ABSTRACT
This study aims to investigate the potential role of CYP2D6*10 (c.100 C>T) gene polymorphism in renal function injury among hypertensive patients without elevated cystatin C. A cohort of hypertensive patients without elevated cystatin C was enrolled between 2021 and 2024 in the Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, and their peripheral venous blood was used for total RNA extraction and CYP2D6*10 genotype analysis. Based on kidney injury status, patients were categorized into two groups, hypertensive patients with kidney injury (n = 94) and those without (n = 893). General characteristics such as age, gender and hyperlipemia were compared between the two groups. Multiple genotype models were investigated between the two groups, including allele models, dominant models, recessive models, co-dominant models, and super-dominant models. The results revealed that in the co-dominant gene model (CC vs. CT vs. TT), the risk of hypertension combined with renal injury was lower with the CT genotype compared to the CC genotype (Odds Ratio (OR) = 0.55, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) = 0.32-0.93, p = 0.02). In the overdominance model (CC + TT vs. CT), the risk of hypertension and renal injury in CC and CT genotypes was 0.42 times lower than that in the CT genotype (OR = 0.42, 95% CI = 0.27-0.64, p < 0.001). This study proposes CYP2D610 gene polymorphism as a potential predictor of renal function injury in hypertensive patients with normal cystatin C levels.
ABSTRACT
Human iPSC line, SDHi001-A, was generated from 65-year-old male patient with mitral valve prolapse, using non-integrative reprogramming method. This cell line shows pluripotency both in vitro and in vivo, and has a normal karyotype.
Subject(s)
Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells , Mitral Valve Prolapse , Humans , Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells/metabolism , Mitral Valve Prolapse/pathology , Aged , Male , Cell Line , Cell DifferentiationABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The influence of left atrial appendage volume (LAAV) on the recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF) following radiofrequency catheter ablation remains unclear. OBJECTIVES: We performed a meta-analysis to assess whether LAAV is an independent predictor of AF recurrence following radiofrequency catheter ablation. METHODS: The PubMed and the Cochrane Library databases were searched until March 2022 to identify publications evaluating LAAV in association with AF recurrence after radiofrequency catheter ablation. Seven studies that fulfilled the specified criteria of our analysis were found. We used the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale to evaluate the quality of the studies. The pooled effects were evaluated depending on standardized mean differences (SMDs) or hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS: A total of 1017 patients from 7 cohort studies with a mean follow-up 16.3 months were included in the meta-analysis. Data from 6 studies (943 subjects) comparing LAAV showed that the baseline LAAV was significantly higher in patients with AF recurrence compared to those without AF (SMD: -0.63; 95% CI: -0.89 to -0,37; all p values < 0.05; I2= 62.6%). Moreover, higher LAAV was independently associated with a significantly higher risk of AF recurrence after radiofrequency catheter ablation (HR: 1.10; 95% CI: 1.02 to 1.18). CONCLUSIONS: The meta-analysis showed that there is a significant correlation between LAAV and AF recurrence after radiofrequency catheter ablation, and the role of LAAV in AF patients should not be ignored in clinical practice.
FUNDAMENTO: A influência do volume do apêndice atrial esquerdo (VAAE) na recorrência de fibrilação atrial (FA) após ablação por cateter de radiofrequência permanece obscura. OBJETIVOS: Realizamos uma metanálise para avaliar se o VAAE é um preditor independente de recorrência de FA após ablação por cateter de radiofrequência. MÉTODOS: Os bancos de dados PubMed e Cochrane Library foram pesquisados até março de 2022 para identificar publicações avaliando o VAAE em associação com a recorrência de FA após ablação por cateter por radiofrequência. Foram encontrados 7 estudos que preencheram os critérios especificados de nossa análise. Usamos a Escala de Newcastle-Ottawa para avaliar a qualidade dos estudos. Os efeitos agrupados foram avaliados dependendo das diferenças médias padronizadas (DMPs) ou hazard ratios (HRs) com intervalos de confiança (ICs) de 95%. Valores de p < 0,05 foram considerados estatisticamente significativos. RESULTADOS: Um total de 1.017 pacientes de 7 estudos de coorte com um seguimento médio de 16,3 meses foram incluídos na metanálise. Dados de 6 estudos (943 indivíduos) comparando VAAE mostraram que o VAAE basal foi significativamente maior em pacientes com recorrência de FA em comparação com aqueles sem FA (DMP: −0,63; IC de 95%: −0,89 a −0,37; todos os valores de p < 0,05; I 2 = 62,6%). Além disso, maior VAAE foi independentemente associado a um risco significativamente maior de recorrência de FA após ablação por cateter de radiofrequência (HR: 1,10; IC de 95%: 1,02 a 1,18). CONCLUSÕES: A metanálise mostrou que existe uma correlação significativa entre o VAAE e a recorrência de FA após ablação por cateter de radiofrequência, e o papel do VAAE em pacientes com FA não deve ser ignorado na prática clínica.
Subject(s)
Atrial Appendage , Atrial Fibrillation , Catheter Ablation , Humans , Atrial Fibrillation/diagnostic imaging , Atrial Fibrillation/surgery , Atrial Appendage/diagnostic imaging , Atrial Appendage/surgery , Cohort Studies , Catheter Ablation/adverse effects , Recurrence , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Resumo Fundamento A influência do volume do apêndice atrial esquerdo (VAAE) na recorrência de fibrilação atrial (FA) após ablação por cateter de radiofrequência permanece obscura. Objetivos Realizamos uma metanálise para avaliar se o VAAE é um preditor independente de recorrência de FA após ablação por cateter de radiofrequência. Métodos Os bancos de dados PubMed e Cochrane Library foram pesquisados até março de 2022 para identificar publicações avaliando o VAAE em associação com a recorrência de FA após ablação por cateter por radiofrequência. Foram encontrados 7 estudos que preencheram os critérios especificados de nossa análise. Usamos a Escala de Newcastle-Ottawa para avaliar a qualidade dos estudos. Os efeitos agrupados foram avaliados dependendo das diferenças médias padronizadas (DMPs) ou hazard ratios (HRs) com intervalos de confiança (ICs) de 95%. Valores de p < 0,05 foram considerados estatisticamente significativos. Resultados Um total de 1.017 pacientes de 7 estudos de coorte com um seguimento médio de 16,3 meses foram incluídos na metanálise. Dados de 6 estudos (943 indivíduos) comparando VAAE mostraram que o VAAE basal foi significativamente maior em pacientes com recorrência de FA em comparação com aqueles sem FA (DMP: −0,63; IC de 95%: −0,89 a −0,37; todos os valores de p < 0,05; I 2 = 62,6%). Além disso, maior VAAE foi independentemente associado a um risco significativamente maior de recorrência de FA após ablação por cateter de radiofrequência (HR: 1,10; IC de 95%: 1,02 a 1,18). Conclusões A metanálise mostrou que existe uma correlação significativa entre o VAAE e a recorrência de FA após ablação por cateter de radiofrequência, e o papel do VAAE em pacientes com FA não deve ser ignorado na prática clínica.
Abstract Background The influence of left atrial appendage volume (LAAV) on the recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF) following radiofrequency catheter ablation remains unclear. Objectives We performed a meta-analysis to assess whether LAAV is an independent predictor of AF recurrence following radiofrequency catheter ablation. Methods The PubMed and the Cochrane Library databases were searched until March 2022 to identify publications evaluating LAAV in association with AF recurrence after radiofrequency catheter ablation. Seven studies that fulfilled the specified criteria of our analysis were found. We used the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale to evaluate the quality of the studies. The pooled effects were evaluated depending on standardized mean differences (SMDs) or hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results A total of 1017 patients from 7 cohort studies with a mean follow-up 16.3 months were included in the meta-analysis. Data from 6 studies (943 subjects) comparing LAAV showed that the baseline LAAV was significantly higher in patients with AF recurrence compared to those without AF (SMD: −0.63; 95% CI: −0.89 to −0,37; all p values < 0.05; I2= 62.6%). Moreover, higher LAAV was independently associated with a significantly higher risk of AF recurrence after radiofrequency catheter ablation (HR: 1.10; 95% CI: 1.02 to 1.18). Conclusions The meta-analysis showed that there is a significant correlation between LAAV and AF recurrence after radiofrequency catheter ablation, and the role of LAAV in AF patients should not be ignored in clinical practice.
