Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Int Orthop ; 42(4): 843-849, 2018 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29090325

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To compare the therapeutic efficacy of radiofrequency target disc decompression(TDD) and nucleoplasty for lumbar disc herniation. METHODS: Two hundred sixty patients with lumbar disc herniation were divided into two groups: target disc decompression group (group T, n = 147) and nucleoplasty group (group N, n = 113). Visual analogue scale (VAS) and functional rating index (FRI) were measured at one, three, six, 12, 24, and 60 months after the surgery. Hospitalization time, operation time, complications, and recurrence/invalid were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Compared with the pre-operation, the VAS and FRI in both groups were significantly decreased in post-operation(P < 0.01). The VAS and FRI in group T have no significant difference compared to those in group N. The hospitalization and operation time of group T were significantly longer than those in group N. There was no significant difference of the occurrence of complications and disease recurrence/invalid during the follow-up between the two groups. Logstic regression analysis showed that operation time was an independent factor in the prognosis. Operation time affects the treatment effect. Shorter operation time leads to better therapeutic efficacy, and longer operation time leads to poor therapeutic efficacy. CONCLUSIONS: Both TDD and nucleoplasty can reduce pain in patients with lumbar disc herniation and improve quality of life. Group N had shorter hospitalization and operation time than group T.


Subject(s)
Decompression, Surgical/methods , Intervertebral Disc Degeneration/surgery , Intervertebral Disc Displacement/surgery , Neurosurgical Procedures/methods , Radiofrequency Ablation/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Decompression, Surgical/adverse effects , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Intervertebral Disc Degeneration/complications , Intervertebral Disc Displacement/complications , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Lumbar Vertebrae/surgery , Male , Middle Aged , Neurosurgical Procedures/adverse effects , Operative Time , Pain/surgery , Pain Measurement , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Radiofrequency Ablation/adverse effects , Recurrence , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
2.
Pain Res Manag ; 2018: 2010129, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30651899

ABSTRACT

At present, there are many constantly updated guidelines and consensuses on the diagnosis and treatment of osteoarthritis both at home and abroad. The recommendations established using methods of evidence-based medicine has experienced strict research on controlling bias and promoting reproduction rate. As a result, the previous evidence was reevaluated, and a lot of changes were provoked in the diagnosis and treatment concept of osteoarthritis. However, several methods not recommended by foreign guidelines are still in use in the current clinical practice in China. On the one hand, Chinese experts have not reached extensive consensus on whether it is necessary to make changes according to foreign guidelines. On the other hand, almost all the current relevant guidelines are on osteoarthritis, but the lesions around knee joints which, as a whole, bear the largest weight in human body, cannot be ignored. For this purpose, Chinese Association for the Study of Pain (CASP) organized some leading experts to formulate this Chinese Pain Specialist Consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of degenerative knee osteoarthritis (DKOA) in combination with the guidelines in foreign countries and the expert experience of clinical practice in China. The consensus, which includes the definition, pathophysiology, epidemiology, clinical manifestation, diagnostic criteria, and treatments of DKOA, is intended to be used by first-line doctors, including pain physicians to manage patients with DKOA.


Subject(s)
Knee Joint/pathology , Osteoarthritis, Knee/diagnosis , Osteoarthritis, Knee/therapy , Evidence-Based Medicine , Humans , Osteoarthritis, Knee/pathology , Practice Guidelines as Topic
3.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 96(51): e9167, 2017 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29390451

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This meta-analysis aimed to illustrate the efficacy and safety of preganalin for pain management in patients with postherpetic neuralgia (PHN). METHODS: In July 2017, a systematic computer-based search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Google database. Data on patients with PHN that compared pregabalin versus placebo were retrieved. The endpoints were the visual analog scale (VAS) at 8 weeks, the percentage of 30% and 50% pain responders; sleep interference score and improvement in patient global impression of change (PGIC). After testing for publication bias and heterogeneity between studies, data were aggregated for random-effects models when necessary. RESULTS: Seven clinical studies with 2192 patients (pregabalin group = 1381, control group = 811) were finally included in the meta-analysis. Pregabalin was associated with reduced pain scores at 8 weeks, corresponding to a reduction of 11.23 points (95% CI, -14.33, -8.13, P = .000) on a 100-point VAS. Pregabalin was also associated with a more percentage of 30% and 50% pain responders than controls (P < .05). Meanwhile, pregabalin can decrease sleep interference score and improvement in PGIC than control groups (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Pregabalin was efficacious in the reduction of postoperative pain and improvement the sleep quality in patients with PHN.


Subject(s)
Analgesics/therapeutic use , Neuralgia, Postherpetic/drug therapy , Pregabalin/therapeutic use , Humans , Neuralgia, Postherpetic/complications , Sleep Wake Disorders/etiology , Sleep Wake Disorders/prevention & control , Visual Analog Scale
4.
Zhongguo Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Za Zhi ; 27(3): 217-9, 2007 Mar.
Article in Chinese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17432680

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and adverse reaction of total glucosides of paeony (TGP) combined with sulfasalazine (SSZ) in the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis (AS). METHODS: Sixty-seven AS patients were randomly assigned to 2 groups: the treatment group (34 cases) treated with TGP and SSZ, the control group (33 cases) with methotrexate (MTX) and SSZ. Changes of clinical efficacy related indexes including lumber pain index, morning stiffness time, peripheral joint pain index, thoracic expansion, Schober test, Bath AS disease active index (BASDAI), Bath AS functional index (BASFI), the levels of erythrocyte sedimentation (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP), and X-ray of sacroiliac joint were observed. RESULTS: The clinical efficacy indexes were significantly improved after treatment in the two groups (P < 0.05). Except that the improvement of lumber pain index and peripheral joint pain index was better in the treatment group than that in the control group (P < 0.05), no significant difference was found in the other indexes between the two groups. The occurrence of adverse reation was less in the treatment group than in the control group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: TGP treatment combined with SSZ shows favorable effect on AS with less and milder adverse reaction.


Subject(s)
Glucosides/therapeutic use , Paeonia/chemistry , Spondylitis, Ankylosing/drug therapy , Sulfasalazine/therapeutic use , Adolescent , Adult , Antirheumatic Agents/therapeutic use , Drug Therapy, Combination , Female , Humans , Male
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...