Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Orthop Surg ; 13(6): 1810-1817, 2021 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34409739

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effectiveness of ultrasound (US) guided intra-hip joint injection to estimate the outcome of hip arthroscopy in patients with femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) syndrome. METHODS: Patients with FAI syndrome (n = 60) were prospectively enrolled in our study. Before hip arthroscopy, a mix of 4 mL 2% lidocaine and 4 mL 1% ropivacaine were injected into the hip joint under the guidance of US. The clinical efficacy of the intra-articular injection was evaluated by comparing the visual analog scale (VAS) and international hip outcome tool 12 (iHOT-12) results before and after the injection. The outcome of hip arthroscopy was evaluated by iHOT-12, the modified Harris hip score (MHHS), and the patient's satisfaction 12 months after the operation. The outcome of intra-articular injection and hip arthroscopy were compared. Factors related to the outcomes of hip arthroscopy were evaluated. The correlation between the efficacy of intra-hip joint injection and arthroscopy was evaluated. RESULTS: The VAS of patients decreased from 11.3 ± 7.7 to 3.3 ± 4.5, and the iHOT-12 increased from 52.1 ± 23.2 to 84.1 ± 18.1 after intra-articular injection (all P < 0.001). The iHOT-12 score increased from 52.1 ± 23.2 to 78.9 ± 19.2, and the MHHS increased from 66.5 ± 6.8 to 81.6 ± 8.1 after hip arthroscopy (all P < 0.001). The satisfaction rate of arthroscopy, including very satisfied and effective patients, was 93.3%. Multi-variable logistic regression showed that only iHOT-12 improved value after injection was included in the regression formula of satisfaction, with the ß of -0.154, standard error of 0.071, Wald value of 4.720, and OR of 0.857 (95%CI 0.746-0.985) (P = 0.03). Significant correlation was detected between iHOT-12 scores after intra-articular anesthesia and at 12 months after arthroscopy (r = 0.784, P < 0.001). So was the iHOT-12 improved value (r = 0.781, P < 0.001) and the iHOT-12 improved ratio (r = 0.848, P < 0.001). If we had performed arthroscopy only on patients with post-injection iHOT-12 score improvement ≥10, the satisfaction rate of arthroscopy would have increased to 96.6%. CONCLUSIONS: US-guided intra-hip joint injection may provide a feasible way to estimate the outcome of hip arthroscopy in patients with FAI syndrome, and could be used as a method for indication selection of hip arthroscopy.


Subject(s)
Anesthetics, Local/administration & dosage , Arthroscopy/methods , Femoracetabular Impingement/diagnosis , Femoracetabular Impingement/surgery , Injections, Intra-Articular/methods , Ultrasonography, Interventional/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Lidocaine/administration & dosage , Male , Middle Aged , Pain Measurement , Patient Reported Outcome Measures , Patient Satisfaction , Prospective Studies , Ropivacaine/administration & dosage , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...