulm Med ; 22(1): 368, 2022 Sep 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36171597

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The successful management of patients infected with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) with inhaled ciclesonide has been reported, however few studies have investigated its application among hospitalized patients. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study enrolled all adult patients admitted to our hospital with confirmed COVID-19 infection from May to June 2021. Critical patients who received mechanical ventilation within 24 h after admission and those who started ciclesonide more than 14 days after symptom onset were excluded. The in-hospital mortality rate was compared between those who did and did not receive inhaled ciclesonide. RESULTS: A total of 269 patients were enrolled, of whom 184 received inhaled ciclesonide and 85 did not. The use of ciclesonide was associated with lower in-hospital mortality (7.6% vs. 23.5%, p = 0.0003) and a trend of shorter hospital stay (12.0 (10.0-18.0) days vs. 13.0 (10.0-25.3) days, p = 0.0577). In subgroup analysis, the use of inhaled ciclesonide significantly reduced mortality in the patients with severe COVID-19 infection (6.8% vs. 50.0%, p < 0.0001) and in those with a high risk of mortality (16.4% vs. 43.2%, p = 0.0037). The use of inhaled ciclesonide also reduced the likelihood of receiving mechanical ventilation in the patients with severe COVID-19 infection. After multivariate analysis, inhaled ciclesonide remained positively correlated with a lower risk of in-hospital mortality (odds ratio: 0.2724, 95% confidence interval: 0.087-0.8763, p = 0.0291). CONCLUSIONS: The use of inhaled ciclesonide in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 infection can reduce in-hospital mortality. Further randomized studies in patients with moderate to severe COVID-19 infection are urgently needed.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Drug Treatment , Pregnenediones , Adult , Hospitalization , Humans , Pregnenediones/therapeutic use , Retrospective Studies
6.
ACS Sens ; 7(7): 1808-1818, 2022 07 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35748570

ABSTRACT

The measurement of oxygen consumption of adherent cells is a profoundly important issue for estimating the bioenergetic health and metabolism activity of cells. The study describes the construction of a microfluidic chip consisting of an open container connected with a position-raised channel and dissolved oxygen (DO)-sensing gold ultramicroelectrodes for quantifying the oxygen consumption rate (OCR) of adherent cells. The microfluidic chip design can reduce the action of shear force on the adherent cells during medium replacement. The residual concentration of analytes in the open container was only 4.4% after solution replacement via the position-raised channel. The DO reduction current measured by ultramicroelectrodes averaged in the range of 40-60 s presented high reproducibility with a 1.1% relative standard deviation suitable for OCR calculation. After short-term (90 min) cultivation, the microfluidic chip can monitor the time-dependent change in the OCR of 3T3-L1 cells for several hours by repeatedly replacing the culture medium or with the stimulation of different mitochondrial inhibitors. The presented microfluidic cell-based chip has great promise for drug screening and chemosensitivity testing by measuring OCR to evaluate the mitochondrial function of adherent cells.


Subject(s)
Oxygen Consumption , Oxygen , Microfluidics , Mitochondria/metabolism , Oxygen/metabolism , Oxygen Consumption/physiology , Reproducibility of Results
7.
J Clin Med ; 12(1)2022 Dec 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36615040

ABSTRACT

The revised post-Cardiac Arrest Syndrome for Therapeutic hypothermia (rCAST) score was proposed to predict neurologic outcomes and mortality among out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients. However, it has rarely been validated outside Japan. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate this issue. All adult patients admitted to our medical intensive care unit for targeted temperature management (TTM) between July 2015 and July 2021 were enrolled. Their medical records were retrieved, and rCAST scores were calculated. A total of 108 post-cardiac arrest syndrome (PCAS) patients who received TTM were analyzed. According to the rCAST score, 49.1%, 50.0%, and 0.9% of the patients were classified as low, moderate, and high severity, respectively. The areas under the curves for the rCAST score were 0.806 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.719-0.876) and 0.794 (95% CI: 0.706-0.866) to predict poor neurologic outcomes and mortality at day 28, respectively. In contrast to the original report, only low-severity patients had favorable neurologic outcomes. The rCAST score showed moderate accuracy in our OHCA patients with PCAS who received TTM to predict poor neurologic outcomes and mortality at day 28.

8.
Ther Hypothermia Temp Manag ; 10(3): 153-158, 2020 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31314693

ABSTRACT

Targeted temperature management (TTM) is widely used for postcardiac arrest management of patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. However, the use of TTM for patients with in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) is controversial. The aim of this study was to investigate the role of TTM in the management of patients with IHCA. The medical records of all IHCA patients who were resuscitated and returned to spontaneous circulation from January 2011 to December 2016 were reviewed. After excluding patients with new do not resuscitate orders and those who died within 24 hours, 262 patients were eligible for analysis. Thirty-five of the 262 patients (13.3%) received TTM after IHCA. Patients who received TTM and standard supportive care (SSC) had similar baseline epidemiological status. The TTM patients were older and had a longer cardiac pulmonary resuscitation duration; however, the differences were not statistically significant. The 28-day survival rate was not significantly different between groups (12/35 in the TTM group [34%] vs. 114/225 in the SSC group [50%], p = 0.079). In the patients with good neurological status before arrest (Glasgow-Pittsburgh cerebral performance category [GP-CPC] scores: 1-2), there was no significant difference in the 28-day survival between groups (11/26 in the TTM group [42.3%] vs. 81/154 [52.6%] in the SSC group; p = 0.332). In this subgroup, the TTM patients had poorer neurological outcomes at discharge (GP-CPC score 1-2) than the SSC patients (1/26 in the TTM group [3.8%] vs. 57/154 in the SSC group [37%]; p = 0.001). TTM was not associated with better 28-day survival than usual care among the patients with IHCA in this study, and the TTM patients had less favorable neurological outcomes at discharge. Randomized clinical trials are needed to assess the efficacy of TTM for IHCA patients.


Subject(s)
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation , Hypothermia, Induced , Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest , Hospitals , Humans , Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest/therapy , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
9.
Am J Emerg Med ; 31(2): 319-25, 2013 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23158613

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Survival after cardiac arrest remains poor, especially when it occurs outside of hospital. In recent years, therapeutic hypothermia has been used to improve outcomes in patients who have experienced cardiac arrest, however, application to out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients remains controversial. METHODS: A total of 175 OHCA patients underwent therapeutic hypothermia (TH), which was performed using large volume ice crystalloid fluid (LVICF) infusions after ICU admission. Ice packs and conventional cooling blankets were used to maintain a core body temperature of 33°C, according to standard protocol for 36 hours. Patients in the control group received standard supportive care without TH. Hospital survival and neurologic outcomes were compared. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the groups with regards to patient characteristics, underlying etiologies, and length of hospital stays. The duration of cardiac pulmonary resuscitation (CPR) was also similar. In the 51 patients that received TH, 14 were alive at hospital discharge. In the 124 patients belonging to the supportive care group, only 15 were alive at hospital discharge (27.5% vs. 12.1%, p = 0.013). Approximately 7.9% of patients in the TH group had good neurologic outcomes (4 of 51) compared with the 1.7% (2 of 124) of patients in the supportive group (p = 0.04). There were no specific treatment-related complications. CONCLUSION: Therapeutic hypothermia can be safely applied to OHCA patients and can improve their outcome. Further large scale studies are needed to verify our results.


Subject(s)
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation , Hypothermia, Induced , Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest/therapy , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Combined Modality Therapy , Female , Humans , Hypothermia, Induced/methods , Male , Middle Aged , Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest/mortality , Retrospective Studies , Survival Rate , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...